ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the interest of cost effectiveness, switching antiretroviral brand name medications to generics is recommended in France since 2013. The study objective was to evaluate the perception of generics per se and antiretroviral generics in HIV-infected patients and their hospital physicians. METHODS AND FINDINGS: 556 out of 703 (79%) adult HIV+ outpatients and 116 physicians in 33 clinics were included in a multicentric cross-sectional survey performed in September 2013. Patients completed a self-questionnaire on their perception and acceptability of generics. Physicians completed a questionnaire on their acceptability of switching antiretroviral to generic. Socio-demographic data, medical history and HIV history were collected. Among the 556 patients with a median HIV duration of 13 years, 77% were France native, 59% in active employment, 100% covered by social insurance, 95% on antiretroviral therapy. Seventy-six percent of the patients accepted generics and 55% trusted them overall. Antiretroviral generics were accepted by 44% of them but only by 17% if the pill burden was going to increase. The factor significantly associated with acceptability of antiretroviral generics was acceptance of generics per se (p<0.001). Among the 116 physicians following a median of 100 HIV-patients/year, 75% would prescribe generics, dropping to 26% if the combo had to be broken. Factors significantly associated with willingness to prescribe antiretroviral generics were the absence of concern regarding the chemical entity (OR = 0.33), being aware that the patient would accept generics for other pathologies (OR = 2.04) and would accept antiretroviral generics (OR = 1.94). No factor related to sociodemographic conditions, HIV status or comorbidities was associated with the acceptability of antiretroviral generics. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability of antiretroviral generics in this French population was mostly dictated by the patient's and physician's knowledge and use of generics overall. It should be improved with an efficient information of both patients and physicians.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Patients/psychology , Physicians/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Demography , Drug Prescriptions , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Perception , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We assessed the association of baseline HIV-1 mutations, phenotypic sensitivity and pharmacokinetics with virological failure (VF) at week 12 (W12) after onset of a darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)-based regimen in a cohort of 67 antiretroviral-experienced HIV-patients failing on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: VF was defined as HIV RNA >2.3 log10copies/ml at W12. HIV reverse transcriptase and protease sequencing was performed at WO; mutations with a P-value <0.25 in univariable analyses were used for a backward selection to find the best mutation set for VF prediction. Genotypic and phenotypic sensitivity scores were calculated and virtual phenotype predicted fold change (FC) assessed. DRV Cmin, Cmax, AUC(0-->12 h) and genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) were determined. RESULTS: Patients had a median of 15 previous treatments for 10 years. Median W0 values included a T-cell count of 129 cells/microl, 4.7 log10 HIV RNA copies/ml, four major protease and six nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations. At W12, median HIV RNA decrease was -2.1 log10 copies/ml with a gain of +67 CD4+ T-cells/microl; 40% of patients failed. We determined the genotypic score I13V+V32I+L33F/I/V+E35D+ M361/L/V+I47V+F53L+I62V. According to <4, 4-5 and >5 mutations, failure occurred in 11%, 48% and 100% of patients. Failure was associated with CDC stage, baseline CD4+ T-cell count, number of major protease inhibitor resistance mutations, FC and DRV/r score. Pharmacokinetics were not associated with failure, but GIQ was. CONCLUSION: At W12, 60% of heavily pretreated patients responded on DRV/r-based HAART. Genotypic and phenotypic information constituted the main virological response determinant in patients with optimal drug concentrations.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , HIV-1/drug effects , Mutation , Ritonavir/pharmacology , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , Adult , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Cohort Studies , Darunavir , Drug Resistance, Viral , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Genotype , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV Protease/genetics , HIV Protease Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , HIV Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/genetics , HIV-1/enzymology , HIV-1/genetics , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Ritonavir/pharmacokinetics , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Sulfonamides/pharmacokinetics , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We analysed the quasispecies at a clonal level in patients whose plasma genotypic test harboured K65R with L74V or thymidine analogue mutations (TAM). We showed that the K65R and TAM such as M41L, D67N, T215Y/D, L210W and K219E can be borne by the same virus. We found no clone bearing both K65R and L74V substitutions. Moreover, the S68G and V75I mutations are not necessarily linked with K65R, and could thus have their own resistance effect.