The Quality of Preoperative Glycemic Control Predicts Insulin Sensitivity During Major Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Case-Control Study.

Objective: To examine the association of the quality of preoperative glycemic control and insulin sensitivity during major upper abdominal surgery. Background: In cardiac surgery, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), an indicator of glycemic control during the preceding 3 months, correlated with intraoperative insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, insulin resistance showed a significant association with adverse clinical outcomes. Methods: This study is a post hoc exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective hepatectomy and receiving the hyperinsulinemic-normoglycemic clamp (HNC) as a potential intervention to reduce surgical site infections (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01528189). Immediately before skin incision, the HNC was initiated by infusing insulin at the rate of 2 mU/kg/min. Dextrose was administered at rates titrated to maintain normoglycemia (4.0-6.0 mmol/L). The average of 3 consecutive dextrose infusion rates during steady state was used as a measure of insulin sensitivity. Primary outcome was the relationship between preoperative HbA1c and insulin sensitivity during surgery. Secondary outcomes were the associations of insulin sensitivity with the patient's body mass index (BMI) and postoperative morbidity. Results: Thirty-four patients were studied. HbA1c (Y = -0.52X + 4.8, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.29), BMI (Y = -0.12X + 5.0, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.43) showed negative correlations with insulin sensitivity. The odds ratio of postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery for every increase in insulin sensitivity by 1 mg/kg/min was 0.22 (95% confidential interval, 0.06-0.59; P = 0.009). Conclusions: We demonstrate significant associations of the quality of preoperative glycemic control and body mass index with insulin sensitivity during hepatectomy. The degree of insulin resistance correlated with postoperative morbidity.

Perioperative clinical practice in liver transplantation: a cross-sectional survey.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe some components of the perioperative practice in liver transplantation as reported by clinicians. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional clinical practice survey using an online instrument containing questions on selected themes related to the perioperative care of liver transplant recipients. We sent email invitations to Canadian anesthesiologists, Canadian surgeons, and French anesthesiologists specialized in liver transplantation. We used five-point Likert-type scales (from "never" to "always") and numerical or categorical answers. Results are presented as medians or proportions. RESULTS: We obtained answers from 130 participants (estimated response rate of 71% in Canada and 26% in France). Respondents reported rarely using transesophageal echocardiography routinely but often using it for hemodynamic instability, often using an intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management strategy, and never using a phlebotomy (medians from ordinal scales). Fifty-nine percent of respondents reported using a restrictive fluid management strategy to manage hemodynamic instability during the dissection phase. Forty-two percent and 15% of respondents reported using viscoelastic tests to guide intraoperative and postoperative transfusions, respectively. Fifty-four percent of respondents reported not pre-emptively treating preoperative coagulations disturbances, and 91% reported treating them intraoperatively only when bleeding was significant. Most respondents (48-64%) did not have an opinion on the maximal graft ischemic times. Forty-seven percent of respondents reported that a piggyback technique was the preferred vena cava anastomosis approach. CONCLUSION: Different interventions were reported to be used regarding most components of perioperative care in liver transplantation. Our results suggest that significant equipoise exists on the optimal perioperative management of this population.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'objectif de cette étude était de décrire certaines composantes de la pratique périopératoire en transplantation hépatique telles que rapportées par les cliniciens. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené un sondage transversal sur la pratique clinique à l'aide d'un instrument en ligne comportant des questions sur des thèmes sélectionnés liés aux soins périopératoires des receveurs de greffe du foie. Nous avons envoyé des invitations par courriel à des anesthésiologistes canadiens, des chirurgiens canadiens et des anesthésiologistes français spécialisés en transplantation hépatique. Nous avons utilisé des échelles de type Likert à cinq points (de « jamais ¼ à « toujours ¼) et des réponses numériques ou catégorielles. Les résultats sont présentés sous forme de médianes ou de proportions. RéSULTATS: Nous avons obtenu des réponses de 130 participants (taux de réponse estimé à 71 % au Canada et à 26 % en France). Les répondants ont déclaré utiliser rarement l'échocardiographie transœsophagienne de routine, mais l'utiliser fréquemment pour l'instabilité hémodynamique, souvent en utilisant une stratégie de prise en charge hémodynamique peropératoire axée sur les objectifs, et jamais en utilisant une phlébotomie (médianes des échelles ordinales). Cinquante-neuf pour cent des répondants ont déclaré utiliser une stratégie restrictive de gestion liquidienne pour prendre en charge l'instabilité hémodynamique pendant la phase de dissection. Quarante-deux pour cent et 15 % des répondants ont déclaré utiliser des tests viscoélastiques pour guider les transfusions peropératoires et postopératoires, respectivement. Cinquante-quatre pour cent des répondants ont déclaré ne pas traiter préventivement les troubles préopératoires de la coagulation, et 91 % ont déclaré les traiter en peropératoire uniquement lorsque les saignements étaient importants. La plupart des répondants (48-64 %) n'avaient pas d'opinion sur les temps ischémiques maximaux du greffon. Quarante-sept pour cent des répondants ont déclaré qu'une technique de 'piggyback' (anastomose latéroterminale) était l'approche préférée pour l'anastomose de la veine cave. CONCLUSION: Différentes interventions ont été signalées pour la plupart des composantes des soins périopératoires dans la transplantation hépatique. Nos résultats suggèrent qu'il existe une incertitude significative concernant la prise en charge périopératoire optimale de cette population.

Randomized controlled trial of the effect of hyperinsulinemic normoglycemia during liver resection on postoperative hepatic function and surgical site infection.

Background: While avoidance of preoperative fasting followed by hyperinsulinemic-normoglycemic clamp (HNC) reduced postoperative hepatic dysfunction and surgical site infection (SSI), the effect of HNC restricted to the intraoperative period is unknown. This study examined whether HNC restricted to the intraoperative period has similar effects in patients undergoing elective liver resections. Methods: This study is a post hoc exploratory analysis of a randomized-controlled trial in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery and receiving the HNC as a potential preventative intervention to reduce infectious morbidity postoperatively. Patients (>18 years old) undergoing elective transabdominal resection of liver malignancy were enrolled. We implemented the random allocation by labelling cards. Consenting patients were randomly assigned to receive the HNC during surgery or standard metabolic care. The HNC was initiated by insulin (2 mU/kg/min) followed by 20% dextrose infusion titrated to keep blood glucose between 4.0 and 6.0 mmol/L until the end of surgery. In the control group, glycemia >10.0 mmol/L prompted insulin treatment according to a standardized sliding scale. The primary outcome was hepatic function on postoperative day (POD) one, assessed by Schindl score. Secondary outcome was the incidence of SSIs within 30 days after surgery. The Schindl score was analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and the incidence of SSIs was analyzed by Fisher's exact test. Two-sided P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: From October 2018 to May 2022, 32 patients in the control group and 34 patients in the HNC group were analyzed. Patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. There was no significant difference in the mean Schindl score on POD1 between the HNC group and the control group (0.8±0.9 vs. 1.2±1.6, P=0.61). However, the incidence of SSIs in the HNC group was significantly lower than in the control group (6% vs. 31%, P=0.01). Conclusions: The HNC restricted to the intraoperative period did not improve postoperative hepatic function but reduced SSIs. Preoperative carbohydrate loading may contribute to the preservation of hepatic function. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01528189.

Postoperative outcomes in surgical COVID-19 patients: a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Data on postoperative outcomes of the COVID-19 patient population is limited. We described COVID-19 patients who underwent a surgery and the pandemic impact on surgical activities. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cohort study between March 13 and June 192,020. We included all COVID-19 patients who underwent surgery in nine centres of the Province of Québec, the Canadian province most afflicted by the pandemic. We also included concomitant suspected COVID-19 (subsequently confirmed not to have COVID-19) patients and patients who had recovered from it. We collected data on baseline characteristics, postoperative complications and postoperative mortality. Our primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We also collected data on overall surgical activities during this first wave and during the same period in 2019. RESULTS: We included 44 COVID-19 patients, 18 suspected patients, and 18 patients who had recovered from COVID-19 at time of surgery. Among the 44 COVID-19 patients, 31 surgeries (71%) were urgent and 16 (36%) were major. In these patients, pulmonary complications were frequent (25%) and 30-day mortality was high (15.9%). This mortality was higher in patients with symptoms (23.1%) compared to those without symptoms (5.6%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.118). Of the total 22,616 cases performed among participating centres during the study period, only 0.19% had COVID-19 at the time of surgery. Fewer procedures were performed during the study period compared to the same period in 2019 (44,486 cases). CONCLUSION: In this Canadian cohort study, postoperative 30-day mortality in COVID-19 patients undergoing surgery was high (15.9%). Although few surgeries were performed on COVID-19 patients, the pandemic impact on surgical activity volume was important. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04458337 .

Early abolition of cough reflex predicts mortality in deeply sedated brain-injured patients.

BACKGROUND: Deep sedation may hamper the detection of neurological deterioration in brain-injured patients. Impaired brainstem reflexes within the first 24 h of deep sedation are associated with increased mortality in non-brain-injured patients. Our objective was to confirm this association in brain-injured patients. METHODS: This was an observational prospective multicenter cohort study involving four neuro-intensive care units. We included acute brain-injured patients requiring deep sedation, defined by a Richmond Assessment Sedation Scale (RASS) < -3. Neurological assessment was performed at day 1 and included pupillary diameter, pupillary light, corneal and cough reflexes, and grimace and motor response to noxious stimuli. Pre-sedation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS-II) were collected, as well as the cause of death in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). RESULTS: A total of 137 brain-injured patients were recruited, including 70 (51%) traumatic brain-injured patients, 40 (29%) vascular (subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracerebral hemorrhage). Thirty patients (22%) died in the ICU. At day 1, the corneal (OR 2.69, p = 0.034) and cough reflexes (OR 5.12, p = 0.0003) were more frequently abolished in patients that died in the ICU. In a multivariate analysis, abolished cough reflex was associated with ICU mortality after adjustment to pre-sedation GCS, SAPS-II, RASS (OR: 5.19, 95% CI [1.92-14.1], p = 0.001) or dose of sedatives (OR: 8.89, 95% CI [2.64-30.0], p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: Early (day 1) cough reflex abolition is an independent predictor of mortality in deeply sedated brain-injured patients. Abolished cough reflex likely reflects a brainstem dysfunction that might result from the combination of primary and secondary neuro-inflammatory cerebral insults revealed and/or worsened by sedation.

Being Convinced and Taking Responsibility: A Qualitative Study of Family Members' Experience of Organ Donation Decision and Bereavement After Brain Death.

OBJECTIVES: Family members of brain dead patients experience an unprecedented situation in which not only they are told that their loved one is dead but are also asked to consider organ donation. The objective of this qualitative study was to determine 1) what it means for family members to make the decision and to take responsibility, 2) how they interact with the deceased patient in the ICU, 3) how family members describe the impact of the process and of the decision on their bereavement process. DESIGN: Qualitative study using interviews with bereaved family members who were approached for organ donation after the death of their relative in the ICU (brain death). SETTING: Family members from 13 ICUs in France. SUBJECTS: Bereaved family members who were approached for organ donation after the death of their relative in the ICU (brain death). INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four interviews were conducted with 16 relatives of organ donor patients and with eight relatives of nonorgan donor patients. Three themes emerged: 1) taking responsibility-relatives explain how they endorse decisional responsibility but do not experience it as a burden, on the contrary; 2) ambiguous perceptions of death-two groups of relatives emerge: those for whom ambiguity hinders their acceptance of the patient's death; those for whom ambiguity is an opportunity to accept the death and say goodbye; and 3) donation as a comfort during bereavement. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of caregivers' efforts to focus organ donation discussions and decision on the patient, family members feel a strong decisional responsibility that is not experienced as a burden but a proof of their strong connection to the patient. Brain death however creates ambivalent experiences that some family members endure whereas others use as an opportunity to perform separation rituals. Last, organ donation can be experienced as a form of comfort during bereavement provided family members remain convinced their decision was right.

Grief Symptoms in Relatives Who Experienced Organ Donation Requests in the ICU.

RATIONALE: Studies show that the quality of end-of-life communication and care have a significant impact on the living long after the death of a relative and have been implicated in the burden of psychological symptoms after the ICU experience. In the case of organ donation, the patient's relatives are centrally involved in the decision-making process; yet, few studies have examined the impact of the quality of communication on the burden of psychological symptoms after death. OBJECTIVES: To assess the experience of the organ donation process and grief symptoms in relatives of brain-dead patients who discussed organ donation in the ICU. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter longitudinal study in 28 ICUs in France. Participants were the relatives of brain-dead patients who were approached to discuss organ donation. Relatives were followed-up by phone at three time points: at 1 month, to complete a questionnaire describing their experience of the organ donation process; at 3 months, to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised; and at 9 months, to complete the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and the Inventory of Complicated Grief. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 202 relatives of 202 patients were included, of whom 158 consented to and 44 refused organ donation. Interviews were conducted at 1, 3, and 9 months with 78%, 68%, and 58% of relatives, respectively. The overall experience of the organ donation process was significantly more burdensome for relatives of nondonors. They were more dissatisfied with communication (27% vs. 10%; P = 0.021), more often shocked by the request (65% vs. 19%; P < 0.0001), and more often found the decision difficult (53% vs. 27%; P = 0.017). However, there were no significant differences in grief symptoms measured at 3 and 9 months between the two groups. Understanding of brain death was associated with grief symptoms; our results show a higher prevalence of complicated grief symptoms among relatives who did not understand the brain death process than among those who did (75% vs. 46.1%; P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Experience of the organ donation process varied between relatives of donor versus nondonor patients, with relatives of nondonors experiencing lower-quality communication, but the decision was not associated with subsequent grief symptoms. Importantly, understanding of brain death is a key element of the organ donation process for relatives.

Early impairment of intracranial conduction time predicts mortality in deeply sedated critically ill patients: a prospective observational pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Somatosensory (SSEP) and brainstem auditory (BAEP) evoked potentials are neurophysiological tools which, respectively, explore the intracranial conduction time (ICCT) and the intrapontine conduction time (IPCT). The prognostic values of prolonged cerebral conduction times in deeply sedated patients have never been assessed. Sedated patients are at risk of developing new neurological complications, undetected. In this prospective observational bi-center pilot study, we investigated whether early impairment of SSEP's ICCT and/or BAEP's IPCT could predict in-ICU mortality or altered mental status (AMS), in deeply sedated critically ill patients. METHODS: SSEP by stimulation of the median nerve and BAEP were assessed in critically ill patients receiving deep sedation on day 3 following ICU admission. Deep sedation was defined by a Richmond Assessment sedation Scale (RASS) <-3. Mean left- and right-side ICCT and IPCT were measured for each patient. Primary and secondary outcomes were, respectively, in-ICU mortality and AMS defined as the occurrence of delirium and/or delayed awakening after discontinuation of sedation. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were studied of which 49 (57%) were non-brain-injured and 37 (43%) were brain-injured. Impaired ICCT was a predictor of in-ICU mortality after adjustment on the global Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA) [OR (95% CI) = 2.69 (1.05-6.85); p = 0.039] and on the non-neurological SOFA components [2.67 (1.05-6.81); p = 0.040]. IPCT was more frequently delayed in the subgroup of patients who developed post-sedation AMS (24%) compared those without AMS (0%). However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.053). Impairment rates of ICCT and IPCT were not found to be significantly different between non-brain- and brain-injured subgroups of patients. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients receiving deep sedation, early ICCT impairment was associated with mortality. Somatosensory and brainstem auditory evoked potentials may be useful early warning indicators of brain dysfunction as well as prognostic markers in deeply sedated critically ill patients.

Brainstem response patterns in deeply-sedated critically-ill patients predict 28-day mortality.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep sedation is associated with acute brain dysfunction and increased mortality. We had previously shown that early-assessed brainstem reflexes may predict outcome in deeply sedated patients. The primary objective was to determine whether patterns of brainstem reflexes might predict mortality in deeply sedated patients. The secondary objective was to generate a score predicting mortality in these patients. METHODS: Observational prospective multicenter cohort study of 148 non-brain injured deeply sedated patients, defined by a Richmond Assessment sedation Scale (RASS) <-3. Brainstem reflexes and Glasgow Coma Scale were assessed within 24 hours of sedation and categorized using latent class analysis. The Full Outline Of Unresponsiveness score (FOUR) was also assessed. Primary outcome measure was 28-day mortality. A "Brainstem Responses Assessment Sedation Score" (BRASS) was generated. RESULTS: Two distinct sub-phenotypes referred as homogeneous and heterogeneous brainstem reactivity were identified (accounting for respectively 54.6% and 45.4% of patients). Homogeneous brainstem reactivity was characterized by preserved reactivity to nociceptive stimuli and a partial and topographically homogenous depression of brainstem reflexes. Heterogeneous brainstem reactivity was characterized by a loss of reactivity to nociceptive stimuli associated with heterogeneous brainstem reflexes depression. Heterogeneous sub-phenotype was a predictor of increased risk of 28-day mortality after adjustment to Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II (SAPS-II) and RASS (Odds Ratio [95% confidence interval] = 6.44 [2.63-15.8]; p<0.0001) or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and RASS (OR [95%CI] = 5.02 [2.01-12.5]; p = 0.0005). The BRASS (and marginally the FOUR) predicted 28-day mortality (c-index [95%CI] = 0.69 [0.54-0.84] and 0.65 [0.49-0.80] respectively). CONCLUSION: In this prospective cohort study, around half of all deeply sedated critically ill patients displayed an early particular neurological sub-phenotype predicting 28-day mortality, which may reflect a dysfunction of the brainstem.

General anesthetics have differential inhibitory effects on gap junction channels and hemichannels in astrocytes and neurons.

Astrocytes represent a major non-neuronal cell population actively involved in brain functions and pathologies. They express a large amount of gap junction proteins that allow communication between adjacent glial cells and the formation of glial networks. In addition, these membrane proteins can also operate as hemichannels, through which "gliotransmitters" are released, and thus contribute to neuroglial interaction. There are now reports demonstrating that alterations of astroglial gap junction communication and/or hemichannel activity impact neuronal and synaptic activity. Two decades ago we reported that several general anesthetics inhibited gap junctions in primary cultures of astrocytes (Mantz et al., (1993) Anesthesiology 78(5):892-901). As there are increasing studies investigating neuroglial interactions in anesthetized mice, we here updated this previous study by employing acute cortical slices and by characterizing the effects of general anesthetics on both astroglial gap junctions and hemichannels. As hemichannel activity is not detected in cortical astrocytes under basal conditions, we treated acute slices with the endotoxin LPS or proinflammatory cytokines to induce hemichannel activity in astrocytes, which in turn activated neuronal hemichannels. We studied two extensively used anesthetics, propofol and ketamine, and the more recently developed dexmedetomidine. We report that these drugs have differential inhibitory effects on gap junctional communication and hemichannel activity in astrocytes when used in their respective, clinically relevant concentrations, and that dexmedetomidine appears to be the least effective on both channel functions. In addition, the three anesthetics have similar effects on neuronal hemichannels. Altogether, our observations may contribute to optimizing the selection of anesthetics for in vivo animal studies.

Sepsis-induced brain dysfunction.

Systemic infection is often revealed by or associated with brain dysfunction, which is characterized by alteration of consciousness, ranging from delirium to coma, seizure or focal neurological signs. Its pathophysiology involves an ischemic process, secondary to impairment of cerebral perfusion and its determinants and a neuroinflammatory process that includes endothelial activation, alteration of the blood-brain barrier and passage of neurotoxic mediators. Microcirculatory dysfunction is common to these two processes. This brain dysfunction is associated with increased mortality, morbidity and long-term cognitive disability. Its diagnosis relies essentially on neurological examination that can lead to specific investigations, including electrophysiological testing or neuroimaging. In practice, cerebrospinal fluid analysis is indisputably required when meningitis is suspected. Hepatic, uremic or respiratory encephalopathy, metabolic disturbances, drug overdose, sedative or opioid withdrawal, alcohol withdrawal delirium or Wernicke's encephalopathy are the main differential diagnoses. Currently, treatment consists mainly of controlling sepsis. The effects of insulin therapy and steroids need to be assessed. Various drugs acting on sepsis-induced blood-brain barrier dysfunction, brain oxidative stress and inflammation have been tested in septic animals but not yet in patients.