Minimally invasive versus open calcaneal osteotomies - Comparing the intraoperative parameters.

BACKGROUND: The calcaneal osteotomies is often performed to correct asymptomatic hindfoot deformities. More recently minimally invasive techniques have been described with promising clinical outcomes. In a prospective study we compared the intraoperative parameters of the open and minimalinvasive (MICO) techniques, which has not previously been reported. METHODS: 60 consecutive with calcaneal osteotomy (33 open and 27 MICO) and a minimum follow up of 12 weeks were included. We recorded the following intraoperative parameters: operation time for the osteotomy [min], the fluoroscopy time, the fluoroscopy dose and the skin incision. The clinical (FAOS) and radiological outcome were examined 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. The Wilcoxon test and the continuity correction were used with alpha=5% value for the statistical significance. RESULTS: The minimally invasive group showed a significantly shorter operation time. There was no significant difference between the radiation time and dose in the two groups. The length of the incision in the minimally invasive group was significantly shorter. We found no difference in clinical outcome and radiological follow up. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a significantly shorter operating time and a shorter incision in the MICO group. The radiation exposition was not significantly different between the two groups. A clinical difference could not be shown in our study. However, we see the shorter operating time of the minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy being beneficial.

New method for assessing hand disinfection shows that pre-operative alcohol/chlorhexidine rub is as effective as a traditional surgical scrub.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that rubbing hands with an alcohol/chlorhexidine solution provides equivalent microbial decontamination to a conventional surgical scrub using aqueous chlorhexidine. However, the authors believe that these studies have methodological flaws that limit their applicability to the operating theatre environment. As such, a method was developed to compare products in an everyday operating theatre environment using working operating theatre personnel. AIM: To determine whether or not an alcohol/chlorhexidine rub is as efficacious as a traditional surgical scrub using a novel method. METHODS: Bacterial counts at baseline were collected from 20 anaesthetists using the glove juice method. Subsequently, with sequential exchange of sterile gloves, one hand underwent a 3-min scrub using 4% aqueous chlorhexidine, and the other hand underwent a 60-s rub with a 70% isopropyl alcohol/0.5% chlorhexidine solution. The residual bacterial count was collected for each hand after 30 min using the glove juice method. These counts were converted to log10 values to compare the baseline counts of right and left hands, and efficacy between the treatment groups. FINDINGS: Mean [± standard deviation (SD)] bacterial counts at baseline were (log10) 4.42 ± 0.81 for left hands and 4.64 ± 0.60 for right hands (P > 0.05). The mean (± SD) reduction from baseline was (log10) 1.45 ± 0.50 for 4% chlorhexidine and 2.01 ± 0.98 for alcohol/chlorhexidine (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: An alcohol/chlorhexidine hand rub was found to be as efficacious as a traditional scrub after 30 min; this study differs from previous work as it was undertaken in a population of practising anaesthetists in their working environment. The McKenzie method allows baseline and study evaluations to be performed contemporaneously on the same individual. Each subject was his/her own control. This method offers a more clinically relevant way to compare disinfectant solutions than standard methods.

Management of congenital talipes equinovarus using the Ponseti method: a systematic review.

We present a systematic review of the results of the Ponseti method of management for congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV). Our aims were to assess the method, the effects of modifications to the original method, and compare it with other similar methods of treatment. We found 308 relevant citations in the English literature up to 31 May 2010, of which 74 full-text articles met our inclusion criteria. Our results showed that the Ponseti method provides excellent results with an initial correction rate of around 90% in idiopathic feet. Non-compliance with bracing is the most common cause of relapse. The current best practice for the treatment of CTEV is the original Ponseti method, with minimal adjustments being hyperabduction of the foot in the final cast and the need for longer-term bracing up to four years. Larger comparative studies will be required if other methods are to be recommended.

Proximal humeral replacement using a fixed-fulcrum endoprosthesis.

Between 1997 and 2007, 68 consecutive patients underwent replacement of the proximal humerus for tumour using a fixed-fulcrum massive endoprosthesis. Their mean age was 46 years (7 to 87). Ten patients were lost to follow-up and 16 patients died. The 42 surviving patients were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) Score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at a mean follow-up of five years and 11 months (one year to ten years and nine months). The mean MSTS score was 72.3% (53.3% to 100%) and the mean TESS was 77.2% (58.6% to 100%). Four of 42 patients received a new constrained humeral liner to reduce the risk of dislocation. This subgroup had a mean MSTS score of 77.7% and a mean TESS of 80.0%. The dislocation rate for the original prosthesis was 25.9; none of the patients with the new liner had a dislocation at a mean of 14.5 months (12 to 18). Endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal humerus using this prosthesis is a reliable operation yielding good results without the documented problems of unconstrained prostheses. The performance of this prosthesis is expected to improve further with a new constrained humeral liner, which reduces the risk of dislocation.

Girdlestones excision arthroplasty: current update.

Girdlestones procedure has become a salvage operation reserved for patients with significant co-morbidities. Recent literature addresses this infrequently used intervention inadequately. This observational study aims to update current literature and review the modern role of this intervention in orthopaedic practice. Twenty-four records were obtained from which patient demographics, indications and co-morbidities were investigated. Seventeen patients completed an abridged Harris Hip Scoring questionnaire and commented on satisfaction. The average age was 78 years and patients had multiple co-morbidities. Dementia was the most frequent condition but several patients suffered from cardiovascular and respiratory disease. The most common operative indication was persistent prosthetic infection with Staphylococcus aureus, the most common pathogen. Overall mortality was 41% but all surviving patients had complete resolution of infection and 65% had adequate pain control. No patients mobilised without aids although 29% of patients were able to manage stairs and 29% were able to mobilise outdoors. Only 29% were unsatisfied with the outcome. This study demonstrates that Girdlestones candidates are an ageing high-risk group and shows that the Girdlestones procedure can, in select cases, provide good functional outcomes. However such intervention comes at the expense of high mortality and should therefore only be used as a last resort.

Lies, damned lies, and DNA statistics: DNA match testing Bayes' Theorem, and the criminal courts.

This study explains the correct method for the interpretation of DNA matches by using Bayesian Probability, and its various traps: the DNA fallacies. The current approach of the Court of Appeal to the use and presentation of DNA evidence is outlined. A new Bayesian Fallacy is explored. Specific focus is on Norman Fenton and Martin Neil's recent research (Fenton and Neil, 2000) which suggests a new dimension in the presentation of DNA evidence in court.

Improving door to needle times with nurse initiated thrombolysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of nurse initiated thrombolysis on door to needle time (the interval between arriving at the hospital and starting thrombolytic treatment) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Comparison of door to needle times before and after the employment of nurses trained and approved to initiate thrombolysis without prescription by a doctor but with a protocol for rapid triage of patients with chest pain. SETTING: A district general hospital. SUBJECTS: All patients admitted with suspected myocardial infarction between April 1995 and March 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speed (door to needle time) and appropriateness of administration of thrombolytic drugs to patients with acute myocardial infarction who gave a characteristic history and had appropriate criteria on the admission ECG. RESULTS: During seven periods (each of four months) before the introduction of nurse initiated thrombolysis and a new chest pain triage protocol, the median door to needle time varied from 50-58 minutes. In four periods (each of 4-6 months) following the introduction of the changes, the median door to needle time was 25-30 minutes. The improvement was significant (p < 0.001). Nurses trained to initiate thrombolysis currently provide cover for 66% of the time. Median door to needle time for nurses was 15 minutes. Median door to needle time for junior doctors improved to 35 minutes. The median door to needle times when nurses initiated thrombolysis was significantly shorter than when doctors did so (p < 0.001). There have been no inappropriate management decisions by nurses approved to initiate thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of nurse initiated thrombolysis has resulted in a clinically important reduction in the time taken for thrombolysis to be started in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Perioperative electrical auditory brain stem response in candidates for pediatric cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the feasibility of recording the electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) evoked by electrical stimulation at the promontory (Prom-EABR) as a tool to assist selection of the ear for cochlear implantation in young children. STUDY DESIGN: The study group consisted of young children for whom the decision to proceed with implantation with the Nucleus mini 22-channel cochlear implant (Cochlear (UK) Ltd., London, UK) had already been made. SETTING: The Prom-EABR was recorded after the children had been anesthetised, but before the start of surgery. PATIENTS: A group of 25 children (11 boys and 14 girls), whose age at implantation ranged from 2 years 11 months to 6 years 8 months (mean age, 4 years 5 months), were investigated. INTERVENTION: Recordings of the Prom-EABR were used to determine which ear would receive the cochlear implant, providing there were no preexisting contraindications regarding selection of the ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: It has been suggested from earlier studies that the characteristics of the amplitude input/output (I/O) function of the EABR are related to neuronal survival. If the ear with the "better" I/O function is chosen for implantation, it might be expected that these children will perform better on average than those in whom the ear has been selected at random. RESULTS: Reliable recordings of the Prom-EABR were achieved in 40 ears (80%) of the 50 ears in the study. In 20 of the 25 children the technique was actively employed for selection of the ear for implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Recording of the Prom-EABR in the operating theater is a viable technique. Future analysis of long-term outcome measures of performance with the implant will confirm or dispute the benefit of ear selection using the Prom-EABR.

A randomized trial of the impact of telephone and recorded delivery reminders on the response rate to research questionnaires.

BACKGROUND: A range of factors have been shown to affect the response rate to mailed questionnaires, but particular strategies to improve patients' response in trials conducted in general practice require further study. METHODS: Non-responders in a larger trial were randomized to receive a telephone or recorded delivery reminder on the third contact. The cost of administration of each method was estimated. RESULTS: Significantly more patients returned completed questionnaires when sent questionnaires by recorded delivery, although the cost per patient contacted was nearly three times more than for contact by telephone. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that sending reminders by recorded delivery, although more expensive, is more effective than telephone reminders for recruiting patients to a study in general practice using research questionnaires.