Exploring the phenomenon and ethical issues of AI paternalism in health apps.

Health apps, including consumer-oriented fitness apps, have two functions. They are supposed to monitor and promote users' health, the latter by way of being an instance of persuasive technology. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) allows for AI health apps, i.e., health apps that act more and more autonomously when it comes to analyzing users' health data and arriving at tailor-made results on how to improve their health. Consequently, AI health apps seem to gain a paternalistic potential. This is a game-changer, for corresponding issues of paternalism can then no longer be traced back to human engineers. Instead, the paternalizing party just is the AI system. Hence, AI health apps lead to the novel issue of AI paternalism in health care. In this paper, I explore this novel phenomenon and its ethical implications. Firstly, I discuss from a critical perspective whether the notion of AI paternalism makes (conceptual) sense to begin with. Unsurprisingly, I argue that it does and how so. Secondly, I briefly indicate important ethical issues that AI paternalism in health apps raise and which need to be discussed in more detail in order to judge under which conditions (certain forms of) AI paternalism might be considered acceptable, if at all.

Drug-eluting balloon: very short-term exposure and overlapping.

Paclitaxel balloon coating has shown promising effects in inhibiting restenosis in initial clinical trials. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of two critical features of drug-eluting balloon (DEB) application - inflation time and increased dose due to overlapping balloons. Fifty-six stainless steel stents were implanted in the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries of 28 domestic pigs using a 1.2:1.0 overstretch ratio. Stents were mounted on conventional uncoated and paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloon catheters. The animals were randomized to five different treatments with a range of short (10 seconds [s] inflation using 1 DEB) to extended (2x60 s inflation using 2 DEB) intima contact time. After 28 days, quantitative angiography and histomorphometry of the stented arteries was performed on a total of 23 pigs. Paclitaxel balloon coating led to a marked reduction of parameters characterizing in-stent stenosis: Late lumen loss was 1.37 +/- 0.49 mm for uncoated balloons, 0.23 +/- 0.42 mm for one coated balloon 60 s inflation time, 0.37 +/- 0.28 mm for 10 s inflation time and 0.30 +/- 0.19 mm for the vessel segment treated by two coated balloons with 60 s inflation each. Neointimal areas were 4.26 +/- 1.18, 1.68 +/- 0.23, 1.83 +/- 0.40 and 1.67 +/- 0.46 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.001 versus control, p > 0.05 between paclitaxel-treated groups). Despite the marked reduction of neointimal proliferation, endothelialization of stent struts was present in all samples. DEB were found to effectively reduce neointimal proliferation regardless of inflation time and dose within the tested range. No adverse reactions were seen as dose was increased to more than three times the clinically tested dose.

Short- and long-term effects of a novel paclitaxel coated stent in the porcine coronary model.

BACKGROUND: Drug eluting stents (DES) are unique in allowing sustained release for weeks after a single short intervention. The challenge with DES still remaining is the combination of a biocompatible drug-eluting matrix including an antiproliferative drug showing efficacy and safety in restenosis prevention. The aim of the present animal studies was to evaluate the novel paclitaxel coated Coroflex. Please stent in the porcine coronary model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Stents were implanted into LAD and CX arteries of 49 domestic pigs. After 5 days, 4 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months, the animals underwent control angiography including dissection of the stented coronary arteries for histology. After 5 days, 3 and 6 months the Coroflex. Please stent was compared with its uncoated counterpart and a paclitaxel free but polymer coated version. After 28 days, an additional group received the Taxus Express(2) stent. After 5 days, healing with the paclitaxel coated stent was comparable to the uncoated bare metal stent as reflected in a similar neointimal proliferation. Compared to the Taxus stent, the new Coroflex. Please stent showed a similar neointimal proliferation after 4 weeks. Inflammatory reaction was comparable among the bare stent and polymer coated stent groups. Paclitaxel coating was associated with a slightly increased inflammatory reaction with both DES. After 3 and 6 months, all groups showed a similar neointimal proliferation and inflammatory reaction. CONCLUSION: The present porcine studies demonstrate excellent safety of the new paclitaxel coated Coroflex stent in the porcine coronary stent model.