Changes in food and drink purchasing behaviour in England during the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis.

BACKGROUND: Restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic affected many health behaviours, including diet. We aimed to examine changes in food and drink purchasing during the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in England. METHODS: In this interrupted time-series analysis, we used transaction-level purchasing data for food and drink items bought for at-home (n=1245 households) and out-of-home consumption (n=226 individuals) for London and the North of England (Kantar GB). Outcomes included household-level weekly purchased total energy, energy from specific products, alcohol volume, and frequency of out-of-home purchasing occasions. We compared purchases between March 16 and June 11, 2020 (pandemic restrictions, the intervention) and Jan 1, 2019, to March 15, 2020 (counterfactual). The effect of the intervention was modelled using 2-part negative binomial regression models adjusted for time, season, festivals, region, and sociodemographic characteristics. Subgroup analyses explored interactions between the intervention and sociodemographic characteristics and usual purchasing levels. FINDINGS: The marginal mean estimate of total take-home energy purchased was 17·4% (95% CI 14·9-19·9; 6130 kcal) higher during the intervention period than during the counterfactual period. Increases of 35·2% (23·4-47·0; 505 mL) in take-home volume of alcoholic beverages and 1·2% (0·1-2·4; 165 kcal) in foods and drinks high in fat, salt, and sugar were observed. Reductions in purchased energy from ultraprocessed foods (-4·0%, -5·2 to -2·8; -541 kcal), and out-of-home purchasing frequency (-44·0%, -58·3 to -29·6; -0·6 days) were observed. Highest socioeconomic status was associated with largest increases in total purchased energy (increase of 7217 kcal, 95% CI 5450-8985, vs 2479 kcal, 935-4023, among low socioeconomic status), while older age groups reported fewer changes in purchasing. Higher usual purchasing levels were associated with greater reductions during pandemic restrictions and vice versa, except for the absolute difference in alcohol purchasing, which increased the most for those with higher pre-pandemic purchasing (lowest 123·2 mL, 95% CI 71·3-175·0; highest 708·3 mL, 381·3-1035·3). INTERPRETATION: Pandemic restrictions were associated with marked changes in purchasing, notably increases in energy and alcohol and decreases in ultra-processed-food and out-of-home purchasing, which differed by individual characteristics. Future research should ascertain if changes persisted, if these changes translate into changes in health, and whether other regions experienced similar effects. FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research (SPHR).

Associations between area deprivation and changes in the digital food environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analysis of three online food delivery platforms.

Online food delivery services facilitate access to unhealthy foods and have proliferated during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explores associations between neighbourhood deprivation and exposure to online food delivery services and changes in exposure by deprivation during the first year of the pandemic. Data on food outlets delivering to 661 postcode districts in London and the North of England in 2020 and 2021 were collected from three online delivery platforms. The association between area deprivation and overall exposure to online food delivery services was moderated by region, with evidence of a positive relationship between count of outlets and deprivation in the North of England, and a negative relationship in London. There was no association between area deprivation and growth of online food delivery services. Associations between neighbourhood deprivation and exposure to the digital food environment vary geographically. Consequently, policies aimed at the digital food environment need to be tailored to the local context.

Associations between the food environment and food and drink purchasing using large-scale commercial purchasing data: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for an association between the local food environment, diet and diet-related disease is mixed, particularly in the UK. One reason may be the use of more distal outcomes such as weight status and cardiovascular disease, rather than more proximal outcomes such as food purchasing. This study explores associations between food environment exposures and food and drink purchasing for at-home and out-of-home (OOH) consumption. METHODS: We used item-level food and drink purchase data for London and the North of England, UK, drawn from the 2019 Kantar Fast Moving Consumer Goods panel to assess associations between food environment exposures and household-level take-home grocery (n=2,118) and individual-level out-of-home (n=447) food and drink purchasing. Density, proximity and relative composition measures were created for both supermarkets and OOH outlets (restaurants and takeaways) using a 1 km network buffer around the population-weighted centroid of households' home postcode districts. Associations between food environment exposure measures and frequency of take-home food and drink purchasing, total take-home calories, calories from fruits and vegetables, high fat, salt and sugar products, and ultra-processed foods (UPF), volume of take-home alcoholic beverages, and frequency of OOH purchasing were modelled using negative binomial regression adjusted for area deprivation, population density, and individual and household socio-economic characteristics. RESULTS: There was some evidence for an inverse association between distance to OOH food outlets and calories purchased from ultra-processed foods (UPF), with a 500 m increase in distance to the nearest OOH outlet associated with a 1.1% reduction in calories from UPF (IR=0.989, 95%CI 0.982-0.997, p=0.040). There was some evidence for region-specific effects relating to purchased volumes of alcohol. However, there was no evidence for an overall association between food environment exposures and take-home and OOH food and drink purchasing. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some evidence for exposure to OOH outlets and UPF purchases, this study finds limited evidence for the impact of the food environment on household food and drink purchasing. Nonetheless, region-specific effects regarding alcohol purchasing indicate the importance of geographical context for research and policy.

Exploring Trends and Differences in Health Behaviours of Health Sciences University Students from Germany and England: Findings from the "SuSy" Project.

Objectives: This research aimed to explore the health behaviours of health sciences students over time and across different settings. Methods: A health behaviour surveillance system has been implemented in Hamburg and Manchester among under- and postgraduate health sciences students. Trends among the Hamburg sample were described. In a cross-sectional assessment, health behaviours across both universities were examined using multivariate regression analysis. Results: Between 2014 and 2018, increasing trends in physical activity and cannabis and alcohol consumption were observed in Hamburg (n = 1,366). While fruit and vegetable intake was constantly low, tobacco smoking decreased. No clear trend was observed for stress perception. The comparison (n = 474) revealed that Manchester students had higher odds of smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, and fruit and vegetable consumption; and lower odds of being physically active, and consuming cannabis. No difference in stress perception was observed. Conclusions: Varying trends and potential areas of intervention were identified for health behaviours in Hamburg. The comparison with Manchester students revealed differences in behaviours, which could be further explored to help inform health promotion strategies in both settings.

Exploring the influence of deforestation on dengue fever incidence in the Brazilian Amazonas state.

INTRODUCTION: Dengue fever is the most prevalent arboviral disease in the Brazilian Amazon and places a major health, social and economic burden on the region. Its association with deforestation is largely unknown, yet the clearing of tropical rainforests has been linked to the emergence of several infectious diseases, including yellow fever and malaria. This study aimed to explore potential drivers of dengue emergence in the Brazilian Amazon with a focus on deforestation. METHODS: An ecological study design using municipality-level secondary data from the Amazonas state between 2007 and 2017 (reported rural dengue cases, incremental deforestation, socioeconomic characteristics, healthcare and climate factors) was employed. Data were transformed according to the year with the most considerable deforestation. Associations were explored using bivariate analysis and a multivariate generalised linear model. RESULTS: During the study period 2007-2017, both dengue incidence and deforestation increased. Bivariate analysis revealed increased incidences for some years after deforestation (e.g. mean difference between dengue incidence before and three years after deforestation was 55.47 cases per 100,000, p = 0.002), however, there was no association between the extent of deforestation and dengue incidence. Using a negative binomial regression model adjusted for socioeconomic, climate and healthcare factors, deforestation was not found to be related to dengue incidence. Access to healthcare was found to be the only significant predictor of dengue incidence. DISCUSSION: Previous research has shown that deforestation facilitates the emergence of vector-borne diseases. However, no significant dose-response relationships between dengue incidence and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazonas state were found in this study. The finding that access to healthcare was the only significant predictor of dengue incidence suggests that incidence may be more dependent on surveillance than transmission. Further research and public attention are needed to better understand environmental effects on human health and to preserve the world's largest rainforest.