ABSTRACT
Introduction This prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial aimed to investigate the effect of different types of local anesthetics on regional tissue blood oxygenation on the stellate ganglion block (SGB). Methods Twenty eligible patients were recruited for this study; 16 of whom were allocated to the study protocol. Participants were randomized into one of the two crossover sequences: 1% lidocaine hydrochloride or 1% mepivacaine hydrochloride, and received SGBs with 6 mL of any one of the local anesthetics, followed by a washout period of more than 24 hours, and then received SGBs by substituting the two local anesthetics. The tissue oxygenation index (TOI) in the skin near the mental foramen on the blocked side was recorded using near-infrared spectroscopy at 15 minutes after the local anesthetic injection. Results One participant did not complete the study. As such, variation in regional tissue oxygenation was compared between the 15 participants. There was no difference in the increase in regional tissue blood flow or tissue oxygenation after SGB between the patients who were given lidocaine and the ones who were given mepivacaine; however, the kinetics of the increase in regional tissue oxygenation were significantly faster with mepivacaine than with lidocaine. Conclusions Different types of local anesthetics do not affect the intensity of the increase in regional tissue oxygenation after SGB, but they do affect the kinetics of the increase. These differences in local anesthetics may affect how patients feel after receiving SGB, the duration of SGB effects, and the frequency of adverse events associated with SGB.
ABSTRACT
Background/purpose: Although many coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine injections have been administered worldwide, the safety of this practice remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the rates of complications associated with COVID-19 vaccines administered by dentists with those of vaccines administered by nurses. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a vaccination program delivered by dentists. Materials and methods: This observational cohort study included 537 recipients of the second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, delivered as an intramuscular injection to the upper arm deltoid muscle by dentists or nurses at the study site. Vaccine recipients were divided into two groups according to the vaccination administrator (dentist vs. nurse groups). The rates of complications associated with intramuscular injection technique (numbness in the hand or arm at the time of the injection, vasovagal reflex at the time of the injection, vaccine-related shoulder injury, and prolonged numbness) were examined. Results: A total of 125 vaccine recipients were included (nurse group, n = 84; dentist group, n = 41). The overall incidence rate of complications was lower in the dentist group (2.4%; 1/41) than in the nurse group (8.3%; 7/84). However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.3). Conclusion: This study suggests that the safety of COVID-19 vaccine administration is comparable between dentists and nurses.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury is a phenomenon that promotes myocardial damage when the blood supply returns to the tissue after a period of ischemia. Anesthetic postconditioning involves myocardial protection against myocardial I/R injury. The effects of atorvastatin (ATV) on sevoflurane postconditioning against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury have not been thoroughly studied. The present study aimed to investigate if ATV interacts synergistically with sevoflurane postconditioning against myocardial infarction in rabbit hearts in vivo. METHODS: Twenty-eight male rabbits underwent 30 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion that was followed by reperfusion for 180 min under ketamine/xylazine (K/X) anesthesia. Rabbits were randomly assigned to four groups that included Group K/X (under K/X anesthesia only), Group POST (sevoflurane exposure at initial reperfusion), Group ATV (ATV 5 mg/kg/day administered before ischemia), and Group ATV + POST (POST intervention with atorvastatin administered once daily for 3 days). At the end of reperfusion, the myocardial infarct size and the area at risk were both measured. RESULTS: The mean infarct sizes in the POST, ATV, and ATV + POST groups were significantly smaller compared to those in the K/X group. Furthermore, the mean infarct size in Group ATV + POST was significantly smaller than was that in Group POST and significantly smaller compared to that in Group ATV. CONCLUSION: The combination of sevoflurane postconditioning and pre-administration of ATV further reduced the myocardial infarction size compared to that observed with sevoflurane postconditioning alone or ATV alone. Our data suggest that sevoflurane postconditioning and ATV may function additively to enhance cardioprotection.
