A non-compulsory stewardship programme for the management of antifungals in a university-affiliated hospital.

Antimicrobial stewardship programmes promote excellence in the use of antimicrobials by selecting the appropriate antimicrobial agent and the correct dose, route of administration and duration of treatment. However, there is limited experience with such programmes targeting antifungal treatments. We present the results of a non-compulsory programme for the control of antifungals. For 12 months, prescriptions of oral voriconazole or intravenous voriconazole, caspofungin and liposomal amphotericin B were reviewed, and non-compulsory recommendations were made. The incidence and outcome of fungal infections were examined. The results for the dispensed defined daily doses (DDDs) and expenditure on antifungals were compared with those for the previous 12 months. The number of antifungal treatments reviewed was 662. A recommendation to change treatment was made in 29% of the cases, including a change from intravenous to oral treatment (15%), cessation of antifungal treatment (8%), and a change to fluconazole (6%). The DDDs of intravenous voriconazole and caspofungin were reduced by 31.4% and 20.2%, respectively. The DDDs of oral voriconazole and dispensed vials of liposomal amphotericin B were increased by 8.2% and 13.9%, respectively. Expenditure on antifungals was reduced by US$370681.78 (11.8% reduction). The programme was not related to significant increases in the incidence of candidaemia, percentage of persistent/relapsing candidaemia cases, percentage of fluconazole-resistant Candida species, incidence of infections by filamentous fungi, or 12-month mortality in patients with filamentous fungal infections. In conclusion, a stewardship programme targeting antifungals achieved a reduction in antifungal expenditure without reducing the quality of care provided.

Preemptive therapy is not adequate for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in pancreas-kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the most common viral infection after pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT). Comparative studies about CMV prophylaxis in PKT have not been developed. METHODS: We analyzed CMV disease in a cohort of 84 PKT recipients. All received intravenous ganciclovir during treatment with anti-thymocyte globulin and later one of the following options for pre-transplant CMV-seropositive recipients: (a) no prophylaxis (n=10 patients), (b) preemptive therapy (PT) (n=13), or (c) continuous prophylaxis (CP) for 12 weeks (n=29). Pre-transplant CMV-seronegative recipients received CP (n=21). RESULTS: Eleven patients were excluded because of organ explantation in the first 15 days. Incidence of CMV disease in seropositive recipients was 30% under no prophylaxis, 23% under PT, and 6.9% under CP. Incidence of CMV disease under CP was 33.3% in seronegative recipients. Six of 9 episodes of CMV disease under CP occurred after finishing prophylaxis. Under CP, the incidence of CMV disease was significantly higher in seronegative than in seropositive recipients (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: According to the results of our study, for CMV-seropositive PKT recipients, CP is a better strategy than PT. For CMV-seronegative recipients, 3 months of CP is an inadequate strategy.