An Online Investigation Into Direct-to-Consumer Men's Health Clinics: The Who, What, and Where.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize direct-to-consumer (DTC) men's health clinics by reviewing their online content. Increasing numbers of patients are seeking treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) and hypogonadism from DTC "men's health" clinics. Treatments are often used off-label, with lack of transparency of provider credentials and qualifications. METHODS: We identified DTC Men's Health Clinics in the United States by internet search by state using the terms, "Men's Health Clinic," and "Low T Center." All stand-alone clinics were reviewed. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-three clinics were reviewed, with 147 (65.9%) offered ED treatments and 196 (87.9%) offering testosterone replacement, and 120 (53.8%) offering both ED treatment and testosterone replacement. Of those clinics offering ED treatments, 93 (63.3%) advertised shockwave therapy and 84 (57.1%) PRP therapy. There were 56 (38%) who offered shockwave therapy and PRP. ICI was significantly more likely to be offered if there was a urologist on staff (p <.001). Clinic providers represented 20 different medical and alternative medicine specialties. Internal medicine was most common (17.4%), followed by family medicine (11.1%). A nonphysician (nurse practitioner or physician assistant) was listed as the primary provider in 10 clinics (4.5%) and 45 clinics (20.1%) did not list their providers. Urologists were listed as the primary provider in 10.3% of clinics. A naturopathic provider was listed as a staff member in 22 (11.6%) of clinics. CONCLUSION: There is significant heterogeneity and misinformation available to the public regarding men's health. Familiarity with and insight into practice patterns of "men's health" clinics will help provide informed patient care and counseling.

Socioeconomic Disparities and Risk Factors in Patients Presenting With Ischemic Priapism: A Multi-Institutional Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate contemporary clinical presentations of priapism, their association with socioeconomic characteristics, and the role of prescribing providers in priapism episodes in a large cohort of patients managed at 3 major academic health systems. METHODS: We identified all consecutive patients presenting with ischemic priapism to the emergency departments of three major academic health systems (2014 -2019). Demographic characteristics, priapism etiologies, and clinical management were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to assess the contribution of socioeconomic characteristics and the role of prescribing providers in priapism episodes. RESULTS: We identified 102 individuals with a total of 181 priapism encounters. Hispanic race, lower income quartile, sickle-cell disease, and illicit drug use were associated with increased risk of recurrent episodes. Of ICI users, 57% received their prescriptions from non-urological medical professionals (NUMPs); the proportion with recurrent episodes was higher for NUMPs compared to urologists (24% vs 0%, P = 0.06) with no demographic differences identified between patients treated by either group. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic disparities exist among patients presenting with recurrent episodes of priapism, potentially highlighting systemic issues with access to care and patient education. With most patients who developed ischemic priapism from ICI being prescribed these medications by NUMPs, further investigation is required to elucidate the prescribing and counseling patterns of these providers. Increased awareness of disparities and complications may improve patient safety.

Plication for Correction of Congenital Penile Curvature: With or Without Degloving?

INTRODUCTION: Previously, incisionless plication (IP) for correction of congenital penile curvature (CPC) has been performed after penile degloving via a circumscribing incision. AIM: To describe our experience with non-degloving incisionless penile plication (NDIP) for correction of CPC and compare these outcomes with those of men who underwent degloving incisionless penile plication (DIP). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of men ≤ 45 years of age who underwent incisionless penile plication for correction of CPC between 2008 and 2020 at two adult tertiary hospitals. Patients underwent either NDIP, performed through a 2-3 cm longitudinal incision along the proximal-to-mid shaft opposite the point of maximum penile curvature, or DIP via a sub-coronal circumscribing incision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the non-degloving and degloving groups. RESULTS: Among the 38 men (mean age, 26 years) who met the inclusion criteria, 25 underwent NDIP, including 6 patients with biplanar curvature (2 Ventral, 4 Dorsal, 6 Lateral). Thirteen patients underwent DIP, including 1 patient with biplanar curvature (1 ventral, 1 lateral). Curvature reduction was 50 ± 23 degrees for the NDIP group and 36 ± 10 degrees for the DIP group (P = .04). Five (20%) patients in the NDIP group and nine (69%) patients in the DIP group experienced a reduction in stretched penile length following plication (SPL) (P = .01). One patient in the NDIP group underwent an additional plication for recurrent curvature. CONCLUSION: Both NDIP and DIP are safe and highly efficacious techniques for the correction of CPC. Kusin SB, Khouri RK, Dropkin BM, et al., Plication for Correction of Congenital Penile Curvature: With or Without Degloving?. Sex Med 2021;9:100462.

Is Opioid-free Post-Vasectomy Analgesia a Pain? A Single Surgeon Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of transitioning from opioid to non-opioid analgesia post-vasectomy on unplanned opioid prescriptions and health encounters. METHODS: A retrospective review for patients who underwent vasectomy from October 2018 through December 2019 was performed. Beginning February 1st, 2019, patients were counseled to take scheduled acetaminophen and ibuprofen in lieu of acetaminophen with codeine, with an opioid prescription only provided upon request. Analysis was performed comparing 200 consecutive patients before and after this transition. Baseline patient characteristics, unplanned postoperative encounters for pain within 30 days of vasectomy, and associated narcotic prescriptions were compared between groups. RESULTS: 400 patients were included, consisting of 200 patients pre and 200 patients postintervention. There were no differences in socioeconomic characteristics between groups. No differences between the pre- and postintervention groups were observed in terms of generating telephone calls to clinic (9% vs 11%, P = .5), clinic visits (2.5% vs 2.5%, P = 1), or ED visits (0% vs 1%), P = .5) for the pre and postintervention cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients that are not prescribed opioids after vasectomy do not generate additional phone calls, clinic, or ED visits compared to those that were routinely prescribed prior to our institutional change. We have permanently discontinued the routine use of opioids for post-vasectomy analgesia. Other physicians performing vasectomy should consider making this change as well.

Pain management following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: transitioning to an opioid free regimen.

Few studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of postoperative pain regimens that exclude opioids altogether in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). To reduce opioid use, we sought to develop an opioid-free regimen for RARP and determine perioperative outcomes before and after implementation. A retrospective, pre-post-interventional study was performed at a single institution between 8/2018 and 10/2019. An opioid-free pain regimen was developed and instituted on 3/7/2019, and all patients received preoperative counseling regarding pain expectations and management. Postoperative pain score was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid use, length of stay, adverse events and unplanned health encounters within 30 days of discharge. Pearson's chi-squared and Student's t-tests were performed on categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine risk factors for postoperative opioid use in the opioid-free cohort. A total of 89 patients were included for analysis; consisting of 47 (53%) pre-intervention and 42 (47%) post-intervention patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. A significantly lower proportion of patients in the post-intervention group were administered opioids postoperatively (5% vs 53%, p < 0.01), despite having similar postoperative pain scores (2.69 vs 3.11, p = 0.19) and length of stay (1.0 days vs 1.2 days, p = 0.07). The post-intervention group had a significantly lower rate of opioid discharge prescriptions (14% vs 96%, p < 0.01). The rate of ED visits (12% vs 15%, p = 0.68), pain-related phone calls (17% vs 19%, p = 0.76) or adverse events (19% vs 13%, p = 0.42) were similar between groups. Among the opioid-free group, older patients were less likely to be administered postoperative opioids (OR 0.84, p = 0.046). A structured opioid-free pain regimen following RARP is non-inferior compared to traditional opioid-based standard of care. Adoption of similar regimens can help address the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States and future work is needed to apply these principles broadly.

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Factors Associated with Appointment Completion and Visit Modality during Virtual Urology Visits.

INTRODUCTION: The necessary transition to telehealth during COVID-19 generated new challenges for providers and patients, with the opportunity to exacerbate or mitigate standing care inequities. To better understand virtual medicine care delivery in urology, we sought to identify factors associated with appointment completion and use of telephone or video visits. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-institutional cross-sectional analysis of all remote patient appointments from March 17, 2020-August 31, 2020. The primary outcome was appointment completion rate. Patients were determined to have not completed an appointment if they canceled, left before being seen or were a "no show." Secondary analysis evaluated factors associated with scheduling video vs telephone appointment. Various patient and appointment-specific factors were analyzed. Chi-squared tests and univariate logistic regression were used for analysis accordingly. RESULTS: Of 3,769 appointments, 2,996 (79.5%) were completed while 773 (20.5%) were not, with 1,544 (41.0%) completed over telephone while 2,225 (59.0%) used video. Race, age, income, insurance, location, division and appointment length showed statistical significance (p <0.05) for appointment completion and visit modality. Females were more likely to use video (62.7% vs 58.0%, p=0.01). Patients were more likely to complete afternoon visits (81.1% vs 78.3%, p=0.04), visits with physicians (81.2% vs 75.4%, p <0.01) and phone calls (83.3% vs 76.9%, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors were associated with both appointment completion rate and use of telephone or video. These factors may reflect disparities in social determinants of health and select patients may benefit from additional coordination of care to prevent missed appointments and deconstruct inequities.

Resolution of Abdominal Pain After Coil Embolization of Varicocele with Robotic Resection of Gonadal Vein.

Background: Chronic pain in the region of varicocele embolization is not well described and can be a challenging symptom to manage, with limited options for treatment after failing conservative measures. It is important to counsel patients of this potential complication when determining the best option for varicocele repair. To our knowledge, there are no reported cases of gonadal vein excision for chronic abdominal pain after coil embolization. Case Presentation: A 63-year-old Caucasian male presented to our urology clinic after coil embolization. His testicular pain resolved but he reported new left-sided abdominal pain after coil embolization for a large left varicocele. After failing conservative measures including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, and prednisone, he was referred for further work-up and to discuss treatment options. On presentation, the patient reported pain on the left side of his abdomen consistent with the location of gonadal vein. After extensive counseling that surgical removal may not alleviate his pain, robotic gonadal vein excision was offered, and the patient elected to proceed. Intraoperatively, the coils were easily seen through the wall of the vessel. This segment of the gonadal vein containing the coil was excised in its entirety. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1 with only nonsteroidal pain medications. Six weeks postoperatively, the patient reported no complications, and almost complete resolution of his preoperative pain. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first case report demonstrating the surgical removal of the gonadal vein for treatment of chronic abdominal pain after varicocele embolization. After failing conservative measures, this may present another viable treatment option to address this difficult complication in a select group of patients.

Vaginal Approach to Excise a Rare Paraurethral Leiomyoma.

Leiomyomas are benign tumors of smooth muscle origin occurring throughout the genitourinary system. While leiomyomas in the uterus are frequently seen, urethral and paraurethral leiomyomas are extremely rare with a hand full of cases in the literature. Typically, periurethral leiomyomas can present with a mass protruding from the urethra originating from the proximal and posterior portion of the urethra. Herein, we present a new case of a paraurethral leiomyoma causing mass effect on the bladder leading to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with no gross involvement of the urethra.

Differentiating reconstructive techniques in partial nephrectomy: a propensity score analysis.

INTRODUCTION: To assess whether volumetric measurements can differentiate functional changes between reconstructive techniques after partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for a single renal mass were retrospectively studied between 2008 and 2012. Computed tomography scans were available for volume calculations on 56 (18 non-renorrhaphy and 38 renorrhaphy). Institutional review board approval was obtained. The primary outcome was %volume loss in the operated kidney, which was calculated from three-dimensional reconstructions using a semiautomatic segmentation algorithm. Multivariable regression and propensity score analysis was performed. RESULTS: Volumetric analysis detected a difference in mean %volume loss between two-layer reconstruction (cortical renorrhaphy and base-layer) and base-layer only (15.6% versus 3.8%, p < 0.001). The mean %glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss was also greater in the two-layer group (8.9% versus 2.4%, p = 0.03). Demographics were similar between groups except the two-layer group was older, had more males, and increased ischemia time. On multivariable regression the presence of two-layer closure (ß = -15.2%, p < 0.001) and tumor diameter (ß = -7.4, p = 0.004) were significant predictors of %volume loss while ischemia time (p = 0.88) was not. Two-layer closure remained a predictor on propensity-adjusted analysis (ß = -14.3, p = 0.004). The base-layer only group had two (5.3%) urine leaks and two (5.3%) bleeding complications. The two-layer group had two (1.7%) urine leaks and three (2.5%) bleeding complications (p = 0.23, 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Volume loss calculated from CT scans can be used to monitor postoperative renal function. Techniques for renal reconstruction and tumor diameter are associated with volume and functional loss after partial nephrectomy and should be controlled for in future studies.