Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 94(3): 404-411, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38105626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy (RP) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) remains the gold standard for the surgical management of patients with medically refractive mucosal ulcerative colitis. We aimed to identify functional and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in RP and IPAA surgery patients at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed including all patients who had undergone RP and IPAA between August 1984 and November 2017 at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH). RESULTS: 316 consecutive patients were identified, median age 39 (range 5 to 81) years. The median duration of disease was 60 (range 1 to 528) months. Ulcerative colitis was the main preoperative diagnosis with the main RP indication being failure of medical treatment. The median postoperative stay post-IPAA was 11 (range of 5 to 67) days. Pouchitis was the most common late complication (22.1%), bleeding pouch (3.5%) the earliest, with a 6.8% rate of symptomatic anastomotic leak. Visual analogue scale QOL measure (P-value <0.001), St Marks incontinence score (P-value = 0.001) and Cleveland clinic score (P-value = 0.002) all revealed significant improvement in functional outcomes and QOL. CONCLUSION: QOL and functional outcomes following RP with IPAA in patients at our institution are excellent and comparable to institutions with larger patient numbers.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Proctocolectomy, Restorative , Humans , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Proctocolectomy, Restorative/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Follow-Up Studies , Retrospective Studies , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Treatment Outcome
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(9)2023 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751969

ABSTRACT

A female in her early 20s was referred to the breast-endocrine surgeons with a self-detected tender left breast lump on the background of a family history of breast cancer. A physical examination revealed a rubbery and mobile mass in the left upper breast. Ultrasound demonstrated a solid hypoechoic mass with a likely differential diagnosis of fibroadenoma, with a subsequent core needle biopsy (CNB) confirming a fibroadenoma. Given the size and tenderness of the lump, an excisional biopsy was performed. Histology revealed a fibroadenoma with components of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ, contained within the fibroadenoma and excised with clear margins.Following surgical excision, a multidisciplinary review determined that no further local therapy was required and recommended a genetics referral. This case was interesting as it raised important questions, including what the best surveillance strategies are for female patients with breast cancer within fibroadenoma and determining the risk and probability of missing epithelial atypia via CNB.


Subject(s)
Breast Diseases , Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating , Fibroadenoma , Female , Humans , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Fibroadenoma/diagnosis , Fibroadenoma/surgery , Fibroadenoma/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast/pathology , Breast Diseases/pathology , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...