Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans: development of EUCAST methods and generation of data on which to determine breakpoints.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based clinical susceptibility breakpoints have been lacking for antimicrobial agents used for diphtheria. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate broth microdilution and disc diffusion methods and create a dataset of MIC values and inhibition zone diameters (ZDs) from which breakpoints could be determined. METHODS: We included 400 recent clinical isolates equally distributed by species (Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans) and by national surveillance programmes (France and Germany). Non-duplicate toxigenic and non-toxigenic isolates were chosen to enable the inclusion of a diversity of susceptibility levels for the 13 agents tested. Broth microdilution and disc diffusion, using EUCAST methodology for fastidious organisms, were used. RESULTS: The distributions of MIC and ZD values were largely in agreement among methods and countries. Breakpoints to allow categorization of WT isolates as susceptible, i.e. susceptible (S) or susceptible, increased exposure (I) were determined for 12 agents. The data supported a breakpoint for benzylpenicillin and amoxicillin of resistant (R) > 1 mg/L since WT isolates were inhibited by 1 mg/L or less. WT isolates were categorized as I (S ≤ 0.001 mg/L) for benzylpenicillin, emphasizing the need for increased exposure, and S (S ≤ 1 mg/L) for amoxicillin. Erythromycin breakpoints were set at S ≤ 0.06 mg/L and R > 0.06 mg/L. The corresponding ZD breakpoints were determined for all agents except amoxicillin, for which categorization was based on benzylpenicillin results. CONCLUSIONS: This work provided a large set of antimicrobial susceptibility data for C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans, using a harmonized methodology. The dataset allowed EUCAST and experts in the diphtheria field to develop evidence-based breakpoints in January 2023.

Vibrio species: development of EUCAST susceptibility testing methods and MIC and zone diameter distributions on which to determine clinical breakpoints.

OBJECTIVES: Most human infections caused by Vibrio spp. do not warrant antimicrobial treatment but in severe cases, targeted antimicrobial treatment can be lifesaving. For Vibrio spp., standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) guidelines with EUCAST methodology are lacking. In this study, we aimed to produce data suitable for EUCAST to establish clinical MIC breakpoints and zone diameter correlates for Vibrio spp. METHODS: An intercontinental collection (N = 524) comprising five important Vibrio spp. (V. alginolyticus, V. cholerae, V. fluvialis, V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus) was organized. All isolates were subjected to broth microdilution (BMD) against 11 antimicrobial agents according to ISO 20776-1 using unsupplemented Mueller-Hinton broth on freeze-dried Sensititre panels (Thermo Scientific, UK), and most isolates (n = 371) were also tested with disc diffusion according to EUCAST methodology for non-fastidious organisms. RESULTS: Aggregated results were used to generate MIC and zone diameter distributions and to prepare graphs of MIC-zone diameter correlation. Based on these results, the EUCAST Steering Committee determined clinical susceptible (S) and resistant (R) MIC (mg/L) breakpoints (S≤/R>) for the five Vibrio spp. for piperacillin/tazobactam (1/1), cefotaxime (0.25/0.25), ceftazidime (1/1), meropenem (0.5/0.5), ciprofloxacin (0.25/0.25), levofloxacin (0.25/0.25), azithromycin (4/4), doxycycline (0.5/0.5) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (0.25/0.25). The corresponding zone diameter breakpoints were identified. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the validity of using standard BMD and EUCAST disc diffusion methodology for AST of five Vibrio spp., and generated suitable data to allow EUCAST to determine clinical MIC and zone diameter breakpoints for five pathogenic Vibrio spp., including both non-toxigenic and toxigenic V. cholerae.

Wild-type distributions of minimum inhibitory concentrations and epidemiological cut-off values-laboratory and clinical utility.

The characterization of wild-type minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and zone diameter distributions with the setting of epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs or ECVs) provides a reference for the otherwise relative MIC values in the international system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Distributions of MIC values for a species and an agent follow a log-normal distribution, which in the absence of resistance mechanisms is monomodal and designated wild type (WT). The upper end of the WT distribution, the ECOFF, can be identified with statistical methods. In the presence of phenotypically detectable resistance, the distribution has at least one more mode (the non-WT), but despite this, the WT is most often identifiable using the same methods. The ECOFF provides the most sensitive measure of resistance development in a species against an agent. The WT and non-WT modes are independent of the organism´s response to treatment, but when the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) determines the clinical breakpoints, the committee avoids breakpoints that split WT distributions of target species. This is to avoid the poorer reproducibility of susceptibility categorization when breakpoints split major populations but also because the EUCAST has failed to identify different clinical outcomes for isolates with different MIC values inside the wild-type distribution. In laboratory practice, the ECOFF is used to screen for and exclude resistance and allows the comparison of resistance between systems with different breakpoints from different breakpoint organizations, breakpoints evolving over time, and different breakpoints between human and animal medicine. The EUCAST actively encourages colleagues to question MIC distributions as presented on the website (https://www.eucast.org/mic_and_zone_distributions_and_ecoffs) and to contribute MIC and inhibition zone diameter data.

Evaluation of prolonged incubation time of 16-20 h with the EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility disc diffusion testing method.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance rates are continuously increasing, driving the need for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) results, especially in the treatment of bloodstream infections. The EUCAST RAST method performed directly from positive blood cultures with incubation times from 4 to 8 h was developed in 2018 and is now used in many laboratories. To increase the practicality of the method, an extended incubation time of 16 and 20 h was evaluated in this study. METHOD: Blood culture bottles were spiked with clinical isolates (n = 325) of the seven most important sepsis pathogens. The EUCAST RAST method was performed, extending the incubation time to 16 and 20 h. Broth microdilution (BMD) was used as a reference, except for screening tests where standard disc diffusion or presence of resistance genes was used. RESULTS: Inhibition zones were possible to read for all species-agent combinations. For 16 and 20 h, the MIC zone diameter correlations were sufficiently similar to allow establishment of common breakpoints for the time interval of 16-20 h. The proportion of isolates in the area of technical uncertainty was, on average, 6% for all species and the number of errors were low, with <1% false-resistant and <0.5% false-susceptible results. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, for EUCAST RAST, prolonging the recommended incubation to 16-20 h is possible and can be used as a complement when the intended shorter incubation is not possible to achieve. The introduction of the prolonged incubation will increase the usefulness of the EUCAST RAST method in clinical laboratories with limited opening hours.

Assessing the quality of the anaerobic environment - a method developed to support EUCAST disk diffusion of anaerobic bacteria.

The purpose of this study is to establish a method for assessing the anaerobic environment for EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of anaerobic bacteria on fastidious anaerobe agar with 5% mechanically defibrinated horse blood (FAA-HB). The method utilizes the association between a decrease in the metronidazole disk zone diameter and increasing oxygen levels with an aerotolerant Clostridium perfringens strain DSM 25589 (CCUG 75076 and NCTC 14679). The C. perfringens strain was tested on FAA-HB with a McFarland 1 inoculum and a metronidazole 5 µg disk. FAA-HB was incubated for 16-20 h at 35-37°C. The association between oxygen levels (0, 0.16, 1, 2, and 4% oxygen) and the metronidazole zone diameter was determined. Reproducibility at 0% oxygen was investigated as part of a European multi-centre study of disk diffusion of anaerobic bacteria. The median zone diameters (n=12) at each oxygen level were 29 mm (0%), 21 mm (0.16%), 16 mm (1%), 15 mm (2%), and 15 mm (4%). The metronidazole zone diameters at 0% oxygen from the multi-centre reproducibility-study had a median of 29 mm and a 95%-percentile range of 25-33 mm (n=236). Only one reading was below 25 mm. Based on our results, a zone diameter of ≥25 mm using a metronidazole 5 µg disk and the C. perfringens strain, tested with EUCAST recommendations, can be used to indicate that the anaerobic environment is of sufficient quality for culture and disk diffusion AST. EUCAST has included the method as part of the quality control for AST of anaerobic bacteria.

Microbiological Epidemiology of Invasive Infections Due to Non-Beta-Hemolytic Streptococci, France, 2021.

Non-beta-hemolytic streptococci (NBHS), also referred to as viridans streptococci, represent an underestimated cause of human invasive diseases. Their resistance to antibiotics, including beta-lactam agents, often complicate their therapeutic management. A prospective multicenter study was conducted by the French National Reference Center for Streptococci between March and April 2021 to describe the clinical and microbiological epidemiology of invasive infections due to NBHS, excluding pneumococcus. A total of 522 NBHS invasive cases were collected. Distribution among streptococcal groups was: Streptococcus anginosus (33%), Streptococcus mitis (28%), Streptococcus sanguinis (16%), Streptococcus bovis/equinus (15%), Streptococcus salivarius (8%), and Streptococcus mutans (<1%). Median age of infection was 68 years old (range <1 day to 100 years). Cases were more frequent in male patients (gender ratio M/F 2.1:1) and manifested mainly as bacteremia without focus (46%), intra-abdominal infections (18%) and endocarditis (11%). All isolates were susceptible to glycopeptides and displayed low-level inherent gentamicin resistance. All isolates of the S. bovis/equinus, S. anginosus, and S. mutans groups were susceptible to beta-lactams. Conversely, nonsusceptibility to beta-lactams was found in 31%, 28%, and 52% of S. mitis, S. salivarius, and S. sanguinis isolates, respectively. The screening for beta-lactam resistance using the recommended one unit benzylpenicillin disk screening failed to detect 21% of resistant isolates (21/99). Last, overall resistance rates to the alternative anti-streptococcal molecules clindamycin and moxifloxacin were 29% (149/522) and 1.6% (8/505), respectively. IMPORTANCE NBHS are recognized as opportunistic pathogens particularly involved in infections of the elderly and immunocompromised patients. This study underlines their importance as common causes of severe and difficult-to-treat infections such as endocarditis. Although species of the S. anginosus and S. bovis/equinus groups remain constantly susceptible to beta-lams, resistance in oral streptococci exceeds 30% and screening techniques are not fully reliable. Therefore, accurate species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by MICs determination appears essential for the treatment of NBHS invasive infections, together with continued epidemiological surveillance.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bacteroides species by disk diffusion: The NordicAST Bacteroides study.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of anaerobic bacteria has until recently been done by MIC methods. We have carried out a multi-centre evaluation of the newly validated EUCAST disk diffusion method for AST of Bacteroides spp. METHODS: A panel of 30 Bacteroides strains was assembled based on reference agar dilution MICs, resistance gene detection and quantification of cfiA carbapenemase gene expression. Nordic clinical microbiology laboratories (n = 45) performed disk diffusion on Fastidious Anaerobe Agar with 5% mechanically defibrinated horse blood (FAA-HB) for piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem and metronidazole. RESULTS: A total of 43/45 (95.6%) laboratories carried out disk diffusion per protocol. Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.87 (0.80-0.93) for piperacillin-tazobactam, 0.95 (0.91-0.97) for meropenem and 0.89 (0.83-0.94) for metronidazole. For metronidazole, one media lot yielded smaller zones and higher variability than another. Piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem zone diameters correlated negatively with cfiA expression. A meropenem zone diameter of <28 mm in B. fragilis indicated presence of cfiA. Piperacillin-tazobactam had the most false susceptible results. Categorical errors for this antimicrobial were particularly prevalent in cfiA-positive strains, and piperacillin-tazobactam had the highest number of comments describing zone reading difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-laboratory agreement by disk diffusion was good or very good. The main challenges were media-related variability for metronidazole and categorical disagreement with the reference method for piperacillin-tazobactam in some cfiA-positive strains. An area of technical uncertainty specific for such strains may be warranted.

Towards clinical breakpoints for non-tuberculous mycobacteria - Determination of epidemiological cut off values for the Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium abscessus using broth microdilution.

OBJECTIVE: For non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of wild-type isolates have not been systematically evaluated despite their importance for establishing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) breakpoints. METHODS: We gathered MIC distributions for drugs used against the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) obtained by commercial broth microdilution (SLOMYCOI and RAPMYCOI) from 12 laboratories. Epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) and tentative ECOFFs (TECOFFs) were determined by EUCAST methodology including quality control (QC) strains. RESULTS: The clarithromycin ECOFF was 16 mg/L for M. avium (n = 1271) whereas TECOFFs were 8 mg/L for M. intracellulare (n = 415) and 1 mg/L for MAB (n = 1014) confirmed by analysing MAB subspecies without inducible macrolide resistance (n = 235). For amikacin, the ECOFFs were 64 mg/L for MAC and MAB. For moxifloxacin, the WT spanned >8 mg/L for both MAC and MAB. For linezolid, the ECOFF and TECOFF were 64 mg/L for M. avium and M. intracellulare, respectively. Current CLSI breakpoints for amikacin (16 mg/L), moxifloxacin (1 mg/L) and linezolid (8 mg/L) divided the corresponding WT distributions. For QC M. avium and M. peregrinum, ≥95% of MIC values were well within recommended QC ranges. CONCLUSION: As a first step towards clinical breakpoints for NTM, (T)ECOFFs were defined for several antimicrobials against MAC and MAB. Broad wild-type MIC distributions indicate a need for further method refinement which is now under development within the EUCAST subcommittee for anti-mycobacterial drug susceptibility testing. In addition, we showed that several CLSI NTM breakpoints are not consistent in relation to the (T)ECOFFs.

Clinical Value of a Routine Urine Culture Prior to Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.

Background: Infectious complications after a transrectal prostate biopsy may be severe. In Sweden, a routine culture prior to all prostate biopsies was introduced to enable targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis and reduce postbiopsy infections. Objective: To investigate whether a clinical routine with a urine culture prior to a prostate biopsy and targeted prophylactic antibiotic therapy reduces postbiopsy infections. Design setting and participants: In 2015, a site-specific antimicrobial stewardship programme with a urine culture prior to a prostate biopsy was initiated in Region Kronoberg. To evaluate this routine, we designed a population-based register study including all men who had an outpatient prostate biopsy in 2015-2019 and a control period including all men who had a biopsy in 2010-2014, when a urinary culture was obtained only on clinical suspicion. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was infectious complications within 10 d and the secondary outcome was a change in antibiotic prophylactic treatment. An infectious complication was defined as prescription of antibiotics for urinary tract infections or admission to hospital for urinary tract infections or sepsis after a biopsy. Results and limitations: The urine culture period included 2971 prostate biopsy procedures, of which 2684 (90%) were preceded by a urine culture. The control period included 2818 procedures, of which 135 (4.8%) were preceded by a urine culture. Infectious complications were slightly more common during the urine culture period (5.0%) than during the control period (4.3%, p = 0.17), as was inpatient care for infections (3.5% vs 2.2%, p = 0.002). The routine identified 5.4% men with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Despite targeted antibiotic treatment (1.5% received a nonfluoroquinolone treatment), the rate of infectious complications (6.3%) was similar to that in the control period. Conclusions: Prebiopsy urine culture did not lead to fewer postbiopsy infections. Other measures are needed to reduce infectious complications after a prostate biopsy. Patient summary: In this report, we evaluated a routine with urine culture prior to a transrectal prostate biopsy and found that it did not lead to fewer infectious complications.

The European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing disc diffusion susceptibility testing method for frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance in anaerobic bacteria is increasing and there is a link between inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and poor clinical outcome in the treatment of infections caused by anaerobic bacteria. Accurate and timely antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria is therefore of critical importance. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) has recently described a disc diffusion susceptibility testing method for anaerobic bacteria using fastidious anaerobe agar (FAA) supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood (HB). This method was previously validated for Bacteroides spp. only. The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of FAA-HB for disc diffusion and also for frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria. METHODS: Clinical isolates, including 54 Bacteroides/Phocaeicola/Parabacteroides spp., 49 Prevotella spp., 51 Fusobacterium necrophorum, 58 Clostridium perfringens, and 54 Cutibacterium acnes were evaluated against six antimicrobial agents. MICs were determined by agar dilution following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methodology, modified to use FAA-HB as recommended by EUCAST, instead of supplemented Brucella agar, and disc diffusion was performed on FAA-HB following EUCAST methodology. RESULTS: Results for quality control strains were reproducible, with 99.3% of zones within range. Disc diffusion by EUCAST methodology was able to distinguish between susceptible and resistant isolates of anaerobic bacteria for benzylpenicillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, clindamycin, and metronidazole (98.7% correct categorization). No isolates resistant to vancomycin were tested, but zone diameters correctly categorized the susceptible isolates, and there was a logical relationship between MICs and inhibition zones. DISCUSSION: The recently published EUCAST method for disc diffusion for anaerobic bacteria based on FAA-HB is a reproducible and accurate method for susceptibility testing of frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria.

Pivmecillinam, the paradigm of an antibiotic with low resistance rates in Escherichia coli urine isolates despite high consumption.

OBJECTIVES: Pivmecillinam, the oral version of mecillinam, represents one of the major recommended and used antibiotics for empiric and targeted treatment of urinary tract infections in primary care in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Mecillinam resistant mutants in Escherichia coli develop easily in vitro, but their fitness cost has been shown to be high. METHODS: We revisited the resistance and consumption data from the monitoring programmes in the three countries and compared pivmecillinam with ciprofloxacin from 2010 to 2020. RESULTS: Mecillinam resistance rates in Escherichia coli remained around 6% in Denmark and Norway relative to a constant consumption in Norway of 1.6-1.8 DID (defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day), and even increasing in Denmark from 1.6 to 2.3 DID. In Sweden resistance was significantly lower at 4% related to the lower consumption of 0.5 DID. For ciprofloxacin, resistance rates fluctuated around 6%-12%, highest in Sweden with the highest consumption (0.8-0.6 DID) and lowest in Denmark (0.55-0.35 DID) and Norway (0.7-0.3 DID), although consumption declined significantly in all three countries. CONCLUSIONS: Pivmecillinam is an example of an antibiotic, which easily develops resistance in vitro, but apparently can be used broadly in primary care without increase in resistance rates.

Adaptation of Brucella melitensis Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing to the ISO 20776 Standard and Validation of the Method.

Brucellosis, mainly caused by Brucella (B.) melitensis, is associated with a risk of chronification and relapses. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) standards for B. melitensis are not available, and the agent is not yet listed in the EUCAST breakpoint tables. CLSI recommendations for B. melitensis exist, but they do not fulfill the requirements of the ISO 20776 standard regarding the culture medium and the incubation conditions. Under the third EU Health Programme, laboratories specializing in the diagnostics of highly pathogenic bacteria in their respective countries formed a working group within a Joint Action aiming to develop a suitable method for the AST of B. melitensis. Under the supervision of EUCAST representatives, this working group adapted the CLSI M45 document to the ISO 20776 standard after testing and validation. These adaptations included the comparison of various culture media, culture conditions and AST methods. A Standard Operation Procedure was derived and an interlaboratory validation was performed in order to evaluate the method. The results showed pros and cons for both of the two methods but also indicate that it is not necessary to abandon Mueller-Hinton without additives for the AST of B. melitensis.

Evaluation of ten brands of pre-poured Mueller-Hinton agar plates for EUCAST disc diffusion testing.

OBJECTIVES: Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) is recommended by EUCAST and CLSI for disc diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). We have previously investigated the quality of dehydrated MHA from several manufacturers. In this study, we evaluated the performance of ten commercial brands of pre-poured MHA plates. METHODS: AST was performed according to EUCAST methodology and results analyzed against targets and ranges in EUCAST quality control (QC) tables. MHA plates from different brands were tested in triplicate against four non-fastidious QC strains. The agar depth and pH were measured for all products. RESULTS: The best performance was observed for MHA from Becton Dickinson (BBL MHA II), bioMérieux (MHE agar) and Hardy Diagnostics, for which >97% of zone diameters were within QC ranges and >60% on target ±1 mm. The poorest performance was seen for plates from HiMedia (MHA and MHA no. 2), where 20% and 18% of readings were outside the QC ranges, respectively. The differences in pH and agar depth of the products were small and mostly within EUCAST specifications. DISCUSSION: The accuracy and reproducibility of disc diffusion AST depends on standardised procedures and high-quality discs and media. The performance among ten brands of pre-poured MHA plates differed significantly. The results indicate a poorer performance for pre-poured commercial plates as compared to in-house prepared plates from dehydrated powder of corresponding brands in our previous study. Manufacturers and clinical laboratories have a shared responsibility for the quality of AST. EUCAST provides QC criteria to be used both by manufacturers and laboratories.

Cefiderocol: EUCAST criteria for disc diffusion and broth microdilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

OBJECTIVES: The reproducibility of cefiderocol MIC determination using broth microdilution (BMD) in iron-depleted CAMHB (ID-CAMHB) was investigated, and the EUCAST disc diffusion (DD) method for cefiderocol susceptibility testing was developed and validated against reference BMD. METHODS: Cefiderocol values were determined for wild-type (WT) and non-WT isolates using BMD plates with ID-CAMHB (Thermo Scientific, Oakwood, USA) per EUCAST guidelines. DD was performed using standard EUCAST methodology on unsupplemented Mueller-Hinton agar with cefiderocol 30 µg discs. Control agents were included in all tests. MICs were correlated with zone diameters (ZD), and ZD breakpoints (BP) best corresponding to the MIC BPs were determined. Areas of technical uncertainty (ATU) were included where appropriate. External laboratory validation of cefiderocol DD was performed per the EUCAST SOP 9.2. RESULTS: MIC and ZD distributions for cefiderocol against WT isolates were established. Cefiderocol ZD BPs were set at susceptible ≥22 mm, resistant <22 mm for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and ATUs were decided. For Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, ZD cut-off values of ≥17 mm and ≥20 mm corresponded to MIC values of ≤2 and ≤0.5 mg/L, respectively. Cefiderocol ZDs for Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (target 27 mm) and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (target 26 mm) were within ±3 mm of the target values. For DD, there was no problematic variation between discs, media or laboratories. CONCLUSIONS: DD is a robust and easy-to-perform method for cefiderocol susceptibility testing. For isolates with results in the ATU, an MIC test should be performed to confirm the results.