ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery is recommended for patients with diagnosed rectal cancer UICC stage II/III. The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative staging with focus on tumor infiltration depth and lymph node status challenging the indication of neoadjuvant CRT. METHOD: All consecutive rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection without neoadjuvant CRT at the Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany, between January 2015 and December 2018, were included into the study. Clinicopathologic features focusing on preoperative tumor staging and histological outcome were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 100/162 patients (61.7%) underwent primary surgical rectal resection with curative intent. Among these patients, 54/100 had a correct preoperative T-staging, while 34 were overstaged and 12 understaged. With regard to the nodal status, 68 were accurately staged, while 28 were overstaged and 4 understaged. Only 4/40 perirectal lymph nodes of more than 5 mm in diameter in preoperative MRI histologically revealed to be metastasis. CONCLUSION: For patients without neoadjuvant CRT, a tendency to preoperative overstaging was observed. Lymph node size alone did not reliably predict metastasis. According to current guidelines, 21/62 (33.9%) of these patients would have been overtreated by using CRT. On the background of relevant side effects, complications, and the limited benefit of CRT on overall survival, we suggest that primary surgical resection should be recommended more liberally for stages II and III rectal cancer.
Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms , Chemoradiotherapy , Germany , Humans , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intraductal tubular papillary neoplasm (ITPN) displays a very rare subtype of epithelial neoplasms of the pancreas. ITPN is characterized by intraductal tubulopapillary growth and cellular dysplasia. In contrast to intraductal papillary neoplasm (IPMN) no overt epithelial mucin production is observed. To date, little is known about ITPN and particularly about pancreatic cancer arising in this tumor entity. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old male presented at our hospital with a distal bile duct occlusion suspicious for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Preoperative staging revealed no signs of distant metastasis. The patient was surgically explored and pylorus preserving duodenopancreatectomy was performed for a solid pancreatic head tumor. Final histopathology surprisingly revealed an ITPN with an associated invasive carcinoma pT3, pN0 (0/12), R0, G2. DISCUSSION: Patients with ITPN frequently present with jaundice suspicious for a bile duct stenosis or a malignant tumor of the pancreatic head. Although, it is possible to diagnose ITPN by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, many tumors are found not before histopathological examination. Differential diagnosis includes ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, neuroendocrine tumors, IPMN, distal bile duct tumors, and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Using immunohistochemistry, other entities of pancreatic tumors can be ruled out. In case of R0 resection oncological prognosis is described to be more favorable when compared to regular ductal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: ITPN displays a rare entity of pancreatic neoplasms. As shown in the present case report, there is a relevant potential of malignant transformation and therefore radical surgical resection and oncologic follow-up is warranted.
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) are benign cystic tumors with a relevant risk of malignant transformation over time. Currently, follow-up after surgical resection of benign IPMNs remains controversial. PATIENT CONCERNS: This is a case report of a 68-year-old male who underwent pancreatic head resection for a multicystic side-branch IPMN with low-grade epithelial dysplasia in March 2009 at the Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Germany. DIAGNOSES: During postoperative follow-up, a new solid, slightly hypodense lesion in the tail of the pancreas measuring 2.4 cm in diameter was diagnosed in July 2016. Preoperative staging revealed no signs of distant metastasis. INTERVENTION: Subsequently, the patient underwent pancreatic tail resection including splenectomy. Histology revealed IPMN-associated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas pT3, pN1 (2/24), M0, R0. OUTCOMES: Patients with IPMN bare a relatively high overall risk of developing pancreatic cancer. The 5-year incidence has been described to be as high as 6.9%. The current Consensus-Guidelines therefore recommend a structural life-time follow-up. In contrast, in 2015 the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) explicitly states that follow-up is not recommended for resected benign IPMN. Currently, a general and international consensus is lacking. LESSONS: The presented case demonstrates that even more than 5 years following resection of benign IPMN, pancreatic cancer can occur in a separate location of the pancreatic gland. We believe that IPMNs can be considered as indicator lesions for pancreatic cancer. Patients with resected side-branch IPMN should therefore undergo long term follow-up.
