The real time to surgery: Limited delay after medical optimization does not impact hip fracture surgery outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Current U.S./Canadian guidelines recommend hip fracture surgery within 48 h of injury to decrease morbidity/mortality. Multiple studies have identified medical optimization as the key component of time to surgery, but have inherent bias as patients with multiple co-morbidities often take longer to optimize. This study aimed to evaluate time from medical optimization to surgery (TMOS) to determine if "real surgical delay" is associated with: 1) mortality and 2) complications for geriatric hip fracture patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of geriatric hip fractures treated from 2015-2018 at a single, level-1 trauma center was conducted. Univariate logistic regression was performed to identify association between TMOS and post-operative complication rates. For mortality, the Wilcoxon test was used to compare TMOS for patients discharged following surgery to those who were not. RESULTS: A total of 884 hip fractures were treated operatively, with median TMOS 16.2 h (5.0-22.5, 1st-3rd quartiles). Univariate logistic regression models did not identify an association between TMOS and complication rates. For patients successfully discharged, median TMOS was 16.2 h (5.0-22.3, 1st-3rd quartiles). For the cohort of patients not successfully discharged, median TMOS was 19.1 h (10.1-25.9, 1st-3rd quartiles, p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: "Real surgical delay", or TMOS is not associated with increased complications or with inpatient mortality for geriatric hip fracture patients. With few exceptions, our institution adhered to the 48-hour time window from injury to hip surgery. We maintain the belief timely surgery following optimization plays a crucial role in the geriatric hip fracture patient outcomes.

Cannabis Abuse Is Associated With Greater Medical Complications, Emergency Department Visits, and Readmissions Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased legalization, little is known about the influence of cannabis use disorder (CUD) following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fractures (DRFs). The aims were to determine whether CUD patients undergoing ORIF for DRF have increased: (1) medical complications; and (2) health care utilization (emergency department [ED] visits and readmission rates). METHODS: Patients were identified from an insurance database from 2010 to 2020 using Current Procedural Terminology codes: 25607, 25608, and 25609. Patients with a history of CUD were 1:5 ratio matched to controls by age, sex, tobacco use, alcohol abuse, opioid dependence, and comorbidities. This yielded 13,405 patients with (n = 2,297) and without (n = 11,108) CUD. Outcomes were to compare 90-day medical complications, ED visits, and readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression models computed the odds ratios of CUD on dependent variables. P values less than .005 were significant. RESULTS: The incidence of CUD among patients aged 20 to 69 years undergoing ORIF increased from 4.0% to 8.0% from 2010 to 2020 (P < .001). Cannabis use disorder patients incurred significantly higher rates and odds of developing 90-day medical complications (15.24% vs 5.76%), including pneumoniae (3.66% vs 1.67%), cerebrovascular accidents (1.04% vs 0.32%), pulmonary emboli (0.57% vs 0.16%), respiratory failures (1.00% vs 0.48%), and surgical site infections (1.70% vs 1.04%; all P < .004). Emergency department visits (2.53% vs 1.14%) and readmission rates (5.79% vs 4.29%) within 90 days were higher among cannabis abusers. CONCLUSIONS: With a greater number of states legalizing cannabis, hand surgeons should be cognizant of the association with increased 90-day complications and health care utilization parameters.

Social determinants of health in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty: are they associated with medical complications, healthcare utilization, and payments for care?

INTRODUCTION: Social determinants of health (SDOH) have previously been shown to impact orthopedic surgery outcomes. This study assessed whether greater socioeconomic disadvantage in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fracture was associated with differences in (1) medical complications, (2) emergency department (ED) utilization, (3) readmission rates, and (4) payments for care. METHODS: A US nationwide database was queried for hemiarthroplasties performed between 2010 and 2020. Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated measure of socioeconomic disadvantage reported on a scale of 0-100, was used to compare two cohorts of greater and lesser deprivation. Patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty from high ADI (95% +) were 1:1 propensity score matched to a comparison group of lower ADI (0-94%) while controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. This yielded 75,650 patients evenly distributed between the two cohorts. Outcomes studied were 90-day medical complications, ED utilizations, readmissions, and payments for care. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of the relationship between ADI and outcomes. p Values < 0.05 were significant. RESULTS: Patients of high ADI developed greater medical complications (46.74% vs. 44.97%; OR 1.05, p = 0.002), including surgical site infections (1.19% vs. 1.00%; OR 1.20, p = 0.011), cerebrovascular accidents (1.64% vs. 1.41%; OR 1.16, p = 0.012), and respiratory failures (2.27% vs. 2.02%; OR 1.13, p = 0.017) compared to patients from lower ADIs. Although comparable rates of ED visits (2.92% vs. 2.86%; OR 1.02, p = 0.579), patients from higher ADI were readmitted at diminished rates (10.57% vs. 11.06%; OR 0.95, p = 0.027). Payments were significantly higher on the day of surgery ($7,570 vs. $5,974, p < 0.0001), as well as within 90 days after surgery ($12,700 vs. $10,462, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients experience increased 90-day medical complications and payments, similar ED utilizations, and decreased readmissions. These findings can be used to inform healthcare providers to minimize disparities in care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Clostridium difficile colitis following geriatric hip fracture surgery: incidence, trends, and risk factors from 45,910 patients.

PURPOSE: Clostridium difficile colitis is a serious complication in elderly patients undergoing surgery. The objectives of this study were: (1) to use a nationwide sample of patients to report the incidence and timing of C. difficile colitis in geriatric patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures, (2) to identify preoperative factors associated with developing C. difficile colitis and mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of the 2016-2019 ACS Targeted Hip Fracture database merged with the ACS-NSQIP database. Patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture were included. Outcomes studied were incidence, preoperative, and postoperative risk factors for occurrence of C. difficile infection and mortality. Chi-squared tests were used to compare demographics between the patients infected (study) and not infected (control). Logistic regression models were utilized to compute the odds ratios (OR) testing for the association of independent factors on developing C. difficile infection postoperatively and mortality. A statistical threshold was set at p < 0.008. RESULTS: The incidence of C. difficile infection within 30 days of hip fracture surgery was 0.81%. Fifty percent of infections were diagnosed within 9 days postoperatively. Preoperative and hospital-associated factors associated with development of C. difficile infection were ≥ 2 days until operation (OR 1.88 [95% CI 1.39-2.55], p < 0.001) and dependent functional status (OR 1.43 [95% CI 1.14-1.79], p = 0.002). After adjusting for multiple comorbidities, increased age, male sex, COPD, CHF, dependent functional status, and C. difficile infection were associated with increased mortality within 30 days of surgery (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Clostridium difficile colitis is a serious infection after hip fracture surgery in geriatric patients with an incidence of about 1%. Patients at increased risk should be targeted with preventative measures to prevent the morbidity from this complication.

Technique for Extraction and Revision of a Bent Intramedullary Nail for a Subtrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Case Report.

CASE: A 17-year-old adolescent boy presented 2 months after initial intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of a comminuted subtrochanteric fracture with refracture at the previous site and approximately 20° varus angulation of the nail. The bent femoral nail was successfully extracted using an open technique using Lohman bone-holding clamps and a broad plate. At the 1-year follow-up, fracture union was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of a deformed IMN is rare. No standardized protocol exists in guiding orthopaedic surgeons. A thorough review of techniques is discussed on this unusual complication.

Soot-Embedded Extruded Talus Fracture After a 5-Story Fall: A Case Report.

CASE: A 17-year-old boy presented with an open talus fracture complicated by soot contamination after a chimney-related accident. Standard irrigation and debridement (I&D) methods were used, but complete removal of soot was not possible. At the latest follow-up, there was no evidence of infection, hardware failure, or avascular necrosis. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of well-established guidelines regarding I&D of traumatic wounds contaminated with fine particulates. A review of potential debridement methods is discussed. Orthoapedic surgeons should be aware of hydrosurgical debridement as a potential treatment approach in these unique scenarios.

The association of dementia on perioperative complications following primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Studies evaluating the association of dementia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures are limited. The aim was to investigate whether patients who have dementia undergoing THA for femoral neck fractures have higher rates of (1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS); 2) complications (medical and prostheses-related); and 3) healthcare expenditures. METHODS: A retrospective query using the PearlDiver database from January 1st, 2005 to March 31st, 2014 to identify patients with dementia undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures was performed. Dementia patients were 1:5 ratio matched to controls which yielded 22,758 patients in the study with (n = 3,798) and without (n = 18,960) dementia. Primary outcomes included comparing LOS, complications, and costs. A logistic regression was constructed to calculate the odds-ratios (OR) of dementia on complications. A p-value less than 0.004 was significant. RESULTS: Dementia patients had longer LOS (7-days vs. 6-days, p < 0.0001) and higher incidence and odds of medical complications (41.52 vs. 17.77%; OR 3.76, p < 0.0001), including cerebrovascular events (5.66 vs. 1.64%; OR 2.35, p < 0.0001), pneumoniae (9.98 vs. 3.82%; OR 1.82, p < 0.0001), and acute kidney injury (8.37 vs. 3.27%; OR 1.62, p < 0.0001). Study group patients had higher frequency of prostheses-related complications (9.53 vs. 8.31%; OR: 1.16, p = 0.012). The study group had greater total healthcare expenditures ($28,879.57 vs. $26,234.10, p < 0.0001) when analyzing ninety-day episode of care charges. CONCLUSION: Patients with dementia undergoing THA due to femoral neck fracture have increased LOS, medical and prostheses-related complications, and cost of care compared to their counterparts.

Risk factors for nonunion following open reduction and internal fixation for proximal humerus fractures.

PURPOSE: The incidence of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is rising and surgical intervention carries risk for fracture nonunion. The purpose was (1) to compare patient demographics of those that developed nonunion and (2) identify patient risk factors that predispose to nonunion following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for PHF. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Medicare Claims Database from 2005 to 2014 for patients who underwent primary ORIF for PHFs. Patients who developed nonunion were identified as the study group (n = 1020) and compared to a control group (n = 51,209). Primary endpoints were to compare demographics of the study group and the comparison cohorts and to identify patient-related risk factors associated with nonunion within 6-months following the index procedure. A logistic regression model was constructed to determine the association of comorbid conditions on developing a nonunion. A p value of 0.001 was the significance threshold. RESULTS: Patients who developed nonunion were younger, more likely to be male, and had higher Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index scores (7 vs. 5; p < 0.0001) when compared with controls. Iron deficiency anemia (OR: 1.32; p = 0.0001), tobacco use (OR: 1.32; p = 0.0004), rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.29; p = 0.0001), depression (OR: 1.28; p = 0.0002), and BMI range from 30-39 kg/m2 (OR: 1.21; p = 0.001) were significant risk factors for nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: Certain patient risk factors including tobacco use, iron deficiency anemia, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, and a BMI in the range of 30-39 were associated with nonunion within 6 months of ORIF for PHF. This study may help in the risk stratification of these patients.

How does sleep apnea impact outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: a matched-control analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that the prevalence of sleep apnea (SA) to be increasing within the United States. While studies have shown the association of SA and its association on complications following elective orthopedic procedures, well-powered studies investigating its impact in a traumatic setting are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether SA patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures have higher rates of: (1) hospital lengths of stay (LOS); (2) readmissions; (3) complications; and (4) healthcare expenditures. METHODS: The 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files was queried from 2005 to 2014 for patients who sustained femoral neck fractures and were treated with primary THA. The study group consisted of patients with concomitant diagnoses of SA, whereas patients without SA served as controls. Study group patients were matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio by age, sex, and various comorbid conditions. Demographics of the cohorts were compared using Pearson's chi-squared analyses, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the odds (OR) of the effects of SA on postoperative outcomes. A p value less than 0.006 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The final query yielded 24,936 patients within the study (n = 4166) and control (n = 20,770) cohorts. SA patients had significantly longer in-hospital LOS (6 vs. 5 days, p < 0.0001) but similar readmission rates (24.12 vs. 20.50%; OR: 1.03, p = 0.476). SA patients had significantly higher frequency and odds of developing medical complications (72.66 vs. 43.85%; OR: 1.57, p < 0.0001), and higher healthcare costs ($22,743.79 vs. $21,572.89, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: SA is associated with longer in-hospital LOS, higher rates of complications and healthcare expenditures. This study is vital as it can allow orthopaedists to educate patients with SA on the potential complications which may occur following their procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparison study of patient demographics and risk factors for infections following primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.

INTRODUCTION: While studies have shown favorable outcomes in the treatment of femoral neck fractures with the utilization of total hip arthroplasty (THA), adverse events, such as infections, can still occur. Therefore, the aims of this study were to 1) compare baseline demographics and 2) identify risk factors associated with developing either surgical site infections (SSIs) or peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary THA for femoral neck fractures were queried from the Medicare database. The inclusion criteria consisted of patients developing SSIs within 90 days or PJIs within 3 years following the index procedure. The query yielded 2502 patients who developed infections in the form of either SSIs (n = 987) or PJIs (n = 1515) out of 57,191 patients treated for femoral neck fractures with primary THA. Primary endpoints were to compare baseline demographic profiles and determine risk factors associated with developing infections. Multivariate binomial logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the odds (OR) of developing infections. A p value less than 0.001 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Patients who developed either infections were found to be significantly different when compared to patients who did not develop infections. SSI (10 vs. 8, p < 0.0001) and PJI (9 vs. 5, p < 0.0001) patients both had significantly higher mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores compared to their counterparts. The regression model found the greatest risks for developing SSIs included hypertension (OR 1.63, p = 0.001), pathologic weight loss (OR 1.58, p < 0.0001), and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) (OR 1.48, p < 0.0001), whereas IDA (OR 2.14, p < 0.0001), pathologic weight loss (OR 1.75, p < 0.0001), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR 1.57, p < 0.0001) increased the odds for PJIs. CONCLUSION: This study can be utilized by orthopedic surgeons and other healthcare professionals to adequately educate these patients of the complications which may occur following their surgery.

No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cephalomedullary nail (CMN) cut-out is a severe complication of treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. This study aimed to identify modifiable risk factors predictive of implant cut-out including: CMN proximal fixation type (lag screw vs. helical blade), tip-apex distance (TAD), reduction quality, nail length, screw location, and surgeon fellowship training. METHODS: A systematic review of the published literature was conducted on Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for English language papers (January 1st, 1985-May 10th, 2020), with 21 studies meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Studies providing quantitative data comparing factors affecting CMN nail cut-out were included, including fixation type (lag screw vs. helical blade), tip-apex distance (TAD), reduction quality, nail length, and screw location. Twelve studies were included and graded by MINOR and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to identify potential biases. Meta-analysis and pooled analysis were conducted when possible with forest plots to summarize odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: There was no difference in implant cut-out rate between lag screws (n = 745) versus helical blade (n = 371) (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.25-4.23). Pooled data analysis revealed TAD > 25 mm (n = 310) was associated with higher odds of increased cut-out rate relative to TAD < 25 mm (n = 730) (OR: 3.72; 95% CI: 2.06-6.72). CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that cephalomedullary implant type (lag screw vs. helical blade) is not a risk factor for implant cut-out. Consistent with the previous literature, increased tip-apex distance > 25 mm is a reliable predictor of implant cut-out risk. Suboptimal screw location and poor reduction quality are associated with increased risk of screw cut-out. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

A matched-control study on the effects of depressive disorders following open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization (WHO) postulates that depressive disorders (DD) will be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality by 2030. Studies evaluating the association of DD following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the treatment of acetabular fractures are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this matched-control study was to determine whether DD patients undergoing ORIF for acetabular fractures have higher rates of: (1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS); (2) readmissions; (3) medical complications; and (4) costs of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective query from the 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF) was performed to identify patients who underwent ORIF for acetabular fractures. The study group consisted of those patients with DD, whereas patients without the condition served as controls. Primary endpoints of the study were to compare in-hospital LOS, readmission rates, ninety-day medical complications, and costs of care. A p-value less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The query yielded 7084 patients within the study (ORIF = 1187, control = 5897). DD patients were found to have significantly longer in-hospital LOS (11 days vs. 10 days, p < 0.0001); however, odds (OR) of readmission rates were similar (23.16 vs. 18.68%; OR: 0.91, p = 0.26). Multivariate regression demonstrated DD to be associated with significantly higher (67.69 vs. 25.54%; OR: 2.64, p < 0.0001) 90-day medical complications. DD patients had significantly higher day of surgery ($30,505.93 vs. $28,424.85, p < 0.0001) and total global 90-day costs ($41,721.98 vs. $37,330.16, p < 0.0001) of care. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for covariates, DD is associated with longer in-hospital, complications, and costs of care in patients undergoing ORIF for the treatment of acetabular fractures, whereas readmission rates are similar. The study is vital as it can be used by orthopaedists and healthcare professionals to adequately educate these patients of the potential outcomes following their surgical procedure.

Causes, risk factors, and costs associated with ninety-day readmissions following primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors associated with primary THA readmissions have not yet been thoroughly analyzed when stratified by underlying indication. Given that a majority of THAs are done electively in the context of osteoarthritis (OA), it remains to be explored whether or not THAs performed non-electively in the trauma setting have different readmission patterns. Therefore, the aims of this study were to identify: 1) causes of readmissions; 2) patient-related risk-factors for readmissions; and 3) costs associated with the reasons for readmissions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who sustained a femoral neck fracture and underwent primary THA from 2005 to 2014 were identified. Those subsequently readmitted within 90-days following the procedure comprised the study cohort whereas those not readmitted served as the comparison cohort. Primary outcomes included identifying causes of readmissions, identifying patient-related risk-factors associated with readmissions and determining healthcare expenditures associated with the different readmission etiologies. A regression analysis was used to calculate the odds (OR) for readmissions. A p-value less than 0.01 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The regression model demonstrated the greatest patient-related risk factors included: electrolyte and fluid disorders (OR: 1.80, p < 0.0001), morbid obesity (OR: 1.60, p < 0.0001), pathologic weight loss (OR: 1.58, p < 0.0001), congestive heart failure (OR: 1.41, p < 0.0001), were the leading risk factors for readmissions. Pulmonary-related causes ($42,357.71) of readmission were the leading driver of costs of care. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic surgeons should identify and optimize pre-operative management of patient-related risk factors that increase readmissions following primary THA for femoral neck fractures. Additionally, pulmonary-related causes of readmission lead to the highest costs of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Perioperative Transfusion Associated With Increased Morbidity and Mortality in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Both conservative and liberal transfusion thresholds, in regard to hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, have been widely studied with varying outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate if transfusion administered peri- (anytime during the admission), pre-, intra-, or postoperatively an its association with morbidity and mortality in the geriatric population undergoing hip surgery. METHODS: This study was an institutional review board approved retrospective analysis of data collected from 841 patients at a single urban institution who underwent surgical repairs for hip fractures from 2008 to 2010. RESULTS: Our analysis included data from 841 surgical patients. Mean patient age was 83, 74% were female, 48% received spinal anesthesia while 52% underwent general anesthesia. Out of 841 patients, 425 were transfused during the perioperative period. Most transfusions occurred postoperatively. Perioperative, intraoperative and postoperative transfusion was associated with an increase in post-operative AKI. Intraoperative blood transfusion was associated with an increase in morbidity (11.6% increased to 22.2%) by 1.9 fold, AKI (3.9% increased to 11.1%) by 2.8 fold, as well as an increase in mortality (5.2 increased to 15.6%) within 60 days by 3 fold. CONCLUSIONS: This may suggest that patients transfused prior to surgery, despite having met a specific trigger hemoglobin level earlier, may have been treated before deteriorating to a point that would cause future systemic implications.

Comparison of Patient Demographics and Patient-Related Risk Factors for Infections After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acetabular Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: In the proper age group, there is evidence that total hip arthroplasty (THA) has superior outcomes for the treatment of acetabular fractures compared with open reduction and internal fixation. Studies comparing patient demographics and identifying risk factors for either surgical site infections (SSIs) or periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to (1) compare baseline demographics of patients who did and did not develop infections and (2) identify risk factors associated with developing either SSIs or PJIs. METHODS: A retrospective study from 2005 to 2014 was done using a nationwide claims database. The inclusion criteria consisted of patients sustaining an acetabular fracture and treated with THA who developed either SSIs or PJIs within 90 days or 2 years, respectively, whereas patients not developing infections served as control subjects. The final study yielded 13,059 patients within the study (n = 988) and control cohort (n = 12,071). Baseline demographics were compared. A multivariate regression model calculated the odds ratio (OR) associated with development of infections. P value less than 0.002 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study demonstrated significant differences among the cohorts regarding baseline demographics. The greatest risk factors for SSIs within 90 days were morbid obesity (OR: 1.84, P < 0.0001), pathologic weight loss (OR: 1.64, P < 0.0001), and iron deficiency anemia (OR: 1.59, P = 0.001). An increased risk of PJIs was associated with iron deficiency anemia (OR: 1.97, P < 0.0001), pathologic weight loss (OR: 1.72, P < 0.0001), and morbid obesity (OR: 1.70, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study found notable differences between baseline demographics of the cohorts and a myriad of risk factors associated with developing infections after THA for acetabular fractures. This study provides insight into orthopaedic surgeons and other healthcare professionals on the need of properly educating these high-risk patients of the potential consequences which they may encounter after their procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Psychological Effects of Musculoskeletal Trauma.

Musculoskeletal injuries comprise a large percentage of hospital admissions for adults and often contribute to persistent daily pain as an illness; opioid dependence; disability; and complaints of increased depression, anxiety, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. The prevalence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder after orthopaedic trauma has been found to be considerably greater than the general adult cohort. Soon after sustaining a fracture, psychological factors can predict pain and disability many months after injury, even after controlling for injury severity. Thus, early in the care of orthopaedic trauma, there exists an opportunity to improve overall health by attending to psychological and social concerns, along with physical health. Recent literature has identified clinically actionable subgroups within the orthopaedic trauma cohort that are at psychological risk after an injury. Improving positive factors such as resilience, social support, and self-efficacy via validated interventions such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, mindfulness training, and other types of mindset training has helped people return to their daily routine. Raising awareness of the psychological effects of trauma among the orthopaedic community could improve post-treatment planning, increase referrals to appropriate nonmedical professionals, and implement earlier effective interventions.

Comparison study of patient demographics and risk factors for surgical site infections following open reduction and internal fixation for lateral malleolar ankle fractures within the medicare population.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze a comprehensive database to 1) compare patient demographic profiles; and 2) identify patient-related risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for lateral malleolar ankle fractures. METHODS: Patients treated with ORIF for lateral malleolar ankle fractures that developed SSIs within 1-year following the procedure were identified. Study group demographics were compared to a control cohort and risks for developing SSI were calculated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between the control group and patients with SSIs. The study showed that morbidly obese patients, peripheral vascular disease, and electrolyte/fluid imbalance were the greatest risk factors for developing SSIs following ORIF for lateral malleolar fractures. CONCLUSION: The study is useful as it can allow orthopaedists to optimize these high-risk patients to potentially mitigate this adverse event.

Effect of weekend admission on geriatric hip fractures.

BACKGROUND: The care discrepancy for patients presenting to a hospital on the weekend relative to the work week is well documented. With respect to hip fractures, however, there is no consensus about the presence of a so-called "weekend effect". This study sought to determine the effects, if any, of weekend admission on care of geriatric hip fractures admitted to a large tertiary care hospital. It was hypothesized that geriatric hip fracture patients admitted on a weekend would have longer times to medical optimization and surgery and increased complication and mortality rates relative to those admitted on a weekday. AIM: To determine if weekend admission of geriatric hip fractures is associated with poor outcome measures and surgical delay. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of operative geriatric hip fractures treated from 2015-2017 at a large tertiary care hospital was conducted. Two cohorts were compared: patients who arrived at the emergency department on a weekend, and those that arrived at the emergency department on a weekday. Primary outcome measures included mortality rate, complication rate, transfusion rate, and length of stay. Secondary outcome measures included time from emergency department arrival to surgery, time from emergency department arrival to medical optimization, and time from medical optimization to surgery. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in length of stay (P = 0.2734), transfusion rate (P = 0.9325), or mortality rate (P = 0.3460) between the weekend and weekday cohorts. Complication rate was higher in patients who presented on a weekend compared to patients who presented on a weekday (13.3% vs 8.3%; P = 0.044). Time from emergency department arrival to medical optimization (22.7 h vs 20.0 h; P = 0.0015), time from medical optimization to surgery (13.9 h vs 10.8 h; P = 0.0172), and time from emergency department arrival to surgery (42.7 h vs 32.5 h; P < 0.0001) were all significantly longer in patients who presented to the hospital on a weekend compared to patients who presented to the hospital on a weekday. CONCLUSION: This study provided insight into the "weekend effect" for geriatric hip fractures and found that day of presentation has a clinically significant impact on delivered care.

Patient outcomes for the Internal Joint Stabilizer of the Elbow (IJS-E).

BACKGROUND: Recently, the Internal Joint Stabilizer of the Elbow (IJS-E) was developed as an internal dynamic fixator for use in the setting of traumatic elbow instability. This study reviews the patients who had an IJS-E placed at our institution. Specifically, postoperative complications, postoperative functional outcomes, and need for subsequent procedures were reviewed. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients in whom the IJS-E was implanted from June 2016 to July 2018. Indications for use, range of motion at final follow-up, and the need for subsequent procedures were reviewed. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Broberg-Morrey scores were also obtained. RESULTS: Ten IJS-E devices were implanted into 10 patients. Average length of follow-up was 13.4 months. Average flexion-extension and pronation-supination motion arcs at final follow-up were 106° and 141°, respectively. Seventy-eight percent of patients achieved >100° arcs of both flexion-extension and pronation-supination. Average DASH and Broberg-Morrey scores were 28.7 and 68.2, respectively. Four subsequent procedures were required in 4 patients: 2 contracture releases, 1 medial collateral ligament reconstruction, and 1 total elbow arthroplasty. There were no postoperative infections or nerve injuries. DISCUSSION: The IJS-E has replaced the use of external hinged fixation at our institution. Final range of motion was consistent with that reported for terrible triad and complex elbow dislocation injuries. The IJS-E is a good option for use in patients with traumatic elbow instability, as it restores motion and function without immediate postoperative complication. However, it does not eliminate the potential for future operative intervention in these complex injuries.

Does Care at a Trauma Center Affect Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients?

INTRODUCTION: With respect to care setting, there are mixed results in the literature with respect to the role of trauma centers in management of isolated geriatric hip fractures. During a transition from a Level 3 to a Level 1 trauma center, significant protocol changes were implemented that sought to standardize and improve the care of hip fracture patients. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of this transition on the management, efficiency, morbidity, mortality, and discharge of geriatric hip fracture patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of geriatric hip fractures treated operatively was conducted. Two cohorts were compared: hip fractures in the year prior to (2015) and year following (2017) Level 1 Trauma designation. Primary outcome measures were length of stay (LOS), transfusion rate, complication rate, and mortality rate. Secondary outcome measures were time from emergency department (ED) arrival to medical optimization, time from medical optimization to surgery, time from ED arrival to surgery, and discharge destination. RESULTS: There were no differences in LOS, transfusion rate, or complication rate between the two cohorts. There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower in-hospital mortality after the transition (2.24% vs 0.83%). There were no differences in time from ED arrival to medical optimization, time from medical optimization to surgery, time from ED arrival to surgery, and percentage of patients discharged home between the cohorts. DISCUSSION: Management of operative geriatric hip fractures at our institution has remained consistent following transition to a Level 1 trauma center. There was a trend toward lower mortality after transition, but this difference was not statistically significant. We attribute the variety of findings in the literature with respect to trauma center management of hip fractures to individualized institutional trauma protocols as well as the diverse patient populations these centers serve.