Role of sleep in neurodegeneration: the consensus report of the 5th Think Tank World Sleep Forum.

Sleep abnormalities may represent an independent risk factor for neurodegeneration. An international expert group convened in 2021 to discuss the state-of-the-science in this domain. The present article summarizes the presentations and discussions concerning the importance of a strategy for studying sleep- and circadian-related interventions for early detection and prevention of neurodegenerative diseases. An international expert group considered the current state of knowledge based on the most relevant publications in the previous 5 years; discussed the current challenges in the field of relationships among sleep, sleep disorders, and neurodegeneration; and identified future priorities. Sleep efficiency and slow wave activity during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep are decreased in cognitively normal middle-aged and older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. Sleep deprivation increases amyloid-ß (Aß) concentrations in the interstitial fluid of experimental animal models and in cerebrospinal fluid in humans, while increased sleep decreases Aß. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for dementia. Studies indicate that positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment should be started in patients with mild cognitive impairment or AD and comorbid OSA. Identification of other measures of nocturnal hypoxia and sleep fragmentation could better clarify the role of OSA as a risk factor for neurodegeneration. Concerning REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), it will be crucial to identify the subset of RBD patients who will convert to a specific neurodegenerative disorder. Circadian sleep-wake rhythm disorders (CSWRD) are strong predictors of caregiver stress and institutionalization, but the absence of recommendations or consensus statements must be considered. Future priorities include to develop and validate existing and novel comprehensive assessments of CSWRD in patients with/at risk for dementia. Strategies for studying sleep-circadian-related interventions for early detection/prevention of neurodegenerative diseases are required. CSWRD evaluation may help to identify additional biomarkers for phenotyping and personalizing treatment of neurodegeneration.

A strategic neurological research agenda for Europe: Towards clinically relevant and patient-centred neurological research priorities.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neurological disorders constitute a significant portion of the global disease burden, affecting >30% of the world's population. This prevalence poses a substantial threat to global health in the foreseeable future. A lack of awareness regarding this high burden of neurological diseases has led to their underrecognition, underappreciation, and insufficient funding. Establishing a strategic and comprehensive research agenda for brain-related studies is a crucial step towards aligning research objectives among all pertinent stakeholders and fostering greater societal awareness. METHODS: A scoping literature review was undertaken by a working group from the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) to identify any existing research agendas relevant to neurology. Additionally, a specialized survey was conducted among all EAN scientific panels, including neurologists and patients, inquiring about their perspectives on the current research priorities and gaps in neurology. RESULTS: The review revealed the absence of a unified, overarching brain research agenda. Existing research agendas predominantly focus on specialized topics within neurology, resulting in an imbalance in the number of agendas across subspecialties. The survey indicated a prioritization of neurological disorders and research gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Building upon the findings from the review and survey, key components for a strategic and comprehensive neurological research agenda in Europe were delineated. This research agenda serves as a valuable prioritization tool for neuroscientific researchers, as well as for clinicians, donors, and funding agencies in the field of neurology. It offers essential guidance for creating a roadmap for research and clinical advancement, ultimately leading to heightened awareness and reduced burden of neurological disorders.

Narcolepsy type 1 and Sydenham chorea - Report of 3 cases and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, low levels of hypocretin-1 in the cerebrospinal fluid, and a strong association with the HLA DQB1*06:02 allele. There is evidence for streptococcal infections as one pathogenic factor that may lead to NT1 as part of a multifactorial pathogenesis. Elevated titers of Antistreptolysin-O antibodies and increased inflammatory activity in response to streptococci antigens have been described in patients with NT1. Sydenham chorea (SC) results from a post-streptococcal autoimmune process targeting basal ganglia neurons. Despite this common trigger, SC has been interpreted as a misdiagnosis in a few described cases of patients who were first diagnosed with SC and later with NT1. Our goal was to analyze the association between SC and NT1. PATIENTS/METHODS: We reviewed the literature and report three patients from three European sleep centers who were diagnosed with both SC and NT1 within a few months. RESULTS: We describe the cases of one male (age 10) and two female (age 22 and 10) patients. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that in those cases both diagnoses are justified, unlike reports of previous cases in which SC was considered a misdiagnosis in patients with NT1. It remains, however, unclear if the conditions occur independently or if there is an overlap disorder- an SC-like subtype of narcolepsy with a particular sequence of symptoms. Further studies need to clarify the causality of the relationship and the pathophysiology of the reported rare association.

Pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays to deal with tolerance to modafinil in patients with narcolepsy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Modafinil is a common treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in narcolepsy. The long-term use of modafinil can lead to tolerance with the loss of efficacy and the continuous increase of its dose. Pharmacological strategies to deal with the tolerance to modafinil are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays in patients with tolerance to modafinil. METHODS: Narcolepsy patients on monotherapy with modafinil who developed symptoms of tolerance were eligible. The following alternating therapy regimen was established: Monday to Friday patients continued on modafinil whereas Saturday and Sunday they switched to pitolisant to "bridge" the EDS symptoms. Patients were assessed at baseline and after three months with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Ullanlinna Narcolepsy Scale (UNS). Health-related quality of life (HrQol) was evaluated by EuroQol5D. Adverse events were documented in the patients' diaries. RESULTS: 41 patients aged 30.9 ± 5.6 years were included. After three months of the alternating therapy regimen, the symptoms of tolerance decreased and the modafinil dose could be reduced by 41% (p < 0.01) resulting in better safety. The EDS improved on ESS (baseline: 18.2 ± 4.2, follow-up: 12.6 ± 4.0, p < 0.0001) and UNS (baseline: 25.8 ± 7.9, follow-up: 18.9 ± 5.9, p < 0.0001). The HrQol increased significantly. CONCLUSION: Patients with tolerance to modafinil could benefit from pitolisant-supported bridging during drug holidays. This alternating pharmacological strategy proved to be safe and helped to reduce EDS and to decrease the modafinil dose. Further randomized controlled studies are required to evaluate the different strategies to deal with the tolerance to modafinil. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier NCT05321355.

Complementary and alternative medicine use in narcolepsy.

BACKGROUND: Management of narcolepsy includes behavior strategies and symptomatic pharmacological treatment. In the general population, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common in Europe (30%), also in chronic neurological disorders (10-20%). The aim of our study was to evaluate frequency and characteristics of CAM use in German narcolepsy patients. METHODS: Demographic, disease-related data frequency and impact of CAM use were assessed in an online survey. Commonly used CAM treatments were predetermined in a questionnaire based on the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine and included the domains: (1) alternative medical systems; (2) biologically based therapies; (3) energy therapies; (4) mind-body interventions, and (5) manipulative and body-based therapies. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 254 questionnaires. Fifteen percent of participants were at the time of survey administration using CAM for narcolepsy, and an additional 18% of participants reported past use. Among the 33% of CAM users, vitamins/trace elements (54%), homoeopathy (48%) and meditation (39%) were used most frequently. 54% of the users described CAM as helpful. CAM users more frequently described having side effects from their previous medication (p = 0.001), and stated more frequently not to comply with pharmacological treatment than non-CAM users (21% vs. 8%; p = 0.024). DISCUSSION: The use of CAM in narcolepsy patients is common. Our results indicate that many patients still feel the need to improve their symptoms, sleepiness and psychological well-being in particular. Frequent medication change, the experience of adverse events and low adherence to physician-recommended medication appears more frequent in CAM users. The impact of CAM however seems to be limited.

Solriamfetol real world experience study (SURWEY): Initiation, titration, safety, effectiveness, and experience during follow-up for patients with narcolepsy from Germany.

BACKGROUND: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a core narcolepsy symptom, for which solriamfetol (Sunosi®) was recently approved in the European Union. SURWEY characterises real-world strategies used by physicians when initiating solriamfetol, and patient outcomes after follow-up. METHODS: SURWEY is an ongoing retrospective chart review conducted by physicians in Germany/France/Italy. Here, data are reported from 70 German patients with EDS and narcolepsy. Eligibility included age ≥18 years, reached a stable solriamfetol dose, and completed ≥6 weeks of treatment. Patients were classified (based on existing EDS treatment) into changeover, add-on, or new-to-therapy subgroups. RESULTS: Patients' mean ± SD age was 36.9 ± 13.9 years. Changeover from prior EDS medication was the most common initiation strategy. Initial solriamfetol dose was typically 75 mg/day (69%). In 30 patients (43%), solriamfetol was titrated; 27/30 (90%) completed titration as prescribed, most within 7 days. Mean ± SD Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was 17.6 ± 3.1 at initiation (n = 61) and 13.6 ± 3.8 at follow-up (n = 51). Slight/strong improvements in EDS were perceived for >90% of patients (patient and physician report). Sixty-two percent reported an effect duration of 6 to <10 h; 72% reported no change in perceived nighttime sleep quality. Common adverse events included headache (9%), decreased appetite (6%), and insomnia (6%); no cardiovascular events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients in this study were switched from a prior EDS medication to solriamfetol. Solriamfetol was typically initiated at 75 mg/day; titration was common. ESS scores improved after initiation, and most patients perceived improvement in EDS. Common adverse events were consistent with those reported in clinical trials. GOV REGISTRATION: N/A.

Real-world treatment of pediatric narcolepsy with pitolisant: A retrospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: First symptoms of narcolepsy mostly present during childhood. Pharmacological management options in children are limited, also due to approval status. Pitolisant is an inverse histamine 3 receptor agonist and has been approved for the treatment of adult narcolepsy with or without cataplexy by EMA and FDA. Clinical experience indicates for a beneficial use also in children and adolescents. Our goal was to evaluate the effects and tolerability of pitolisant in narcolepsy children/adolescents in a real-world setting. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective observational study included 55 patients with narcolepsy from three international narcolepsy centers (Germany, France and Italy) who were treated with pitolisant. Patients were eligible if they were at least 6 years old and diagnosed with narcolepsy type 1 or 2. Demographic and clinical characteristics, questionnaires, sleep medicine and laboratory data were collected. RESULTS: 55 children/adolescents (25 girls, 45.45%, 30 boys, 54.55%) aged 6-18 years, with narcolepsy (type 1 = 92.7%, type 2 = 7.3%), were treated with pitolisant. The mean pitolisant dose was 34.1 mg/d. Treatment was effective for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy: the pediatric Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score decreased from 19 to 13.5 (p < 0.001) and the weekly cataplexy frequency improved from 7.9 at baseline to 5.2 (p < 0.001). Treatment with pitolisant was well tolerated. Side effects were mild and mostly short-term. Insomnia was reported most frequently (5.5%). CONCLUSION: First real-world results suggest that pitolisant treatment is effective in improving EDS and cataplexy in children with narcolepsy, and also is well tolerated.

Narcolepsy: a model interaction between immune system, nervous system, and sleep-wake regulation.

Narcolepsy is a rare chronic neurological disorder characterized by an irresistible excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. The disease is considered to be the result of the selective disruption of neuronal cells in the lateral hypothalamus expressing the neuropeptide hypocretin, which controls the sleep-wake cycle. Diagnosis and management of narcolepsy represent still a substantial medical challenge due to the large heterogeneity in the clinical manifestation of the disease as well as to the lack of understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. However, significant advances have been made in the last years, thus opening new perspective in the field. This review describes the current knowledge of clinical presentation and pathology of narcolepsy as well as the existing diagnostic criteria and therapeutic intervention for the disease management. Recent evidence on the potential immune-mediated mechanisms that may underpin the disease establishment and progression are also highlighted.

Prevalence, incidence, and health care utilization of patients with narcolepsy: a population-representative study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Previous estimated prevalence of narcolepsy in Europe was 47 patients per 100,000 persons, with a yearly incidence of 0.64-1.37 per 100,000. However, analyses of representative datasets from large cohorts are limited. This study aimed to estimate the population-based diagnostic prevalence and incidence of narcolepsy in Germany and to describe these patients and their health care resource utilization. METHODS: This study used the InGef research database, an anonymized representative dataset of 4 million persons covered by statutory health insurance in Germany. Patients with confirmed narcolepsy diagnoses in 2018 were included. Mid-p-exact tests were used to calculate 95% confidence intervals. Patients with narcolepsy diagnoses and narcolepsy-targeting therapy in 2014-2018 were included to describe health care resource utilization in the year prior to diagnosis. RESULTS: In 2018, diagnostic prevalence was estimated as 17.88 (95% confidence interval 16.45-19.40) and 12-month incidence as 0.79 (0.52-1.15) per 100,000 persons. Forty-six percent of patients were in psycho-behavioral therapeutic treatment and 61% of employees had sick leave days. One in three patients was hospitalized for any cause; 28% received antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic prevalence was lower, but incidence was consistent with previous reports, although previous estimates may diverge in terms of age/sex distributions. Patients showed a substantial utilization of health care resources, including sick leave and hospitalization. Almost half the patients underwent psycho-behavioral treatment in the year prior to diagnosis, which might indicate a high burden of psychiatric symptoms. The increased use of antibiotics could indicate more frequent infections than in the general population. CITATION: Kallweit U, Nilius G, Trümper D, Vogelmann T, Schubert T. Prevalence, incidence, and health care utilization of patients with narcolepsy: a population-representative study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(6):1531-1537.

European guideline and expert statements on the management of narcolepsy in adults and children.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Narcolepsy is an uncommon hypothalamic disorder of presumed autoimmune origin that usually requires lifelong treatment. This paper aims to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of narcolepsy in both adults and children. METHODS: The European Academy of Neurology (EAN), European Sleep Research Society (ESRS), and European Narcolepsy Network (EU-NN) nominated a task force of 18 narcolepsy specialists. According to the EAN recommendations, 10 relevant clinical questions were formulated in PICO format. Following a systematic review of the literature (performed in Fall 2018 and updated in July 2020) recommendations were developed according to the GRADE approach. RESULTS: A total of 10,247 references were evaluated, 308 studies were assessed and 155 finally included. The main recommendations can be summarized as follows: (i) excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in adults-scheduled naps, modafinil, pitolisant, sodium oxybate (SXB), solriamfetol (all strong); methylphenidate, amphetamine derivatives (both weak); (ii) cataplexy in adults-SXB, venlafaxine, clomipramine (all strong) and pitolisant (weak); (iii) EDS in children-scheduled naps, SXB (both strong), modafinil, methylphenidate, pitolisant, amphetamine derivatives (all weak); (iv) cataplexy in children-SXB (strong), antidepressants (weak). Treatment choices should be tailored to each patient's symptoms, comorbidities, tolerance and risk of potential drug interactions. CONCLUSION: The management of narcolepsy involves non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches with an increasing number of symptomatic treatment options for adults and children that have been studied in some detail.

European guideline and expert statements on the management of narcolepsy in adults and children.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Narcolepsy is an uncommon hypothalamic disorder of presumed autoimmune origin that usually requires lifelong treatment. This paper aims to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of narcolepsy in both adults and children. METHODS: The European Academy of Neurology (EAN), European Sleep Research Society (ESRS) and European Narcolepsy Network (EU-NN) nominated a task force of 18 narcolepsy specialists. According to the EAN recommendations, 10 relevant clinical questions were formulated in PICO format. Following a systematic review of the literature (performed in Fall 2018 and updated in July 2020) recommendations were developed according to the GRADE approach. RESULTS: A total of 10,247 references were evaluated, 308 studies were assessed and 155 finally included. The main recommendations can be summarized as follows: (i) excessive daytime sleepiness in adults-scheduled naps, modafinil, pitolisant, sodium oxybate (SXB), solriamfetol (all strong), methylphenidate, amphetamine derivates (both weak); (ii) cataplexy in adults-SXB, venlafaxine, clomipramine (all strong) and pitolisant (weak); (iii) excessive daytime sleepiness in children-scheduled naps, SXB (both strong), modafinil, methylphenidate, pitolisant, amphetamine derivates (all weak); (iv) cataplexy in children-SXB (strong), antidepressants (weak). Treatment choices should be tailored to each patient's symptoms, comorbidities, tolerance and risk of potential drug interactions. CONCLUSION: The management of narcolepsy involves non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches with an increasing number of symptomatic treatment options for adults and children that have been studied in some detail.

Awakening to sleep disorders in Europe: Survey on education, knowledge and treatment competence of European residents and neurologists.

OBJECTIVES: Sleep-wake disorders are common in the general population and in most neurological disorders but are often poorly recognized. With the hypothesis that neurologists do not get sufficient training during their residency, the Young European Sleep Neurologist Association (YESNA) of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) performed a survey on postgraduate sleep education. METHODS: A 16-item questionnaire was developed and distributed among neurologists and residents across European countries. Questions assessed demographic, training and learning preferences in sleep disorders, as well as a self-evaluation of knowledge based on five basic multiple-choice questions (MCQs) on sleep-wake disorders. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 568 participants from 20 European countries. The mean age of participants was 31.9 years (SD 7.4 years) and was composed mostly of residents (73%). Three-quarters of the participants reported undergraduate training in sleep medicine, while fewer than 60% did not receive any training on sleep disorders during their residencies. Almost half of the participants (45%) did not feel prepared to treat neurological patients with sleep problems. Only one-third of the participants correctly answered at least three MCQs. Notably, 80% of participants favoured more education on sleep-wake disorders during the neurology residency. CONCLUSIONS: Education and knowledge on disorders in European neurological residents is generally insufficient, despite a strong interest in the topic. The results of our study may be useful for improving the European neurology curriculum and other postgraduate educational programmes.

Insomnia in neurological diseases.

Insomnia is defined as difficulties of initiating and maintaining sleep, early awakening and poor subjective sleep quality despite adequate opportunity and circumstances for sleep with impairment of daytime performance. These components of insomnia - namely persistent sleep difficulties despite of adequate sleep opportunity resulting in daytime dysfunction - appear secondary or co-morbid to neurological diseases. Comorbid insomnia originates from neurodegenerative, inflammatory, traumatic or ischemic changes in sleep regulating brainstem and hypothalamic nuclei with consecutive changes of neurotransmitters. Symptoms of neurological disorders (i.e motor deficits), co-morbidities (i.e. pain, depression, anxiety) and some disease-specific pharmaceuticals may cause insomnia and/or other sleep problems.This guideline focuses on insomnias in headaches, neurodegenerative movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, epilepsies, stroke, neuromuscular disease and dementia.The most important new recommendations are: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBTi) is recommended to treat acute and chronic insomnia in headache patients. Insomnia is one of the most frequent sleep complaints in neurodegenerative movement disorders. Patients may benefit from CBTi, antidepressants (trazodone, doxepin), melatonin and gaba-agonists. Insomnia is a frequent precursor of MS symptoms by up to 10 years. CBTi is recommended in patients with MS, traumatic brain injury and. Melatonin may improve insomnia symptoms in children with epilepsies. Patients with insomnia after stroke can be treated with benzodiazepine receptor agonists and sedating antidepressants. For patients with dementia suffering from insomnia trazodone, light therapy and physical exercise are recommended.

Efficacy of pitolisant in patients with high burden of narcolepsy symptoms: pooled analysis of short-term, placebo-controlled studies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of pitolisant, a histamine 3 (H3)-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, in adult patients with high burden of narcolepsy symptoms. METHODS: Data were pooled from two randomized, placebo-controlled, 7- or 8-week studies of pitolisant (titrated to a potential maximum dose of 35.6 mg/day) in adults with narcolepsy. Analyses included three independent patient subgroups: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) baseline score ≥16, Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) sleep latency ≤8 min, and ≥15 cataplexy attacks per week. RESULTS: The analysis populations included 118 patients for ESS (pitolisant, n = 60; placebo, n = 58), 105 for MWT (pitolisant, n = 59; placebo, n = 46), and 31 for cataplexy (pitolisant, n = 20; placebo, n = 11). On the ESS, least-squares mean change from baseline was significantly greater for pitolisant (-6.1) compared with placebo (-2.3; P < 0.001). Significantly more pitolisant-treated patients were classified as treatment responders: ESS score reduction ≥3, 69.0% in the pitolisant group versus 35.1% in the placebo group (P = 0.001); final ESS score ≤10, 36.2% versus 10.5%, respectively (P = 0.005). On the MWT, mean sleep latency increased from 3.5 min to 10.4 min with pitolisant and from 3.4 min to 6.8 min with placebo (P = 0.017). Least-squares mean change in the weekly rate of cataplexy was significantly greater for pitolisant (-14.5; baseline, 23.9; final, 9.4) compared with placebo (-0.1; baseline, 23.1; final, 23.0; P = 0.004). Headache was the most common adverse event with pitolisant. CONCLUSIONS: Pitolisant, at once-daily doses up to 35.6 mg, was efficacious for reducing excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy in patients with severe narcolepsy symptom burden.

[Narcolepsy in adults: Definition, etiology and treatment]. / Narkolepsie im Erwachsenenalter: Definition, Ätiologie und Behandlung.

Narcolepsy is a hypersomnolence disorder of central origin that presents with a disturbance of the wake-sleep regulation. Lead symptoms consist of excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. Nowadays, two types of narcolepsy are distinguished. Type 1 narcolepsy, formerly known as narcolepsy with cataplexy, is based on hypocretin deficiency. The cause of type 2 narcolepsy, formerly known as narcolepsy without cataplexy, remains mainly unknown. A multimodal approach is necessary for diagnosis. The mean latency between the onset of disease and diagnosis in Europe ranges 14 years. Narcolepsy has a major impact on workability and quality of life. The management of narcolepsy is usually life-long and includes non-pharmacological approaches and a symptomatic pharmacological treatment.