Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 4(1): e000356, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31799417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thoracic injuries are common in trauma. Approximately one-third will develop a pneumothorax, hemothorax, or hemopneumothorax (HPTX), usually with concomitant rib fractures. Tube thoracostomy (TT) is the standard of care for these conditions, though TTs expose the patient to the risk of infectious complications. The controversy regarding antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of TT placement remains unresolved. This multicenter study sought to reconcile divergent evidence regarding the effectiveness of antibiotics given as prophylaxis with TT placement. METHODS: The primary outcome measures of in-hospital empyema and pneumonia were evaluated in this prospective, observational, and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study. Patients were grouped according to treatment status (ABX and NoABX). A 1:1 nearest neighbor method matched the ABX patients with NoABX controls. Multilevel models with random effects for matched pairs and trauma centers were fit for binary and count outcomes using logistic and negative binomial regression models, respectively. RESULTS: TTs for HPTX were placed in 1887 patients among 23 trauma centers. The ABX and NoABX groups accounted for 14% and 86% of the patients, respectively. Cefazolin was the most frequent of 14 antibiotics prescribed. No difference in the incidence of pneumonia and empyema was observed between groups (2.2% vs 1.5%, p=0.75). Antibiotic treatment demonstrated a positive but non-significant association with risk of pneumonia (OR 1.61; 95% CI: 0.86~3.03; p=0.14) or empyema (OR 1.51; 95% CI: 0.42~5.42; p=0.53). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to support the routine use of presumptive antibiotics for post-traumatic TT to decrease the incidence of pneumonia or empyema. More investigation is necessary to balance optimal patient outcomes and antibiotic stewardship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II Prospective comparative study.

2.
West J Emerg Med ; 20(2): 228-231, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30881540

ABSTRACT

Video review for quality and education purposes has been a valued tool for decades. However, the use of this process dropped significantly after the development of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act in the 1990s. Video review was recently reestablished at our institution. By working with our institutional legal counsel and risk management team, we have been able to create a video review process that complies with legal requirements. Literature on this subject has not described the process of obtaining video recordings. We aimed to review the process of obtaining high quality recordings in a secure manner. We hope that in the future, the data collected through our multidisciplinary review process will be helpful in improving quality of care for injured patients and providing coaching and feedback to learners, as well as improving our trauma education curriculum.


Subject(s)
Resuscitation/standards , Video Recording , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Humans , Patient Care Team/standards , Quality Improvement , Resuscitation/education , Risk Management , Traumatology/education
3.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 86(4): 557-564, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30629009

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As more pneumothoraxes (PTX) are being identified on chest computed tomography (CT), the empiric trigger for tube thoracostomy (TT) versus observation remains unclear. We hypothesized that PTX measuring 35 mm or less on chest CT can be safely observed in both penetrating and blunt trauma mechanisms. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients diagnosed with PTX by chest CT between January 2011 and December 2016. Patients were excluded if they had an associated hemothorax, an immediate TT (TT placed before the initial chest CT), or if they were on mechanical ventilation. Size of PTX was quantified by measuring the radial distance between the parietal and visceral pleura/mediastinum in a line perpendicular to the chest wall on axial imaging of the largest air pocket. Based on previous work, a cutoff of 35 mm on the initial CT was used to dichotomize the groups. Failure of observation was defined as the need for a delayed TT during the first week. A univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of failure in both groups, and multivariate analysis was constructed to assess the independent impact of PTX measurement on the failure of observation while controlling for demographics and chest injuries. RESULTS: Of the 1,767 chest trauma patients screened, 832 (47%) had PTX, and of those meeting inclusion criteria, 257 (89.0%) were successfully observed until discharge. Of those successfully observed, 247 (96%) patients had a measurement of 35 mm or less. The positive predictive value for 35 mm as a cutoff was 90.8% to predict successful observation. In the univariant analyses, rib fractures (p = 0.048), Glasgow Coma Scale (p = 0.012), and size of the PTX (≤35 mm or >35 mm) (P < 0.0001) were associated with failed observation. In multivariate analysis, PTX measuring 35 mm or less was an independent predictor of successful observation (odds ratio, 0.142; 95% confidence interval, 0.047-0.428)] for the combined blunt and penetrating trauma patients. CONCLUSION: A 35-mm cutoff is safe as a general guide with only 9% of stable patients failing initial observation regardless of mechanism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level III.


Subject(s)
Observation , Pneumothorax/diagnosis , Thoracic Injuries/diagnosis , Thoracostomy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumothorax/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Thoracic Injuries/therapy , Trauma Centers , Wounds, Penetrating/therapy
4.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 85(1): 198-207, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29613959

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traumatic diaphragm injuries (TDI) pose both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in both the acute and chronic phases. There are no published practice management guidelines to date for TDI. We aim to formulate a practice management guideline for TDI using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. METHODS: The working group formulated five Patient, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome questions regarding the following topics: (1) diagnostic approach (laparoscopy vs. computed tomography); (2) nonoperative management of penetrating right-sided injuries; (3) surgical approach (abdominal or thoracic) for acute TDI, including (4) the use of laparoscopy; and (5) surgical approach (abdominal or thoracic) for delayed TDI. A systematic review was undertaken and last updated December 2016. RevMan 5 (Cochran Collaboration) and GRADEpro (Grade Working Group) software were used. Recommendations were voted on by working group members. Consensus was obtained for each recommendation. RESULTS: A total of 56 articles were used to formulate the recommendations. Most studies were retrospective case series with variable reporting of outcomes measures and outcomes frequently not stratified to intervention or comparator. The overall quality of the evidence was very low for all Patient, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes. Therefore, only conditional recommendations could be made. CONCLUSION: Recommendations were made in favor of laparoscopy over computed tomography for diagnosis, nonoperative versus operative approach for right-sided penetrating injuries, abdominal versus thoracic approach for acute TDI, and laparoscopy (with the appropriate skill set and resources) versus open approach for isolated TDI. No recommendation could be made for the preferred operative approach for delayed TDI. Very low-quality evidence precluded any strong recommendations. Further study of the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to TDI is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Guideline; Systematic review, level IV.


Subject(s)
Diaphragm/injuries , Thoracic Injuries/therapy , Wounds, Penetrating/therapy , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Thoracic Injuries/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Wounds, Penetrating/complications , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnosis
5.
J Surg Educ ; 75(4): 924-927, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29102558

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The topic of restrictive covenants in fellowships that are not approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of institutional polices at academic medical centers regarding restrictive covenants in non-ACGME fellowships. METHODS: The graduate medical education (GME) office website of 132 academic medical centers was evaluated and searched for the following as of June 1, 2017: presence of any ACGME residency or fellowship, presence of any non-ACGME fellowship, presence of GME policies and procedures, presence of a restrictive covenant policy, and if that policy applies to non-ACGME fellowships. RESULTS: A total of 96 academic medical centers had non-ACGME fellowships. Of these, 56 prohibit restrictive covenants in non-ACGME fellowships because of either their GME policy or state law. Seven academic medical centers have a GME policy that allows restrictive covenants in non-ACGME fellowships. Two academic medical centers clearly state that fellows in a certain subspecialty fellowship will be required to sign a restrictive covenant. CONCLUSIONS: GME policies at academic medical centers that allow restrictive covenants in non-ACGME fellowships are very uncommon. The practice of having fellows sign a restrictive covenant in a non-ACGME fellowship is in conflict with an American Medical Association ethics statement, ACGME institutional requirement IV.L, and the rules of the San Francisco Match.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Contract Services , Economic Competition , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Fellowships and Scholarships/standards , Internet , Accreditation , Humans , Internship and Residency , Organizational Policy , Specialty Boards , United States
6.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 82(1): 138-140, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27779598

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Blunt pelvic fractures can be associated with major pelvic bleeding. The significance of contrast extravasation (CE) on computed tomography (CT) is debated. We sought to update our experience with CE on CT scan for the years 2009-2014 to determine the accuracy of CE in predicting the need for angioembolization. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the trauma registry and our electronic medical record from a Level I trauma center. Patients seen from July 1, 2009, to September 7, 2014, with blunt pelvic fractures and contrast-enhanced CT were included. Standard demographic, clinical, and injury data were obtained. Patient records were queried for CE, performance of angiography, and angioembolization. Positive patients were those where CE was associated with active bleeding requiring angioembolization. All other patients were considered negative. RESULTS: There were 497 patients during the study time period with blunt pelvic fracture meeting inclusion criteria, and 75 patients (15%) had CE. Of those patients with CE, 30 patients (40%) underwent angiography, and 17 patients (23%) required angioembolization. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CE on CT were 100%, 87.9%, 22.7%, and 100%, respectively. Two patients without CE underwent angiography but did not undergo embolization. Patients with CE had higher mortality (13 vs. 6%, p < 0.05) despite not having higher ISS scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study reinforces that CE on CT pelvis with blunt trauma is common, but many patients will not require angioembolization. The negative predictive value of 100% should be reassuring to trauma surgeons such that if a modern CT scanner is used, and there is no CE seen on CT, then the pelvis will not be a source of hemorrhagic shock. All of these findings are likely due to both increased comfort with observing CEs and the increased sensitivity of modern CT scanners. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.


Subject(s)
Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Angiography , Contrast Media , Embolization, Therapeutic , Female , Fractures, Bone/mortality , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Iohexol , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Trauma Centers , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy
7.
JSLS ; 18(2): 333-7, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24960502

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia is a rare injury. We present a case of an intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia from blunt trauma. In this report we will review the current literature and also describe the first report of a primary laparoscopic repair of the defect. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 38-year-old unrestrained male passenger had blunt chest and abdominal trauma from a motor vehicle collision. Two months later, on a computed tomography scan, he was found to have an intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia. The defect was repaired primarily through a laparoscopic approach. DISCUSSION: Symptoms of intrapericardial diaphragmatic hernia are chest pain, upper abdominal pain, dysphagia, and dyspnea. Chest computed tomography is the most useful diagnostic test to define the defect. Even when the injury is diagnosed late, laparoscopy can be used for primary and patch repair.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Hernia, Diaphragmatic, Traumatic/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Pericardium/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Accidents, Traffic , Adult , Hernia, Diaphragmatic, Traumatic/diagnosis , Hernia, Diaphragmatic, Traumatic/etiology , Humans , Male , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis
10.
WMJ ; 112(3): 117-22; quiz 123, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23894809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pedestrian-vehicle crashes are a significant problem in public health. Understanding contributing factors within a specific community helps recognize and target key intervention points. METHODS: Trauma registry analysis included all of the patients treated at a Level I trauma center following pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2010. Variables examined included patient demographics, timing of collision, abbreviated injury scale score, injury severity score (ISS), hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and emergency department and hospital disposition. RESULTS: A total of 945 pedestrians were reviewed within the study period. Average age was 46.4+/-19.4 years. One hundred seventy-seven (18.7%) patients were elderly and of the elderly group, 69 (39%) were 80 years of age or greater. The median ISS score was 12, average hospital LOS was 10.8 days and average ICU length of stay was 6.0+/-7.5 days. More elderly patients required admission to the ICU than the nonelderly (61.6% vs 40.2%; P<0.001), and more elderly patients required admission to a skilled nursing facility than nonelderly (42.1% vs. 9%; P< 0.001). The mortality rate for elderly patients was more than double that of nonelderly patients (20.9% vs 9.1%; P<0.001). Pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions occurred disproportionately between the hours of 6 PM and midnight (P< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients struck by a motor vehicle have a mortality rate twice that of the nonelderly and a higher rate of discharge to a skilled nursing facility, despite having a similar injury severity score on admission. This highlights the need for aggressive prevention efforts targeted at the elderly population.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Walking , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Vehicles , Registries , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Trauma Centers , Urban Population , Wisconsin/epidemiology
11.
Surg Clin North Am ; 92(6): 1475-83, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23153880

ABSTRACT

Weaning from mechanical ventilation is usually straightforward but is occasionally challenging. Sedation must be used at the appropriate times and with appropriate dosing. A protocol that calls for a daily sedation holiday with a spontaneous breathing trial decreases time on the ventilator. Early tracheostomy is beneficial in traumatic brain injury patients. Noninvasive ventilation is most useful in patients with baseline obstructive sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Ventilator Weaning , Analgesia/methods , Conscious Sedation/methods , Humans , Tracheostomy , Ventilator Weaning/methods
13.
J Pediatr Surg ; 45(4): E1-3, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20385263

ABSTRACT

Suction evisceration from a pool drain is a rare injury. This child presented with what appeared to be isolated perineal trauma. Ultimately, the patient was found to have complete transanal small bowel evisceration. Reported herein are the specifics of this case, along with a review of the relevant literature relating to this case.


Subject(s)
Colon, Sigmoid/injuries , Intestine, Small/injuries , Lacerations , Rectal Prolapse/etiology , Swimming Pools , Child , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Fatal Outcome , Female , Humans , Intestine, Small/transplantation , Lacerations/surgery , Rectal Prolapse/surgery , Suction/adverse effects
14.
J Burn Care Res ; 29(2): 319-22, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18354288

ABSTRACT

The inherent danger of illegal manufacture of methamphetamine is explosion and fire with the "cookers" presenting to burn centers for treatment. Recent studies have shown that methamphetamine burn patients required resuscitation volumes two to three times that of the standard Parkland formula and experienced a higher mortality rate. The purpose of this study was to compare the fluid resuscitation requirements and other characteristics of our methamphetamine-positive burn patients with a control group of methamphetamine-negative burn patients. A retrospective study of burn patients with methamphetamine-positive urine toxicology screens was conducted from August 1996 to April 2005. The data collected were age, sex, %total body surface area (%TBSA) burn, urine toxicology screen result, length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, weight, urine output, and fluid requirement during the first 24 hours along with fluid type, survival, and hospital charges. Methamphetamine-positive patients were matched to controls for %TBSA, age, and sex. Eleven methamphetamine-positive burn patients were well matched with 11 methamphetamine-negative controls. There was no difference in intubation rate, ventilator days, LOS, and there were no deaths in either group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups for the ratio of the 24-hour fluid resuscitation requirement divided by the estimate from the Parkland formula. Hospital charges were similar for the two groups. The largest volume of fluid infused was lactated Ringers (LR) and the slightly hypertonic fluid combination of LR + 50 mEq sodium bicarbonate + 3.4 mmol potassium phosphate. Both groups also received a dextran-40 (Rheomacrodex) infusion. In contrast to previous studies, our experience with methamphetamine-positive burn patients shows that they did not have an increased initial fluid requirement, a longer LOS, more days on the ventilator, higher hospitalization charges nor an increased mortality rate. The only apparent difference between our study and others is in the method of resuscitation. The slightly hypertonic fluid combination of LR + 50 mEq sodium bicarbonate +3.4 mM potassium phosphate was used for resuscitation along with Rheomacrodex. Prospective trials should be conducted on this fluid resuscitation strategy to determine wider applicability for all large burn patients.


Subject(s)
Burns/therapy , Dextrans/therapeutic use , Explosions , Fires , Fluid Therapy/methods , Methamphetamine , Saline Solution, Hypertonic/therapeutic use , Adult , Burns/complications , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL