Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents , Diarylquinolines , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Reference Standards , Diarylquinolines/therapeutic use , Diarylquinolines/pharmacology , Humans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiologyABSTRACT
In the accompanying study, Nimmo and colleagues estimated the dates of emergence of mutations in mmpR5 (Rv0678), the most important resistance gene to the anti-tuberculosis drug bedaquiline, in over 3500 geographically diverse Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomes. This provided important insights to improve the design and analysis of clinical trials, as well as the World Health Organization catalogue of resistance mutations, the global reference for interpreting genotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.
Subject(s)
Diarylquinolines , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Humans , Diarylquinolines/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , MutationABSTRACT
Previous work reported unprecedented differences in the intrinsic in vitro susceptibility of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) to pretomanid (Pa) using the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system. We tested 125 phylogenetically diverse strains from all known MTBC lineages (1-9) without known Pa resistance mutations and four strains with known resistance mutations as controls. This confirmed that MTBC, unlike most bacteria-antimicrobial combinations, displayed substantial differences in the intrinsic susceptibility relative to the technical variation of Pa MIC testing. This was also the case for the Middlebrook 7H11 (7H11) medium, demonstrating that these differences were not specific to MGIT. Notably, lineage 1 was confirmed to have intrinsically elevated MICs compared with lineages 2, 3, 4, and 7 (L2-4/7), underlining the urgent need for WHO to publish its decision of whether lineage 1 should be deemed treatable by BPaL(M), the now preferred all-oral regimen for treating rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. Lineages 5 and 6, which are most frequent in West Africa, responded differently to Pa, with lineage 5 being more similar to L2-4/7 and lineage 6 being more susceptible. More data are needed to determine whether 7H11 MICs are systematically lower than those in MGIT. IMPORTANCE: This study confirmed that the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex lineage 1, responsible for 28% of global tuberculosis cases, is less susceptible to pretomanid (Pa). It also refined the understanding of the intrinsic susceptibilities of lineages 5 and 6, most frequent in West Africa, and lineages 8 and 9. Regulators must review whether these in vitro differences affect the clinical efficacy of the WHO-recommended BPaL(M) regimen and set breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing accordingly. Notably, regulators should provide detailed justifications for their decisions to facilitate public scrutiny.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Nitroimidazoles , Tuberculosis , Humans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis/microbiology , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Results from clinical strains and knockouts of the H37Rv and CDC1551 laboratory strains demonstrated that ndh (Rv1854c) is not a resistance-conferring gene for isoniazid, ethionamide, delamanid, or pretomanid in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This difference in the susceptibility to NAD-adduct-forming drugs compared with other mycobacteria may be driven by differences in the absolute intrabacterial NADH concentration.
Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Humans , Isoniazid/pharmacology , Ethionamide/pharmacology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiologyABSTRACT
As meropenem-clavulanic acid is recommended for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis, the repurposing of new carbapenem combinations may provide new treatment options, including oral alternatives. Therefore, we studied the in vitro activities of meropenem-vaborbactam, meropenem-clavulanic acid, and tebipenem-clavulanic acid. One hundred nine Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) clinical isolates were tested, of which 69 were pan-susceptible and the remaining pyrazinamide- or multidrug-resistant. Broth microdilution MICs were determined using the EUCAST reference method. Meropenem and tebipenem were tested individually and in combination with vaborbactam 8 mg/L and clavulanic-acid 2 and 4 mg/L, respectively. Whole-genome sequencing was performed to explore resistance mechanisms. Clavulanic acid lowered the modal tebipenem MIC approximately 16-fold (from 16 to 1 mg/L). The modal meropenem MIC was reduced twofold by vaborbactam compared with an approximately eightfold decrease by clavulanic acid. The only previously described high-confidence carbapenem resistance mutation, crfA T62A, was shared by a subgroup of lineage 4.3.4.1 isolates and did not correlate with elevated MICs. The presence of a ß-lactamase inhibitor reduced the MTBC MICs of tebipenem and meropenem. The resulting MIC distribution was lowest for the orally available drugs tebipenem-clavulanic acid. Whether this in vitro activity translates to similar or greater clinical efficacy of tebipenem-clavulanic acid compared with the currently WHO-endorsed meropenem-clavulanic acid requires clinical studies. IMPORTANCE Repurposing of already approved antibiotics, such as ß-lactams in combination with ß-lactamase inhibitors, may provide new treatment alternatives for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Meropenem-clavulanic acid was more active in vitro compared to meropenem-vaborbactam. Notably, tebipenem-clavulanic acid showed even better activity, raising the potential of an all-oral treatment option. Clinical data are needed to investigate whether the better in vitro activity of tebipenem-clavulanic acid correlates with greater clinical efficacy compared with the currently WHO-endorsed meropenem-clavulanic acid.
ABSTRACT
The World Health Organization (WHO) recently revised its guidelines for rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). This study aimed to investigate if TB reference diagnostic services are prepared to support these revisions. An online survey was performed among 44 TB National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) in the WHO European Region. Questions addressed the use of WHO-recommended molecular techniques for the diagnosis of drug-resistant TB, the techniques applied to investigate antimicrobial resistance, and questions on quality assurance. Among 35 of 44 (80%) participating NRLs, 29 of 35 (83%) reported using the GeneXpert platform as the initial test to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance. Five laboratories reported using another WHO-recommended, moderate-complexity, automated nucleic acid amplification test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid. Most (32 of 35; 91%) NRLs reported the capacity to test second-line drugs that have been in clinical use for many years (fluoroquinolones, linezolid, and injectable agents). Only 23 of 35 (66%) and 21 of 35 (60%) NRLs reported the capacity to test bedaquiline and clofazimine. Further efforts will be needed to improve the availability of quality-controlled testing against WHO Group A and Group B drugs. Earlier considerations on the scale-up of diagnostic capacities should be enforced as part of future approval processes for new antimycobacterial agents.
Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Humans , Rifampin , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , World Health Organization , Linezolid , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Background: Molecular diagnostics are considered the most promising route to achieving rapid, universal drug susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosiscomplex (MTBC). We aimed to generate a WHO endorsed catalogue of mutations to serve as a global standard for interpreting molecular information for drug resistance prediction. Methods: A candidate gene approach was used to identify mutations as associated with resistance, or consistent with susceptibility, for 13 WHO endorsed anti-tuberculosis drugs. 38,215 MTBC isolates with paired whole-genome sequencing and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing data were amassed from 45 countries. For each mutation, a contingency table of binary phenotypes and presence or absence of the mutation computed positive predictive value, and Fisher's exact tests generated odds ratios and Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p-values. Mutations were graded as Associated with Resistance if present in at least 5 isolates, if the odds ratio was >1 with a statistically significant corrected p-value, and if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval on the positive predictive value for phenotypic resistance was >25%. A series of expert rules were applied for final confidence grading of each mutation. Findings: 15,667 associations were computed for 13,211 unique mutations linked to one or more drugs. 1,149/15,667 (7·3%) mutations were classified as associated with phenotypic resistance and 107/15,667 (0·7%) were deemed consistent with susceptibility. For rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, fluoroquinolones, and streptomycin, the mutations' pooled sensitivity was >80%. Specificity was over 95% for all drugs except ethionamide (91·4%), moxifloxacin (91·6%) and ethambutol (93·3%). Only two resistance mutations were classified for bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, and linezolid as prevalence of phenotypic resistance was low for these drugs. Interpretation: This first WHO endorsed catalogue of molecular targets for MTBC drug susceptibility testing provides a global standard for resistance interpretation. Its existence should encourage the implementation of molecular diagnostics by National Tuberculosis Programmes. Funding: UNITAID, Wellcome, MRC, BMGF.
Subject(s)
Ethambutol , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To develop a robust phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) method with a correctly set breakpoint for pretomanid (Pa), the most recently approved anti-tuberculosis drug. METHODS: The Becton Dickinson Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube™ (MGIT) system was used at six laboratories to determine the MICs of a phylogenetically diverse collection of 356 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains to establish the epidemiological cut-off value for pretomanid. MICs were correlated with WGS data to study the genetic basis of differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid. RESULTS: We observed ancient differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid among various members of MTBC. Most notably, lineage 1 of M. tuberculosis, which is estimated to account for 28% of tuberculosis cases globally, was less susceptible than lineages 2, 3, 4 and 7 of M. tuberculosis, resulting in a 99th percentile of 2â mg/L for lineage 1 compared with 0.5â mg/L for the remaining M. tuberculosis lineages. Moreover, we observed that higher MICs (≥8â mg/L), which probably confer resistance, had recently evolved independently in six different M. tuberculosis strains. Unlike the aforementioned ancient differences in susceptibility, these recent differences were likely caused by mutations in the known pretomanid resistance genes. CONCLUSIONS: In light of these findings, the provisional critical concentration of 1â mg/L for MGIT set by EMA must be re-evaluated. More broadly, these findings underline the importance of considering the global diversity of MTBC during clinical development of drugs and when defining breakpoints for AST.
Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Nitroimidazoles , Tuberculosis , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Tuberculosis/microbiologyABSTRACT
Antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens poses a major global health threat. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) is estimated to have the highest resistance rates of any pathogen globally. Given the low growth rate and the need for a biosafety level 3 laboratory, the only realistic avenue to scale up drug susceptibility testing (DST) for this pathogen is to rely on genotypic techniques. This raises the fundamental question of whether a mutation is a reliable surrogate for phenotypic resistance or whether the presence of a second mutation can completely counteract its effect, resulting in major diagnostic errors (i.e., systematic false resistance results). To date, such epistatic interactions have only been reported for streptomycin that is now rarely used. By analyzing more than 31,000 MTBC genomes, we demonstrated that the eis C-14T promoter mutation, which is interrogated by several genotypic DST assays endorsed by the World Health Organization, cannot confer resistance to amikacin and kanamycin if it coincides with loss-of-function (LoF) mutations in the coding region of eis. To our knowledge, this represents the first definitive example of antibiotic reversion in MTBC. Moreover, we raise the possibility that mmpR (Rv0678) mutations are not valid markers of resistance to bedaquiline and clofazimine if these coincide with an LoF mutation in the efflux pump encoded by mmpS5 (Rv0677c) and mmpL5 (Rv0676c).
Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Amikacin/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Clofazimine/pharmacology , Diarylquinolines , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Epistasis, Genetic , Humans , Kanamycin/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/geneticsABSTRACT
In a recent report of a systematic review of critical concentrations (CCs), the World Health Organization (WHO) lowered the rifampin (RIF) CC for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using Middlebrook 7H10 medium and the Bactec Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system from 1 to 0.5 µg/ml. The previous RIF CC for 7H10 had been in use for over half a century. Because it had served as the de facto reference standard, it contributed to the endorsement of inappropriately high CCs for other AST methods, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MGIT system. Moreover, this resulted in confusion about the interpretation of seven borderline resistance mutations in rpoB (i.e., L430P, D435Y, H445L, H445N, H445S, L452P, and I491F). In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Shea et al. (J Clin Microbiol 59:e01885-20, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01885-20) provide evidence that the CC endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for the Sensititre MYCOTB system, which is not FDA approved but is CE-IVD marked in the European Union, is likely also too high. These findings underscore the importance of calibrating AST methods against a rigorously defined reference standard, as recently proposed by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, as well as the value of routine next-generation sequencing for investigating discordant AST results.
Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Rifampin , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Culture Media , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Rifampin/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains not detected by commercial molecular drug susceptibility testing (mDST) assays due to the RpoB I491F resistance mutation are threatening the control of MDR tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Eswatini. METHODS: We investigate the evolution and spread of MDR strains in Eswatini with a focus on bedaquiline (BDQ) and clofazimine (CFZ) resistance using whole-genome sequencing in two collections ((1) national drug resistance survey, 2009-2010; (2) MDR strains from the Nhlangano region, 2014-2017). RESULTS: MDR strains in collection 1 had a high cluster rate (95%, 117/123 MDR strains) with 55% grouped into the two largest clusters (gCL3, n = 28; gCL10, n = 40). All gCL10 isolates, which likely emerged around 1993 (95% highest posterior density 1987-1998), carried the mutation RpoB I491F that is missed by commercial mDST assays. In addition, 21 (53%) gCL10 isolates shared a Rv0678 M146T mutation that correlated with elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to BDQ and CFZ compared to wild type isolates. gCL10 isolates with the Rv0678 M146T mutation were also detected in collection 2. CONCLUSION: The high clustering rate suggests that transmission has been driving the MDR-TB epidemic in Eswatini for three decades. The presence of MDR strains in Eswatini that are not detected by commercial mDST assays and have elevated MICs to BDQ and CFZ potentially jeopardizes the successful implementation of new MDR-TB treatment guidelines. Measures to limit the spread of these outbreak isolates need to be implemented urgently.
Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Diarylquinolines/pharmacology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/genetics , Clone Cells/drug effects , Disease Outbreaks , Eswatini , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mutation , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiologyABSTRACT
False-susceptible phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) results for pyrazinamide due to mutations with MICs close to the critical concentration (CC) confound the classification of pncA resistance mutations, leading to an underestimate of the specificity of genotypic DST. This could be minimized by basing treatment decisions on well-understood mutations and by adopting an area of technical uncertainty for phenotypic DST rather than only testing the CC, as is current practice for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.
Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Amidohydrolases/genetics , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Pyrazinamide/pharmacology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Improved genetic understanding of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) resistance to novel and repurposed anti-tubercular agents can aid the development of rapid molecular diagnostics. METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, in March 2018, we performed a systematic review of studies implicating mutations in resistance through sequencing and phenotyping before and/or after spontaneous resistance evolution, as well as allelic exchange experiments. We focused on the novel drugs bedaquiline, delamanid, pretomanid and the repurposed drugs clofazimine and linezolid. A database of 1373 diverse control MTB whole genomes, isolated from patients not exposed to these drugs, was used to further assess genotype-phenotype associations. RESULTS: Of 2112 papers, 54 met the inclusion criteria. These studies characterized 277 mutations in the genes atpE, mmpR, pepQ, Rv1979c, fgd1, fbiABC and ddn and their association with resistance to one or more of the five drugs. The most frequent mutations for bedaquiline, clofazimine, linezolid, delamanid and pretomanid resistance were atpE A63P, mmpR frameshifts at nucleotides 192-198, rplC C154R, ddn W88* and ddn S11*, respectively. Frameshifts in the mmpR homopolymer region nucleotides 192-198 were identified in 52/1373 (4%) of the control isolates without prior exposure to bedaquiline or clofazimine. Of isolates resistant to one or more of the five drugs, 59/519 (11%) lacked a mutation explaining phenotypic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review supports the use of molecular methods for linezolid resistance detection. Resistance mechanisms involving non-essential genes show a diversity of mutations that will challenge molecular diagnosis of bedaquiline and nitroimidazole resistance. Combined phenotypic and genotypic surveillance is needed for these drugs in the short term.
Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Nitroimidazoles , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Clofazimine/pharmacology , Diarylquinolines/pharmacology , Humans , Linezolid/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Nitroimidazoles/pharmacology , Oxazoles , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The surveillance of drug resistance among tuberculosis (TB) patients is central to combatting the global TB epidemic and preventing the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Isoniazid and rifampicin are two of the most powerful first-line anti-TB medicines, and resistance to either of them increases the risk of treatment failure, relapse, or acquisition of resistance to other drugs. The global prevalence of rifampicin resistance is well documented, occurring in 3.4% (95% CI 2.5%-4.4%) of new TB patients and 18% (95% CI 7.6%-31%) of previously treated TB patients in 2018, whereas the prevalence of isoniazid resistance at global and regional levels is less understood. In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended a modified 6-month treatment regimen for people with isoniazid-resistant, rifampicin-susceptible TB (Hr-TB), which includes rifampicin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, and levofloxacin. We estimated the global prevalence of Hr-TB among TB patients and investigated associated phenotypic and genotypic drug resistance patterns. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Aggregated drug resistance data reported to WHO from either routine continuous surveillance or nationally representative periodic surveys of TB patients for the period 2003-2017 were reviewed. Isoniazid data were available from 156 countries or territories for 211,753 patients. Among these, the global prevalence of Hr-TB was 7.4% (95% CI 6.5%-8.4%) among new TB patients and 11.4% (95% CI 9.4%-13.4%) among previously treated TB patients. Additional data on pyrazinamide and levofloxacin resistance were available from 6 countries (Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Pakistan, the Philippines, and South Africa). There were no cases of resistance to both pyrazinamide and levofloxacin among Hr-TB patients, except for the Philippines (1.8%, 95% CI 0.2-6.4) and Belarus (5.3%, 95% CI 0.1-26.0). Sequencing data for all genomic regions involved in isoniazid resistance were available for 4,563 patients. Among the 1,174 isolates that were resistant by either phenotypic testing or sequencing, 78.6% (95% CI 76.1%-80.9%) had resistance-conferring mutations in the katG gene and 14.6% (95% CI 12.7%-16.8%) in both katG and the inhA promoter region. For 6.8% (95% CI 5.4%-8.4%) of patients, mutations occurred in the inhA promoter alone, for whom an increased dose of isoniazid may be considered. The main limitations of this study are that most analyses were performed at the national rather than individual patient level and that the quality of laboratory testing may vary between countries. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the prevalence of Hr-TB among TB patients was higher than the prevalence of rifampicin resistance globally. Many patients with Hr-TB would be missed by current diagnostic algorithms driven by rifampicin testing, highlighting the need for new rapid molecular technologies to ensure access to appropriate treatment and care. The low prevalence of resistance to pyrazinamide and fluoroquinolones among patients with Hr-TB provides further justification for the recommended modified treatment regimen.
Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Data Analysis , Genetic Profile , Internationality , Isoniazid/therapeutic use , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/genetics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Prevalence , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Whole Genome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens threatens the future of modern medicine. One such resistant pathogen is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is resistant to nearly all ß-lactam antibiotics, limiting treatment options. Here, we show that a significant proportion of MRSA isolates from different lineages, including the epidemic USA300 lineage, are susceptible to penicillins when used in combination with ß-lactamase inhibitors such as clavulanic acid. Susceptibility is mediated by a combination of two different mutations in the mecA promoter region that lowers mecA-encoded penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) expression, and in the majority of isolates by either one of two substitutions in PBP2a (E246G or M122I) that increase the affinity of PBP2a for penicillin in the presence of clavulanic acid. Treatment of S. aureus infections in wax moth and mouse models shows that penicillin/ß-lactamase inhibitor susceptibility can be exploited as an effective therapeutic choice for 'susceptible' MRSA infection. Finally, we show that isolates with the PBP2a E246G substitution have a growth advantage in the presence of penicillin but the absence of clavulanic acid, which suggests that penicillin/ß-lactamase susceptibility is an example of collateral sensitivity (resistance to one antibiotic increases sensitivity to another). Our findings suggest that widely available and currently disregarded antibiotics could be effective in a significant proportion of MRSA infections.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Clavulanic Acid/pharmacology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Penicillin-Binding Proteins/genetics , Penicillins/pharmacology , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Amino Acid Substitution , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Clavulanic Acid/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Mice , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Moths , Mutation , Penicillin-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Penicillins/metabolism , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , beta-Lactam Resistance/drug effects , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
MIC testing using the Bactec mycobacteria growth indicator tube system 960 of 70 phylogenetically diverse, isoniazid-resistant clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis revealed a complex pattern of overlapping MIC distributions. Whole-genome sequencing explained most of the levels of resistance observed. The MIC distribution of strains with only inhA promoter mutations was split by the current concentration endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute to detect low-level resistance to isoniazid and is, consequently, likely not optimally set.
Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Isoniazid/pharmacology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Whole Genome SequencingABSTRACT
Using 894 phylogenetically diverse genomes of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), we simulated in silico the ability of the Hain Lifescience GenoType MTBC assay to differentiate the causative agents of tuberculosis. Here, we propose a revised interpretation of this assay to reflect its strengths (e.g., it can distinguish some strains of Mycobacterium canettii and variants of Mycobacterium bovis that are not intrinsically resistant to pyrazinamide) and limitations (e.g., Mycobacterium orygis cannot be differentiated from Mycobacterium africanum).
Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/classification , Tuberculosis/microbiology , Genotyping Techniques , Humans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purificationABSTRACT
Despite being fundamental to all treatment decisions, the breakpoints that define susceptibility and resistance to conventional anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs were traditionally defined based on expert opinion as opposed to modern microbiological principles. As a result, the breakpoints for several key drugs (i.e. amikacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin) were too high, resulting in the systematic misclassification of a proportion of resistant strains as susceptible. Moreover, a recent systematic review of clinical outcome data prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to make significant changes to its treatment guidelines. For example, capreomycin and kanamycin are no longer recommended for TB treatment because their use correlates with worse clinical outcomes. This history notwithstanding, robust breakpoints still do not exist for bedaquiline and delamanid six years after their approval. This was compounded by the fact that access to both agents for drug-susceptibility testing had initially been restricted. It is incumbent upon the European Medicines Agency, the United States Food and Drug Administration, and WHO to ensure that drug developers generate the necessary data to set breakpoints as a prerequisite for the approval of new agents.