ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To guarantee equal access to optimal radiotherapy, a concept of patient assignment to photon or particle radiotherapy using remote treatment plan exchange and comparison - ReCompare - was proposed. We demonstrate the implementation of this concept and present its clinical applicability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ReCompare concept was implemented using a client-server based software solution. A clinical workflow for the remote treatment plan exchange and comparison was defined. The steps required by the user and performed by the software for a complete plan transfer were described and an additional module for dose-response modeling was added. RESULTS: The ReCompare software was successfully tested in cooperation with three external partner clinics and worked meeting all required specifications. It was compatible with several standard treatment planning systems, ensured patient data protection, and integrated in the clinical workflow. CONCLUSION: The ReCompare software can be applied to support non-particle radiotherapy institutions with the patient-specific treatment decision on the optimal irradiation modality by remote treatment plan exchange and comparison.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Internet , Photons/therapeutic use , Radiometry/methods , Software Validation , Software , Radiotherapy Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Disconnected cancer research data management and lack of information exchange about planned and ongoing research are complicating the utilisation of internationally collected medical information for improving cancer patient care. Rapidly collecting/pooling data can accelerate translational research in radiation therapy and oncology. The exchange of study data is one of the fundamental principles behind data aggregation and data mining. The possibilities of reproducing the original study results, performing further analyses on existing research data to generate new hypotheses or developing computational models to support medical decisions (e.g. risk/benefit analysis of treatment options) represent just a fraction of the potential benefits of medical data-pooling. Distributed machine learning and knowledge exchange from federated databases can be considered as one beyond other attractive approaches for knowledge generation within "Big Data". Data interoperability between research institutions should be the major concern behind a wider collaboration. Information captured in electronic patient records (EPRs) and study case report forms (eCRFs), linked together with medical imaging and treatment planning data, are deemed to be fundamental elements for large multi-centre studies in the field of radiation therapy and oncology. To fully utilise the captured medical information, the study data have to be more than just an electronic version of a traditional (un-modifiable) paper CRF. Challenges that have to be addressed are data interoperability, utilisation of standards, data quality and privacy concerns, data ownership, rights to publish, data pooling architecture and storage. This paper discusses a framework for conceptual packages of ideas focused on a strategic development for international research data exchange in the field of radiation therapy and oncology.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Data Collection/methods , Data Mining/methods , Databases, Factual , Electronic Health Records/organization & administration , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Biomedical Research/methods , Humans , Information Dissemination/methods , International Cooperation , Research DesignABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Identifying those patients who have a higher chance to be cured with fewer side effects by particle beam therapy than by state-of-the-art photon therapy is essential to guarantee a fair and sufficient access to specialized radiotherapy. The individualized identification requires initiatives by particle as well as non-particle radiotherapy centers to form networks, to establish procedures for the decision process, and to implement means for the remote exchange of relevant patient information. In this work, we want to contribute a practical concept that addresses these requirements. METHODS: We proposed a concept for individualized patient allocation to photon or particle beam therapy at a non-particle radiotherapy institution that bases on remote treatment plan comparison. We translated this concept into the web-based software tool ReCompare (REmote COMparison of PARticlE and photon treatment plans). RESULTS: We substantiated the feasibility of the proposed concept by demonstrating remote exchange of treatment plans between radiotherapy institutions and the direct comparison of photon and particle treatment plans in photon treatment planning systems. ReCompare worked with several tested standard treatment planning systems, ensured patient data protection, and integrated in the clinical workflow. CONCLUSIONS: Our concept supports non-particle radiotherapy institutions with the patient-specific treatment decision on the optimal irradiation modality by providing expertise from a particle therapy center. The software tool ReCompare may help to improve and standardize this personalized treatment decision. It will be available from our website when proton therapy is operational at our facility.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Patient Selection , Proton Therapy/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Software , Algorithms , Decision Making , Humans , Patient Care Planning , Photons/therapeutic use , Precision Medicine/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Identifying the most radiosensitive patient group would have huge clinical implications. METHODS: A tissue bank containing skin fibroblasts, whole blood, lymphocytes, plasma and lymphoblastoid cell lines from clinically radiation hypersensitive patients was established from patients in Europe and Canada. Over-reacting individuals had CTCAE3.0 severe acute side effects grade 2 or more occurring at very low radiation doses where these side effects are unexpected or grade 3-4 lasting more than 4 weeks after the end of radiotherapy and/or requiring surgical intervention at any time or severe late side effects grade 3-4. RESULTS: Eleven patients have been identified with a mean age of 61.6±8.5 years (range 49-74). Two patients were male, 9 female. One patient had non-small cell lung cancer, 6 breast cancer, 2 head and neck cancer, one lymphoma and one meningioma. The mean follow-up time after radiotherapy was 1658±1048 days (range 84-3752). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of an international tissue bank of the rare group of patients with extreme hypersensitivity to radiotherapy was proven to be feasible and should enable in-depth molecular studies.
Subject(s)
Radiation Tolerance/genetics , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Tissue Banks/organization & administration , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Canada , Europe , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lymphoma/genetics , Lymphoma/radiotherapy , Male , Meningioma/genetics , Meningioma/radiotherapy , Middle Aged , Radiation Injuries , Radiotherapy DosageABSTRACT
The image quality in a conventional positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanner is degraded by respiratory motion because of erroneous attenuation correction when three-dimensional image acquisition is used. To overcome this problem, time-resolved data acquisition (4D) is required. For this, a Siemens Biograph 16 PET/CT scanner has been modified and its normal capability has been extended to a true 4D-PET/4D-CT imaging device including phase-correlated attenuation correction. To verify the correct functionality of this device, experiments on a respiratory motion phantom that allowed movement in two dimensions have been performed. The measurements showed good spatial correlation as well as good time synchronization between the PET and CT data. Furthermore, the motion pattern of the phantom and the shape of the activity distribution have been examined, and the volume of the reconstructed PET images has been analyzed. The results demonstrate the feasibility of such a procedure, and we therefore recommend that 4D-PET data should be reconstructed using 4D-CT data, which can be acquired on the same machine.
Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography/instrumentation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Statistics as Topic , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentationABSTRACT
PET systems using the acquisition control system version 2 (ACS2), e.g. the ECAT Exact HR PET scanner series, offer a rather restricted list-mode functionality. For instance, typical transfers of acquisition data consume a considerable amount of time. This represents a severe obstacle to the utilization of potential advantages of list-mode acquisition. In our study, we have developed hardware and software solutions which do not only allow for the integration of list-mode into routine procedures, but also improve the overall runtime stability of the system. We show that our methods are able to speed up the transfer of the acquired data to the image reconstruction and processing workstations by a factor of up to 140. We discuss how this improvement allows for the integration of list-mode-based post-processing methods such as an event-driven movement correction into the data processing environment, and how list-mode is able to improve the overall flexibility of PET investigations in general. Furthermore, we show that our methods are also attractive for conventional histogram-mode acquisition, due to the improved stability of the ACS2 system.
Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Positron-Emission Tomography/instrumentation , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Equipment Design , Humans , Movement/physiology , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
A method is presented to correct positron emission tomography (PET) data for head motion during data acquisition. The method is based on simultaneous acquisition of PET data in list mode and monitoring of the patient's head movements with a motion tracking system. According to the measured head motion, the line of response (LOR) of each single detected PET event is spatially transformed, resulting in a spatially fully corrected data set. The basic algorithm for spatial transformation of LORs is based on a number of assumptions which can lead to spatial artifacts and quantitative inaccuracies in the resulting images. These deficiencies are discussed, demonstrated and methods for improvement are presented. Using different kinds of phantoms the validity and accuracy of the correction method is tested and its applicability to human studies is demonstrated as well.