What people want from their family physician.

The public wants and is satisfied by care provided within a patient-physician relationship based on understanding, honesty, and trust. If the U.S. health care system is ever to become patient-centered, it must be designed to support these values and sustain, rather than fracture, the relationships people have with their primary physician.

Few people in the United States can identify primary care physicians.

Almost one decade after the Institute of Medicine (IOM) defined primary care, only one third of the American public is able to identify any of the medical specialties that provide it, and only 17 percent were able to accurately distinguish primary care physicians from medical or surgical specialists and non-physicians. This lack of discrimination compromises the goal of achieving primary care for all and merits immediate attention.

Results of the 2001 National Resident Matching Program: family practice.

The results of the 2001 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) reflect a persistent decline of student interest in family practice residency training in the United States. Compared with the 2000 Match, 240 fewer positions (317 fewer US seniors) were filled in family practice residency programs through the NRMP in 2001, as well as 76 fewer (47 fewer US seniors) in primary care internal medicine, 5 fewer in pediatrics-primary care (7 fewer US seniors), and 7 fewer (1 fewer US senior) in internal medicine-pediatric programs. In contrast, 40 more positions (64 more US seniors) were filled in anesthesiology and 11 more (10 more US seniors) in diagnostic radiology, two "marker" disciplines that have shown increases over the past 3 years. Ninety-one fewer positions (2 fewer US seniors) were also filled in categorical internal medicine, while 49 more positions (67 more US seniors) were filled in categorical pediatrics programs, where trainees perceive options for either practicing as generalists or entering subspecialty fellowships, depending on the market. While the needs of the nation, especially rural and underserved populations, continue to offer a market for family physicians, family practice experienced a fourth year of decline though the 2001 NRMP. Current forces, including student perspectives of specialty prestige, the turbulence of the health care environment, media hype, market factors, lifestyle choices, and student debt, all appear to be influencing many students to choose subspecialty rather than primary care careers.

Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 1999-2000 and 3-year summary.

This is the 19th report prepared by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each US medical school's graduates entering family practice residency programs. Approximately 13.4% of the 16,143 graduates of US medical schools between July 1998 and June 1999 were first-year family practice residents in 1999, compared with 15.4% in 1998 and 16.6% in 1997. Medical school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were almost twice as likely to be first-year family practice residents in October 1999 than were residents from privately funded schools, 16.2% compared with 9.3%. The West North Central region reported the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were first-year residents in family practice programs in October 1999 at 20.6%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions reported the lowest percentages at 7.7% and 8.0%, respectively. Nearly half of the medical school graduates (48.4%) entering a family practice residency program as first-year residents in October 1999 entered a program in the same state where they graduated from medical school. The percentages for each medical school have varied substantially from year to year since the AAFP began reporting this information. This article reports the average percentage for each medical school for the last 3 years. Also reported are the number and percentage of graduates from colleges of osteopathic medicine who entered Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs, based on estimates provided by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine.

Results of the 2000 National Resident Matching Program: family practice.

The results of the 2000 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) reflect substantial volatility in the perceptions and career choices of physicians entering graduate medical education in the United States. Ninety-four fewer positions (191 fewer US seniors) were filled in family practice residency programs through the NRMP in 2000, compared with 1999, as well as 60 fewer (66 fewer US seniors) in primary care internal medicine, 12 fewer in pediatrics-primary care (6 fewer US seniors), and 10 fewer (9 fewer US seniors) in internal medicine-pediatric programs. In contrast, 37 more positions (36 more US seniors) were filled in anesthesiology and 4 more (13 more US seniors) in diagnostic radiology, two "marker" disciplines that have recently been market sensitive. Twelve fewer positions (63 fewer US seniors) were also filled in categorical internal medicine, while 35 fewer positions (104 fewer US seniors) were filled in categorical pediatrics programs, where trainees perceive options for practicing as generalists or entering subspecialty fellowships, depending on the market. While the needs of the nation, especially rural and underserved populations, continue to offer a market for family physicians, family practice experienced a third year of decline through the 2000 NRMP. Current forces, including media hype, market factors, lifestyle choices, debt, and the turbulence of the health care environment, appear to be influencing many students to choose subspecialty rather than primary care careers.

Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 1998-1999 and 3-year summary.

This is the 18th report prepared by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each US medical school's graduates entering family practice residency programs. Approximately 15.4% of the 16,114 graduates of US medical schools between July 1997 and June 1998 were first-year family practice-residents in October 1998, compared with 16.6% in 1997 and 15.9% in 1996. Medical school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were almost twice as likely to be first-year family practice residents in October 1998 than were residents from privately funded schools, 18.8% compared with 10.7%. The Mountain region reported the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were first-year residents in family practice programs in October 1998 at 22.0%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions reported the lowest percentages at 9.9% and 8.7%, respectively. Half of the medical school graduates (50.0%) entering a family practice residency program as first-year residents in October 1998 entered a program in the same state where they graduated from medical school. The percentages for each medical school have varied substantially from year to year since the AAFP began reporting this information. This article reports the average percentage for each medical school for the last 3 years. Also reported are the number and percentage of graduates from colleges of osteopathic medicine who entered Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs, based on estimates provided by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine.

Results of the 1999 National Resident Matching Program: family practice.

The 1999 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) results reflect continued volatility in the perceptions and career choices of physicians entering graduate medical education in the United States. A total of 117 fewer positions (155 fewer US seniors) were filled in family practice residency programs in 1999, as well as 23 fewer (29 fewer US seniors) in primary care internal medicine and 38 fewer (27 fewer US seniors) in internal medicine-pediatric programs. In contrast, nine more positions (19 more US seniors) were filled in anesthesiology and one more (10 more US seniors) in diagnostic radiology, two "marker" disciplines that have recently been market sensitive. Seventy-three more positions (but 67 fewer US seniors) were also filled in categorical internal medicine, while 30 more positions (40 more US seniors) were filled in categorical pediatrics programs, where trainees are "pluripotential" with perceived options for practicing as generalists or entering subspecialty fellowships, depending on the market. While the demands of managed care and the needs of rural and underserved populations continue to offer a market for family physicians, family practice experienced a second year of "primary care backlash" through the 1999 NRMP. In addition, current forces appear to be influencing some students to choose subspecialty rather than primary care careers.

Responses to questions about the specialty of family practice as a career.

This article provides answers to many of the questions medical students ask about the specialty of family practice. It is the fourth update of a previous article and was developed in response to feedback from medical students at the 1997 National Congress of Student Members held by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Students at the 1998 Congress also identified areas of interest and concern. This article discusses the hours and income of the family physician, the scope of medical practice in the specialty, required continuing medical education and board certification, family practice residency training and combined-specialty training.

Emerging lessons of the Interdisciplinary Generalist Curriculum (IGC) Project.

The Interdisciplinary Generalist Curriculum Project (IGC) was funded in 1993 by the Health Resources and Services Administration with the goal of developing innovative preclinical generalist curricula in ten of the nation's medical and osteopathic schools. The IGC successfully completed two competitive cycles in which ten schools were awarded three-year contracts. Although the long-term goal of the project is to increase the proportion of medical students choosing generalist careers, much has been learned thus far about the processes of curricular change and interdisciplinary cooperation. Drawing on information from school reports, site visits, external evaluations, academic presentations, and annual project meetings, this report presents the emerging lessons learned in the key areas of interdisciplinary collaboration, recruitment and retention of community preceptors, faculty development, and integration of generalist-related components into the four-year medical school curriculum. These lessons should prove useful for other schools embarking upon significant curricular innovations.

Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 1997-1998 and 3-year summary.

This is the 17th report prepared by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each US medical school's graduates entering family practice residency programs. Approximately 16.6% of the 15,894 graduates of US medical schools between July 1996 and June 1997 were first-year family practice residents in October 1997, compared with 15.9% in 1996 and 14.6% in 1995. This is the highest percentage since this series of studies began in 1980-1981 (12.8%). Medical school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were almost twice as likely to be first-year family practice residents in October 1997 than were residents from privately funded schools, 19.8% compared with 11.8%. The Mountain region reported the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were first-year residents in family practice programs in October 1997 at 25.8%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions reported the lowest percentages at 11.7% and 10.7%, respectively. Nearly half of the medical school graduates (48.1%) entering a family practice residency program as first-year residents in October 1997 entered a program in the same state where they graduated from medical school. The percentages for each medical school have varied substantially from year to year since the AAFP began reporting this information. This article reports the average percentage for each medical school for the last 3 years. Also reported are the number and percentage of graduates of colleges of osteopathic medicine who entered Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs, based on estimates provided by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine.

Results of the 1998 National Resident Matching Program: family practice.

The 1998 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) results reflect a change in the perceptions and choices of physicians entering graduate medical education in the United States. Ninety-one fewer positions were filled in family practice residency programs in 1998, as well as 21 fewer in primary care internal medicine, 12 fewer in primary care pediatrics, and 13 fewer in internal medicine-pediatric programs. In contrast, 49 more positions were filled in anesthesiology, and 12 more US seniors chose diagnostic radiology, two "marker" disciplines that have recently been market sensitive. Thirty-four more positions were also filled in each of categorical internal medicine and pediatrics programs, where trainees are "pluripotential" with perceived options for practicing as generalists or entering subspecialty fellowships, depending on the market. While the demands of managed care and the needs of rural and underserved populations continue to offer a market for family physicians, family practice may have experienced a "primary care backlash" though the 1998 NRMP.

Twenty years of consulting for excellence: the Residency Assistance Program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Residency Assistance Program (RAP) in family practice was established in 1975 to provide consultative assistance to family practice residency program directors interested in enhancing the quality of their training programs. Since its inception, RAP activities have been monitored and policies approved by a project board, with representation from all the national family medicine/practice organizations. The voluntary, confidential, nonpunitive, collaborative problem-solving process has provided more than 800 RAP consultations in RAP's 20 years of operation. This paper reviews the historical development, current status, and future directions of the program.

Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 1996-1997 and 3-year summary.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This is the 16 report prepared by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each US medical school's graduates entering family practice residency programs. Approximately 15.9% of the 16,029 graduates of the US medical schools between July 1995 and June 1996 were first-year family practice residents in October 1996, compared with 14.6% in 1995 and 13.4% in 1994. This is the highest percentage since 1980-1981 (12.8%), when this series of studies began. Medical school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were almost twice as likely to be first-year family practice residents in October 1996 than were residents from privately funded schools, 19.1% compared with 11.2%. The Mountain region reported the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were first-year residents in family practice programs in October 1996 at 24%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions reported the lowest percentage at 11.4% and 9.9%, respectively. Nearly half of the medical school graduates (48.4%) entering a family practice residency program as first-year residents in October 1996 entered a program in the same state where they graduated from medical school. The percentages for each medical school have varied substantially from year to year since the AAFP began reporting this information. This article reports the average percentage for each medical school for the last 3 years. Also reported are the number and percentage of graduates from colleges of osteopathic medicine who entered Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs.

Results of the 1997 National Resident Matching Program: family practice.

The 1997 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) results reveal all-time highs for the number of positions filled in family practice residencies (2,905) and the number of positions filled with US seniors (2,340). This is the largest number of US seniors choosing family practice in the history of the NRMP. Of the 65 additional positions filled through the NRMP, compared with 1996 (2,905 versus 2,840), 64 were filled with additional US seniors (2,340 versus 2,276). Continuing a trend begun in 1992, the 1997 results showed more positions filled in family practice residencies on July 1 than in the previous year, with 3,570 in 1997, compared with 3,494 in 1996. Internal medicine residencies matched 128 more US seniors in 1997, and pediatric residencies matched 63 more US seniors. Of the US seniors matching through the NRMP, only 37.5% are predicted to practice as generalists. In the past 5 years, family practice has been the choice of 71.5% of additional US seniors choosing primary care. The continued record increased interest in family practice as a career, coupled with the nation's need for more family physicians, demands increased support for the nation's family practice residency programs.

Entry of US medical school graduates into family practice residencies: 1995-1996 and 3-year summary.

This is the 15th report prepared by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) on the percentage of each US medical school's graduates entering family practice residency programs. Approximately 14.6% of the 16,124 graduates of US medical schools between July 1994 and June 1995 were first-year family practice residents in October 1995, compared with 13.4% in 1994 and 12.3% in 1993. This is the highest percentage since 1980-1981 (12.8%), when this series of studies began. Medical school graduates from publicly funded medical schools were almost twice as likely to be first-year family practice residents in October 1995 than were residents from privately funded schools, 18% compared with 9.7%. The West North Central region reported the highest percentage of medical school graduates who were first-year residents in family practice programs in October 1995 at 24.8%; the Middle Atlantic and New England regions continued with the lowest percentages at 7.6% and 9.3%, respectively. Approximately one in two medical school graduates (46.7%) entering a family practice residency program as first-year residents in October 1995 entered a program in the same state where they graduated from medical school. The percentages for each medical school have varied substantially from year to year since the AAFP began reporting this information. The average percentage for each medical school for the last 3 years is reported. In addition, the number and percentage of graduates from colleges of osteopathic medicine who entered Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs are reported.

Results of the 1996 National Resident Matching Program: family practice.

The results of the 1996 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) set records in the number of positions filled in family practice residencies, with a 10.8% increase over 1995 (2,840 vs 2,563) and a 9.4% increase in positions filled with US seniors (2,276 vs 2,081). This is the largest number of US seniors choosing family practice in the history of the NRMP. A total of 196 (6.7%) more positions were offered in family practice through the NRMP, compared with 1995 (3,137 vs 2,941). Thus, 195 of these additional 196 positions were filled with US seniors. In keeping with the trend begun in 1992, 242 more positions were filled on July 1, 1996, than 1995 (3,494 vs 3,252), for a fill rate of 97.8%. Internal medicine residencies matched 67 fewer US seniors in 1996, while pediatric residencies matched 85 more US seniors. During the past 4 years, family practice has been the choice of 82.6% of the additional US seniors choosing a primary care residency. With continued record increased interest in family practice as a career choice and the need for more family physicians, priority support for the nation's family practice residency programs continues to be of critical importance.