ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic had an adverse impact on several cardiovascular risk factors. This study investigated the prevalence, awareness and treatment of hypertension in Greece before and after the pandemic. Data were collected in the context of the May Measurement Month (MMM) global survey initiated by the International Society of Hypertension. METHODS: Adult volunteers (age ≥ 18 years) were recruited through opportunistic screening in public areas across cities in Greece in 2019 and 2022. Medical history and triplicate sitting blood pressure (BP) measurements were taken using validated automated upper-arm cuff devices. The data were uploaded to the international MMM cloud platform. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic ≥90 mm Hg and/or self-reported use of drugs for hypertension. The same threshold was used to define uncontrolled BP in treated individuals. RESULTS: Data from 12,080 adults were collected (5,727/6,353 in MMM 2019/2022; men 46/49%, p < 0.01; mean age 52.7 ± 16.6/54.8 ± 16.2, p < 0.001; smokers, 24.7/30.5, p < 0.001; diabetics 12/11.5%, p = NS; cardiovascular disease 5/5.8%, p = NS). The prevalence of hypertension was 41.6/42.6% (MMM 2019/2022, p = NS), with 21.3/27.5% of individuals with hypertension being unaware of their condition (p < 0.001), 5.6/2.4% aware untreated (p < 0.001), 24.8/22.1% treated uncontrolled (p < 0.05), and 48.3/47.8% treated controlled (p = NS). CONCLUSION: In Greece, the COVID-19 pandemic did not appear to affect the prevalence and control of hypertension; however, the rate of undiagnosed hypertension was higher after the pandemic. National strategies need to be implemented for the early detection and optimal management of hypertension in the general population in Greece.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Deep Learning , Humans , Artificial Intelligence , Acetaminophen , Blood Pressure , SodiumABSTRACT
This study aimed to assess the reliability of opportunistic screening programs in estimating the prevalence, treatment, and control rate of hypertension in the general population. Two recent epidemiological surveys obtained data on hypertension in the adult general population in Greece. The EMENO (2013-2016) applied a multi-stage stratified random sampling method to collect nationwide data. The MMM (2019) collected data through opportunistic (voluntary) screening in five large cities. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 mmHg (single occasion; average of 2nd-3rd measurement; electronic devices) and/or use of antihypertensive drugs. Data from a total of 10,426 adults were analyzed (EMENO 4,699; MMM 5,727). Mean age (SD) was 49.2 (18.6)/52.7 (16.6) years (EMENO/MMM, p < 0.001), men 48.6/46.5% (p < 0.05) and body mass index 28.2 (5.7)/27.1 (5.0) kg/m2 (p < 0.001). The prevalence of hypertension in ΕΜΕΝΟ/MMM was 39.6/41.6% (p < 0.05) and was higher in men (42.7/50.9%, p < 0.001) than in women (36.5/33.6%, p < 0.05). Among hypertensive subjects, unaware were 31.8/21.3% (EMENO/MMM, p < 0.001), aware untreated 2.7/5.6% (p < 0.001), treated uncontrolled 35.1/24.8% (p < 0.001), and treated controlled 30.5/48.3% (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the prevalence of hypertension was similar with random sampling (EMENO) and opportunistic screening (MMM). However, opportunistic screening underestimated the prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension and overestimated the rate of hypertension treatment and control. Thus, random sampling national epidemiological studies are necessary for assessing the epidemiology of hypertension. Screening programs are useful for increasing awareness of hypertension in the general population, yet the generalization of such findings should be interpreted with caution.
Subject(s)
Hypertension , Adult , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Hypertension remains a major public health issue with inadequate control worldwide. The May Measurement Month (MMM) initiative by the International Society of Hypertension was implemented in Greece in 2019 aiming to raise hypertension awareness and control. Adult volunteers (≥18 years) were recruited through opportunistic screening in five urban areas. Information on medical history and triplicate sitting blood pressure (BP) measurements were obtained using validated automated upper-arm devices. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥90 mmHg, and/or self-reported use of drugs for hypertension. A total of 5727 were analysed [mean age 52.7 (SD 16.6) years, men 46.5%, 88.3% had BP measurement in the last 18 months]. The prevalence of hypertension was (41.6%) and was higher in men and in older individuals. Among individuals with hypertension, 78.7% were diagnosed, 73.1% treated, and 48.3% controlled. Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension were higher in women and in older individuals. Hypertensives had a higher body mass index (BMI) and were more likely to have diabetes, myocardial infarction and stroke, and less likely to smoke than normotensives (all P < 0.001). Among treated hypertensives, 65.1% were on monotherapy, and with increasing number of antihypertensive drugs the BP levels were higher and hypertension control rates lower. The prevalence of hypertension in Greece is high, with considerable potential for improving awareness, treatment, and control. Screening programmes, such as MMM, need to be widely implemented at the population level, together with training programmes for healthcare professionals aiming to optimise management and control.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: An 'optimum' universally agreed exercise programme for heart failure (HF) patients has not been found. ARISTOS-HF randomized clinical trial evaluates whether combined aerobic training (AT)/resistance training (RT)/inspiratory muscle training (IMT) (ARIS) is superior to AT/RT, AT/IMT or AT in improving aerobic capacity, left ventricular dimensions, and secondary functional outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients of New York Heart Association II-III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% were randomized to an ARIS, AT/RT, AT/IMT, or AT group, exercising 3 times/week, 180 min/week for 12 weeks. Pre- and post-training, peakVO2 was evaluated with cardiopulmonary exercise testing, left ventricular dimensions using echocardiography, walking distance with the 6-min walk test (6MWT), quality of life by the Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire (MLwHFQ), while a programme preference survey (PPS) was used. Seventy-four patients of [mean 95% (confidence interval, CI)] age 66.1 (64.3-67.9) years and peakVO2 17.3 (16.4-18.2) mL/kg/min were finally analysed. Between-group analysis showed a trend for increased peakVO2 (mL/kg/min) [mean contrasts (95% CI)] in the ARIS group [ARIS vs. AT/RT 1.71 (0.163-3.25)(.), vs. AT/IMT 1.50 (0.0152-2.99)(.), vs. AT 1.38 (-0.142 to 2.9)(.)], additional benefits in circulatory power (mL/kg/minâ mmHg) [ARIS vs. AT/RT 376 (60.7-690)*, vs. AT/IMT 423 (121-725)*, vs. AT 345 (35.4-656)*], left ventricular end-systolic diameter (mm) [ARIS vs. AT/RT -2.11 (-3.65 to (-0.561))*, vs. AT -2.47 (-4.01 to (-0.929))**], 6MWT (m) [ARIS vs. AT/IMT 45.6 (18.3-72.9)**, vs. AT 55.2 (27.6-82.7)****], MLwHFQ [ARIS vs. AT/RT -7.79 (-11 to (-4.62))****, vs. AT -8.96 (-12.1 to (-5.84))****], and in PPS score [mean (95% CI)] [ARIS, 4.8 (4.7-5) vs. AT, 4.4 (4.2-4.7)*] [(.) P ≤ 0.1; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: ARISTOS-HF trial recommends exercise training for 180 min/week and supports the prescription of the ARIS training regime for HF patients (Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. ARISTOS-HF Clinical Trial number, NCT03013270).
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Resistance Training , Aged , Exercise/physiology , Exercise Tolerance/physiology , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Muscles , Quality of Life , Resistance Training/methods , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
Stress induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy (TC) represents an acute heart failure syndrome triggered by physical or emotional stressors. COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unprecedented health crisis resulting in fear, distress and anxiety, with emerging cardiovascular implications. COVID-19 related stress can act as potential trigger for TC. We present a case of an elderly female who developed TC due to stress surrounding COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Lifestyle changes decrease blood pressure (BP) levels by 3-5 mmHg in hypertensive patients. We assessed the effect of mid-day sleep on BP levels in hypertensive patients. METHODS: We prospectively studied two hundred and twelve hypertensive patients. Mid-day sleep duration, lifestyle habits, anthropometric characteristics, office BP, ambulatory BP monitoring, pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AI) were recorded. A standard echocardiographic evaluation was performed. RESULTS: 53.8% were females, mean age was 62.5±11.0 years and mean body mass index was 28.9±5.4kg/m2. Mean average 24h systolic and diastolic BP (SBP & DBP) was 129.9±13.2/76.7±7.9 mmHg respectively. The majority was non-smokers (70.3%) and did not have diabetes (74.7%). The mean midday sleep duration was 48.7±54.3 min. Average 24h SBP (127.6±12.9 mmHg vs 132.9±13.1 mmHg), average daytime SBP & DBP were lower in patients who sleep at midday, compared to those who do not (128.7±13/76.2±11.5 vs 134.5±13.4/79.5±10.4 mmHg) (p<0.005). The effect was not correlated to the dipping status. Midday sleep duration was negatively correlated with average 24h SBP & daytime SBP. In a linear regression model, for every 60 min of midday sleep, 24h average SBP decreases by 3 mmHg (p<0.001). There were no differences in the number of antihypertensive medications, PWV, AI or echocardiographic indices between study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-day sleep significantly decreases average 24h and daytime SBP/DBP in hypertensives. Its effect seems to be as potent as other well-established lifestyle changes and is independent of dipping status.
Subject(s)
Hypertension , Pulse Wave Analysis , Aged , Blood Pressure , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , SleepABSTRACT
The management of resistant hypertension presents several challenges in everyday clinical practice. During the past few years, several studies have been performed to identify efficient and safe pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for the management of such patients. The Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2) trial demonstrated significant benefits with the use of spinorolactone as a fourth-line drug for the treatment of resistant hypertension over doxazosin and bisoprolol. In addition, recent data support that spironolactone may demonstrate superiority over central acting drugs in such patients, as well. Based on the European guidelines, spironolactone is recommended as the fourth-line drug option, followed by amiloride, other diuretics, doxazosin, bisoprolol or clonidine. Among several device-based approaches, renal sympathetic denervation had fallen into hibernation after the disappointing results of the Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (SYMPLICITY HTN) 3 trial. However, the technique re-emerged at the epicenter of the clinical and research interest after the favorable results of three sham-controlled studies, which facilitated novel catheters and techniques to perform the denervation. Significant results of iliac anastomosis on blood pressure levels have also been demonstrated. Nevertheless, the technique-related adverse events resulted in withdrawal of this interventional approach. Last, the sympatholytic properties of the carotid baroreceptor activation therapy were associated with significant blood pressure reductions in patients with resistant hypertension, which need to be verified in larger controlled trials. Currently device-based approaches are recommended only in the setting of clinical trials until more safety and efficacy data become available.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension/therapy , Bisoprolol/therapeutic use , Catheters , Clinical Trials as Topic , Clonidine/therapeutic use , Denervation , Doxazosin/therapeutic use , Humans , Kidney , Spironolactone/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Angina, Stable , Hypotension , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists , Calcium Channel Blockers , Humans , Nitrates , SyndromeSubject(s)
Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Europe , Humans , Societies, Medical , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the overwhelming evidence and the established benefits of antihypertensive treatment, adherence to treatment remains low. OBJECTIVE: To assess the adherence to treatment with a perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination (SPC), its effectiveness on blood pressure (BP) reduction, as well as the safety and tolerability of this SPC over a 4-month treatment period. METHODS: This multicenter, non-interventional study prospectively included 2285 hypertensive patients on perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine SPC. The data were recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 4 months. RESULTS: Of the 2285 hypertensive patients included in the study, 50.5% were at "high/very high risk". Mean systolic (SBP)/diastolic (DBP) decreased from 162.3 ± 13.3/93.1 ± 9.3 mmHg at baseline to 129.7 ± 8.3/78.6 ± 7.1 mmHg at 4 months (p < 0.001). Patients with higher baseline BP levels showed greater BP reduction. Patients with hypertension stages 1, 2, and 3 showed mean SBP/DBP reductions of 21.5/10.4 mmHg, 34.2/14.7 mmHg, and 51.2/22.5 mmHg, respectively, at study end (p < 0.001). Only 26 patients (1.1%) prematurely discontinued treatment (0.58% due to an adverse reaction or event). CONCLUSIONS: Perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine SPC decreased BP levels rapidly and significantly. The degree of BP reduction was associated with the severity of hypertension and/or with total cardiovascular risk at baseline. Simplifying the drug regimen by using this SPC improved adherence and showed excellent tolerability.
Subject(s)
Amlodipine/administration & dosage , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Hypertension/drug therapy , Indapamide/administration & dosage , Medication Adherence , Perindopril/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Blood Pressure/physiology , Drug Combinations , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Trimetazidine (TMZ) is a metabolic agent with significant anti-ischemic properties. By inhibiting the terminal enzyme in the ß-oxidation pathway, it shifts the energy substrate metabolism, enhancing glucose metabolism. Thus, it maintains the required energy production with less oxygen consumption, an effect necessary in cases of myocardi. Trimetazidine was recently reaccredited as add-on therapy for symptomatic treatment in patients with stable angina, not adequately controlled or intolerant to first-line therapy. Trimetazidine was included in the European Society of Cardioloy 2013 guidelines for the management of stable coronary artery disease. Although TMZ has been used in cardiology for >40 years, only a few studies have assessed its effects in patients with acute ischemic conditions. This review summarizes the current literature regarding the addition of TMZ in patients with acute ischemic conditions (acute myocardial infarction, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting). There is growing evidence from recent studies that the addition of TMZ in patients with such conditions is beneficial in terms of myocardial damage and major cardiac events as well as decreasing reperfusion injury and contrast-induced nephropathy.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Energy Metabolism/drug effects , Glucose/metabolism , Kidney/drug effects , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Myocytes, Cardiac/drug effects , Trimetazidine/therapeutic use , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/metabolism , Acute Kidney Injury/pathology , Animals , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Humans , Kidney/metabolism , Kidney/pathology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/metabolism , Myocardial Reperfusion Injury/pathology , Myocytes, Cardiac/metabolism , Myocytes, Cardiac/pathology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Trimetazidine/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists consist of a class of drugs with pleiotropic beneficial effects in several cardiovascular diseases. However, physicians frequently overlook their use due to the adverse effects of such agents. OBJECTIVES: To determine the adverse effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and to suggest clinically meaningful options. We present data on the two most administered agents of this class: spironolactone and eplerenone. METHOD: We conducted an in-depth review of the existing international literature to draft a mini review about the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists-related side effects. RESULT: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are associated with increased risk of hyperkalemia and acute deterioration of renal function. Of note, these adverse effects are dose-dependent, more common during the initial period of treatment, and are usually reversed after the withdrawal of therapy. Sex-related adverse events are noted mainly in spironolactone while switching to eplerenone could attenuate those. CONCLUSION: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists therapy is significantly limited due to their side effects. The development of novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists could substantially widen the use of such agents.
Subject(s)
Gynecomastia/chemically induced , Hyperkalemia/chemically induced , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Breast Feeding , Female , Humans , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , PregnancyABSTRACT
We compared pulse wave velocity (PWV) between hypertensive patients and control patients to identify demographics and patient characteristics related to PWV. We retrospectively analyzed 9923 participants (3105 controls and 6818 hypertensive patients) from 5 outpatient hypertensive clinics (in Serbia and Greece). Pulse wave velocity had different distribution between controls and hypertensive patients ( P < .001). The magnitude of PWV increase was related to blood pressure (BP) category (from optimal to stage III hypertension; P < .001). Even in hypertensive patients with systolic BP (SBP) <140 and/or diastolic BP (DBP) <90 mm Hg, PWV was greater than in control patients ( P < .001). Pulse wave velocity was associated with almost all baseline characteristics of hypertensive patients (body mass index [BMI], gender, age, SBP, DBP, smoking status, and heart rate; P < .001). This association remained after adjustment of PWV confounders. There were 2231 (32.7%) hypertensive patients who had reached SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP <90 mm Hg. Pulse wave velocity was increased in hypertensive patients, and the degree of PWV increase was associated with baseline BP as well as with anthropometric parameters (eg, BMI, gender, age, heart rate, and smoking status).
Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Body Mass Index , Hypertension/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Balkan Peninsula , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pulse Wave Analysis/methods , Retrospective Studies , Serbia/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of awareness of arterial hypertension on quality of life in hypertensive patients in Greece. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study that included 189 aware hypertensive patients on treatment with antihypertensive therapy. Patients were ambulatory men or women ≥18 years old, with diagnosed essential hypertension. The administration and fulfillment of the questionnaires was given at the outpatient hypertensive clinic starting with the SF-36 and continuing with the BDI-I test. RESULTS: The mean BDI score was 9.9 ± 6.9, and 58, 25, 8.9, and 7.3% were identified as without, with minimal, moderate, and 0.8% with severe depression, respectively. The mean score for physical component summary (PCS-36) was 48.9 ± 7.6, and the mean score for mental component summary (MCS-36) was 46.0 ± 10.6. The stage of hypertension was not an independent predictor for any of the SF-36 dimensions. Dippers had not different levels of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as compared with non-dippers. LV hypertrophy was associated with lower scores on bodily pain (p < 0.05) and kidney failure was associated with lower scores on general health perception (p < 0.05). Female gender, increased age, and the presence of COPD were independently associated with lower physical and mental health scores (p < 0.05). Score on BDI independently correlated with all dimensions of SF-36, indicating that greater depression levels are associated with lower levels of HRQOL. CONCLUSION: The stage as well as awareness of arterial hypertension does not affect physical and mental health. The fact that arterial hypertension per se is not a symptomatic disease may explain these results at least in patients with uncomplicated hypertension.
ABSTRACT
Preeclampsia has been linked to high morbidity and mortality during pregnancy. However, no efficient pharmacological options for the prevention of this condition are currently available. Preeclampsia is thought to share several pathophysiologic mechanisms with cardiovascular disease, which has led to investigations for the potential role of statins (HMG CoA reductase inhibitors) in its prevention and early management. Pravastatin seems to have a safer pharmacokinetic profile compared to other statins, however, the existing preclinical evidence for its effectiveness in preeclampsia treatment has been mostly restricted to animal models. This review aims to summarize the current data and delineate the potential future role of statins in the prevention and management of preeclampsia.