ABSTRACT
AIM: To describe the use of composite endpoints (CEs) in cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of type 2 diabetes and to evaluate the significance of the individual outcomes included within these CEs from the perspectives of both patients and clinicians. Secondary objectives were to estimate the gradient of treatment effects and events across outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials assessing CV outcomes for patients with diabetes from 2008 and onwards. Trials were identified by searching the reports from the CVOT Summit of the Diabetes & CV Disease EASD (European Association for the Study of Diabetes) Study Group. The individual outcomes comprising the CE were compared for differences in importance for patients and clinicians, proportion of events, and effect size. RESULTS: We included 22 trials randomizing a mean of 8098 patients to an active intervention or a comparator group for an average of 33 months (standard deviation 16). All primary outcomes were CEs, and from a patient perspective there was no gradient of importance across outcomes in 22 of 22 (100%) CEs, while the gradient was small in 22 of 22 (100%) from a clinician perspective. The gradient of effect was moderate to large in 9 of 18 (50%) reporting studies, while assessment of events was available in 15 of 22 studies (68%), finding that three of 15 (20%) had a gradient of effect of more than 5% points between included outcomes. In 10 of 22 (45%) trial reports, the results were not clearly presented as based on a CE. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid misinterpretation, clinicians and regulatory authorities should be careful when interpreting the results of trials, of which the main outcomes are CEs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) have a high sensitivity to chemotherapy and a high cure rate, although with serious adverse effects. In the search for tumour suppressive drugs, the RANKL inhibitor Denosumab, used to treat osteoporosis, came up as a candidate since RANKL signalling was recently identified in the testis. METHODS: Expression of RANKL, RANK and OPG, and the effects of RANKL inhibition were investigated in human TGCTs, TGCT-derived cell-lines, and TGCT-xenograft models. Serum RANKL was measured in TGCT-patients. RESULTS: RANKL, RANK, and OPG were expressed in germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), TGCTs, and TGCT-derived cell lines. RANKL-inhibition reduced proliferation of seminoma-derived TCam-2 cells, but had no effect on embryonal carcinoma-derived NTera2 cells. Pretreatment with Denosumab did not augment the effect of cisplatin in vitro. However, inhibition of RANKL in vivo reduced tumour growth exclusively in the TCam-2-xenograft model and Denosumab-treatment decreased proliferation in human GCNIS cultures. In TGCT-patients serum RANKL had no prognostic value. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the RANKL signalling system is expressed in GCNIS and seminoma where RANKL inhibition suppresses tumour growth in vitro and in vivo. Future studies are needed to determine whether RANKL is important for the malignant transformation or transition from GCNIS to invasive tumours.