ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The care of distal periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) is becoming a major interdisciplinary challenge due to demographic developments. The operative treatment is often performed (depending on the type of fracture) by means of locking plate fixation (LPF), although little data on the clinical outcome exist by now. The aim of the study is to identify risk factors for a poor outcome and increased mortality METHODS: In this retrospective study, 36 cases with distal PFF were examined. Exclusively treatment with LPF were included. Relevant previous illnesses (ASA score, Charlson index), fracture morphology and major complications were recorded as well as 1- and 3- year mortality. The clinical outcome was detected by using the Lysholm score. RESULTS: The 1- and 3- year mortality were 9% and 26% - exclusively affecting ASA 3 and 4 patients. The Lysholm Score showed a high variability (65⯱ 27 points) with higher values in the ASA 1-2 subgroup (82 vs. 63 points) but independent of fracture type. The preoperative ASA score, the Charlson comorbidity index, and the patient age were determined to be decisive for 3-year mortality. CONCLUSION: This case series displayed a high absolute mortality even if the rate was slightly lower compared to previously published data. The rate of secondary dislocations, lack of fracture healing or follow-up operations were also low. The LPF therefore appears to be a suitable treatment for fractures with a stable prosthesis. However, there is a high variability in the clinical outcome regardless of the type of fracture and significantly increased mortality rates in previously ill patients.
Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures , Periprosthetic Fractures , Bone Plates , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fracture Healing , Humans , Periprosthetic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The differential diagnoses of osteoporosis in geriatric and trauma patients are very important as they may induce different therapies. On average approximately 20% of women and 50% of men have secondary causes of osteoporosis. The foundation of the diagnostics is a basic osteological laboratory investigation with which the most important secondary causes can be identified. From a geriatric and traumatological point of view vitamin D deficiency with secondary hyperparathyroidism, primary hyperparathyroidism, male hypogonadism, multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of unclear significance (MGUS) are of particular importance.
Subject(s)
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/complications , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Geriatrics , Humans , Male , Vitamin D Deficiency/bloodABSTRACT
Serial fractures of metatarsal bones are rare and usually caused by direct or indirect high-energy trauma; however, in cases of pre-existing diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, they also can occur spontaneously or as insidious fractures. Due to the substantial soft tissue swelling mostly associated with such injuries, minimally invasive osteosynthesis with intramedullary Kirschner-wires (Kwires) is recommended. The antegrade technique for placement of the Kwires is preferred as the technically simpler retrograde procedure has several significant disadvantages. The preferred operative approach is described in detail exemplified by two clinical cases.
Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Fractures, Bone , Metatarsal Bones , Bone Wires , Fracture Fixation, Internal , HumansABSTRACT
The present review gives a summary of recent epidemiological data on osteoporosis and the state of the quality of care especially regarding older adults. The results show that three quarters of all patients with vertebral and peripheral fractures are older than 65 years. Regarding hip fractures three out of four patients are older than 70 years. The association between age and fractures results as a direct consequence of the practically invariably present underlying osteoporosis and frequent falls in older adults.In Germany the prevalence of osteoporosis among women aged over 50 years is given as 24% and among men as 6%. In contrast to men where the incidence continues to rise, there is a small decrease of the incidence of hip fractures among women. Despite this decrease an enormous increase in both sexes is expected caused by the ongoing demographic changes with substantial socioeconomic consequences.Despite this development, the treatment rates of patients with osteoporosis or fragility fractures have remained low for many years. In contrast, national and international studies have shown that the rate of subsequent fractures could be reduced by up to 50% by using various measures to improve osteoporosis care, such as a fracture liaison service, providing adherence is maintained by the patients.
Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Quality of Health Care , Aged , Female , Germany , Hip Fractures/psychology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multi-drug-resistant bacteria (e.g. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, extended-spectrum betalactamase or carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae) are emerging in early-onset infections. So far, there is no report describing the eradication of these bacteria in a osseous infection of an open proximal tibial fracture in combination with the hexapod technology to address both osseous consolidation and closed drop foot correction. CASE PRESENTATION: After sustaining a proximal tibial fracture (Gustilo 3B), a 41-year-old man was primarily treated with open reduction and internal fixation by a locking plate and split-thickness skin graft in the home country. At the time of admission to our hospital there was a significant anterolateral soft tissue defect covered with an already-necrotic split-thickness graft and suspicious secretion. CAT and MRI scans revealed no signs of osseous healing, intramedullary distinctive osteomyelitis, as well as a large abscess zone in the dorsal compartment. Multiple wound smears showed multi-drug-resistant bacteria: Acinetobacter baumannii (Carbapenem resistant) as well as Enterobacter cloacae complex (AmpC overexpression). After implant removal, excessive osseous and intramedullary debridements using the Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA®) as well as initial negative pressure wound therapy were performed. Colistin hand-modelled chains and sticks were applied topically as well as an adjusted systemic antibiotic scheme was applied. After repetitive surgical interventions, the smears showed bacterial eradication and the patient underwent soft tissue reconstruction with a free vascularized latissimus dorsi muscle flap. External fixation was converted to a hexapod fixator (TSF®) to correct primary varus displacement, axial assignment and secure osseous healing. A second ring was mounted to address the fixed drop foot in a closed fashion without further intervention. At final follow-up, 12 months after trauma, the patient showed good functional recovery with osseous healing, intact soft tissue with satisfactory cosmetics and no signs of reinfection. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach with orthopaedic surgeons for debridement, planning and establishing osseous and joint correction and consolidation, plastic surgeons for microvascular muscle flaps for soft tissue defect coverage as well as clinical microbiologists for the optimized anti-infective treatment is essential in these challenging rare cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections , Enterobacteriaceae Infections , Peroneal Neuropathies/therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Tibial Fractures/therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/etiology , Acinetobacter Infections/therapy , Acinetobacter baumannii , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Debridement/methods , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Enterobacter cloacae , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/etiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/therapy , External Fixators , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Humans , Internal Fixators , Male , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Open Fracture Reduction/adverse effects , Open Fracture Reduction/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgical FlapsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Orthogeriatric ankle fractures seem to play an essential role in terms of quality of life in the elderly. Knowledge of the outcome after orthogeriatric ankle fractures is sparse. The present study investigates the outcome after surgically treated ankle fractures at a certified orthogeriatric trauma center. MATERIAL & METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed investigating the outcome of surgically treated ankle fractures in orthogeriatric patients between 2015-2017. Outcome parameters included but were not limited to the EQ-5D 3â¯L, Barthel Index, Karlsson Score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Housing situation and mobility were evaluated and potential associations to the fracture pattern and the related treatment strategy were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 58 patients were included (age 77.7⯱â¯6,2 years). The majority were AO-44 B2 fractures (72%). General outcome was related to the Parker score; a Parker Score of 9 prior surgery was independently associated with an improved outcome according to the EQ-5D 3â¯L and Barthel Index. Patients under 80 years of age also had better results. Place of residence did not significantly change after surgery. Neither different types of implants nor initial use of an external fixator (e.g. open fractures) did influence outcome. A wound healing impairment was found in 10% of our patients whereas the overall unplanned reoperation rate was 7%. Overall complication rate was 20%, one-year mortality was 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgically treated ankle fractures in the elderly which are treated in a certified geriatric fracture center seem to have limited negative effect on their quality of life. We did not observe the otherwise often demonstrated high mortality rates, but still nearly half of the patients demonstrated perioperative complications, which emphasizes the need for optimal perioperative care at an orthogeriatric trauma center. Since there was a reasonable number of patients with wound healing issues this study supports the idea of a staged protocol using external fixation with secondary ORIF.
Subject(s)
Ankle Fractures/rehabilitation , Ankle Joint/physiopathology , Fracture Fixation, Internal/rehabilitation , Health Services for the Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/rehabilitation , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Trauma Centers , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ankle Fractures/physiopathology , Ankle Fractures/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Osteoporotic Fractures/physiopathology , Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
This article presents the case of an 83-year-old woman with a peri-implant femoral fracture after hip arthrodesis in adolescence. Due to the rarity of such operations, there is no standardized approach for these cases. In order to secure the treatment goal of rapid pain-adapted full weight bearing despite reduced bone quality, it was decided to perform a new osteosynthesis with a retrograde femoral nail after removal of some fixation screws of the existing arthrodesis plate. Due to this type of treatment, the preservation of activity and independence of an older trauma patient could be sustainably secured despite operative challenges. Taking an extended osteoporosis treatment into consideration, a bony fracture consolidation and complete convalescence of activity and autonomy were ultimately achieved.
Subject(s)
Arthrodesis/adverse effects , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Hip Joint/surgery , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Nails , Bone Plates , Bone Screws , Device Removal , Female , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Humans , Periprosthetic Fractures/etiologyABSTRACT
Fractures to the anterior process of the calcaneus (PAC) have long been considered rare injuries and have received little attention in clinical research. On the contrary, recent studies have reported a distinct higher incidence, especially following ankle sprains. Decisive reasons are that fractures of the PAC are regularly missed on plain radiographs and that a clinical differentiation from injuries to the lateral ankle ligaments is difficult. With the broad availability of cross-sectional imaging modalities fractures of the PAC are diagnosed more frequently and more reliably. The purpose of this review is to give an overview on the diagnostics, classification and treatment recommendations to this topic and discuss the studies available. To date no evidence-based recommendations are available for the treatment of fractures of the PAC. The few case reports and case series published, predominantly recommend conservative treatment; however, the treatment regimens vary considerably, ranging from immobilization in a lower leg cast (2-10 weeks) to early functional treatment with full weight-bearing. The surgical treatment by open reduction and internal fixation has been described primarily for large dislocated fractures. Surgical excision is considered mainly in cases of persistent pain or symptomatic non-union following non-operative treatment. For both, non-operative and operative treatment, the case reports and case series report satisfactory outcomes for the majority of patients. Nevertheless, comparative studies and patient-rated outcome measures are missing. Therefore, evidence-based recommendations cannot be given.
Subject(s)
Ankle Fractures/therapy , Calcaneus/injuries , Sprains and Strains/complications , Ankle Fractures/classification , Ankle Fractures/diagnosis , Ankle Fractures/etiology , HumansABSTRACT
Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic bone disease with decreased bone strength and an increased susceptibility for fractures. Older people in particular face an increased risk of fractures. These kind of fractures are usually caused by an inadequate trauma and are the so-called fragility fractures. In older adults immediate fracture stabilization and early mobilization have become the standard procedure after a fragility fracture. Treatment of the underlying osteoporosis often plays a minor role in clinical practice. Only a small group of patients are already under osteoporosis medication and even after a fracture occurs only few patients receive osteoporosis drug treatment with the aim to reduce the progression of osteoporosis and to reduce subsequent fractures. In the literature this has been described as the osteoporosis care gap. The following article presents an overview of treatment options and answers many different questions from the clinical routine.
Subject(s)
Osteoporosis/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Early Ambulation , Female , Fracture Fixation , Germany , Guideline Adherence , Hip Fractures/diagnosis , Hip Fractures/etiology , Hip Fractures/therapy , Humans , Male , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/etiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Professional Practice Gaps , Risk Factors , Spinal Fractures/diagnosis , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Spinal Fractures/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The treatment of geriatric patients in the field of trauma surgery is increasingly gaining importance. To provide optimized treatment to these mostly multimorbid patients, interdisciplinary treatment concepts between trauma surgeons and geriatricians have been designed and implemented successfully. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this survey was to evaluate the current state of interdisciplinary management in the treatment of geriatric patients on trauma surgery wards throughout Austria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The directors of 64 Austrian trauma surgery wards were surveyed using an online-questionnaire regarding the current interdisciplinary treatment of geriatric patients. RESULTS: A total of 39 (61 %) questionnaires were analyzed. Of the participating wards, 20 % distinguished between geriatric and non-geriatric patients. There were various criteria to classify the patients. The average percentage of patients older than 70 years was 43 %. Of the participating wards, 26 % had established a periodical cooperation between trauma surgeons and geriatricians and 8 % of the participants stated that there is no interdisciplinary cooperation. The establishment of an interdisciplinary treatment concept in the near future was planned in 28 %. The most commonly mentioned obstacle that prevented trauma surgery wards from establishing an interdisciplinary management model was the lack of personnel resources (59 %) - especially the lack of geriatricians (62 %). CONCLUSION: The survey's results underline the geriatric trauma surgery's great importance especially regarding the high percentage of geriatric patients, as well as the fact that the significance of the interdisciplinary cooperation between trauma surgeons and geriatricians is not yet perceived by the majority of Austrian trauma surgery wards.
Subject(s)
Geriatrics , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Orthopedics , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Aged , Austria , Comorbidity , Female , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Male , Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fragility fractures are a major health care problem worldwide. Both hip and non-hip fractures are associated with excess mortality in the years following the fracture. Residents of long-term nursing homes represent a special high-risk group for poor outcomes. Orthogeriatric co-management models of care have shown in multiple studies to have medical as well as economic advantages, but their impact on this high-risk group has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: We studied the outcome of long-term care residents with hip and non-hip fractures admitted to a geriatric fracture center. METHODS: The study design is a single center, prospective cohort study at a level-I trauma center in Austria running a geriatric fracture center. The cohort included all fragility fracture patients aged over 70 admitted from a long-term care residence from May 2009 to November 2011. The data set consisted of 265 patients; the mean age was 86.8 ± 6.7 years, and 80 % were female. The mean follow-up after the index fracture was 789 days, with a range from 1 to 1842 days. Basic clinical and demographic data were collected at hospital admission. Functional status and mobility were assessed during follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Additional outcome data regarding readmissions for new fractures were obtained from the hospital information database; mortality was crosschecked with the death registry from the governmental institute of epidemiology. RESULTS: 187 (70.6 %) patients died during the follow-up period, with 78 patients (29.4 %) dying in the first year. The mean life expectancy after the index fracture was 527 (±431) days. Differences in mortality rates between hip and non-hip fracture patients were not statistically significant. Compared to reported mortality rates in the literature, hip fracture patients in this orthogeriatric-comanaged cohort had a significantly reduced one-year mortality [OR of 0.57 (95 % CI 0.31-0.85)]. After adjustment for confounders, only older age (OR 1.091; p = 0.013; CI 1.019-1.169) and a lower Parker Mobility Scale (PMS) (OR 0.737; p = 0.022; CI 0.568-0.957) remained as independent predictors. During follow-up, 62 patients (23.4 %) sustained at least one subsequent fracture, and 10 patients (3.4 %) experienced multiple fractures; 29 patients (10.9 %) experienced an additional fracture within the first year. Nearly, half (47.1 %) regained their pre-fracture mobility based on the PMS. CONCLUSION: Despite the generally poor outcomes for fragility fracture patients residing in long-term care facilities, orthogeriatric co-management appears to improve the outcome of high-risk fragility fracture patients. One-year mortality was 29.4 % in this cohort, significantly lower than in comparable trials. Orthogeriatric co-management may also have positive impacts on both functional outcome and the risk of subsequent fractures.
Subject(s)
Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Hip Fractures/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Austria , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Fractures/mortality , Humans , Long-Term Care , Male , Orthopedics , Osteoporotic Fractures/mortality , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of osteoporosis in female patients over 75 years of age is 59.2 %. In Germany ~6.3-7.8 million patients are affected by osteoporosis. In 77 % of german patients osteoporosis is not treated adequately. Even after fragility fractures only 16-21 % of female patients and 3 % of male patients are supplied with a specific osteoporosis therapy. Establishing a Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) is a possible addition to co-management for an efficient treatment of osteoporosis in orthogeriatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: According to a treatment algorithm adapted to the DVO guideline 2014, data of 251 (77 male, 173 female) patients were collected over 3 months. For the assessment specific and standardized questionnaires were used. There was also a basic laboratory testing for osteoporosis done. RESULTS: The average age of female patients was 76.1 years, in male patients 76.6 years. Thirty-seven patients had vertebral fractures, 25 patients proximal humerus fractures, 18 distal radius fractures and a total of 78 proximal femur fractures were recorded. Eighteen percent of the 251 patients have already been treated with a basic and 11 % with a specific osteoporosis medication. Approximately 40 % of the orthogeriatric patients were diagnosed with osteoporosis for the first time in our clinic. Less than 1 % of the patients had a vitamin D level over 40 ng/ml and 32 % had a vitamin D level under 10 ng/ml. Sixty-five percent of the discharged patients received a basic osteoporosis therapy and 25 % an additional specific therapy. DISCUSSION: Due to the demographic development osteoporosis-associated fractures steadily increase. In addition to the surgical treatment of fractures, osteological diagnosis and treatment are essential components of successful treatment and critical to the prevention of further fractures. A combination of orthogeriatric center and fracture liaison service allows a more efficient treatment of osteoporosis by close supervision of orthogeriatric patients by the physicians involved.
Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/therapy , Secondary Prevention/organization & administration , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Bone Density/drug effects , Dietary Supplements , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Patient-Centered Care , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Use of standardized cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA) for the treatment of trochanteric fragility fractures, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality, to achieve safer conditions for immediate full weight-bearing and mobilization, thus, improving preservation of function and independency of orthogeriatric patients. INDICATIONS: Trochanteric fragility fractures (type 31-A1-3). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Ipsilateral arthritis of the hip, leakage of contrast agent into the hip joint, femoral neck fractures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Reduction of the fracture on a fracture table if possible, or minimally invasive open reduction of the proximal femur, i. e., using collinear forceps if necessary. Positioning of guidewires for adjustment of the PFNA and the spiral blade, respectively. Exclusion of leakage of contrast agent and subsequent injection of TRAUMACEM™ V(+) into the femoral head-neck fragment via a trauma needle kit introduced into the spiral blade. Dynamic or static locking of the PFNA at the diaphyseal level. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immediate mobilization of the patients with full weight-bearing and secondary prevention, such as osteoporosis management is necessary to avoid further fractures in the treatment of these patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients older than 65 years underwent the procedure. Of the 72 patients available for follow-up (average age 85.3 years), all fractures healed after an average of 15.3 months. No complications related with cement augmentation were observed. Approximately 60 % of patients achieved the mobility level prior to trauma.
Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Hip Fractures/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Polymethyl Methacrylate/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Cements/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Hip Fractures/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Range of Motion, Articular , Plastic Surgery Procedures/instrumentation , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Osteoporosis-associated fractures represent a growing challenge in the treatment of orthopedic patients. In November 2014 a new revision of the guidelines on osteoporosis by the German Osteology Society (Dachverband Osteologie DVO) was adopted, in which additional risk factors for fractures and further treatment options have been included. On the one hand the existing model used to diagnose osteoporosis and estimate a high fracture risk as a guidance for the use of specific anti-osteoporotic therapy in patients without a fragility fracture was maintained and further refined. On the other hand the guideline includes the option to initiate a specific osteoporosis therapy without a prior bone densitometry in patients with typical radiographs of a proximal femur fracture and higher grade vertebral fractures, suspicious for osteoporosis, depending on the overall clinical context. This may reduce the treatment gap of osteoporosis in Germany. In this paper the changes in the DVO guidelines 2014 on osteoporosis are summarized, focusing on the most important changes with practical relevance for orthopedic surgeons.
Subject(s)
Osteology/standards , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Germany , Humans , Traumatology/standardsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative complications after hip fractures in osteoporotic bone such as implant cutout can be reduced by the use of specially designed implants or additional cement augmentation. It is not yet clear at which degree of osteoporosis, patients will profit from implant augmentation or specially designed implants for geriatric patients. As the surgeon ideally should obtain information on local bone quality at the site of implant anchorage already preoperatively, the aim of the study was to develop an easily applicable radiographic method to estimate bone quality in those patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 75 patients with unilateral hip fracture were included. Preoperatively, a CT scan with a calibration device was conducted. Postoperatively, DXA scans were performed. The proposed method measures local cancellous bone mineral density in the contralateral and uninjured femoral head. As a control, 15 young and healthy non-osteoporotic subjects were included. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was investigated for a subgroup of 20 patients. RESULTS: Study group patients had a mean BMD measured by CT scans of 194.2 mg/cm(3) (SD 40.4). There was a statistically significant correlation with data from DXA scans (r = 0.706, p < 0.001). The control group was significantly younger and showed a significantly higher BMD when compared to the study group (p < 0.001). Reliability evaluation showed no statistically significant difference in inter- and intraobserver measurements. Interclass correlation proved to be very high. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is an easily applicable, reliable and useful tool to estimate bone quality preoperatively using the contralateral hip as a reference. Obtained data may facilitate the decision-making towards the use of further therapeutic measures to improve implant anchorage in osteoporotic bone such as bone cement augmentation. Thus, our method allows for a more individualized surgical treatment of hip fracture patients adapted to the estimated cancellous bone quality of the patient.
Subject(s)
Bone Density , Femoral Neck Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Female , Femoral Neck Fractures/etiology , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Femur/injuries , Fracture Fixation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Osteoporosis-associated fractures are of increasing importance in trauma surgery. The implementation of systematic diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis during hospitalization, however, remains insufficient; therefore, a specific algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in trauma surgery patients was developed based on the German Osteology Society (Dachverband Osteologie, DVO) guidelines for osteoporosis from 2014. In a first step, the individual patient age and risk profile for osteoporosis are identified considering specific fractures indicative of osteoporosis. For these patients a questionnaire is completed which detects specific risk factors. In addition, the physical activity, risk of falls, dietary habits and the individual medication are collated as these can have a decisive influence on the subsequent therapy decisions. Prior to a specific treatment, laboratory osteoporosis tests, bone densitometry by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and if needed X-rays of the spine are carried out. For proximal femoral fractures the treatment of osteoporosis could already be indicated. With pre-existing glucocorticoid therapy, a history of previous fractures or other risk factors according to the risk questionnaire, the threshold of treatment has to be adjusted according to the table of T-scores detected by DXA. The treatment algorithm for diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis in hospitalized trauma surgery patients can systematically and efficiently improve the identification of patients at risk. Thus, further fractures associated with osteoporosis or failure of internal fixation could be reduced in future. A prospective validation of the algorithm has already be initiated.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnosis , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Germany , Guideline Adherence/standards , Humans , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Risk Assessment/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Due to the demographic change fractures of the proximal femur are an increasing major healthcare problem and are associated with the highest mortality among frailty fractures. OBJECTIVES: These mainly osteoporosis-associated fractures of the hip often represent a surgical challenge and the outcome has a decisive influence on the preservation of function and independency of orthogeriatric patients. Augmentation techniques could improve the stability of osteosynthesis in proximal femoral fractures. METHODS: Cement augmentation of proximal femoral nailing (PFNA) for the treatment of pertrochanteric femoral fractures is the most commonly used and standardized method of augmentation for these fractures by which a safer condition for immediate full weight bearing and mobilization can be achieved. RESULTS: In biomechanical and clinical studies good fracture healing was shown and there was no evidence of cement-associated complications in augmented PFNA nailing. In the majority of patients the mobility level prior to trauma could be achieved. CONCLUSION: In addition to the optimal surgical treatment, secondary prevention such as osteoporosis management to avoid further fractures is crucial in the treatment of these patients. This article is based on the current literature and provides an overview of the possible applications of cement augmentation for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. In addition the surgical approach as well as previous scientific data on an established osteosynthesis using cement-augmented PFNA for the treatment of pertrochanteric frailty fractures are presented.
Subject(s)
Bone Cements/therapeutic use , Cementoplasty/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Hip Fractures/therapy , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Humans , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Plastic Surgery Procedures/instrumentationABSTRACT
Proximal femoral fractures represent an increasing major healthcare problem due to the demographic changes in this aging population and are associated with the highest mortality among fractures in elderly patients after suffering insufficiency injuries (so-called fragility fractures). The main aim in the treatment of orthogeriatric patients who suffered from a proximal femoral fracture is the preservation of function and independency. Given the high prevalence of comorbidities in these patients, interdisciplinary and interprofessional approaches are required. The use of modern osteosynthesis procedures can provide an improved, individualized surgical treatment with early full weight bearing of the affected extremity. Another aspect is the accompanying geriatric treatment which is associated with a significant reduction of perioperative and postoperative complications. In addition to acute treatment, the organization of secondary fracture prevention is a crucial pillar of treatment. This article provides an overview of the essential elements of orthogeriatric trauma surgery in elderly patients following proximal femoral fractures.
Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/rehabilitation , Hip Fractures/diagnosis , Hip Fractures/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Hip Fractures/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Recurrence , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fragility fractures are becoming more common and are leading to significantly increased morbidity and mortality rates. METHOD: In order to improve the outcome of these patients, they are increasingly being treated from the beginning interdisciplinarily and interprofessionally as part of co-management models. The main contents of these systems are rapid surgical stabilization for rapid remobilization, treatment with standardized paths and regular communication within the team and a well-functioning discharge management. Furthermore, the organization is a key ingredient in secondary prevention of geriatric traumatology. CONCLUSION: If this system can be implemented as a whole, this will lead to an improvement of the functional outcomes for the patient as well as to cost savings.