Ethics Education in U.S. Allopathic Medical Schools: A National Survey of Medical School Deans and Ethics Course Directors.

AbstractPurpose: to characterize ethics course content, structure, resources, pedagogic methods, and opinions among academic administrators and course directors at U.S. medical schools. METHOD: An online questionnaire addressed to academic deans and ethics course directors identified by medical school websites was emailed to 157 Association of American Medical Colleges member medical schools in two successive waves in early 2022. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize responses. RESULTS: Representatives from 61 (39%) schools responded. Thirty-two (52%) respondents were course directors; 26 (43%) were deans of academic affairs, medical education, or curriculum; and 3 with other roles also completed the survey (5%). All 61 schools reported some form of formal ethics education during the first year of medical school, with most (n = 54, 89%) reporting a formal mandatory introductory course during preclinical education. Schools primarily utilized lecture and small-group teaching methods. Knowledge-based examinations, attendance, and participation were most commonly used for assessment. A large majority regarded ethics as equally or more important than other foundational courses, but fewer (n = 37, 60%) provided faculty training for teaching ethics. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a response rate of 39 percent, the authors conclude that medical schools include ethics in their curricula in small-group and lecture formats with heterogeneity regarding content taught. Preclinical curricular redesigns must innovate and implement best practices for ensuring sound delivery of ethics content in future curricula. Additional large-scale research is necessary to determine said best practices.

A Retrospective Study Analyzing Opioid Prescription Practices in Hand Surgery from 2013 to 2019.

Background: The potential for opioid prescription medication addiction and abuse has been a growing concern in healthcare. It is not uncommon for hand surgery patients to be overprescribed opioid medication for postoperative pain management. The objective of this study was to characterize changes in opioid prescription practices of hand surgeons treating Medicare Part D patients from 2013 to 2019. Methods: A retrospective analysis of Medicare Part D prescriber data from 2013 to 2019 was conducted. This database provides information on drugs paid for under the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program. For each prescriber and medication, the dataset includes the total number of prescriptions dispensed (original prescriptions and number of refills), and total medication cost. Results: In 2013, the 10 most common medications prescribed totaled 114,409 prescriptions, with 89,701 (78.4%) opioid prescriptions. In 2019, the 10 most common medications prescribed totaled 164,955 prescriptions, with 109,665 (66.5%) opioid prescriptions. Although total opioid prescriptions dropped, there was a 22% increase in the total number of prescriptions written. The two most common medications prescribed, hydrocodone-acetaminophen and oxycodone-acetaminophen, totaled 75,796 in 2013, compared with 76,518 in 2019. The overall number of prescriptions for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increased by 157%, and the percentage of total opioids prescribed declined by 7.9%. Conclusions: The increase in total opioid prescriptions from 2013 to 2019 by hand surgeons in the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program lags behind the recommended shift to nonopioid pain management. The reasons for the overall rise in prescriptions deserve further exploration.

Patient Perspectives and Quality of Life after Breast Reconstruction and the Impact of Subsequent Revisions.

There is limited research on the impact of revisional surgery after breast reconstruction on patient experience and postoperative quality of life (QoL). Methods: Patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate implant-based or autologous free-flap breast reconstruction from 2008 to 2020 were reviewed. These patients were categorized by revisions (0-1, 2-3, and 4+) and surveyed on QoL metrics using BREAST-Q and Was It Worth It? (WIWI) questionnaires. BREAST-Q QoL, satisfaction, and WIWI metrics between revision groups were evaluated. Results: Among 252 patients, a total of 150 patients (60%) underwent zero to one revisions, 72 patients (28%) underwent two to three revisions, and 30 patients (12%) underwent four or more revisions. Median follow-up was 6 years (range, 1-11 years). BREAST-Q satisfaction among patients with four or more revisions was significantly lower (P = 0.03), while core QoL domains (chest physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being) did not significantly differ. Analysis of unplanned reoperations due to complications and breast satisfaction showed no significant difference in QoL scores between groups (P = 0.08). Regarding WIWI QoL metrics, four or more revisions were associated with a higher rate of worse QoL (P = 0.035) and worse overall experience (P = 0.001). Most patients in all revision groups felt it was worthwhile to undergo breast reconstruction (86%), would choose breast reconstruction again (83%), and would recommend breast reconstruction to others (79%). Conclusions: Overall, a majority of patients undergoing revisions after breast reconstruction still have a worthwhile experience. Although reoperations after breast reconstruction do not significantly impact long-term BREAST-Q QoL domains, patients undergoing four or more revisions have significantly lower breast satisfaction, worse QoL, and a postoperative experience worse than expected.

Trends in Medicare Reimbursement for the Top 20 Surgical Procedures in Craniofacial Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Research regarding financial trends in craniofacial trauma surgery is limited. Understanding these trends is important to the evolvement of suitable reimbursement models in craniofacial plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the top 20 most utilized surgical procedures for facial trauma. METHODS: The 20 most commonly utilized Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for facial trauma repairs in 2018 were queried from The National Summary Data File from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Reimbursement data for each procedure was then extracted from The Physician Fee Schedule Lookup Tool. Changes to the United States consumer price index (CPI) were used to adjust all gathered data for inflation to 2021 US dollars (USD). The average annual and the total percent change in reimbursement were calculated for the included procedures based on the adjusted trends from the years 2000 to 2021. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2021, the average reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 16.6% after adjusting for inflation. Closed treatment of temporomandibular joint dislocation and closed treatment of nasal bone fractures without manipulation demonstrated the greatest decrease in mean adjusted reimbursement at -48.7% and -48.3%, respectively, while closed treatment of nasal bone fractures without stabilization demonstrated the smallest mean decrease at -1.4% during the study period. Open treatment of nasal septal fractures with or without stabilization demonstrated the greatest increase in mean adjusted reimbursement at 18.9%, while closed treatment of nasal septal fractures with or without stabilization demonstrated the smallest increase at 1.2%. The average reimbursement for all closed procedures in the top 20 decreased by 19.3%, while that for all open procedures decreased by 15.5%. The adjusted reimbursement rate for all top 20 procedures decreased by an average of 0.8% each year. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively evaluate trends in Medicare reimbursement for facial trauma surgical repairs. Adjusting for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for the top 20 most commonly utilized procedures has largely decreased from 2000 to 2021. Consideration of these trends by surgeons, hospital systems, and policymakers will be important to assure continued access to meaningful surgical facial trauma care in the United States.

Can Montgomery tubercles impact aesthetic 3D nipple-areolar complex tattooing? An anatomical, quantitative analysis of breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: We aimed to establish a relationship between the amount of Montgomery tubercles (MTs) per nipple-areolar complex (NAC) given patient characteristics such as age, BMI, menopausal status, race/ethnicity, and NAC size to better inform current 3D NAC tattooing practices. METHODS: Preoperative photographs of patients pursuing breast reconstruction after mastectomy in 2010 through 2018 were reviewed. The number of MTs on each native NAC was quantified. The impact of patient factors on the quantity of MTs was evaluated via Pearson correlation and bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven patients (399 breasts) were reviewed. On average, patients had 5.0 ± 5.2 MTs (range, 0-25 MTs). Number of MTs did not correlate with patient age, BMI, or NAC size. Premenopausal females were more likely than postmenopausal females to have a greater number of MTs per breast (p-value = 0.0183). CONCLUSIONS: Postmastectomy patients desiring a more "youthful" NAC may consider additional MTs when pursuing 3D NAC tattooing.

Comparison of Male and Female Surgeons' Experiences With Gender Across 5 Qualitative/Quantitative Domains.

Importance: A growing body of literature has been developed with the goal of attempting to understand the experiences of female surgeons. While it has helped to address inequities and promote important programmatic improvements, work remains to be done. Objective: To explore how practicing male and female surgeons' experiences with gender compare across 5 qualitative/quantitative domains: career aspirations, gender-based discrimination, mentor-mentee relationships, perceived barriers, and recommendations for change. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national concurrent mixed-methods survey of Fellows of the American College of Surgeons (FACS) compared differences between male and female FACS. Differences between female FACS and female members of the Association of Women Surgeons (AWS) were also explored. A randomly selected 3:1 sample of US-based male and female FACS was surveyed between January and June 2020. Female AWS members were surveyed in May 2020. Exposure: Self-reported gender. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported experiences with career aspirations (quantitative), gender-based discrimination (quantitative), mentor-mentee relationships (quantitative), perceived barriers (qualitative), and recommendations for change (qualitative). Results: A total of 2860 male FACS (response rate: 38.1% [2860 of 7500]) and 1070 female FACS (response rate: 42.8% [1070 of 2500]) were included, in addition to 536 female AWS members. Demographic characteristics were similar between randomly selected male and female FACS, with the notable exception that female FACS were less likely to be married (720 [67.3%] vs 2561 [89.5%]; nonresponse-weighted P < .001) and have children (660 [61.7%] vs 2600 [90.9%]; P < .001). Compared with female FACS, female AWS members were more likely to be younger and hold additional graduate degrees (320 [59.7%] were married; 238 [44.4%] had children). FACS of both genders acknowledged positive and negative aspects of dealing with gender in a professional setting, including shared experiences of gender-based harassment, discrimination, and blame. Female FACS were less likely to have had gender-concordant mentors. They were more likely to emphasize the importance of gender when determining career aspirations and prioritizing future mentor-mentee relationships. Moving forward, female FACS emphasized the importance of avoiding competition among female surgeons. They encouraged male surgeons to acknowledge gender bias and admit their potential role. Male FACS encouraged male and female surgeons to treat everyone the same. Conclusions and Relevance: Experiences with gender are not limited to supportive female surgeons. The results of this study emphasize the importance of recognizing the voices of all stakeholders involved when striving to promote workforce diversity and the related need to develop quality improvement/surgical education initiatives that enhance inclusion through open, honest discourse.

Management of Free Fillet Flap Transfers in Large Oncologic Resections.

The fillet flap is a reliable flap for reconstruction of large deformities following oncologic resection. It provides healthy, nonradiated tissue for coverage with the secondary benefit of preserving other potential donor sites for reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of the medical records of eight patients who underwent fillet flap reconstruction from 2013 to 2021 at Mayo Clinic, Arizona, were analyzed. Results: Eight patients who underwent four hemipelvectomies, three forequarter amputations, and one below the knee amputation were identified. Patients' ages ranged between 24 and 66 years. All indications for oncologic ablation were curative. Defect sizes ranged from 16 × 20 to 30 × 60 cm. Four pedicled flaps and four free fillet flaps were performed. Indication for free fillet flap was tumor invasion of local vascular structures. There was no flap loss in the pedicled group (follow-up ranged from 1 to 9 years), and one of four free fillet flaps had a successful long-term outcome (follow-up 36 months). Conclusions: Successful free fillet flap reconstruction in the setting of oncologic resection is a difficult task to achieve. Changes to the management of case 3F allowed for a successful transfer. Immediate elevation and anastomosis of the flap before oncologic resection, large caliber recipient vessels and isolation from the zone of injury, protection of the anastomosis, and delay in flap inset all contributed to flap survival. It is our belief that applying these general considerations in large oncologic resections with free fillet flap transfer may aid in successful flap transfer and improve its survival odds.

Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.

Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is a microsurgical treatment for lymphedema of the lower extremity (LEL). This study systematically reviews the most recent data on outcomes of various LVA techniques for LEL in diverse patients. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus databases to extract articles published through June 2021. Studies reporting data on objective postoperative improvement in lymphedema and/or subjective improvement in quality of life for patients with LEL were included. Extracted data comprised demographics, number of patients and lower limbs, duration of symptoms before LVA, surgical technique, duration of follow-up, and objective and subjective outcomes. Results: A total of 303 articles were identified and evaluated, of which 74 were ultimately deemed eligible for inclusion in this study, representing 6260 patients and 2554 lower limbs. The average patient age ranged from 22.6 to 76.14 years. The duration of lymphedema before LVA ranged from 12 months to 11.4 years. Objective rates of improvement in lymphedema ranged from 23.3% to 100%, with the greatest degree of improvement seen in patients with early-stage LEL. Conclusions: LVA is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of LEL of all stages. Several emerging techniques and variations may lead to improved patient outcomes.

Comprehensive Management of Pressure Injury: A Review.

Pressure injuries (PIs) are a spectrum of localized tissue destruction that develops most often at a bony prominence. PIs are the result of a combination of extrinsic (eg, pressure, shear, friction, and moisture) and intrinsic (nutritional status, spasticity, decreased sensation, and vascular disease) factors. Given their complex etiology, management of PIs requires a multidisciplinary approach from a team of health care professionals. After addressing both extrinsic and intrinsic factors, local wound care is generally recommended for stages 1 to 2 PIs and surgical intervention for stages 3 to 4.

Characterization of National Medical Societies' Accessible Resources to Support Underrepresented Minority and Female Trainees.

Importance: The lack of racial, ethnic, and gender diversity in medicine has been recognized as problematic, but the question of what medical educators and societies are doing to rectify and promote representation of historically marginalized groups persists. Objective: To examine what easily accessible resources are offered by medical and surgical societies to support women and individuals in minority groups that are underrepresented in medicine (URiM). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study evaluated transparent and accessible resources on the webpages of societies recognized by the Council of Medical Specialty Societies. Data collection and analysis were performed from September 1, 2021, to November 1, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The society websites were searched for official diversity statements, diversity and women task forces or committees, and mentorship and scholarship opportunities for URiM and female trainees. The primary outcome was accessible resources in the form of financial support (scholarships) and mentorship for URiM and female trainees. Results: Of the 45 societies included in the analysis, 38 (84.4%) have published diversity statements. All but 6 societies (86.7%) have a dedicated diversity task force, committee, or work group. Twenty societies (44.4%) have a committee specifically for women or include women in diversity task force initiatives. Seventeen societies (37.8%) offer minority-specific mentorship, 15 (33.3%) offer scholarships targeted toward URiM trainees, 10 (22.2%) provide gender-specific mentorship, and 8 (17.8%) offer scholarship opportunities for female trainees. Conclusions and Relevance: Although most of the societies included in this study acknowledge the importance of diversity in medicine, less than half of these societies offer readily accessible scholarships or mentorship opportunities to URiM and female applicants.

Long-term breast and nipple sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: Relevance to physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being.

BACKGROUND: The effect of postoperative sensation on quality-of-life (QoL) following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with implant-based reconstruction is not well described. We evaluated the impact of breast and nipple sensation on patient QoL by using BREAST-Q. METHODS: Patients undergoing NSM with implant reconstruction from 2008 to 2020 were mailed a survey to characterize their postoperative breast and nipple sensation. BREAST-Q metrics were compared between totally numb patients and those with sensation. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were included. Overall, 131 (38%) responded; response rates regarding breast and nipple sensation were 36% (N = 124/349) and 34% (N = 117/349). Median time from surgery to survey completion was 6 years. The majority had bilateral procedures (101, 77%), including direct-to-implant (99, 76%) and tissue expander (32, 24%) reconstruction. Regarding breast sensation, the majority of patients reported their reconstructed breasts as totally numb (47, 38%) or much less sensation than before surgery (59, 48%). Regarding nipple sensation, the majority of patients reported their nipples were totally numb (67, 57%) or had much less sensation than before surgery (37, 32%). Total numbness of reconstructed breasts resulted in a significantly lower chest physical well-being (mean score: 73.5 vs. 81.2, respectively, P = 0.048). Total numbness of postoperative nipple(s) resulted in significantly lower chest physical (mean score: 74.8 vs. 85.2, respectively, P = 0.007), psychosocial (mean score 77.4 vs. 84.4, respectively, P = 0.041), and sexual well-being (mean score: 55.7 vs. 68.3, respectively, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term breast and nipple sensation are significantly diminished after NSM with implant reconstruction. Patients with preserved sensation experience better physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being.

A Comparative Analysis of the Common Injections Performed by Plastic Surgeons: 2012 and 2019.

Background: Plastic surgeons regularly perform injections for both cosmetic and functional purposes. This article examines the most common injections utilized by plastic surgeons under Medicare and how their usage and billing has changed between 2012 and 2019. Methods: Using the earliest and latest data available on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Provider Utilization and Payment Data File, we first determined Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System injection codes most billed to Medicare in 2012 and 2019. The number of services, amount of Medicare beneficiaries, and reimbursement rates were collected and analyzed for each Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code from the Provider Utilization and Payment Data File for years 2012 and 2019. We compared the change in reimbursement rate for each injection to the rate of inflation in US dollars over the same period. Results: The unadjusted Medicare reimbursement rate for eight included injection types increased an average of 31.63% during the study period. This was not significantly different from the rate of inflation during the same period (+11.33%, P = 0.311). When all Medicare reimbursement data were adjusted for inflation to 2019 dollars, the average percentage change in reimbursement for all included injections in this study increased by 17.58% from 2012 to 2019. Conclusions: The findings from our study suggest that injections administered by plastic surgeons appear to be unique in their general stability in reimbursement rates as compared to rates in other fields. Further research should be performed to better understand the driving factors for usage and reimbursement changes.