Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
2.
Trials ; 25(1): 3, 2024 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167484

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The new European Medicines Agency (EMA) Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS), based on the Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR EU 536/2014), came into full effect on 31 January 2022 and was intended to provide an easier, more streamlined approach to the registration of clinical trials taking place in Europe. Using the experience gained on the new regulatory framework from three multi-national European clinical research studies of outbreak-prone infectious diseases, this article describes the advantages and shortcomings of the new clinical trial submission procedure. METHODS: We report the time to approval, size of the application dossier, and number of requests for information (RFIs) for each study. We also explore the experience of each study within the regulatory framework and its use of CTIS to document the real-world, practical consequences of the system on individual studies. The study assesses the experience of three multi-country studies conducted in Europe working within the EU and non-EU regulatory environments. RESULTS: While the time to regulatory and ethical approval has improved since the implementation of the new regulation, the timelines for approvals are still unacceptably slow, particularly for studies being conducted in the context of an evolving outbreak. Within the new regulatory approval procedure, there is evidence of conflicting application requirements, increased document burden, barriers to submitting important modifications, and debilitating technical hurdles. CONCLUSIONS: CTIS promised to lower the administrative bar, but unfortunately this has not been achieved. There are challenges that need to be urgently confronted and addressed for international research collaborators to effectively manage health crises in the future. While the value of multi-national outbreak research is clear, the limitations and delays imposed by the system, which raise challenging ethical questions about the regulation, are prejudicial to all clinical research, especially publicly funded academic studies. This report is relevant to both regulators and clinical researchers. It is hoped that these findings can help improve pan-European clinical trials, especially for the purpose of epidemic preparedness and response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This paper references experiences gained during management of three pan-European trials: EU-SolidAct's Bari-SolidAct (CT No. 2022-500385-99-00 - 15 March 2022) and AXL-SolidAct (CT No. 2022-500363-12-00 - 19 April 2022), and MOSAIC (CT No. 2022-501132-42-00 - 22 June 2022).


Subject(s)
Forecasting , Humans , Europe , Clinical Trials as Topic
3.
Wellcome Open Res ; 8: 415, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38031544

ABSTRACT

Background: Human mpox is a viral disease caused by an Orthopoxvirus, human mpox virus (hMPXV), typically causing fever and a rash. Mpox has historically been endemic to parts of Central and West Africa, with small numbers of imported cases reported elsewhere, but starting May 2022 an unprecedented global outbreak caused by clade IIb hMPXV was reported outside traditionally endemic countries. This prompted the initiation of MOSAIC, a cohort study implemented in Europe and Asia that aims to describe clinical and virologic outcomes of PCR-confirmed hMPXV disease, including those who receive antiviral therapy. The focus of this article, however, is on describing the study protocol itself with implementation process and operational challenges. Methods: MOSAIC recruits participants of any age with laboratory-confirmed mpox disease who provide informed consent. Participants enrol in the cohort for a total of six months. Blood, lesion and throat samples are collected at several timepoints from the day of diagnosis or the first day of treatment (Day 1) until Day 28 for PCR detection of hMPXV. Clinical data are collected by clinicians and participants (via a self-completion questionnaire) for six months to characterize the signs and symptoms associated with the illness, as well as short- and more long-term outcomes. Discussion: The design and prompt implementation of clinical research response is key in addressing emerging outbreaks. MOSAIC began enrolment within two months of the start of the international mpox epidemic. Enrolment has been stopped and the last follow-up visits are expected in January 2024. ICTRP registration: EU CT number: 2022-501132-42-00 (22/06/2022).

7.
Metabolism ; 142: 155412, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36731720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes and obesity are populations at high-risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes and have shown blunted immune responses when administered different vaccines. Here we used the 'ANRS0001S COV-POPART' French nationwide multicenter prospective cohort to investigate early humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in the sub-cohort ('COVPOP OBEDIAB') of patients with obesity and diabetes. METHODS: Patients with diabetes (n = 390, type 1 or 2) or obesity (n = 357) who had received two vaccine doses and had no history of previous COVID-19 infection and negative anti-nucleocapsid (NCP) antibodies were included and compared against healthy subjects (n = 573). Humoral response was assessed at baseline, at one month post-first dose (M0) and one-month post-second dose (M1), through percentage of responders (positive anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (Sabs), geometric means of Sabs; BAU/mL), proportion of individuals with anti-RBD antibodies, and proportion of individuals with anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies (Nabs). Potential clinical and biological factors associated with weak response (defined as Sabs < 264 BAU/mL) and presence of non-reactive anti-RBD antibodies at M1 were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to estimate crude and adjusted coefficients with 95 % confidence intervals. Poor glycemic control was defined as HbA1c ≥ 7.5 % at inclusion. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes, particularly type 2 diabetes, and patients with obesity were less likely to have positive Sabs and anti-RBD antibodies after the first and second dose compared to controls (p < 0.001). At M1, we found Sabs seroconversion in 94.1 % of patients with diabetes versus 99.7 % in controls, anti-RBD seroconversion in 93.8 % of patients with diabetes versus 99.1 % in controls, and Nabs seroconversion in 95.7 % of patients with diabetes versus 99.6 % in controls (all p < 0.0001). Sabs and anti-RBD seroconversion at M0 and M1 were also significantly lower in obese patients than controls, at respectively 82.1 % versus 89.9 % (p = 0.001; M0 Sabs), 94.4 % versus 99.7 % (p 0.001; M1 Sabs), 79.0 % vs 86.2 % (p = 0.004 M0 anti-RBD), and 96.99 % vs 99.1 % (p = 0.012 M1 anti-RBD). The factors associated with low vaccine response (BAU < 264/mL) in patients with diabetes were chronic kidney disease (adjusted OR = 6.88 [1.77;26.77], p = 0.005) and poor glycemic control (adjusted OR = 3.92 [1.26;12.14], p = 0.018). In addition, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 was found to be associated with a higher vaccine response (adjusted OR = 0.10 [0.01;0.91], p = 0.040) than patients with BMI < 40 kg/m2. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccine humoral response was lower in patients with obesity and diabetes one month after second dose compared to controls, especially in diabetic patients with CKD or inadequate glycemic control. These findings point to the need for post-vaccination serological checks in these high-risk populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Obesity/complications , France/epidemiology
9.
Antiviral Res ; 188: 105016, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33444703

ABSTRACT

ABMA and its analogue DABMA are two molecules of the adamantane family known to perturbate the endosomal pathway and to inhibit cell infection of several RNA and DNA viruses. Their activity against Rabies Virus (RABV) infection has already been demonstrated in vitro. (Wu et al., 2017, 2019). Here, we describe in more details their mechanism of action by comparison to Arbidol (umifenovir) and Ribavirin, two broad spectrum antivirals against emerging viruses such as Lassa, Ebola, influenza and Hantaan viruses. ABMA and DABMA, delivered 2 h pre-infection, inhibit RABV infection in vitro with an EC50 of 7.8 µM and 14 µM, respectively. They act at post-entry, by causing RABV accumulation within the endosomal compartment and DABMA specifically diminishes the expression of the GTPase Rab7a controlling the fusion of early endosomes to late endosomes or lysosomes. This may suggest that ABMA and DABMA act at different stages of the late endosomal pathway as supported by their different profile of synergy/antagonism with the fusion inhibitor Arbidol. This difference is further confirmed by the RABV mutants induced by successive passages under increasing selective pressure showing a particular involvement of the viral G protein in the DABMA inhibition while ABMA inhibition induces less mutations dispersed in the M, G and L viral proteins. These results suggest new therapeutic perspectives against rabies.


Subject(s)
Adamantane/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Benzylamines/pharmacology , Rabies virus/drug effects , Animals , Cell Line , Drug Resistance, Viral , Drug Synergism , Endosomes/metabolism , Indoles/pharmacology , Mutation , Rabies virus/genetics , Rabies virus/physiology , Ribavirin/pharmacology , Viral Proteins/genetics , Virus Internalization/drug effects
10.
ACS Med Chem Lett ; 10(8): 1140-1147, 2019 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413797

ABSTRACT

The small molecule ABMA has been previously shown to protect cells against multiple toxins and pathogens including virus, intracellular bacteria, and parasite. Its mechanism of action is directly associated with host endolysosomal pathway rather than targeting toxin or pathogen itself. However, the relationship of its broad-spectrum anti-infection activity and chemical structure is not yet resolved. Here, we synthesized a series of derivatives and compared their activities against diphtheria toxin (DT). Dimethyl-ABMA (DABMA), one of the most potent analogs with about 20-fold improvement in protection efficacy against DT, was identified with a similar mechanism of action to ABMA. Moreover, DABMA exhibited enhanced efficacy against Clostridium difficile toxin B (TcdB), Clostridium sordellii lethal toxin (TcsL), Pseudomonas Exotoxin A (PE) as well as Rabies and Ebola viruses. The results revealed a structure-activity relationship of ABMA, which is a starting point for its clinical development as broad-spectrum drug against existing and emerging infectious diseases.

11.
Viruses ; 10(4)2018 04 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29642580

ABSTRACT

Arthropod-borne flaviviruses are human pathogens of global medical importance, against which no effective small molecule-based antiviral therapy has currently been reported. Arbidol (umifenovir) is a broad-spectrum antiviral compound approved in Russia and China for prophylaxis and treatment of influenza. This compound shows activities against numerous DNA and RNA viruses. The mode of action is based predominantly on impairment of critical steps in virus-cell interactions. Here we demonstrate that arbidol possesses micromolar-level anti-viral effects (EC50 values ranging from 10.57 ± 0.74 to 19.16 ± 0.29 µM) in Vero cells infected with Zika virus, West Nile virus, and tick-borne encephalitis virus, three medically important representatives of the arthropod-borne flaviviruses. Interestingly, no antiviral effects of arbidol are observed in virus infected porcine stable kidney cells (PS), human neuroblastoma cells (UKF-NB-4), and human hepatoma cells (Huh-7 cells) indicating that the antiviral effect of arbidol is strongly cell-type dependent. Arbidol shows increasing cytotoxicity when tested in various cell lines, in the order: Huh-7 < HBCA < PS < UKF-NB-4 < Vero with CC50 values ranging from 18.69 ± 0.1 to 89.72 ± 0.19 µM. Antiviral activities and acceptable cytotoxicity profiles suggest that arbidol could be a promising candidate for further investigation as a potential therapeutic agent in selective treatment of flaviviral infections.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Arthropod Vectors/virology , Flavivirus/drug effects , Indoles/pharmacology , Animals , Antiviral Agents/toxicity , Cell Line , Cell Survival/drug effects , Chlorocebus aethiops , Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne/drug effects , Encephalitis Viruses, Tick-Borne/genetics , Flavivirus/genetics , Flavivirus Infections/virology , Gene Expression Regulation, Viral/drug effects , Humans , Indoles/toxicity , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Vero Cells , Viral Envelope Proteins/genetics , West Nile virus/drug effects , West Nile virus/genetics , Zika Virus/drug effects , Zika Virus/genetics
12.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 15567, 2017 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29138439

ABSTRACT

Intracellular pathogenic microorganisms and toxins exploit host cell mechanisms to enter, exert their deleterious effects as well as hijack host nutrition for their development. A potential approach to treat multiple pathogen infections and that should not induce drug resistance is the use of small molecules that target host components. We identified the compound 1-adamantyl (5-bromo-2-methoxybenzyl) amine (ABMA) from a cell-based high throughput screening for its capacity to protect human cells and mice against ricin toxin without toxicity. This compound efficiently protects cells against various toxins and pathogens including viruses, intracellular bacteria and parasite. ABMA provokes Rab7-positive late endosomal compartment accumulation in mammalian cells without affecting other organelles (early endosomes, lysosomes, the Golgi apparatus, the endoplasmic reticulum or the nucleus). As the mechanism of action of ABMA is restricted to host-endosomal compartments, it reduces cell infection by pathogens that depend on this pathway to invade cells. ABMA may represent a novel class of broad-spectrum compounds with therapeutic potential against diverse severe infectious diseases.


Subject(s)
Adamantane/analogs & derivatives , Benzyl Compounds/pharmacology , Endosomes/drug effects , Ricin/antagonists & inhibitors , Toxins, Biological/antagonists & inhibitors , Adamantane/chemistry , Adamantane/pharmacology , Animals , Benzyl Compounds/chemistry , Benzylamines , Cell Compartmentation/drug effects , Endoplasmic Reticulum/drug effects , Golgi Apparatus/drug effects , HeLa Cells , Humans , Lysosomes/drug effects , Mice , Ricin/drug effects , Ricin/toxicity , Toxins, Biological/chemistry , Toxins, Biological/toxicity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...