ABSTRACT
Historically, animal numbers have most often been in the hundreds for experiments designed to estimate the dose reduction factor (DRF) of a radiation countermeasure treatment compared to a control treatment. Before 2010, researchers had to rely on previous experience, both from others and their own, to determine the number of animals needed for a DRF experiment. In 2010, a formal sample size formula was developed by Kodell et al. This theoretical work showed that sample sizes for realistic, yet hypothetical, DRF experiments could be less than a hundred animals and still have sufficient power to detect clinically meaningful DRF values. However, researchers have been slow to use the formula for their DRF experiments, whether from ignorance to its existence or hesitancy to depart from "tried and true" sample sizes. Here, we adapt the sample size formula to better fit usual DRF experiments, and, importantly, we provide real experimental evidence from two independent DRF experiments that sample sizes smaller than what have typically been used can still statistically detect clinically meaningful DRF values. In addition, we update a literature review of DRF experiments which can be used to inform future DRF experiments, provide answers to questions that researchers have asked when considering sample size calculations rather than solely relying on previous experience, whether their own or others', and, in the supplementary material, provide R code implementing the formula, along with several exercises to familiarize the user with the adapted formula.
Subject(s)
Sample Size , Animals , Feasibility StudiesABSTRACT
The present studies evaluate the in vivo prophylactic radioprotective effects of 1-bromoacetyl-3, 3-dinitroazetidine (RRx-001), a phase III anticancer agent that inhibits c-myc and downregulates CD-47, after total body irradiation (TBI), in lethally and sublethally irradiated CD2F1 male mice. A single dose of RRx-001 was administered by intraperitoneal (IP) injection 24 h prior to a lethal or sublethal radiation dose. When irradiated with 9.35 Gy, the dose lethal to 70% of untreated mice at 30 days (LD70/30), only 33% of mice receiving RRx-001 (10 mg/kg) 24 h prior to total body irradiation (TBI) died by day 30, compared to 67% in vehicle-treated mice. The same pretreatment dose of RRx-001 resulted in a significant dose reduction factor of 1.07. In sublethally TBI mice, bone marrow cellularity was increased at day 14 in the RRx-001-treated mice compared to irradiated vehicle-treated animals. In addition, significantly higher numbers of lymphocytes, platelets, percent hematocrit and percent reticulocytes were observed on days 7 and/or 14 in RRx-001-treated mice. These experiments provide proof of principle that systemic administration of RRx-001 prior to TBI significantly improves overall survival and bone marrow regeneration.
ABSTRACT
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon that elicits toxicity through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). In the liver, gross markers of TCDD toxicity are attributed to AhR activation in parenchymal hepatocytes. However, less is known regarding the consequences of TCDD treatment on non-parenchymal cells in the liver. Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are non-parenchymal cells that store vitamin A when quiescent. Upon liver injury, activated HSCs lose this storage ability and instead function in the development and maintenance of inflammation and fibrosis through the production of pro-inflammatory mediators and collagen type I. Reports that TCDD exposure disrupts hepatic retinoid homeostasis and dysregulates extracellular matrix remodeling in the liver led us to speculate that TCDD treatment may disrupt HSC activity. The human HSC line LX-2 was used to test the hypothesis that TCDD treatment directly activates HSCs. Results indicate that exposure to 10nM TCDD almost completely inhibited lipid droplet storage in LX-2 cells cultured with retinol and palmitic acid. TCDD treatment also increased LX-2 cell proliferation, expression of α-smooth muscle actin, and production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), all of which are characteristics of activated HSCs. However, TCDD treatment had no effect on Col1a1 mRNA levels in LX-2 cells stimulated with the potent profibrogenic mediator, transforming growth factor-ß. The TCDD-mediated increase in LX-2 cell proliferation, but not MCP-1 production, was abolished when phosphoinositide 3-kinase was inhibited. These results indicate that HSCs are susceptible to direct modulation by TCDD and that TCDD likely increases HSC activation through a multi-faceted mechanism.
