Associations between psoriasis and mental illness: an update for clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: This review explores the association between psoriasis and mental illness and the potential underlying pathophysiologic explanations for this association. METHOD: Using a search via the MEDLINE database in December 2020, eligible studies with a focus on systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized control trials (RCTs) were retrieved and reviewed. RESULTS: Psoriasis patients are 1.5 times more likely to show depressive symptoms and experience a higher prevalence of anxiety symptoms (20-50%) than individuals without psoriasis. Schizophrenia (2.82%) and suicidal ideation (12.7%) are found to be more prevalent among psoriasis patients than among the general population. Pro-inflammatory markers, which play an important role in the pathophysiology of psoriasis, have been shown to be elevated in patients with depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia; this suggests shared inflammatory pathways may be involved. CONCLUSIONS: There is an elevated burden of psychiatric co-morbidity in psoriasis patients which may be explained by an inflammatory model. We recommend that clinicians conduct universal screening of depression, anxiety, and suicidality among their psoriasis patients and remain vigilant for any symptoms of severe psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia. Collaboration between dermatologists, psychiatrists and primary care physicians is essential in supporting psychological wellbeing and clinical outcomes for psoriasis patients.

Hair Removal Practices: A Literature Review.

Hair removal practices have evolved from adhering to social, cultural, and religious traditions to meeting aesthetic standards. Hair removal methods can be divided into two categories: 1) depilation, which involves removing the hair shaft and includes shaving and chemical depilatories, and 2) epilation, which involves removing the hair shaft, follicle, and bulb, and includes plucking, threading, waxing, sugaring, lasers, intense pulsed light system, electrolysis, and photodynamic therapy. Furthermore, an eflornithine hydrochloride 13.9% cream (Vaniqa®, neither an epilatory or depilatory technique), has been US FDA- and Health Canada-approved to slow the rate of facial hair growth and to be used in combination with other hair removal methods. All methods are temporary except for electrolysis, and each technique has advantages and disadvantages in terms of efficacy and adverse events. Importantly, most studies examining the efficacy of hair removal techniques are limited to darker hair and fairer skin, and further research is required especially for those with light-colored hair.

Rosacea: An Update in Diagnosis, Classification and Management.

The diagnosis and classification of rosacea has been modified to reflect presenting features. On exclusion of differentials, the diagnosis of rosacea is based on the presence of either (1) phymatous changes, or (2) centrofacial persistent erythema. In their absence, diagnosis can be established by presence of any two of: flushing/transient erythema, papules and pustules, telangiectases, or ocular manifestations. Management of rosacea depends on presenting feature(s), their severity, and impact. General management includes gentle skin care, sun protection, and trigger avoidance. Evidence-based treatment recommendations include topical brimonidine and oxymetazoline for persistent erythema; topical azelaic acid, ivermectin, metronidazole, minocycline and oral doxycycline, tetracycline and isotretinoin for papules and pustules; vascular lasers and light devices for telangiectases; and omega-3 fatty acids and cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion for ocular rosacea. While surgical or laser therapy can be considered for clinically noninflamed phyma, there are no trials on their utility. Combination therapies include topical brimonidine with topical ivermectin, or topical metronidazole with oral doxycycline. Topical metronidazole, topical ivermectin, and topical azelaic acid are appropriate for maintenance therapy. In conclusion, the updated phenotype approach, based on presenting clinical features, is the foundation for current diagnosis, classification, and treatment of rosacea.

Early clinical sequelae of Ebola virus disease in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the prevalence and predictors of clinical sequelae in survivors of Ebola virus disease (EVD). The EVD Survivor Clinic in Port Loko, Sierra Leone, has provided clinical care for 603 of 661 survivors living in the district. We did a cross-sectional study to describe the prevalence, nature, and predictors of three key EVD sequelae (ocular, auditory, and articular) in this cohort of EVD survivors. METHODS: We reviewed available clinical and laboratory records of consecutive patients assessed in the clinic between March 7, 2015, and April 24, 2015. We used univariate and multiple logistic regression to examine clinical and laboratory features of acute EVD with the following outcomes in convalescence: new ocular symptoms, uveitis, auditory symptoms, and arthralgias. FINDINGS: Among 277 survivors (59% female), median age was 29 years (IQR 20-36) and median time from discharge from an EVD treatment facility to first survivor clinic visit was 121 days (82-151). Clinical sequelae were common, including arthralgias (n=210, 76%), new ocular symptoms (n=167, 60%), uveitis (n=50, 18%), and auditory symptoms (n=67, 24%). Higher Ebola viral load at acute EVD presentation (as shown by lower cycle thresholds on real-time RT-PCR testing) was independently associated with uveitis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3·33, 95% CI 1·87-5·91, for every five-point decrease in cycle threshold) and with new ocular symptoms or ocular diagnoses (aOR 3·04, 95% CI 1·87-4·94). INTERPRETATION: Clinical sequelae during early EVD convalescence are common and sometimes sight threatening. These findings underscore the need for early clinical follow-up of survivors of EVD and urgent provision of ocular care as part of health systems strengthening in EVD-affected west African countries. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.