Donor risk score and baseline biopsy CADI value predict kidney graft outcome.

Different donor parameters and baseline biopsy have been used to assess the quality of donor organs. There is, however, no consensus which risk factors and chronic changes in the donor kidney can be accepted for transplantation. The study included 481 deceased organ donors and their 829 kidney recipients transplanted during 1995-2005. The biopsies were re-evaluated according to the Banff 97 classification. The prognostic significance of donor risk factors and Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) was analyzed. We propose a new donor risk score, calculated as the count of positive risk factors from a defined set of factors in the medical history of the donor. This donor risk score predicts histological quality of the kidney, graft function, and survival. Transplantations from donors with donor risk score >4 had significantly decreased graft survival compared to those with donor risk scores 0-4; the five-yr death-censored graft survivals were 83% vs. 93%, respectively. High donor CADI score (>3) was associated with worse graft function and survival. Three-yr glomerular filtration rate declined from 82 to 49 mL/min with donor CADI increase from 0 to ≥4. Our results show that high donor risk score and CADI value reflect low functional reserve and risk for poor graft outcome.

Successful rescue therapy with mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation improves the long-term graft survival.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the graft survival after kidney transplantation in patients treated with azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and analyze the significance of different risk factors for graft survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 137 patients, transplanted between January 1996 and June 2001, were retrospectively divided into two groups: patients who received AZA together with cyclosporine A and methylprednisolone (AZA group, n=72) and patients who received MMF either immediately or were switched from AZA to MMF during 3 months (MMF group, n=65). RESULTS: According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, a 1-year graft survival was 79% in the AZA group and 85% in the MMF group; a 6-year graft survival was 51% and 67%, respectively (P=0.046). Multivariate Cox survival model demonstrated that MMF therapy reduced the risk of graft loss by 34% (P=0.028), while delayed graft function increased the risk of graft loss (risk ratio 2.26, P=0.009). A statistically significant difference in total cholesterol level (6.7 vs. 5.7 mmol/L, respectively; P=0.002), mean systolic blood pressure (145 vs. 134 mmHg, P=0.009), and cyclosporine A daily dose (238 vs. 203 mg, P=0.015) between the AZA and MMF groups at 1 year was revealed. CONCLUSION: MMF rescue therapy improves the long-term graft survival compared to AZA despite high early rejection rate and avoids the negative impact of acute rejections on graft survival.