Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Orthop ; 48(4): 1071-1077, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189926

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Several descriptions of the anatomy of the pectoralis major (PM) have been published. However, the precise description of its distal humeral insertion, which is involved in traumatic tears, remains controversial. The distal tendon is classically described as being made of two layers, one anterior (ALPM) and one posterior (PLPM), which regroup at their distal edge. The clavicular head (CH) participates in the ALPM according to most authors. However, others describe a more superficial termination in a close relationship with the deltoid humeral insertion. The objective of this anatomical work is to precisely describe the anatomy of the CH and its relationship with the rest of the distal PM tendon and the distal deltoid tendon. MATERIALS: Twenty-three fresh cadaveric specimens were dissected (41 shoulders). The entire PM as well as the deltoid were exposed. Several measurements were collected to establish the relationships between the distal tendon of the CH and the PM, the deltoid and the bony landmarks. RESULTS: In all cases, the CH muscular portion sits on the ALPM but does not participate in the connective structure of the PM distal tendon. The inferolateral part of its distal end gives a thin tendinous portion that inserts lower on the humerus in conjunction with the distal tendon of the deltoid. In 24.4%, this tendon was more difficult to isolate but was always observed. CONCLUSIONS: The distal tendon of the PM only comes from the muscle fibres of its sternal head. The CH fibres do not contribute to this tendon but appear to terminate in a separate tendon fusing with the humeral insertion of the deltoid: the deltopectoral tendon. This could explain the different patterns of tears observed in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Pectoralis Muscles , Tendons , Humans , Shoulder , Clavicle , Humerus/anatomy & histology , Cadaver
2.
Int Orthop ; 48(1): 253-259, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857856

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic fractures around a stemless implant often involve lesser and greater tuberosities with a well-fixed implant in the metaphysis. This exposes the surgeon to unique questions and challenges as no surgical option (open reduction and internal fixation or revision to a stem) appears satisfactory to address them. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after non-operative management of periprosthetic fractures after stemless shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted to identify all patients who had sustained non-operative management of a periprosthetic fracture after a stemless shoulder. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) intraoperative fractures and (2) implant loosening. Primary outcomes included mean Constant score and mean active range of motion. Secondary outcomes were VAS, radiological analysis, and complications. RESULTS: Nine patients were included. One was excluded due to the loss of follow-up at three months. Mean age was 79 years. At the last follow-up, no significant difference was observed between the Constant score, VAS, or the range of motion before fracture and at the last follow-up. Fracture healing did not result in any change in angulation in the frontal plane in seven cases and was responsible for a varus malunion in two cases of anatomic arthroplasty. No change in lateralization or distalization was reported. No cases of implant loosening after fracture have been observed. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management seems to be appropriate in cases of minimally displaced fractures without implant loosening.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Humeral Fractures , Periprosthetic Fractures , Aged , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/adverse effects , Humeral Fractures/etiology , Humeral Fractures/therapy , Periprosthetic Fractures/etiology , Periprosthetic Fractures/therapy , Retrospective Studies
3.
Hand Surg Rehabil ; 42(5): 400-405, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37490952

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze clinical and radiological results for 1-stage radiolunate arthrodesis and scaphoidectomy associated to the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, to alleviate pain and conserve wrist motion. METHODS: Seven patients (8 wrists) with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the radiolunate and distal radioulnar joints were treated from 1999 to 2016. Mean age at surgery was 49 years and M/F sex ratio was 6/1. Etiologies were distal radial intra-articular malunion for 6 patients and bilateral gouty arthritis for 1. The procedure was performed by a dorsal approach in a single step. Pain was assessed on visual analogue scale (VAS). Pre- and post-operative active flexion-extension and pronation-supination were compared. The secondary endpoint was onset of postoperative complications. RESULTS: At a mean 71 months' follow-up (range, 30-168 months), there was significant reduction in pain (VAS, 0.5/10; p < 0.0001). Motion results were satisfactory, with 32° flexion, 39° extension, for a non-significant decrease of 11° and 5° respectively; pronation and supination were significantly increased, by a mean 23° and 30° respectively. Three wrists (37.5%) required a second surgery. There were no cases of surgical site infection or non-union. CONCLUSION: Radiolunate arthrodesis and scaphoidectomy combined to Sauvé-Kapandji procedure was an effective solution for the treatment of symptomatic radiolunate and distal radioulnar osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis , Wrist , Humans , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Arthrodesis/methods , Radiography , Pain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL