Diaphragmatic dysfunction is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications and phrenic nerve paresis in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

PURPOSE: We aimed to quantify perioperative changes in diaphragmatic function and phrenic nerve conduction in patients undergoing routine thoracic surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in patients undergoing esophageal resection or pulmonary lobectomy. Examinations were carried out the day prior to surgery, 3 days and 10-14 days after surgery. Endpoints for diaphragmatic function included ultrasonographic measurements of diaphragmatic excursion and thickening fraction. Endpoints for phrenic nerve conduction included baseline-to-peak amplitude, peak-to-peak amplitude, and transmission delay. Measurements were assessed on both the surgical side and the non-surgical side of the thorax. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study. Significant reductions in diaphragmatic excursion were seen on the surgical side of the thorax for all excursion measures (posterior part of the right hemidiaphragm, p < 0.001; hemidiaphragmatic top point, p < 0.001; change in intrathoracic area, p < 0.001). Significant changes were seen for all phrenic nerve measures (baseline-to-peak amplitude, p < 0.001; peak-to-peak amplitude, p < 0.001; transmission delay, p = 0.041) on the surgical side. However, significant changes were also seen on the non-surgical side for all phrenic nerve measures (baseline-to-peak amplitude, p < 0.001; peak-to-peak amplitude, p < 0.001; transmission delay, p = 0.022). A postoperative reduction in posterior diaphragmatic excursion of more than 50% was significantly associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (coefficient: 2.69 (95% CI [1.38, 4.01], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thoracic surgery caused a significant unilateral reduction in diaphragmatic excursion on the surgical side of the thorax, which was accompanied by significant changes in phrenic nerve conduction. However, phrenic nerve conduction was also significantly affected on the non-surgical side to a lesser extent, which was not mirrored in diaphragmatic excursion. Our findings suggest that phrenic nerve paresis plays a role in postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction, which may be a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of postoperative pulmonary complications. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04507594.

Validity and reliability of measurement of peripheral oxygen saturation during the 6-Minute Walk Test in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) using the fingers may have important limitations due to Raynaud's phenomenon and sclerodactyly in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Sensors located at more central body positions may be more accurate as these as less prone to Raynaud attacks. To determine the validity and reliability of the SpO2 measured at the finger, forehead, and earlobe during the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Eighty two patients with SSc had an arterial line placed while performing the 6MWT. Peripheral oxygen saturation was simultaneously measured by finger, forehead, and earlobe sensors and compared to the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measured before and after the 6MWT. 40 patients repeated the 6MWT one week later to determine re-test reliability. We used Bland-Altman plots to display the agreement between SpO2 and SaO2. The intraclass correlation coefficient for repeated measurement of minimum SpO2 was calculated. The mean difference between SpO2 and SaO2 after the 6MWT was - 3% (SD: ± 5), 0% (SD: ± 2), and 1% (SD: ± 2) for the finger, forehead, and earlobe, respectively. The minimum SpO2 measured at the finger demonstrated the poorest re-test reliability: The ICC (95% CI) showed good agreement using the ear and forehead probe (ICCear = 0.89 [95% CI 0.80; 0.94]; ICCforehead = 0.77 [95% CI 0.60; 0.87]), while a modest reliability was found using the finger probe (ICCfinger = 0.65 95% CI [0.43; 0.80]). SpO2 should be measured using either the earlobe or forehead during the 6MWT in patients with SSc. Clinical Trials.Gov (NCT04650659).

Complication rates rise with age and Haller index in minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum: A high-volume, single-center retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to describe the compounded complication rate of minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum, identify predisposing risk factors, and evaluate the optimal timing of correction. Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum is the standard treatment for pectus excavatum and consists of 2 invasive procedures, for example, correction with bar insertion followed by bar removal after 2 to 3 years. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study identifying children, adolescents, and adults of both genders corrected for pectus excavatum with minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum between 2001 and 2022. Information on complications related to bar insertion and removal procedures for each individual patient was compiled into a compounded complication rate. Complication severities were categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: A total of 2013 patients were corrected by minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum with a median age (interquartile range) for correction of 16.6 (5) years. Overall compounded complication rate occurred at a frequency of 16.4%, of which 9.3% required invasive reinterventions (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥IIIa). The complication rate related to bar insertion was 2.6-fold higher compared with bar removal (11.8% vs 4.5%, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; P < .001), precorrection Haller Index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; P < .033), and early-phase institutional experience (adjusted odds ratio, 1.59; P < .002) as independent predisposing risk factors. The optimal age of correction was 12 years, and the compounded complication rate correlated exponentially with age with a doubling time of 7.2 years. Complications increased 2.2-fold when the Haller index increased to 5 or more units. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum is associated with a high compounded complication rate that increases exponentially with age and high Haller Index. Consequently, we recommend repair during late childhood and early adolescence, and emphasize the importance of informing patients and relatives about the significant risks of adult correction as well as the need of 2 consecutive procedures taking the complication profile into account before planning surgery.

Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records. RESULTS: We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.

Replacement of fluoroscopy by ultrasonography in the evaluation of hemidiaphragm function, an exploratory prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Dysfunction of the diaphragm may ultimately lead to respiratory insufficiency and compromise patient outcome. Evaluation of diaphragm function is cumbersome. Fluoroscopy has been the gold standard to measure diaphragmatic excursion. Ultrasonography can visualize diaphragm excursion and holds many advantages such as no radiation exposure, increased portability and accessibility. However, correlation between fluoroscopy and ultrasonography has never been studied. We aimed to compare fluoroscopic and ultrasound measures of diaphragm excursion to determine if ultrasonography can replace fluoroscopy. METHODS: We performed ultrasound and fluoroscopy simultaneously during sniff inspiration and at total inspiratory capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure and in healthy volunteers. Cranio-caudal excursion was measured by fluoroscopy and compared directly to M-mode excursion, B-mode excursion, area change, resting thickness, thickening fraction and contraction velocity measured by ultrasonography. RESULTS: Forty-two participants were included. The Pearson correlation between M-mode and fluoroscopy excursion was 0.61. The slope was 0.9 (90%CI 0.76-1.04) in a regression analysis. Using the Bland-Altman method, the bias was - 0.39 cm (95% CI - 1.04-0.26), p = 0.24. The Pearson correlation between fluoroscopy and B-mode and area change ultrasonography was high; low for thickness and fraction. All correlations were lower during sniff inspiration compared with inspiratory capacity breathing. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography has an acceptable correlation and bias compared to fluoroscopy and can thus be used as the primary tool to evaluate diaphragm excursion.

The effects of respiratory rate and tidal volume on pulse pressure variation in healthy lungs-a generalized additive model approach may help overcome limitations.

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is a well-established method for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. The predictive accuracy is, however, disputed for ventilation with low tidal volume (VT) or low heart-rate-to-respiratory-rate ratio (HR/RR). We investigated the effects of VT and RR on PPV and on PPV's ability to predict fluid responsiveness. We included patients scheduled for open abdominal surgery. Prior to a 250 ml fluid bolus, we ventilated patients with combinations of VT from 4 to 10 ml kg-1 and RR from 10 to 31 min-1. For each of 10 RR-VT combinations, PPV was derived using both a classic approach and a generalized additive model (GAM) approach. The stroke volume (SV) response to fluid was evaluated using uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. An SV increase > 10% defined fluid responsiveness. Fifty of 52 included patients received a fluid bolus. Ten were fluid responders. For all ventilator settings, fluid responsiveness prediction with PPV was inconclusive with point estimates for the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve between 0.62 and 0.82. Both PPV measures were nearly proportional to VT. Higher RR was associated with lower PPV. Classically derived PPV was affected more by RR than GAM-derived PPV. Correcting PPV for VT could improve PPV's predictive utility. Low HR/RR has limited effect on GAM-derived PPV, indicating that the low HR/RR limitation is related to how PPV is calculated. We did not demonstrate any benefit of GAM-derived PPV in predicting fluid responsiveness.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, reg. March 6, 2020, NCT04298931.

Perioperative anaesthesia by local infiltration following median sternotomy - a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Post-operative pain following open heart surgery is a clinical challenge usually requiring significant amounts of opioids. Long-acting local infiltration anaesthesia may effectively reduce post-operative opioid consumption and improve recovery. The trial is a publicly funded, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effect of long-acting local infiltration anaesthesia in open heart surgery. METHODS: Two Danish centres are planning to randomise 100 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting to treatment with long-acting infiltration anaesthesia or placebo. We compare an active solution of bupivacaine, adrenaline, clonidine and dexamethasone with saline placebo. The primary outcome measure is the accumulated opioid use within the first 24 post-operative hours. Secondary outcome measures include evaluation of respiratory function, patient-reported pain scores, mobilisation, opioid-associated side effects and long-term opioid consumption. CONCLUSION: This trial will define whether the use of long-acting infiltration anaesthesia during heart surgery may reduce acute and prolonged post-operative opioid consumption. Reduction of opioid-related adverse effects may improve recovery. FUNDING: The trial is supported by public grants (Dansk Selskab for Anæstesiologi og Intensiv Medicin: 40,000 DKK; Regionernes Medicin og Behandlingspulje 2022: 686,000 DKK). The work of I. S. Modrau is supported by an unrestricted grant from the Health Research Foundation of the Central Denmark Region. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2021-005886-41.

A comprehensive echocardiographic analysis during simulated hypovolaemia: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Peri-operative and critically ill patients often experience mild to moderate hypovolaemic shock with preserved mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and decreased stroke volume index (SVI). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters during simulated mild to moderate central hypovolaemia. DESIGN: This was a prospective preclinical study. SETTING: Laboratory trial performed in Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy male volunteers underwent graded central hypovolaemia using a lower body negative pressure (LBNP) chamber with a stepwise decrease to simulate a mild (-15 mmHg), mild-to-moderate (-30 mmHg), and moderate state of hypovolaemic shock (-45 mmHg). During every stage, a transthoracic echocardiography examination (TTE) was performed by a certified examiner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Systolic and diastolic myocardial performance markers, as well as cardiac volumes were recorded during simulated hypovolaemia and compared to baseline values. RESULTS: During simulated hypovolaemia via LBNP, SVI decreased progressively at all stages, whereas MAP and HR did not consistently change. Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction decreased at -30 and -45 mmHg. Simultaneously with SVI decline, LV global longitudinal strain (LV GLS), tricuspid annular plain systolic excursion (TAPSE), and right ventricular RV S' and left-atrial end-systolic volume (LA ESV) decreased compared to baseline at all stages. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, simulated central hypovolaemia using LBNP did not induce consistent changes in MAP and HR. SVI decreased and was associated with deteriorated right- and left-ventricular function, observed with echocardiography. The decreased filling status was characterised by decreased LA ESV. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03481855.

Individualised perioperative blood pressure and fluid therapy in oesophagectomy ­ study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: Oesophagectomy is the mainstay of curative treatment for oesophageal cancer, but it is associated with a high risk of major complications. Goal-directed fluid therapy and individualised blood pressure management may prevent complications after surgery. Extending goal-directed fluid therapy after surgery and applying an individual blood pressure target may have substantial benefit in oesophagectomy. This is a protocol for a clinical trial implementing a novel haemodynamic protocol from the start of anaesthesia to the next day with the patient's own night-time blood pressure as the lower threshold. METHODS: This is a single-centre, single-blind, randomised, clinical trial. Oesophagectomy patients are randomised 1:1 for either perioperative haemodynamic management according to a goal-directed fluid therapy protocol with an individual target blood pressure or for standard care. The primary endpoint is the total burden of morbidity and mortality assessed by the Comprehensive Complication Index 30 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints are complications, reoperations, fluid and vasopressor dosage and quality of life at 90 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this trial provide an objective and easy-to-follow algorithm for fluid administration, which may improve patient-centred outcomes in oesophagectomy patients. FUNDING: The trial is supported by Aarhus University (1,293,400 DKK) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (625,200 DKK). TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2021-002816-30.

The haemodynamic effects of phenylephrine after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Phenylephrine increases systemic- and pulmonary resistances and therefore may increase blood pressures at the expense of blood flow. Cardio-pulmonary bypass alters vasoreactivity and many patients exhibit chronotropic insufficiency after cardiac surgery. We aimed to describe the haemodynamic effects of phenylephrine infusion after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Patients in steady state after low-risk cardiac surgery received incremental infusion rates of phenylephrine up to 1.0 µg/kg/min with the aim of increasing systemic mean arterial blood pressure 20 mmHg. Invasive haemodynamic parameters, including pulmonary wedge pressures, were captured along with echocardiographic measures of biventricular function before, during phenylephrine infusion at target systemic blood pressure, and 20 min after phenylephrine discontinuation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. Phenylephrine increased mean arterial pressure increased from 78 (±9) mmHg to 98 (±10) mmHg with phenylephrine infusion. Also, pulmonary blood pressure as well as systemic- and pulmonary resistances increased. The ratio between systemic- and pulmonary artery resistances did not change statistically significantly (p = .59). Median cardiac output was 4.35 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6-5.4) L/min at baseline and increased significantly with phenylephrine infusion (median Δcardiac output was 0.25 [IQR 0.1-0.6] L/min) (p = .012). Pulmonary artery wedge pressure increased from 10.2 (±3.0) mmHg to 11.9 (±3.4) mmHg (p < .001). This was accompanied by significant increases in central venous pressure. Phenylephrine infusion increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume from 105 (±46) mL to 119 (±44) mL (p < .001). All results of phenylephrine infusion were reversed with discontinuation. CONCLUSION: In haemodynamically stable patients after cardiac surgery, phenylephrine increased PVR and SVR, but did not change the PVR/SVR ratio. Phenylephrine increased biventricular filling pressures and left ventricular end-diastolic area. Consequently, CO increased as ejection fraction was maintained. These findings do not discourage the use of phenylephrine after low-risk cardiac surgery. REGISTRATION: clinicaltrial.gov (identifier NCT04419662).

Collaboration for Evidence-based Practice and Research in Anaesthesia (CEPRA): A consortium initiative for perioperative research.

Evidence in perioperative care is insufficient. There is an urgent need for large perioperative research programmes, including pragmatic randomised trials, testing daily clinical treatments and unanswered question, thereby providing solid evidence for effects of interventions given to a large and growing number of patients undergoing surgery and anaesthesia. This may be achieved through large collaborations. Collaboration for Evidence-based Practice and Research in Anaesthesia (CEPRA) is a novel collaborative research network founded to pursue evidence-based answers to major clinical questions in perioperative medicine. The aims of CEPRA are to (1) improve clinical treatment and outcomes and optimise the use of resources for patients undergoing anaesthesia and perioperative care, and (2) disseminate results and inform caretakers, patients and relatives, and policymakers of evidence-based treatments in anaesthesia and perioperative medicine. CEPRA is inclusive in its concept. We aim to extend our collaboration with all relevant clinical collaborators and patient associations and representatives. Although initiated in Denmark, CEPRA seeks to develop an international network infrastructure, for example, with other Nordic countries. The work of CEPRA will follow the highest methodological standards. The organisation aims to structure and optimise any element of the research collaboration to reduce economic costs and harness benefits from well-functioning research infrastructure. This includes successive continuation of trials, harmonisation of outcomes, and alignment of data management systems. This paper presents the initiation and visions of the CEPRA network. CEPRA aims to be inclusive, patient-focused, methodologically sound, and to optimise all aspects of research logistics. This will translate into faster research conduct, reliable results, and accelerated clinical implementation of results, thereby benefiting millions of patients whilst being cost and labour-saving.

PrehospitaL Ultrasound in Undifferentiated DyspnEa (PreLUDE): a prospective, clinical, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic uncertainty in patients with dyspnea is associated with worse outcomes. We hypothesized that prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Prospective observational study of adult patients suffering dyspnea. Prehospital critical care physicians registered a suspected diagnosis based on clinical examination alone, performed POCUS of the heart and lungs, and finally registered suspected diagnoses based on their clinical examination supplemented with POCUS. Pre- and post-POCUS diagnoses were compared to endpoint committee adjudicated diagnoses. The primary outcome was improved sensitivity for diagnosing acute heart failure. Secondary outcomes included other diagnostic accuracy measures in relation to acute heart failure and other causes of dyspnea. RESULTS: In total, 214 patients were included. The diagnosis of acute heart failure was suspected in 64/214 (30%) of patients before POCUS and 64/214 (30%) patients after POCUS, but POCUS led to reclassification in 53/214 (25%) patients. The endpoint committee adjudicated the diagnosis of acute heart failure in 87/214 (41%) patients. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of acute heart failure was 58% (95% CI 46%-69%) before POCUS compared to 65% (95% CI 53%-75%) after POCUS (p = 0.12). ROC AUC for the diagnosis acute heart failure was 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.78) before POCUS compared to 0.79 (0.73-0.84) after POCUS (p < 0.001). ROC AUC for the diagnosis acute exacerbation (AE) of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma was 0.87 (0.82-0.91) before POCUS and 0.93 (0.88-0.97) after POCUS (p < 0.001). A POCUS finding of any of severely reduced left ventricular function, bilateral B-lines or bilateral pleural effusion demonstrated the highest sensitivity for acute heart failure at 88% (95% CI 79%-94%), whereas the combination of all of these three findings yielded the highest specificity at 99% (95% CI 95%-100%). CONCLUSION: Supplementary prehospital POCUS leads to an improvement of diagnostic accuracy of both heart failure and AE-COPD/-asthma overall described by ROC AUC, but the increase in sensitivity for the diagnoses of acute heart failure did not reach statistical significance. Tailored use of POCUS findings optimizes diagnostic accuracy for rule-out and rule-in of acute heart failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in Clinical Trials, 05.04.2019 (identifier: NCT03905460) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03905460?term=NCT03905460&cond=Dyspnea&cntry=DK&draw=2&rank=1 .

The effects of ultrasound guidance on first-attempt success for difficult peripheral intravenous catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Identifying patients at risk of difficult intravenous access (DIVA) and increasing the success rates of peripheral intravenous catheterization (PIVC), preferably on the first catheterization attempt, is of clinical importance. The aim of this study was to compare the use of dynamic ultrasound guidance for PIVC with the traditional technique of visualization and palpation in patients with predicted DIVA. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ultrasound-guided PIVC with the traditional technique was performed. Data were systematically collected through MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to March 2021. Eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trials performed on patients meeting criteria for difficult catheterization comprising either (a) no palpable or visible veins, (b) previous history of difficult venous catheterization, (c) patient age less than 4 years, (d) suspicion of difficult catheterization by operator, or (e) two or more unsuccessful attempts using the traditional technique before enrollment were included. For all outcomes, a random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian and Laird method was performed. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, and the secondary outcomes were the overall success rate and the number of attempts for successful intravenous catheterization. Bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Seven studies with a total of 994 patients were included. Patients comprised both children and adults and settings included operating rooms, emergency departments, and intensive care units. Ultrasound guidance was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.66-5.65; P < 0.001). For the secondary outcomes, ultrasound guidance was associated with a higher overall success rate (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.04-8.79; P = 0.04); however, this finding did not meet statistical significance in a sensitivity analysis (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 0.71-11.93; P = 0.14). Ultrasound was not associated with a significantly different number of attempts compared with the traditional technique (difference in means, 0.14; 95% CI, -0.32 to 0.05; P = 0.15). The use of ultrasound guidance resulted in a three-fold increase in odds for the first-attempt success rate in patients with predicted DIVA compared with the traditional technique of PIVC.

The effects of preoperative focused cardiac ultrasound in high-risk patients: A randomised controlled trial (PREOPFOCUS).

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the third most common cause of mortality worldwide. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) yields information on cardiac status and discloses the presence of unknown pathology. Preoperative FOCUS changes patient treatment, allowing for a patient-tailored anaesthesia. We hypothesised that preoperative FOCUS would reduce the proportion of patients who were either admitted to hospital for more than 10 days or who were dead within 30 days after high-risk, non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: This was a randomised, controlled, multi-center study. Patients ≥65 years of age, admitted for urgent orthopaedic- or abdominal surgery, scheduled for general- or neuraxial anaesthesia and with ASA 3/4 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to preoperative FOCUS or no preoperative FOCUS performed in accordance with a predefined protocol. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients admitted more than 10 days or who were dead within 30 days. Secondary endpoints included major complications, days of admission and changes in anaesthesia handling. RESULTS: During the second COVID-19 wave the study monitoring committee terminated the study prematurely. We included 338 patients of which 327 were included in the final analysis. In the FOCUS group, 41/163 (25%) patients met the criteria for the primary endpoint versus 35/164 (21%) for the control group, adjusted odds ratio 1.37 (95% CI 0.86-2.30), p = .36. The proportions of patients who developed major complications did not differ significantly between groups. Length of hospital stay was 4 (3-8) days in the FOCUS group and 4 (3-7) days on the control group (adjusted p = .24). CONCLUSION: The routine availability of preoperative FOCUS assessment in this cohort does not appear to reduce the risk for hospitalisation exceeding 10 days or 30-day mortality, although study enrolment was prematurely terminated.

Epidural analgesia and abnormal coagulation in patients undergoing minimal invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

Background: Epidural analgesia (EA) is effective in patients undergoing minimal invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) but is associated with major complications such as epidural hematomas. It is recommended to assess coagulation status in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy prior to EA, although no consensus exists in patients without a history of bleeding tendency or anticoagulant therapy. Thus, the aim of this paper was to assess 1) the prevalence of abnormal routine coagulation parameters, i.e., international normalized ratio (INR) and platelet count, and 2) the safety of EA in patients undergoing MIRPE. Methods: In this retrospective study, we identified 1,973 patients undergoing MIRPE at our center between 2001 and 2019. Complications related to EA were registered for all patients. Information on coagulation parameters was present in 929 patients. Patients with spontaneously elevated INR ≥1.5 were referred for assessment of coagulation factor VII in order to assess the cause of the elevated INR. Results: Of 929 patients with coagulation information available, 18 patients had spontaneously elevated INR ≥1.5 (1.9%). In patients with INR ≥1.5, 12 patients underwent further assessment of factor VII, with all patients having a slightly reduced factor VII close to the lower reference range. The majority of the 1,973 patients undergoing MIRPE received EA (99.6%) with very low complication rates (0.2%) and no incidence of epidural hematomas. Conclusion: In patients undergoing MIRPE, coagulation screening prior to EA should not be mandatory as it revealed no clinically relevant consequences. EA is safe with very low complication rates.

Effects of changes in position, positive end-expiratory pressure and mean arterial pressure on renal, portal and hepatic Doppler ultrasound perfusion indices: a randomized crossover study in cardiac surgery patients.

Point-of-care ultrasound perfusion indices can be used for detection of AKI and venous congestion. Patients in the postoperative- and intensive care units are frequently exposed to alternating treatment and loading conditions. We aimed to study the effects of changes in preload (patient positioning), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and afterload (phenylephrine) on renal, portal and hepatic ultrasound indices. We hypothesized that renal resistive index was not influenced by changes in PEEP and patient positioning. This was a single-site, randomized, crossover study. Patients above 18 years scheduled for elective open-heart surgery at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, were available for inclusion. Patients were randomized to a sequence of six combinations of PEEP and position in addition to an increase in mean arterial pressure by phenylephrine. Thirty-one patients participated in the study. Resistive index was influenced by positional change (P = 0.007), but not by change in PEEP (P = 0.50) (Table 1). Renal venous stasis index and portal pulsatility fraction increased in the raised legs position (P ≤ 0.019), but not with increases in PEEP. Renal venous flow pattern and hepatic venous flow pattern were affected by position (P ≤ 0.019), but not by PEEP. None of the ultrasound indices were significantly changed by infusion of phenylephrine. Doppler perfusion indices were significantly affected by changes in preload, but not by changes in PEEP or afterload. Although the changes in the Doppler ultrasound indices were significant, they were small in absolute numbers. Therefore, from a clinical perspective, the ultrasound indices were robust.Trial registration Registered at clinicaltrials.com, first posted online June 5th 2020, identifier: NCT04419662.

Ultrasound Hepatic Vein Ratios Are Associated With the Development of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the use of hepatic venous and right-heart ultrasound parameters in predicting cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). DESIGN: This was a prospective, contextual, descriptive two-center study. Blood tests,clinical and ultrasound data were obtained preoperatively, and postoperative day one, and day four. The hepatic vein, inferior vena cava, and right-heart Doppler ultrasound parameters were obtained and analyzed. SETTING: The sites of the study were Johannesburg, South Africa, and Aarhus, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who satisfied inclusion criteria, between August 2019 and January 2020, were included, with a total of 152 participants. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) age of patients was 68 (55-73) years, predominantly male, and the majority were hypertensive. Of 152 patients analyzed, 54 (35%) patients developed AKI. Among these, 37 (69%) were classified as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage I, 11 (20%) as stage II, while six (11%) were stage III. Age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.10 p = 0.031), The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II (AOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.80, p = 0.005], and preoperative serum creatinine (AOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.013) were predictive of AKI. Those who developed AKI had experienced longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times (p < 0.001). Preoperatively, hepatic vein S-wave measurements were significantly higher in patients with AKI (p < 0.05). On postoperative day one (D1), the hepatic vein flow ratios of patients with AKI were significantly decreased, driven by low S waves and high D waves, and accompanied by significantly elevated central venous pressure (CVP) levels. CVP levels on D1 postoperatively were predictive of AKI (AOR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.55, p = 0.001). Measurements of right ventricular (RV) base, tricuspid annular plane excursion (TAPSE), and inferior vena cava were not associated with the development of AKI (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was an association between the development of AKI and a decrease in hepatic flow ratios on D1, driven by low S-wave and high D-wave velocities. The presence of venous congestion was reflected by significantly elevated CVP values, which were independently associated with AKI on D1. RV base and TAPSE measurements were, however, not associated with AKI. These parameters may reflect perioperative circumstances, including prolonged CPB times and potential fluid management, which can be modified in this period.

Perioperative Doppler measurements of renal perfusion are associated with acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and severe complication in cardiac surgery. Normal renal function is dependent on adequate renal perfusion, which may be altered in the perioperative period. Renal perfusion can be assessed with Doppler measurement. We aimed to determine the association between Doppler measurements of renal perfusion and the development of AKI. This was a prospective, observational study of 100 patients with ≥ one risk factor for postoperative AKI undergoing open-heart surgery. Doppler ultrasound examinations were performed before surgery and on the first and fourth postoperative day. AKI was defined according to the KDIGO criteria and subdivided into mild (KDIGO stage 1) and severe AKI (KDIGO stage 2 + 3). Thirty-three patients developed AKI, 25 developed mild and eight developed severe AKI. Abnormal renal venous flow pattern on the first postoperative day was significantly associated with the development of severe AKI (OR 8.54 (95% CI 1.01; 72.2), P = 0.046), as were portal pulsatility fraction (OR 1.07 (95% CI 1.02; 1.13), P = 0.005). Point-of-care Doppler ultrasound measurements of renal perfusion are associated with the development of AKI after cardiac surgery. Renal and portal Doppler ultrasonography can be used to identify patients at high risk or very low risk of AKI after cardiac surgery.

Impact of focused cardiac ultrasound in vascular surgery patients: A prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and logistical consequences of routine preoperative focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) in patients scheduled for elective vascular surgery. METHODS: In a prospective, observational study, FOCUS was performed in all patients seen in the vascular surgery outpatient clinic from January 14 to May1, 2019, unless a full echocardiography had been conducted in the preceding 12 months or the patient was already referred to an echocardiography by the vascular surgeons. FOCUS followed a stringent protocol and referrals for a full echocardiography followed predefined criteria. RESULTS: Preoperative FOCUS was performed in 55 (60%) patients. Of these, 12 patients (22%) revealed cardiac pathology and were referred to a full echocardiography. Coronary angiography was subsequently performed in one of these patients but was without a further consequence. All patients underwent surgery. CONCLUSION: FOCUS disclosed cardiac pathology in the outpatient clinic but with little clinical consequence. This study does not support routine FOCUS as a part of the preoperative patient cardiovascular assessment before vascular surgery. However, larger studies are warranted to further evaluate the relevance of preoperative FOCUS in a larger sample size.