Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Int J Psychiatry Med ; 53(4): 317-338, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807502

ABSTRACT

Objective To examine stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders among primary care professionals and to identify potential factors related to stigmatizing attitudes through a systematic review. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Lilacs, IBECS, Index Psicologia, CUMED, MedCarib, Sec. Est. Saúde SP, WHOLIS, Hanseníase, LIS-Localizador de Informação em Saúde, PAHO, CVSO-Regional, and Latindex, through the Virtual Health Library portal ( http://www.bireme.br website) through to June 2017. The articles included in the review were summarized through a narrative synthesis. Results After applying eligibility criteria, 11 articles, out of 19.109 references identified, were included in the review. Primary care physicians do present stigmatizing attitudes towards patients with mental disorders and show more negative attitudes towards patients with schizophrenia than towards those with depression. Older and more experience doctors have more stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental illness compared with younger and less-experienced doctors. Health-care providers who endorse more stigmatizing attitudes towards mental illness were likely to be more pessimistic about the patient's adherence to treatment. Conclusions Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders are common among physicians in primary care settings, particularly among older and more experienced doctors. Stigmatizing attitudes can act as an important barrier for patients to receive the treatment they need. The primary care physicians feel they need better preparation, training, and information to deal with and to treat mental illness, such as a user friendly and pragmatic classification system that addresses the high prevalence of mental disorders in primary care and community settings.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/psychology , Physicians, Primary Care , Primary Health Care , Social Stigma , Attitude of Health Personnel , Humans , Needs Assessment , Physicians, Primary Care/ethics , Physicians, Primary Care/psychology , Physicians, Primary Care/standards , Primary Health Care/ethics , Primary Health Care/standards , Stereotyping
2.
Rev. peru. med. exp. salud publica ; 33(4): 824-826, oct.-dic. 2016.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: biblio-845747

ABSTRACT

Resumen Desde 2005, cuando la Asociación Mundial de Psiquiatría presentó su Programa Institucional de Psiquiatría para la Persona, muchas organizaciones están trabajando en conjunto para que los cuidados médicos sean menos orientados a las enfermedades y mas centrados en la persona como un todo. Hoy en día, más que 30 organizaciones están relacionadas en promover la medicina centrada en la persona, donde se destacan algunas de sus iniciativas.


Abstract Since 2005, when the World Psychiatric Association has launched its Institutional Program on Psychiatry for the Person, many different organizations have worked together to advance medical care from a disease-oriented challenge to a focus centered in the whole person. Nowadays, over 30 organizations are related in promoting person-centered medicine, from which some initiatives are highlighted.


Subject(s)
Humans , Patient-Centered Care , Interinstitutional Relations , Psychiatry
3.
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica ; 33(4): 824-826, 2016.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28327856

ABSTRACT

Since 2005, when the World Psychiatric Association has launched its Institutional Program on Psychiatry for the Person, many different organizations have worked together to advance medical care from a disease-oriented challenge to a focus centered in the whole person. Nowadays, over 30 organizations are related in promoting person-centered medicine, from which some initiatives are highlighted.


Subject(s)
Interinstitutional Relations , Patient-Centered Care , Humans , Psychiatry
4.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 265(3): 189-97, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25190351

ABSTRACT

The stigma of mental illness affects psychiatry as a medical profession and psychiatrists. The present study aimed to compare the extent and correlation patterns of perceived stigma in psychiatrists and general practitioners. An international multicenter survey was conducted in psychiatrists and general practitioners from twelve countries. Responses were received from N = 1,893 psychiatrists and N = 1,238 general practitioners. Aspects of stigma assessed in the questionnaire included perceived stigma, self-stigma (stereotype agreement), attitudes toward the other profession, and experiences of discrimination. Psychiatrists reported significantly higher perceived stigma and discrimination experiences than general practitioners. Separate multiple regression analyses showed different predictor patterns of perceived stigma in the two groups. Hence, in the psychiatrists group, perceived stigma correlated best with discrimination experiences and self-stigma, while in the general practitioners group it correlated best with self-stigma. About 17% of the psychiatrists perceive stigma as a serious problem, with a higher rate in younger respondents. Against this background, psychiatry as a medical profession should set a high priority on improving the training of young graduates. Despite the number of existing antistigma interventions targeting mental health professionals and medical students, further measures to improve the image of psychiatry and psychiatrists are warranted, in particular improving the training of young graduates with respect to raising awareness of own stigmatizing attitudes and to develop a better profession-related self-assertiveness.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners/psychology , International Cooperation , Mental Disorders/psychology , Psychiatry , Social Stigma , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 36(4): 285-292, Oct-Dec/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-730598

ABSTRACT

Background: Dimensional models of psychopathology demonstrate that two correlated factors of fear and distress account for the covariation among depressive and anxiety disorders. Nevertheless, these models tend to exclude variables relevant to psychopathology, such as temperament traits. This study examined the joint structure of DSM-IV-based major depression and anxiety disorders along with trait negative affect in a representative sample of adult individuals residing in the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Methods: The sample consisted of 3,728 individuals who were administered sections D (phobic, anxiety and panic disorders) and E (depressive disorders) of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 2.1 and a validated version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Data were analyzed using correlational and structural equation modeling. Results: Lifetime prevalence ranged from 2.4% for panic disorder to 23.2% for major depression. Most target variables were moderately correlated. A two-factor model specifying correlated fear and distress factors was retained and confirmed for models including only diagnostic variables and diagnostic variables along with trait negative affect. Conclusions: This study provides support for characterization of internalizing psychopathology and trait negative affect in terms of correlated dimensions of distress and fear. These results have potential implications for psychiatric taxonomy and for understanding the relationship between temperament and psychopathology. .


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Affect/physiology , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Models, Psychological , Anxiety Disorders/classification , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/classification , Fear/physiology , Psychopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Reference Values , Temperament/physiology
6.
Braz J Psychiatry ; 36(4): 285-92, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25310205

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dimensional models of psychopathology demonstrate that two correlated factors of fear and distress account for the covariation among depressive and anxiety disorders. Nevertheless, these models tend to exclude variables relevant to psychopathology, such as temperament traits. This study examined the joint structure of DSM-IV-based major depression and anxiety disorders along with trait negative affect in a representative sample of adult individuals residing in the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. METHODS: The sample consisted of 3,728 individuals who were administered sections D (phobic, anxiety and panic disorders) and E (depressive disorders) of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 2.1 and a validated version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Data were analyzed using correlational and structural equation modeling. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence ranged from 2.4% for panic disorder to 23.2% for major depression. Most target variables were moderately correlated. A two-factor model specifying correlated fear and distress factors was retained and confirmed for models including only diagnostic variables and diagnostic variables along with trait negative affect. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for characterization of internalizing psychopathology and trait negative affect in terms of correlated dimensions of distress and fear. These results have potential implications for psychiatric taxonomy and for understanding the relationship between temperament and psychopathology.


Subject(s)
Affect/physiology , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Models, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anxiety Disorders/classification , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/classification , Fear/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychopathology , Reference Values , Surveys and Questionnaires , Temperament/physiology , Young Adult
7.
Braz J Psychiatry ; 35(2): 169-72, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23904023

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Positive and negative affect are the two psychobiological-dispositional dimensions reflecting proneness to positive and negative activation that influence the extent to which individuals experience life events as joyful or as distressful. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a structured questionnaire that provides independent indexes of positive and negative affect. This study aimed to validate a Brazilian interview-version of the PANAS by means of factor and internal consistency analysis. METHODS: A representative community sample of 3,728 individuals residing in the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, voluntarily completed the PANAS. Exploratory structural equation model analysis was based on maximum likelihood estimation and reliability was calculated via Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: Our results provide support for the hypothesis that the PANAS reliably measures two distinct dimensions of positive and negative affect. CONCLUSION: The structure and reliability of the Brazilian version of the PANAS are consistent with those of its original version. Taken together, these results attest the validity of the Brazilian adaptation of the instrument.


Subject(s)
Affect , Psychological Tests , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brazil , Female , Humans , Language , Likelihood Functions , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Translating , Young Adult
8.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 35(2): 169-172, April-June 2013. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-680890

ABSTRACT

Objective: Positive and negative affect are the two psychobiological-dispositional dimensions reflecting proneness to positive and negative activation that influence the extent to which individuals experience life events as joyful or as distressful. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a structured questionnaire that provides independent indexes of positive and negative affect. This study aimed to validate a Brazilian interview-version of the PANAS by means of factor and internal consistency analysis. Methods: A representative community sample of 3,728 individuals residing in the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, voluntarily completed the PANAS. Exploratory structural equation model analysis was based on maximum likelihood estimation and reliability was calculated via Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Results: Our results provide support for the hypothesis that the PANAS reliably measures two distinct dimensions of positive and negative affect. Conclusion: The structure and reliability of the Brazilian version of the PANAS are consistent with those of its original version. Taken together, these results attest the validity of the Brazilian adaptation of the instrument. .


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Affect , Psychological Tests , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Brazil , Language , Likelihood Functions , Psychometrics , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Translating
9.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 261 Suppl 2: S119-23, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21947511

ABSTRACT

The stigma of mental illness is a severe burden for people suffering from mental illness both in private and public life, also affecting their relatives, their close social network, and the mental health care system in terms of disciplines, providers, and institutions. Interventions against the stigma of mental illness employ complementary strategies (e.g., protest, education, and contact) and address different target groups (e.g., school children and teachers, journalists, stakeholders). Within this framework, the World Psychiatric Association has adopted an Action Plan with the goal to improve the image of psychiatry and to reduce potential stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatry and psychiatrists. To evaluate such interventions, a questionnaire has been developed that assesses opinions and attitudes toward psychiatrists and psychiatry in different samples of medical specialists (psychiatrists and general practitioners). The questionnaire comprises scales about perceived stigma in terms of the perception of societal stereotypes, self-stigma in terms of stereotype agreement, perceived stigma in terms of structural discriminations, discrimination experiences, stigma outcomes, and attitudes toward a second medical discipline. It is available in several languages (Arab, English, German, Japanese, Polish, and Spanish) and can easily be adapted for utilization in other medical specialties.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Physicians/psychology , Psychiatry , Stereotyping , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Career Choice , Humans , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Workforce
10.
World Psychiatry ; 9(3): 131-44, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20975855

ABSTRACT

In 2009 the WPA President established a Task Force that was to examine available evidence about the stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists and to make recommendations about action that national psychiatric societies and psychiatrists as professionals could do to reduce or prevent the stigmatization of their discipline as well as to prevent its nefarious consequences. This paper presents a summary of the Task Force's findings and recommendations. The Task Force reviewed the literature concerning the image of psychiatry and psychiatrists in the media and the opinions about psychiatry and psychiatrists of the general public, of students of medicine, of health professionals other than psychiatrists and of persons with mental illness and their families. It also reviewed the evidence about the interventions that have been undertaken to combat stigma and consequent discrimination and made a series of recommendations to the national psychiatric societies and to individual psychiatrists. The Task Force laid emphasis on the formulation of best practices of psychiatry and their application in health services and on the revision of curricula for the training of health personnel. It also recommended that national psychiatric societies establish links with other professional associations, with organizations of patients and their relatives and with the media in order to approach the problems of stigma on a broad front. The Task Force also underlined the role that psychiatrists can play in the prevention of stigmatization of psychiatry, stressing the need to develop a respectful relationship with patients, to strictly observe ethical rules in the practice of psychiatry and to maintain professional competence.

11.
Int Rev Psychiatry ; 22(4): 378-81, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20874068

ABSTRACT

This article is about the psychiatric educational components in the field of psychiatry. Currently the training and educational objectives focus on five major areas: undergraduate education (medical students); graduate education (psychiatric residents); psychiatric education for primary care physicians, as well as physicians in other medical specializations (psychosomatic training); public health and public education at large, and patient and family education, and the promotion of 'mental health' at a community level. Given the strong globalization process observed in all regions of the world in the past two or three decades, it is very important for Latin America to constantly review and update its psychiatric and behavioural sciences curriculum across all medical institutions and universities of the continent. New methods of teaching and novel approaches to education in the field of psychiatry are currently based on models that are also in use in other parts of the world, especially in the USA. Boards of certification for psychiatrists are being implemented all over the continent. Sound certification guarantees that the professional has followed and passed an educational training plan to make him/her qualified to start practising the profession. The future of psychiatric training will be closely bound to the future of the practice of psychiatry, and will have to get ahead of the challenges the specialism will face during the next decades.


Subject(s)
Behavioral Sciences/education , Certification/legislation & jurisprudence , Education, Medical/methods , Psychiatry/education , Humans , Latin America , Teaching/trends
12.
BMC Psychiatry ; 9: 30, 2009 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19480721

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Life trauma is highly prevalent in the general population and posttraumatic stress disorder is among the most prevalent psychiatric consequences of trauma exposure. Brazil has a unique environment to conduct translational research about psychological trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder, since urban violence became a Brazilian phenomenon, being particularly related to the rapid population growth of its cities. This research involves three case-control studies: a neuropsychological, a structural neuroimaging and a molecular neuroimaging study, each focusing on different objectives but providing complementary information. First, it aims to examine cognitive functioning of PTSD subjects and its relationships with symptomatology. The second objective is to evaluate neurostructural integrity of orbitofrontal cortex and hippocampus in PTSD subjects. The third aim is to evaluate if patients with PTSD have decreased dopamine transporter density in the basal ganglia as compared to resilient controls subjects. This paper shows the research rationale and design for these three case-control studies. METHODS AND DESIGN: Cases and controls will be identified through an epidemiologic survey conducted in the city of São Paulo. Subjects exposed to traumatic life experiences resulting in posttraumatic stress disorder (cases) will be compared to resilient victims of traumatic life experiences without PTSD (controls) aiming to identify biological variables that might protect or predispose to PTSD. In the neuropsychological case-control study, 100 patients with PTSD, will be compared with 100 victims of trauma without posttraumatic stress disorder, age- and sex-matched controls. Similarly, 50 cases and 50 controls will be enrolled for the structural study and 25 cases and 25 controls in the functional neuroimaging study. All individuals from the three studies will complete psychometrics and a structured clinical interview (the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Global Assessment of Function, The Social Adjustment Scale, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Early Trauma Inventory, Clinical global Impressions, and Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire). A broad neuropsychological battery will be administered for all participants of the neuropsychological study. Magnetic resonance scans will be performed to acquire structural neuroimaging data. Single photon emission computerized tomography with [(99m)Tc]-TRODAT-1 brain scans will be performed to evaluate dopamine transporters. DISCUSSION: This study protocol will be informative for researchers and clinicians interested in considering, designing and/or conducting translational research in the field of trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder.


Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Adaptation, Psychological , Brazil/epidemiology , Crime Victims , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Neuropsychological Tests , Personality Inventory , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics , Severity of Illness Index , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urban Population , Violence
13.
World Psychiatry ; 7(2): 127-8, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18566671
14.
15.
Compr Psychiatry ; 47(6): 463-7, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17067869

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the frequency of social phobia is high among alcoholic patients, this anxiety disorder is often neglected because treatment tends to be focused exclusively on alcohol dependence. METHODS: A total of 300 hospitalized alcoholic patients were interviewed using Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition and Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale as well a questionnaire to check the use of medication for social phobia among alcoholics and the relationship between social phobia and alcohol use. RESULTS: A prevalence of 30.6% was found for specific phobia, 24.7% for social phobia, 22.2% for anxiety disorder induced by alcohol, 19.3% for generalized anxiety disorder, 5% for obsessive-compulsive disorder, 4.6% for posttraumatic stress disorder, and 2% for panic disorder with agoraphobia. Social phobia preceded alcohol dependence in 90.2% of the patients. The frequency of the use of medication for social phobia among social phobic alcoholics was 20.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the high prevalence of anxiety disorders among alcoholics, particularly of social phobia. It also suggests that social phobia precedes alcohol dependence but shows that the use of medication for social phobia is still infrequent. Further studies are required to check if the failure to identify this comorbidity can make the recovery of alcoholics even more difficult.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Phobic Disorders/epidemiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Adult , Alcoholism/psychology , Alcoholism/rehabilitation , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/rehabilitation , Brazil , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phobic Disorders/psychology , Phobic Disorders/rehabilitation , Quality Assurance, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
16.
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi ; 105(1): 9-16, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12701207

ABSTRACT

Minor psychiatric disorders, specially depression and anxiety, are highly prevalent in Latin American (LA) countries including Brazil. Some important social factors specially present in medium and large LA cities such as violence, migration and homelessness probably contribute to large number of people suffering of different forms of depressive and anxiety disorders. Latin America was colonized about 500 years ago by Spain and Portugal and their cultural identity is still very much influenced by Ibero-American attitudes and beliefs. Probably as a consequence of this situation, depression is usually expressed in LA countries more through somatic symptoms such as headaches, gastrointestinal disturbances, or complaints of "nerves" than through subjective feelings of sadness or guilty. So, depression is much more seen in primary care services than in psychiatric clinics and as in other parts of the World is not recognized. Nevertheless, primary care patients from different cultural backgrounds with somatic complaints due to depression differ in their preferred explanations or attributions for these symptoms. Somatic complaints many times represent just a different idiom of distress related to depression; to understand their origin and role for patients from different cultures will certainly help health professionals to better identify and treat them.


Subject(s)
Depression/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Cultural Characteristics , Humans , Latin America/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology
17.
Obes Res ; 10(11): 1127-34, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12429876

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine binge-eating disorder (BED) and its association with obesity, weight patterns, and psychopathology in a Brazilian sample of female participants of a weight-loss program in São Paulo, Brazil. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Two hundred and seventeen overweight (body mass index >/= 25 kg/m(2)) women, ages 15 to 59 years, enrolled in the Weight Watchers Program were recruited for the study at a program branch meeting after completing the Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns-Revised, Beck Depression Inventory, and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20. Participants were categorized into four groups: those who met questionnaire criteria for BED, those who met questionnaire criteria for bulimia nervosa (BN), those that reported binge eating but did not meet all the criteria for any eating disorder (BE), and those with no eating disorder symptoms (No ED). Groups were compared on measures of weight, depressive symptoms, and alexithymia. RESULTS: Binge eating was frequently reported by women in this study (BED, 16.1%; BN, 4.6%; BE, 22.6%). BED women had significantly higher body mass index, greater highest weight ever, and more frequent weight cycling than the No ED group. BED women also reported more depressive symptoms than BE and No ED women, and were more alexithymic than the No ED group. BE women presented more frequent weigh cycling and were also more depressed and alexithymic than the No ED group. DISCUSSION: BED is not uncommon in overweight Brazilian women, and similar to North American and European samples, it is associated with overweight and higher levels of psychopathology in this population.


Subject(s)
Bulimia/epidemiology , Weight Loss , Adolescent , Adult , Body Mass Index , Brazil/epidemiology , Bulimia/diagnosis , Bulimia/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Diet, Reducing , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Int J Eat Disord ; 31(4): 430-41, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11948648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between loss of control over eating, adiposity, and psychological distress in a nontreatment sample of overweight children. METHOD: Based on self-reports of eating episodes, 112 overweight children, 6-10 years old, were categorized using the Questionnaire of Eating and Weight Patterns-Adolescent Version into those describing episodes of loss of control over eating (LC), and those with no loss of control (NoLC). Groups were compared on measures of adiposity, dieting, and eating behavior, and associated psychological distress. RESULTS: LC children (33.1%) were heavier and had greater amounts of body fat than NoLC children. They also had higher anxiety, more depressive symptoms, and more body dissatisfaction. 5.3% met questionnaire criteria for BED. Episodes of loss of control occurred infrequently, were often contextual, and involved usual meal foods. DISCUSSION: As in adults, overweight children reporting loss of control over eating have greater severity of obesity and more psychological distress than those with no such symptoms. It remains unknown whether children who endorse loss of control over eating before adolescence will be those who develop the greatest difficulties with binge eating or obesity in adulthood.


Subject(s)
Bulimia/complications , Internal-External Control , Obesity/psychology , Stress, Psychological/complications , Analysis of Variance , Body Image , Body Mass Index , Child , Energy Intake , Female , Humans , Male , Maryland
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...