The role of a trauma review system and development of intra-operative checklists in improving the quality of fracture fixations in a high volume tertiary centre.

INTRODUCTION: In high volume centres, audits are essential to ensure good surgical techniques and fracture fixations to avoid complications, revision surgeries and poor outcomes. A method to assess fixations for fractures of different regions employing different implants and surgical demands is a challenge. We present here a simple method of review and follow-up work flow of more than 6000 fixations every year that helped in improving outcomes and also provide training for residents and junior staff. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of 6348 fracture fixations in 2014, led to a trauma review system in January 2015 to classify all fracture fixations by senior consultants into three categories: category A (good fixations); category B (acceptable fixations; need further follow-up); category C (poor/unacceptable fixations needing revision) combined with a teaching program. A strategy was evolved that included the following practices: (1) identifying 'red flag' fractures that led to frequent failures, (2) routine senior surgeons' involvement in such fractures, (3) evolving 'intra-operative checklists', (4) requirement of senior surgeons' intervention if there was a 'fiddle time' of more than 20 min, and (5) approval of post-fixation c-arm image by a senior person before closure. The impact of these rules on the fixations for 2015, 2016 and 2017 were prospectively analysed. RESULTS: In the years 2015, 2016 and 2017 the number of fracture fixations performed were 6579, 6978 and 7012, respectively. There was a significant increase (p < 0.001) in the number of category A fixations (87.7%, 94.6% and 96.3% in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively) and also a decrease in the number of category C fixations (2.23%, 0.7% and 0.2% in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively). The quality of fixations of the 'red flag' fractures also improved. CONCLUSION: We present here a very effective, tested, simple and easily reproducible method of audit and follow-up work flow that can be used in all high turnover trauma centres to improve outcomes and can also serve as a teaching resource for junior staff. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

A surgical algorithm for the management of recalcitrant distal femur nonunions based on distal femoral bone stock, fracture alignment, medial void, and stability of fixation.

BACKGROUND: Recalcitrant distal femur nonunions (RDFN) are a challenge in management due to factors including poor bone stock, multiple surgeries, metaphyseal bone loss, and joint contractures. There are no specific guidelines in the management of cases of RDFN. Based on our experience, we devised an algorithm and we present the results of 62 cases of RDFN managed following it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our algorithm was formulated after analyzing 34 cases of RDFN and it involved four factors which were hypothesized to influence outcomes namely: distal femoral bone stock, extent of medial void, alignment of the fracture, and stability of fixation. Each factor was addressed specifically to achieve a good outcome. Between 2012 and 2015, 62 patients with RDFN at a mean age of 47.4 years (26-73) and 2.3 prior surgeries (2-6) were managed following the algorithm. INTERVENTION: 58 patients required revision osteosynthesis to improve alignment and achieve a stable fixation. 4 elderly patients with poor bone stock were managed with arthroplasty. Extent of medial void was found to significantly influence surgical decision making. Five patients without medial void required only cancellous autograft bone grafting, 47 patients with < 2 cm void were treated with an allograft fibular strut inserted in the metaphysis and 6 patients with a void > 2 cm were managed with medial plating. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: 57 patients treated with osteosynthesis achieved union at an average of 7.4 months (6-11) and the 4 patients managed with arthroplasty also had a favourable outcome. One patient who was managed with revision osteosynthesis had a nonunion with an implant failure and needed an arthroplasty procedure. The average LEFS (lower extremity functional score) of all our patients was 67 (51-76) at an average follow-up of 18.2 months (12-33). CONCLUSION: Our stepwise surgical algorithm would help surgeons to identify the factors that need to be addressed and guide them towards the interventions that are necessary to achieve a successful outcome while managing cases of RDFN. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. LEVEL OF CLINICAL CARE: Level I Tertiary trauma centre.

Variation in practice preferences in management of open injuries of extremities-an international survey by SICOT research academy.

PURPOSE: Open fractures are challenging injuries and there is a lot of variation in practice preferences which may reflect the wide variations in outcome in different units across the world. A survey was done amongst the international community of SICOT membership to document the practice preferences and variations. METHODS: An online questionnaire containing 23 questions which were sub-divided into three sections covering the various aspects of open injury management was sent by email to orthopaedic trauma surgeons across the world. A total of 358 responses were evaluated and presented in this manuscript. RESULTS: The SICOT study confirmed wide variation in practice protocols. About 94.7 % of orthopaedic surgeons around the world use the Gustillo Anderson scoring system for assessment of open injury and 50.6 % of surgeons prefer lavage in operation theatre. For lavage, 84.6 % of surgeons preferred normal saline and for antibiotic prophylaxis, 48.3 % used a combination of second generation cephalosporin, metronidazole and an aminoglycoside for a minimum of three to five days. In 88 % of patients, orthopaedic surgeons performed the initial debridement and 69.2 % surgeons aimed for debridement within six hours. Regarding wound management, 43.9 % units preferred and were capable of soft tissue cover within 72 hours and about 26.3 % surgeons combined definitive fixation along with plastic procedure. CONCLUSION: Our study documented wide variations in practice preferences across the world and showed that information and awareness about current guidelines and practices will help many to update themselves in terms of basic questions about open fracture care.