More isn't always better: antibiotic duration after surgical decortication in pleural empyema.

Background: While ample high-level evidence supports the limited use of antibiotics post-source control in intraabdominal infections, there is a paucity of available data in guiding antibiotic duration for intrathoracic infections. This study aims to analyze patient outcomes among those who have undergone surgical decortication for parapneumonic pleural empyema, comparing cases managed with infectious disease (ID) specialists against those without, and to identify predictive factors influencing antibiotic duration post-source control. We hypothesized that antibiotic duration would vary depending on the involvement of ID specialists. Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed on patients with parapneumonic pleural empyemas who underwent surgical decortication at a single tertiary center from January 2011 to March 2021. Differences in patient characteristics and outcomes for those whose antibiotics were managed by ID or not were compared with Wilcoxon two-sample tests and Fisher's exact tests. Linear regression was used to evaluate for significant factors predictive of antibiotic duration. Results: A total of 116 patients underwent surgical decortication for pleural empyema of parapneumonic etiology. ID specialists were involved with antibiotic management in 62 (53.4%) cases, while the remaining cases were not managed by ID. Demographics and patient comorbidities were similar between both groups. Growth of preoperative fluid cultures was higher in patients managed by ID (40.3% vs. 20.4%, P=0.03). Postoperatively, patients managed by ID had longer durations of antibiotics (28.7 vs. 20.9 days, P<0.001) and were more likely to be on IV antibiotics than patients not managed by ID (59.7% vs. 38.9%, P=0.04). However, postoperative outcomes were similar, including rates of disease recurrence, readmission, and 30-day mortality. Linear regression revealed length of antibiotics was significantly dependent on preoperative ventilator status [estimate: 16.346; 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.365-26.326; P=0.002], growth of preoperative pleural fluid cultures (estimate: 10.203; 95% CI: 2.502-17.904; P=0.01), and ID involvement (estimate: 8.097; 95% CI: 1.003-15.191; P=0.03). Conclusions: Antibiotic duration for pleural empyema managed with surgical decortication is significantly dependent on ID involvement, preoperative growth of cultures, and preoperative ventilator status. However, outcomes, including disease recurrence and 30-day mortality, were similar between patients regardless of ID involvement and longer length of antibiotics, raising the question of what the adequate duration of antibiotics is for patients who receive appropriate source control for pleural empyema. Further study with randomized control trials should be conducted to provide high-level evidence regarding length of antibiotics in this patient population.

Sublobar Resection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Wedge Resection vs. Segmentectomy.

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death. The mainstay treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in the early stages, is surgical resection. Traditionally, lobectomy has been considered the gold-standard technique. Sublobar resection includes segmentectomy and wedge resection. Compared to lobectomy, these procedures have been viewed as a compromise procedure, reserved for those with poor cardiopulmonary function or who are poor surgical candidates for other reasons. However, with the advances in imaging and surgical techniques, the subject of sublobar resection as a curative treatment is being revisited. Many studies have now shown segmentectomy to be equivalent to lobectomy in patients with small (<2.0 cm), peripheral NSCLC. However, there is a mix of evidence when it comes to wedge resection and its suitability as a curative procedure. At this time, until more data can be found, segmentectomy should be considered before wedge resection for patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Emergent Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Malignancy Is Associated with Higher Rates of Perioperative Complications but No Independent Impact on Short-Term Mortality.

Background: Data on perioperative outcomes of emergent versus elective resection in esophageal cancer patients requiring esophagectomy are lacking. We investigated whether emergent resection was associated with increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data on patients with esophageal malignancy who underwent esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Thirty-day complication and mortality rates were compared between emergent esophagectomy (EE) and non-emergent esophagectomy. Logistic regression assessed factors associated with complications and mortality. Results: Of 10,067 patients with malignancy who underwent esophagectomy, 181 (1.8%) had EE, 64% had preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, or septic shock, and 44% had bleeding requiring transfusion. The EE group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class and functional dependency. More transhiatal esophagectomies and diversions were performed in the EE group. After EE, the rates of 30-day mortality (6.1% vs. 2.8%), overall complications (65.2% vs. 44.2%), bleeding, pneumonia, prolonged intubation, and positive margin (17.7% vs. 7.4%) were higher, while that of anastomotic leak was similar. On adjusted logistic regression, older age, lower albumin, higher ASA class, and fragility were associated with increased complications and mortality. McKeown esophagectomy and esophageal diversion were associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications. EE was associated with 30-day postoperative complications (odds ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-3.43; p<0.0001). Conclusion: EE was associated with a more than 2-fold increase in complications compared to elective procedures, but no independent increase in short-term mortality. These findings may help guide data-driven critical decision-making for surgery in select cases of complicated esophageal malignancy.

Chest vs. neck anastomotic leak post esophagectomy for malignancy: rate, predictors, and outcomes.

Background: Anastomotic leak is a major contributor to comorbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. We sought to assess rate and predictors of leak after esophagectomy and compare outcomes of chest versus neck anastomotic leaks. Methods: A retrospective review was performed utilizing National-Surgical-Quality-Improvement-Program data from 2016-2019 for patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignancy. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared. Patients were classified into two groups: Ivor Lewis esophagectomy [ILE, chest leak (CL)] and transhiatal esophagectomy (THE)/McKeown esophagectomy [ME, neck leak (NL)]. Multivariable regression models were constructed to determine predictors of each type of leak and postoperative complications. Results: A total of 1,665 patients underwent esophagectomy with 14.1% reported post-operative leak, 61% of patients underwent ILE while 39% underwent THE or ME. Of patients who underwent ILE, 13.8% had CL with complications including significantly higher length of stay and mortality compared to patients without leak. Independent predictors of CL included: diabetes, hypertension, advanced disease stage, chronic steroid use, and operative time. Ninety-five patients (14.6%) who underwent either THE or ME had NL with similar complications. Diabetes, pre-operative white blood cell (WBC), and operative time were independent predictors for NL. On multivariable regression, CL was associated with greater odds of requiring intervention compared with NL. Conclusions: Post-esophagectomy CL and NL are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Diabetes and operative time were independent predictors for both leaks while steroid use, hypertension, and advanced disease stage predicted CL. CL was associated with greater odds of needing an intervention, but contrary to conventional wisdom, was not associated with higher morbidity or mortality.

Specialized pro-resolving mediators as modulators of immune responses.

Specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) are endogenous small molecules produced mainly from dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids by both structural cells and cells of the active and innate immune systems. Specialized pro-resolving mediators have been shown to both limit acute inflammation and promote resolution and return to homeostasis following infection or injury. There is growing evidence that chronic immune disorders are characterized by deficiencies in resolution and SPMs have significant potential as novel therapeutics to prevent and treat chronic inflammation and immune system disorders. This review focuses on important breakthroughs in understanding how SPMs are produced by, and act on, cells of the adaptive immune system, specifically macrophages, B cells and T cells. We also highlight recent evidence demonstrating the potential of SPMs as novel therapeutic agents in topics including immunization, autoimmune disease and transplantation.

Bochdalek Hernia With Gastric Necrosis Requiring Roux-en-Y Esophagojejunostomy.

Bochdalek hernias are the most common congenital diaphragmatic hernias and are usually diagnosed during childhood. They can present in adulthood and, in uncommon circumstances, result in gastric herniation with strangulation. We present a case of an adult Bochdalek hernia resulting in total gastric necrosis necessitating Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy in an otherwise healthy 39-year-old man. This case highlights the potential morbidity associated with unrepaired congenital diaphragmatic hernias and the need for appropriate referral.

Predictive value of pulmonary function measures for short-term outcomes following lung resection: analysis of a single high-volume institution.

Despite the importance of preoperative risk-stratification, there is a lack of consensus on how to identify high-risk patients for pulmonary resection. Enrollment criteria for national trials propose one definition based on preoperative pulmonary function tests. We sought to examine the value of preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) to predict short-term outcomes following pulmonary resection. Using our institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database we identified 419 consecutive lung cancer patients who presented to our institution for pulmonary resection between 2012 and 2016. We identified patients as "high risk" based on the national trial criteria of FEV1 or DLCO ≤50%. Our primary outcome was any postoperative complication within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included cardiac and pulmonary complications, 30-day readmission, and discharge disposition. DLCO ≤50% was associated with any postoperative complication (P=0.03), but not predictive of cardiac events, pulmonary complications, or 30-day readmission. There were no significant differences in any of these short-term outcomes for patients with FEV1 ≤50%. On multivariable analysis, neither FEV1 nor DLCO ≤50% were significantly associated with occurrence of postoperative complication (OR =1.67, 95% CI: 0.60-4.63; OR =1.66, 95% CI: 0.96-2.86, respectively). Notably, DLCO ≤50%-but not FEV1-was associated with discharge to a skilled facility on univariate (P=0.01) and multivariable analysis (OR =2.54; 95% CI: 1.08-5.99; P=0.03). This association between DLCO and discharge to a skilled facility persisted when DLCO was used as a continuous variable. For all-comers presenting to our institution for lung cancer resection, classification based on FEV1 or DLCO ≤50% may not reliably identify those at highest risk for short-term postoperative complications. While our findings suggest caution when using pulmonary parameters in isolation, the potential value of DLCO as a proxy for underlying comorbidity warrants further investigation.

Specific Donor HLA-DR Types Correlate With Altered Susceptibility to Development of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: The greatest challenge to long-term graft survival is the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Th17 responses to collagen type V (colV) predispose lung transplant patients to the severe obstructive form of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, known as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). In a previous study cohort (n = 54), pretransplant colV responses were increased in recipients expressing HLA-DR15, consistent with the high binding avidity of colV (α1) peptides for HLA-DR15, whereas BOS incidence, which was known to be strongly associated with posttransplant autoimmunity to colV, was higher in patients who themselves lacked HLA-DR15, but whose lung donor expressed it. METHODS: To determine if this DR-restricted effect on BOS incidence could be validated in a larger cohort, we performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes for 351 lung transplant recipients transplanted between 1988 and 2008 at the University of Wisconsin. All subjects were followed until graft loss, death, loss to follow-up, or through 2014, with an average follow-up of 7 years. Comparisons were made between recipients who did or did not develop BOS. Grading of BOS followed the recommendations of the international society for heart and lung transplantation. RESULTS: Donor HLA-DR15 was indeed associated with increased susceptibility to severe BOS in this population. We also discovered that HLA-DR7 expression by the donor or HLA-DR17 expression by the recipient decreased susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: We show in this retrospective study that specific donor HLA class II types are important in lung transplantation, because they are associated with either protection from or susceptibility to development of severe BOS.

The presence or severity of pulmonary hypertension does not affect outcomes for single-lung transplantation.

Advanced lung disease (ALD) that requires lung transplantation (LTX) is frequently associated with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Whether the presence of PH significantly affects the outcomes following single-lung transplantation (SLT) remains controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively examined the outcomes of 279 consecutive SLT recipients transplanted at our centre, and the patients were split into four groups based on their mean pulmonary artery pressure values. Outcomes, including long-term survival and primary graft dysfunction, did not differ significantly for patients with versus without PH, even when PH was severe. We suggest that SLT can be performed safely in patients with ALD-associated PH.