Is Surgical Treatment Effective or Contraindicated in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Exhibiting Extrahepatic Metastasis?

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection for patients with hepatic and extrahepatic colorectal metastases remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of curative resection of distant extrahepatic metastatic lesions in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS: From 2007 to 2019, 377 patients with CRLM were treated; of these, 323 patients underwent hepatectomy, and 54 patients with extrahepatic metastases (EHM) had received only chemotherapy. Survival and recurrence were compared between patients with and without EHM. Variables potentially associated with survival were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among patients who underwent hepatectomy, the median, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates for patients with EHM (n = 60) were 32 months, 47%, and 28%, respectively, while those for patients without EHM (n = 263) were 115 months, 79%, and 66%, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, outcomes were similar in R2 patients with EHM and those with unresectable tumors. However, outcomes were significantly better in the R0/1 group than in the R2 and unresectable groups (p < 0.001). Among patients with EHM, multivariate analysis revealed that higher clinical risk score, incomplete resection of all EHM, extrahepatic disease detected intraoperatively, and previous treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CRLM with EHM (liver + one organ), gross curative resection is necessary when surgical treatment is contemplated, and resection of liver metastases should be performed in patients with CRLM with smaller and fewer tumors (e.g., H1).

The Relationship Between the Number of Ports and Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Reduced port surgery (RPS) has been garnering interest as a novel minimally invasive surgery lately. AIM: The authors examined the relationship between the number of ports and surgical outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and April 2019, 209 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial resection and lateral sectionectomy were retrospectively analyzed with respect to operative variables and surgical outcomes. Patients were divided into 5 groups by the number of ports used. Student's t test, the χ test, the likelihood-ratio test, Fisher exact test, or Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Operative duration was significantly longer in patients with a larger number of ports than in those with a smaller number of ports. Chronological pain scores according to the visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 7 were not associated with the number of ports and wound length in the umbilical region. The frequency of using additional analgesic agents was not significantly different between the groups. VAS scores and the number of additional analgesic agents used were smaller in patients in whom non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were regularly administered postoperatively than in those in whom the drug was not regularly administered postoperatively. LH had a 3.4% complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification >IIIA); however, this was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in postoperative pain was observed between RPS and conventional methods, although operative durations were shorter with RPS. However, RPS for LH may be associated with excellent cosmetic results compared with conventional methods.

The Management of Recurrence within Six Months after Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatectomy is currently recommended as the most reliable treatment for colorectal liver metastases. However, the association between the choice of treatment for recurrence and the timing of recurrence remains controversial. METHODS: Two-hundred ninety-five patients who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed for the risk factors and the outcomes for early recurrence within 6 months. The remnant liver volumes (RLVs) and laboratory data were measured postoperatively using multidetector computed tomography on days 7 and months 1, 2, and 5 after the operation. RESULTS: Early recurrence developed in 88/295 patients (29.8%). Colorectal cancer lymph node metastasis, synchronous liver metastasis, and multiple liver metastases were independent risk factors for the occurrence of early recurrence (p < 0.001, 0.032, and 0.019, respectively). Patients with early recurrence had a poorer prognosis than did patients who developed later recurrence (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent surgery or other local treatment had better outcomes. The changes in RLV and laboratory data after postoperative month 2 were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with early recurrence within 6 months had a poorer prognosis than did patients who developed later recurrence. However, patients who underwent repeat hepatectomy for recurrence had a better prognosis than did those who underwent other treatments, with good prospects for long-term survival.

Laparoscopic Repeat Hepatic Resection for the Management of Liver Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatic resection has been developed as a minimally invasive surgery; however, laparoscopic repeat minor hepatic resection (LRH) carries a higher risk of damage to other organs because of postoperative changes to and losses of anatomical landmarks. The current standard approach at many facilities has been to perform open repeat minor hepatic resection (ORH). This paper describes the surgical outcomes, procedure safety, and utility of ORH versus LRH, as well as the laparoscopic techniques used in LRH. METHODS: Between February 2010 and May 2018, the data of 142 patients who underwent LRH or ORH at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, procedure safety, and procedure utility data were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent LHR and 97 patients underwent ORH. The conversion rate from LHR to OHR was 13.3%. After propensity score matching (PSM), the estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the LRH group than in the ORH group (50 mL vs. 350 mL; P < 0.001). The LRH group had an 8.1% complication rate, while the ORH group had a complication rate of 24.3% (P = 0.044). The postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in the LHR group than in the OHR group (9 days vs. 11 days) (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: LRH can be performed safely using various surgical devices. More favorable results are achieved with LRH than with ORH in terms of surgical outcomes including intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, and postoperative lengths of stay.

Laparoscopic liver resection for patients with cardiac disease.

INTRODUCTION: The gravest problem facing medicine is caring for an aging society and the comorbidities that develop with age, including an increasing prevalence of cardiac disease. Unrecognized or untreated cardiac disease increases the risk of complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). We herein describe the preoperative status, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative courses of patients with or without cardiac disease who undergo LLR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 339 patients who underwent LLR at a single institution between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Their preoperative status, surgical outcomes, and postoperative courses were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 339 patients who underwent LLR, one was excluded for pre-existing severe valvular disease. Of the remaining 338 patients, 16 had coexisting cardiac disease and 322 did not. The patients with coexisting cardiac disease had a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 66% (22-74%). LLR was performed after cardiac function was controlled in the patients with cardiac disease; there were no instances of increased central venous pressure (CVP) or destabilized vital signs during surgery. Intraoperative CVP did not differ between the groups (p = 0.521). There were no significant differences in the demographics except for age, operative characteristics, and surgical outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with non-severe or controlled severe cardiac disease do not exhibit different postoperative courses compared to patients without coexisting cardiac disease. Uncontrolled severe cardiac disease can lead to unstable vital signs during surgery, such as increased CVP. In such cases, treating the cardiac disease should be prioritized.

Is neoadjuvant chemotherapy appropriate for patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer?

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for resectable liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRLM) is used widely, but its efficacy lacks clear evidence. This study aimed to clarify its worth and develop appropriate treatment strategies for CRLM. METHODS: We analyzed, retrospectively, the clinicopathological factors and outcomes of 137 patients treated for resectable CRLM between 2006 and 2015, with upfront surgery (NAC- group; n = 117) or initial NAC treatment (NAC+ group; n = 20). RESULTS: The time to surgical failure (TSF) and overall survival (OS) after initial treatment were significantly worse in the NAC+ group than in the NAC- group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.032, respectively). At hepatectomy, the NAC+ group had a lower median prognostic nutrition index (PNI), higher rates of a positive Glasgow Prognostic Score (P = 0.002) and more perioperative blood transfusions (P = 0.027) than the NAC- group. Moreover, the serum albumin (P = 0.006), PNI (P ≤ 0.001) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (P ≤ 0.001) were significantly decreased and the GPS positive rate was increased from 15 to 35% in the NAC+ group. The OS rates did not differ significantly according to the NAC response (5-year OS rates-CR/PR 67%, SD 60%, PD 38%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with resectable CRLM should undergo upfront hepatectomy because NAC did not improve OS after initial treatment in these patients.

The Relationship Between Postoperative Chemotherapy and Remnant Liver Regeneration and Outcomes After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative chemotherapy for treating colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) has been introduced with the aim of improving therapeutic outcomes. However, there is no consensus on the utility of multidisciplinary treatments with postoperative chemotherapy. Therefore, we evaluated surgical outcomes in patients with CLMs who underwent hepatectomy, while focusing on the effects of post-hepatectomy chemotherapy on remnant liver regeneration. METHODS: Two hundred ninety patients who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed using propensity score matching. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated with a focus on the effects of post-hepatectomy chemotherapy on regeneration of the remnant liver in patients with CLM. The remnant liver volumes (RLVs) were measured postoperatively using multi-detector computed tomography on day 7 and months 1, 2, 5, and 12 after the operation. RESULTS: RLV regeneration and postoperative blood laboratory data did not differ significantly between patients who received postoperative chemotherapy and those who did not receive postoperative chemotherapy immediately after surgery or at any time point from postoperative day 7 to postoperative month 12. The recurrence rates, including same and other segmental intrahepatic recurrences, as well as the resection frequency of the remnant liver were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative chemotherapy may be of small significance for patients with CLM in terms of the remnant liver volume regeneration and functional recovery.

Volumetric and Functional Regeneration of Remnant Liver after Hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Post-hepatectomy liver regeneration is of great interest to liver surgeons, and understanding the process of regeneration could contribute to increasing the safety of hepatectomies and improving prognoses. METHODS: Five hundred thirty-eight patients who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated, with a focus on the effects of portal vein resection and resected liver volume on remnant liver regeneration in patients with liver tumors. Remnant liver volumes (RLVs) and laboratory data were measured postoperatively using multidetector computed tomography on day 7 and months 1, 2, 5, 12, and 24 after the operation. RESULTS: Liver regeneration speed peaked at 1 week postoperatively and gradually decreased. Regeneration with large resections was longer than that with small resections, with the remnant liver regeneration rate being significantly lower in the former at all time points. Remnant liver regeneration plateaued around 5 months postoperatively, when regeneration is almost complete. Up to 1 month postoperatively, laboratory data were significantly worse when more portal veins was resected. After 2 months postoperatively, these data recovered to near normal levels. CONCLUSION: The speed and rate of remnant liver regeneration primarily showed a strong correlation with the number of resected portal veins and the amount of removed liver parenchyma. The larger the resection ratio, the longer it took the liver to regenerate. We confirmed that recovery of the liver's functional aspects accompanies recovery of the RLV.

The utility of the subcuticular suture in hepatic resection.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Despite recent technical progress and advances in the perioperative management of liver surgery, postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is still one of the most common complications that extends hospital stays and increases medical expenses following hepatic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2017 a total of 1180 patients who underwent hepatic resection for liver tumours were retrospectively analysed with respect to the predictive factor of superficial incisional SSI, using a propensity score matching by procedure (subcuticular or mattress suture). RESULTS: The incidence of superficial and deep incisional SSIs was found to be 7.1% (84/1180). By propensity score matching (PSM), 121 of the 577 subcuticular suture group patients could be matched with 121 of the 603 mattress suture group patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated wound closure technique as the only independent risk factor that correlated significantly with the occurrence of superficial incisional SSIs (p = 0.038). C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on postoperative day 4 were significantly higher in patients with incisional SSIs than in those without (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Wound closure technique with subcuticular continuous spiral suture using absorbable suture should be considered to minimise the incidence of incisional SSIs. Moreover, wounds should be carefully checked when CRP levels are high on postoperative day 4.

Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery improves short-term outcomes for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of the use of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in patients with gastric cancer remains unclear. METHODS: This study was a single-center, prospective randomized trial involving patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative gastrectomy. The primary end point was the length of postoperative hospital stay. Secondary end points were the postoperative complication rate, admission costs, weight loss, and amount of physical activity. RESULTS: From July 2013 to June 2015, we randomized 148 patients into an ERAS protocol group (n = 73) and a conventional protocol group (n = 69); six patients withdrew from the study. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS protocol group than in the conventional protocol group (9 days vs 10 days; P = 0.037). The ERAS protocol group had a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications of grade III or higher (4.1% vs 15.4%; P = 0.042) and reduced costs of hospitalization (JPY 1,462,766 vs JPY 1,493,930; P = 0.045). The ratio of body weight to preoperative weight at 1 week and 1 month after the operation was higher in the ERAS protocol group (0.962 vs 0.957, P = 0.020, and 0.951 vs 0.937, P = 0.021, respectively). The ERAS protocol group recorded more physical activity in the first week after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The ERAS protocol is safe and efficient, and seems to improve the postoperative course of patients with gastric cancer.