Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 134: 1-6, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36758903

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Various assay methods have been developed to study antimicrobial activity based on contamination of surfaces with different amounts of liquid bacterial suspensions. Since surfaces with frequent hand contact are typically touched in a dry state in clinical settings, these tests may be inappropriate at assessing effectiveness to reduce pathogen transmission. AIM: To investigate a surface previously confirmed to display antimicrobial activity even after drying of small volumes of bacterial suspension (Egger antimicrobial surfaces: EAS) under conditions modelling dry contamination using a touch-transfer method. METHODS: EAS, an antimicrobial copper alloy, as well as a negative control were examined to assess interlaboratory test reproducibility. FINDINGS: Significantly fewer bacteria on EAS after touch transfer and some differences in the touch transmission were detected between the two laboratories. However, an identical assessment of effectiveness for EAS came from both laboratories. Interestingly, despite previously detected antimicrobial efficacy of EAS and the antimicrobial copper alloy after liquid contamination, insufficient activity was observed under dry conditions during a contact time of 4 h by both laboratories. Experiments under standardized air humidity in one laboratory revealed at least for copper a strong influence of humidity on antimicrobial activity. These data indicate that procedures involving contamination of surfaces with organisms suspended in liquids are not directly comparable to dry contamination. CONCLUSION: Since, in the real world of a hospital, organisms are typically transferred between dry surfaces, further standardization of the touch-transfer method is worthwhile for a better understanding of the efficacy of such surfaces.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Touch , Humans , Copper/pharmacology , Reproducibility of Results , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria , Alloys/pharmacology
3.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 24(10): 1101.e1-1101.e6, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29408276

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Several outbreaks of severe infections due to contamination of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes, mainly duodenoscopes, have been described. The rate of microbial endoscope contamination varies dramatically in literature. The aim of this multicentre prospective study was to evaluate the hygiene quality of endoscopes and automated endoscope reprocessors (AERs) in Tyrol/Austria. METHODS: In 2015 and 2016, a total of 463 GI endoscopes and 105 AERs from 29 endoscopy centres were analysed by a routine (R) and a combined routine and advanced (CRA) sampling procedure and investigated for microbial contamination by culture-based and molecular-based analyses. RESULTS: The contamination rate of GI endoscopes was 1.3%-4.6% according to the national guideline, suggesting that 1.3-4.6 patients out of 100 could have had contacts with hygiene-relevant microorganisms through an endoscopic intervention. Comparison of R and CRA sampling showed 1.8% of R versus 4.6% of CRA failing the acceptance criteria in phase I and 1.3% of R versus 3.0% of CRA samples failing in phase II. The most commonly identified indicator organism was Pseudomonas spp., mainly Pseudomonas oleovorans. None of the tested viruses were detected in 40 samples. While AERs in phase I failed (n = 9, 17.6%) mainly due to technical faults, phase II revealed lapses (n = 6, 11.5%) only on account of microbial contamination of the last rinsing water, mainly with Pseudomonas spp. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study the contamination rate of endoscopes was low compared with results from other European countries, possibly due to the high quality of endoscope reprocessing, drying and storage.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/microbiology , Decontamination/methods , Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal/microbiology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Austria , Europe , Humans , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas/growth & development
4.
Med Mycol ; 47(4): 398-405, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19085459

ABSTRACT

This study aims to determine the occurrence of Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium species in natural and human-dominated environments. Habitats (136 sampling sites) in a transect with increasing human impact were investigated (natural areas, agricultural soils, urban playgrounds, industrial areas). Physico-chemical parameters were measured to characterize the different areas included in this investigation. Fungal identification was performed by morphology and sequence data analysis. Comparative description of virulence was largely based on the database of the ECMM/ISHAM Working Group on Pseudallescheria/Scedosporium Infections. Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium species were most abundant in industrial areas, followed by urban playgrounds and agricultural areas. None of the species were isolated from natural habitats. The abundance of Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium species could be correlated with increasing nitrogen concentrations (P<0.01) and decreasing pH (P<0.05) within a pH range of 6.1-7.5. In general, frequency of the different Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium species in the environment is strongly enhanced by human activities, and largely differs from species distribution in clinical settings, suggesting that these species have different degrees of virulence. Pseudallescheria boydii is relatively frequently found as agent of human disease, while Scedosporium dehoogii is found almost exclusively in the environment. Scedosporium apiospermum is responsible for the majority of infections and is found at comparable frequency in the environment; S. aurantiacum and P. minutispora showed similar spectra, but at much lower frequencies.


Subject(s)
Biodiversity , Ecology , Environmental Microbiology , Mycoses/microbiology , Pseudallescheria/isolation & purification , Scedosporium/isolation & purification , DNA, Fungal/chemistry , DNA, Fungal/genetics , Humans , Microscopy , Pseudallescheria/cytology , Pseudallescheria/genetics , Scedosporium/cytology , Scedosporium/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL