Antibiotic Duration and UTI Outcomes in Recurrent UTI Patients.

IMPORTANCE: Little evidence is available to inform management of acute urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women with recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the proportion of acute UTIs with persistence/relapse or recurrence based on duration of treatment antibiotics (acute UTI guideline-consistent versus extended). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective noninferiority study of women with rUTI was performed at an academic tertiary referral center from January 2016 to December 2020. Exposure was UTI treatment with acute UTI guideline-consistent versus extended antibiotics. Outcomes were persistent/relapsed UTI (subsequent culture with the same pathogen requiring additional antibiotics within 4 weeks), recurrent UTI (culture with different pathogen), or resolution. Sample size was calculated under the null hypothesis that the proportion of acute UTIs with persistence/relapse or recurrence after acute UTI guideline-consistent antibiotics would be within a 10% noninferiority margin of extended duration (α = 0.05, ß = 0.20, 2-sided tests, P < 0.05 significant). RESULTS: We included 219 patients with 553 acute UTIs. The mean ± SD number of UTIs per patient was 2.53 ± 1.88, the mean ± SD age was 68.60 ± 16.29 years, and the mean ± SD body mass index was 29.73 ± 7 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). There were no differences in prior surgical procedures postvoid residual volume, pelvic floor disorders, or preventive treatments between groups. Two-hundred sixty UTIs (260 of 553 [47%]) were treated with acute UTI guideline-consistent antibiotics. Overall, 86 of 553 UTIs (15.6%) persisted/relapsed, and 29 of 553 (5.2%) recurred. The difference in the proportions of UTIs with persistence/relapse or recurrence excluded the noninferiority margin (4.4%; 95% confidence interval, -0.04 to 6.80%). In total, 115 of 553 UTIs (20.8%) had persistence/relapse or recurrence. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients with rUTI experiencing acute UTIs, acute UTI guideline-consistent duration of antibiotics was noninferior.

Assessment of Quality of Life, Grief, and Psychosocial Need Among Bereaved Caregivers of Children with Cancer.

Cancer is the leading disease-related cause of death for children in the United States; however, limited data exists on caregivers' needs and evidence-based bereavement interventions are lacking. This is a cross-sectional study of primary caregivers of children who died from cancer. Participants completed five surveys assessing well-being and an optional semi-structured, in-depth qualitative interview. Caregiver's greatest unmet needs were finding meaning in the death, personal wellness, and social activities. Bereaved caregivers with greater unmet needs reported poorer quality of life in the energy/fatigue (p = .01), role limitations due to emotional problems (p = .01), pain (p = .01), and emotional well-being (p = .02) domains. Interview themes elicited include inadequate bereavement services, support for siblings, desired contact with the medical team, and connections to other bereaved caregivers. Findings support the need for intensive, evidence-based bereavement programs for families of children who died from cancer, to attempt to mitigate poor bereavement-related outcomes.

"The simple life experiences that every other human gets": Desire for normalcy among adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer identify normalcy as an important component of quality end-of-life care. We sought to define domains of normalcy and identify ways in which clinicians facilitate or hinder normalcy during advanced cancer care. PROCEDURE: This was a secondary analysis of a qualitative study that aimed to identify priority domains for end-of-life care. Content analysis of semi-structured interviews among AYAs aged 12-39 years with advanced cancer, caregivers, and clinicians was used to evaluate transcripts. Coded excerpts were reviewed to identify themes related to normalcy. RESULTS: Participants included 23 AYAs with advanced cancer, 28 caregivers, and 29 clinicians. Participants identified five domains of normalcy including relationships, activities, career/school, milestones, and appearance. AYAs and caregivers identified that clinicians facilitate normalcy through exploration of these domains with AYAs, allowing flexibility in care plans, identification of short-term and long-term goals across normalcy domains, and recognizing losses of normalcy that occur during cancer care. CONCLUSIONS: AYAs with cancer experience multiple threats to normalcy during advanced cancer care. Clinicians can attend to normalcy and improve AYA quality of life by acknowledging these losses through ongoing discussions on how best to support domains of normalcy and by reinforcing AYA identities beyond a cancer diagnosis.

Patient, Family, and Clinician Perspectives on Location of Death for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

PURPOSE: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer have high rates of hospital deaths. It is not clear if this reflects their preferences or barriers to dying at home. METHODS: Between December 2018 and January 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with AYAs (age 12-39 years) with stage IV or recurrent cancer, family caregivers including bereaved caregivers, and clinicians of AYAs with cancer. Patients were asked about their priorities for care including location of death, caregivers were asked what was most important in the care of their AYA family member, and clinicians were asked to reflect on priorities identified through caring for AYAs. Directed content analysis was applied to interview data, and themes regarding location of death were developed. RESULTS: Eighty individuals (23 AYAs, 28 caregivers, and 29 clinicians) participated in interviews. Most AYAs and caregivers preferred a home death. However, some AYAs and caregivers opted for a hospital death to alleviate caregiver burden or protect siblings from the perceived trauma of witnessing a home death. Lack of adequate services to manage intractable symptoms at home and insufficient caregiver support led some AYAs/caregivers to opt for hospital death despite a preference for home death. Participants acknowledged the value of hospice while also pointing out its limitations in attaining a home death. CONCLUSION: Although most AYAs prefer to die at home, this preference is not always achieved. Robust home-based services for effective symptom management and caregiver support are needed to close the gap between preferred and actual location of death for AYAs.

Safe Use of Memantine in a Pediatric Patient With Catatonia.

Pediatric catatonia is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome. Benzodiazepines are standard first-line pharmacotherapy. When benzodiazepines do not provide relief of symptoms, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most proven effective therapy. However, the use of NMDA antagonists (amantadine and memantine) has been reported effective in adult patients as adjuncts and may provide an alternative treatment modality when ECT is not readily accessible. To the author's knowledge there are no prior case reports of memantine used in pediatric catatonia. This case demonstrates the safe use of memantine as an adjunctive agent in an adolescent with catatonia.

Patient, Family, and Clinician Perspectives on End-of-Life Care Quality Domains and Candidate Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

Importance: End-of-life care quality indicators specific to adolescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 12 to 39 years with cancer have not been developed. Objective: To identify priority domains for end-of-life care from the perspectives of AYAs, family caregivers, and clinicians, and to propose candidate quality indicators reflecting priorities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study was conducted from December 6, 2018, to January 5, 2021, with no additional follow-up. In-depth interviews were conducted with patients, family caregivers, and clinicians and included a content analysis of resulting transcripts. A multidisciplinary advisory group translated priorities into proposed quality indicators. Interviews were conducted at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, and an AYA cancer support community (lacunaloft.org). Participants included 23 AYAs, 28 caregivers, and 29 clinicians. Exposure: Stage IV or recurrent cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Care priorities. Results: Interviews were conducted with 23 patients (mean [SD] age, 29.3 [7.3] years; 12 men [52%]; 18 White participants [78%]), 28 family caregivers (23 women [82%]; 14 White participants [50%]), and 29 clinicians (20 women [69%]; 13 White participants [45%]). Caregivers included 22 parents (79%), 5 spouses or partners (18%), and 1 other family member (4%); the 29 clinicians included 15 physicians (52%), 6 nurses or nurse practitioners (21%), and 8 social workers or psychologists (28%). Interviews identified 7 end-of-life priority domains: attention to physical symptoms, attention to quality of life, psychosocial and spiritual care, communication and decision-making, relationships with clinicians, care and treatment, and independence. Themes were consistent across the AYA age range and participant type. Although some domains were represented in quality indicators developed for adults, unique domains were identified, as well as AYA-specific manifestations of existing domains. For example, quality of life included global quality of life; attainment of life goals, legacy, and meaning; support of personal relationships; and normalcy. Within communication and decision-making, domains included communication early in the disease course, addressing prognosis and what to expect at the end of life, and opportunity for AYAs to hold desired roles in decision-making. Care and treatment domains relevant to cancer therapy, use of life-prolonging measures, and location of death emphasized the need for preference sensitivity rather than a standard path. This finding differs from existing adult indicators that propose that late-life chemotherapy, intensive measures, and hospital death should be rare. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this qualitative study suggest that AYAs with cancer have priorities for care at the end of life that are not fully encompassed in existing indicators for adults. Use of new indicators for this young population may better reflect patient- and family-centered experiences of quality care.