COVID-19 Disease in Children With ALL Receiving Maintenance Therapy: Do Not Discount the Risk.

PURPOSE: Unlike most childhood cancers, therapy for ALL includes a prolonged maintenance phase during which children typically resume regular activities. Physicians need data regarding the persistent impact of COVID-19 in this population to help guide families after the pandemic. METHODS: The Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report (POCC) collects deidentified data (sociodemographics, clinical data [cancer, COVID-19 course]) on children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer and COVID-19 from 104 US pediatric oncology institutions. The analysis presented here compares children (≤21 years) with ALL in maintenance (ALL-MTN) with all other children with cancer and COVID-19. Multivariable analyses adjust for age, race/ethnicity, insurance, absolute neutrophil count at the time of infection, vaccination, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Compared with other children reported to POCC (n = 1,190), those in ALL-MTN (n = 481) were less often hospitalized (23% v 29%, P = .01) or admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU: 3% v 5%, P = .01); these findings persisted in multivariable analysis (hospitalization: odds ratio [OR], 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.9]; ICU: OR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8]). However, cancer-directed therapy was changed more often for children in ALL-MTN (50% v 33%, P ≤ .01; OR, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.6 to 2.5[). Vaccination was an independent prognostic factor in our multivariable model, decreasing odds of hospitalization (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9]). CONCLUSION: Children in ALL-MTN required fewer hospitalizations and ICU admissions but more therapy modifications than other children with cancer. Vaccination against COVID-19 reduced the odds of hospitalization.

Adolescents and young adults with cancer: the clinical course of COVID-19 infections.

Adolescents and young adults (ie, individuals aged 15-39 years, known as AYAs) with cancer face unique vulnerabilities yet remain underrepresented in clinical trials, including adult registries of COVID-19 in cancer (AYAs: 8%-12%). We used the Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report to examine the clinical course of COVID-19 among AYAs with cancer. The Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report collects deidentified clinical and sociodemographic data regarding individuals aged from birth to 39 years with cancer (37%) and COVID-19 from more than 100 institutions. Between April 1, 2020, and November 28, 2023, 191 older AYAs (individuals 22-39 years of age) and 640 younger AYAs (individuals 15-21 years of age) were captured. Older AYAs were less often hospitalized (P < .001), admitted to the intensive care unit (P = .02), and required respiratory support (P = .057). In multivariable analyses, older AYAs faced 80% lower odds of intensive care unit admission but 2.3-times greater odds of changes to cancer-directed therapy. Unvaccinated patients had 5.4-times higher odds of intensive care unit admission. Among AYAs with cancer, the COVID-19 course varies by age. These findings can inform oncology teams directing COVID-19 management and prevention in AYA patients with cancer.

COVID-19 in Children with Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study aims to describe what is currently known about how children with cancer have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including morbidity and mortality, interruptions in cancer care and delays in diagnosis, and psychosocial effects. Here we summarize the literature on how this patient population has fared during the pandemic, reviewing multiple smaller reports along with two large registries. RECENT FINDINGS: Although children with cancer generally have better outcomes with COVID-19 infection than adults with cancer, their risks of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death are greatly increased compared to the general pediatric population. There are socioeconomic and ethnic disparities present in these effects. Children with cancer experience significant risks from the COVID-19 pandemic. It has yet to be seen how delays and interruptions of cancer treatment and direct organ toxicities caused by the virus itself may affect long-term outcomes in these patients.

Pediatric Malignancies in Plastic Surgery: Case Report of Facial Leukemia Cutis.

Skin and soft tissue lesion removal contributes significantly to both academic and private plastic surgery practices. When encountering various types of dermatologic diseases, it is crucial for a plastic surgeon to exercise caution and consider further medical evaluation before proceeding with local excision of any abnormal skin growth, especially those that involve the face in the pediatric or adolescent population. In this case report, we discuss the case of a child who presented with a primary cutaneous skin lesion involving the left nasal ala, which was ultimately diagnosed as B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This case is reported to highlight B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia for plastic and reconstructive surgeons so that it can be included in the differential when encountering fast growing cutaneous lesions of the face in children.

Niche-based screening identifies small-molecule inhibitors of leukemia stem cells.

Efforts to develop more effective therapies for acute leukemia may benefit from high-throughput screening systems that reflect the complex physiology of the disease, including leukemia stem cells (LSCs) and supportive interactions with the bone marrow microenvironment. The therapeutic targeting of LSCs is challenging because LSCs are highly similar to normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and are protected by stromal cells in vivo. We screened 14,718 compounds in a leukemia-stroma co-culture system for inhibition of cobblestone formation, a cellular behavior associated with stem-cell function. Among those compounds that inhibited malignant cells but spared HSPCs was the cholesterol-lowering drug lovastatin. Lovastatin showed anti-LSC activity in vitro and in an in vivo bone marrow transplantation model. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that the effect was on target, via inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. These results illustrate the power of merging physiologically relevant models with high-throughput screening.

A hybrid strategy for the prevention of cytomegalovirus-related complications in pediatric liver transplantation recipients.

BACKGROUND: This single center, retrospective study describes experience with a hybrid prevention strategy combining short-course antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive cytomegalovirus (CMV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) monitoring. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two pediatric liver transplantation recipients were followed up for a median of 2.3 years posttransplantation. Subjects received a minimum of 14 days of postoperative ganciclovir, followed by monthly CMV PCR monitoring. RESULTS: Forty-three CMV seronegative recipients received seropositive grafts and were considered high risk for CMV; 79 subjects were routine risk. CMV was detected by PCR in the absence of symptoms in 34.4% of subjects and was more likely in high risk than in routine risk recipients (58.1% vs. 21.8%, P=0.0001). Twelve subjects (9.8%) developed CMV disease (8 high risk vs. 4 routine risk, P=0.03). Three subjects developed acute rejection in the 6 months after detection of CMV, but CMV was preceded by rejection in 13 subjects. There were no mortalities secondary to CMV. A total of 38.5% of subjects were spared antiviral medications beyond their initial postoperative prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a hybrid preventative approach for CMV is a reasonable alternative to prolonged antiviral prophylaxis and may reduce unnecessary exposure to antiviral therapy. However, patients who receive intensified immunosuppression after acute rejection are at increased risk for CMV and may require extended prophylaxis and closer monitoring.