ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Medical simulation is a continuously expanding field. In surgical specialties, in particular, simulation can provide an alternative avenue for learning. The objective of this process improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of adding simulation-based training to our educational curriculum regarding common otologic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A low-cost, novel ear procedure simulator was designed and constructed from readily available clinic supplies. Participants were asked to fill out a pre-simulator survey to assess their own comfort and skill level before undergoing the simulation course. A pre-simulation PowerPoint training course was then administered to participants. The participants then underwent the simulation training course and were again asked to fill out a post-simulator training exercise survey to reassess their own comfort and skill level. Institutional review board approval was not required by Tripler Army Medical Center. RESULTS: A total of 15 participants consisting of junior residents in otolaryngology, third- and fourth-year medical students rotating on an otolaryngology clinical clerkship, and one physician assistant in otolaryngology were included in the study. There was a significant improvement in both provider comfort with the procedure and clinical performance of the procedure among participants after training on the simulation-based model. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based training provides a safe, effective, and cost-friendly alternative to clinical medical education. Future studies are needed to address the wide-scale applicability of these results to other forms of surgical training.
Subject(s)
Otolaryngology , Simulation Training , Humans , Syringes , Curriculum , Computer Simulation , Educational Measurement , Otolaryngology/education , Clinical Competence , Simulation Training/methodsABSTRACT
In this narrative medicine essay, a resident otolaryngologist's grief over the loss of his daughter at nearly 20 weeks' gestation nearly crushes him until he finds relief hearing the stories of other parents at a hospital-sponsored rememberance celebration.
Subject(s)
Mothers , Nuclear Family , Humans , FemaleABSTRACT
Background: Many surgeons refuse to perform elective nasal surgery in active smokers, but little literature exists that addresses the risks of doing so; we sought to quantify the differences in outcomes after nasal surgery among smokers, previous smokers, and nonsmokers by measuring complication rates, revision rates, and improvement in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores. Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients undergoing nasoseptal surgery. Specifically, we noted demographic characteristics, smoking status, surgery type, and pre- and postoperative NOSE scores. We compared NOSE scores, complication rates, and revision rates among current smokers, previous smokers, and never smokers. Results: Five hundred thirty patients were included for complication and revision rate analysis; there was no difference in complication or revision rates among patients of different smoking categories. Two hundred ninety-one patients completed pre- and postoperative NOSE scores. Scores for all surgeries and in all smoking categories improved postoperatively (p < 0.001). There was a difference in NOSE score change among surgical groups, with rhinoplasty resulting in the greatest improvement (p = 0.044). There was no difference in NOSE score improvement across smoking categories. Conclusion: Active smokers benefit from surgical intervention and can expect a similar improvement in nasal breathing to their nonsmoking counterparts if they meet indications for and undergo nasal surgery.
Subject(s)
Nasal Septum/surgery , Non-Smokers , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Rhinoplasty , Smokers , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the international literature for studies evaluating the effect of alcohol consumption on the occurrence and severity of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea and to use the available data to perform a meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL/EBASCO, and Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO in March 2018. Following PRISMA guidelines, 2 independent researchers conducted a search from their inception through July 2018. Polysomnography (PSG) data were collected for sleep stages, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), respiratory disturbance index, and/or lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT). Data concerning the frequency and severity of snoring intensity and sleep architecture were also collected. Only studies with PSG data were evaluated, with exclusion of studies with home sleep testing data. A multivariate regression and pooled analysis with forest plot was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1266 manuscripts were screened, and 13 manuscripts with 279 patients met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis of AHI for control versus alcohol consumption revealed a mean difference (MD) of 3.98 events per hour (95% CI, 3.27 to 4.68; P < .001). Pooled analysis of LSAT for control versus alcohol consumption revealed an MD of -2.72% (95% CI, -3.69 to -1.76; Z score, 5.53; P < .00001). CONCLUSION: Alcohol consumption is associated with worsening severity of snoring, altered sleep architecture, AHI, as well as lowest oxygen saturation among patients susceptible to snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.
