Enpatoran in COVID-19 pneumonia: Safety and efficacy results from a phase II randomized trial.

Enpatoran is a selective inhibitor of toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (TLR7/8) that potentially targets pro-inflammatory pathways induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A phase II study conducted in Brazil, the Philippines, and the USA during the early pandemic phase assessed the safety and efficacy of enpatoran in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia (NCT04448756). A total of 149 patients, who scored 4 on the World Health Organization's (WHO) 9-point ordinal severity scale, were randomized 1:1:1 and received enpatoran 50 mg (n = 54) or 100 mg (n = 46), or placebo (n = 49) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 14 days plus standard of care. The primary objectives were safety and time to recovery (WHO 9-point scale ≤3). Clinical deterioration (WHO 9-point scale ≥ 5) was a key secondary objective. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable across groups (56.5%-63.0%). Treatment-related TEAEs were numerically higher with enpatoran 50 mg (14.8%) than 100 mg (10.9%) or placebo (8.2%). Serious TEAEs were numerically lower with enpatoran (50 mg 9.3%, 100 mg 2.2%) than placebo (18.4%). The primary efficacy objective was not met; median time to recovery was 3.4-3.9 days across groups, with placebo-treated patients recovering on average faster than anticipated. Clinical deterioration event-free rates up to Day 7 were 90.6%, 95.6%, and 81.6% with enpatoran 50 mg, 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Enpatoran was well tolerated by patients acutely ill and hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Positive signals in some secondary end points suggested potential beneficial effects, supporting further evaluation of enpatoran in patients with hyperinflammation due to infection or autoimmunity.

Identifying lupus Patient Subsets Through Immune Cell Deconvolution of Gene Expression Data in Two Atacicept Phase II Studies.

OBJECTIVE: To use cell-based gene signatures to identify patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) in the phase II/III APRIL-SLE and phase IIb ADDRESS II trials most likely to respond to atacicept. METHODS: A published immune cell deconvolution algorithm based on Affymetrix gene array data was applied to whole blood gene expression from patients entering APRIL-SLE. Five distinct patient clusters were identified. Patient characteristics, biomarkers, and clinical response to atacicept were assessed per cluster. A modified immune cell deconvolution algorithm was developed based on RNA sequencing data and applied to ADDRESS II data to identify similar patient clusters and their responses. RESULTS: Patients in APRIL-SLE (N = 105) were segregated into the following five clusters (P1-5) characterized by dominant cell subset signatures: high neutrophils, T helper cells and natural killer (NK) cells (P1), high plasma cells and activated NK cells (P2), high B cells and neutrophils (P3), high B cells and low neutrophils (P4), or high activated dendritic cells, activated NK cells, and neutrophils (P5). Placebo- and atacicept-treated patients in clusters P2,4,5 had markedly higher British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A/B flare rates than those in clusters P1,3, with a greater treatment effect of atacicept on lowering flares in clusters P2,4,5. In ADDRESS II, placebo-treated patients from P2,4,5 were less likely to be SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4, SRI-6, and BILAG-Based Combined Lupus Assessment responders than those in P1,3; the response proportions again suggested lower placebo effect and a greater treatment differential for atacicept in P2,4,5. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis indicates larger differences between placebo- and atacicept-treated patients with SLE in a molecularly defined patient subset.

A plain language summary of what clinical studies can tell us about the safety of evobrutinib - a potential treatment for multiple sclerosis.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary explains the findings from a recent investigation that combined the results of over 1000 people from three clinical studies to understand the safety of evobrutinib. Evobrutinib is an oral medication (taken by mouth), being researched as a potential treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). This medication was also investigated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Over 1000 people have taken evobrutinib as part of three separate phase 2 clinical studies. These studies looked at how much of the drug should be taken, how safe the drug is, and how well it might work for treating a certain medical condition. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Evobrutinib was well-tolerated by participants in all three studies. The number of side effects reported by participants taking the medication was very similar to those reported by participants taking the placebo (a 'dummy' treatment without a real drug). The most common side effects in clinical studies were urinary tract infections, headache, swelling of the nose and throat, diarrhoea and blood markers of potential liver damage (these returned to normal once the treatment was stopped). WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: The safety data from all three clinical studies are encouraging and can be used to inform further research into using evobrutinib in MS. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02975349 (multiple sclerosis), NCT03233230 (rheumatoid arthritis), NCT02975336 (systemic lupus erythematosus) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Investigation of the low glutamate diet as an adjunct treatment for pediatric epilepsy: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Current dietary therapies for epilepsy have side effects and are low in nutrients, which would make an alternative dietary treatment, which addresses these issues, advantageous. One potential option is the low glutamate diet (LGD). Glutamate is implicated in seizure activity. Blood brain barrier permeability in epilepsy could enable dietary glutamate to reach the brain and contribute to ictogenesis. OBJECTIVE: to assess the LGD as an adjunct treatment for pediatric epilepsy. METHODS: This study was a nonblinded, parallel, randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted virtually due to COVID-19 and registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04545346). Participants were eligible if they were between the ages of 2 and 21 with ≥4 seizures per month. Baseline seizures were assessed for 1-month, then participants were allocated via block randomization to the intervention month (N=18), or a wait-listed control month followed by the intervention month (N=15). Outcome measures included seizure frequency, caregiver global impression of change (CGIC), non-seizure improvements, nutrient intake, and adverse events. RESULTS: Nutrient intake significantly increased during the intervention. No significant differences in seizure frequency were observed between intervention and control groups. However, efficacy was assessed at 1-month compared to the standard 3-months in diet research. Additionally, 21% of participants were observed to be clinical responders to the diet. Overall health (CGIC) significantly improved in 31%, 63% experienced ≥1 non-seizure improvements, and 53% experienced adverse events. Clinical response likelihood decreased with increasing age (0.71 [0.50-0.99], p=0.04), as did the likelihood of overall health improvement (0.71 [0.54-0.92], p=0.01). DISCUSSION: This study provides preliminary support for the LGD as an adjunct treatment before epilepsy becomes drug resistant, which is in contrast to the role of current dietary therapies in drug resistant epilepsy.

Efficacy and Safety of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Evobrutinib in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Evobrutinib is a highly selective, orally administered Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. The objective of this phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evobrutinib in patients with active autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Patients were diagnosed with SLE by either the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria or at least four American College of Rheumatology criteria 6 months or more prior to screening, had an SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 score of 6 or more, were autoantibody-positive and on standard-of-care therapy. Randomization was 1:1:1:1 to oral evobrutinib 25 mg once daily (QD), 75 mg QD, 50 mg twice daily, or placebo. Primary efficacy endpoints were SLE responder index (SRI)-4 response at week 52 and SRI-6 response at week 52 in the high disease activity subpopulation. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: A total of 469 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of evobrutinib or placebo at the time of primary analysis. Mean (SD) age at baseline was 40.7 (±12.3) years; 94.9% of patients were female. Neither primary efficacy endpoint was met. All doses of evobrutinib were well tolerated, and there was no clear dose effect on the incidence of reported TEAEs, or serious TEAEs, including severe infections. CONCLUSION: This phase II, dose-ranging trial in SLE failed to show a treatment effect of evobrutinib versus placebo at any dose. Evobrutinib was generally well tolerated, with no dose effect observed for TEAEs. These results suggest that BTK inhibition does not appear to be an effective therapeutic intervention for patients with SLE.

Disease trajectory of SLE clinical endpoints and covariates affecting disease severity and probability of response: Analysis of pooled patient-level placebo (Standard-of-Care) data to enable model-informed drug development.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease affecting multiple organ systems. Many investigational agents have failed or shown only modest effects when added to standard of care (SoC) therapy in placebo-controlled trials, and only two therapies have been approved for SLE in the last 60 years. Clinical trial outcomes have shown discordance in drug effects between clinical endpoints. Herein, we characterized longitudinal disease activity in the SLE population and the sources of variability by developing a latent disease trajectory model for SLE component endpoints (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index [SLEDAI], Physician's Global Assessment [PGA], British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index [BILAG]) and composite endpoints (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index [SRI], BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment [BICLA], and Lupus Low Disease Activity State [LLDAS]) using patient-level historical SoC data from nine phase II and III studies. Across all endpoints, in predictions up to 52 weeks from the final disease trajectory model, the following baseline covariates were associated with a greater decrease in SLE disease activity and higher response to placebo + SoC: Hispanic ethnicity from Central/South America, absence of hypocomplementemia, recent SLE diagnosis, and high baseline disease activity score using SLEDAI and BILAG separately. No discernible differences were observed in the trajectory of response to placebo + SoC across different SoC medications (antimalarial and immunosuppressant such as mycophenolate, methotrexate, and azathioprine). Across all endpoints, disease trajectory showed no difference in Asian versus non-Asian patients, supporting Asia-inclusive global SLE drug development. These results describe the first population approach to support a model-informed drug development framework in SLE.

Characterisation of the safety profile of evobrutinib in over 1000 patients from phase II clinical trials in multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: an integrated safety analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Analyse the integrated safety profile of evobrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), using pooled data from multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) trials. METHODS: Phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial data were analysed (N=1083; MS: n=213, 48 weeks (W); RA: n=390, 12W; SLE: n=480, 52W). The analysis included all patients who received ≥1 dose of evobrutinib (25 mg or 75 mg once daily, or 50 mg or 75 mgtwice daily) or placebo. Descriptive statistics and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR) were used to report treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Data from 1083 patients were pooled: evobrutinib, n=861; placebo, n=271 (sum >1083 due to MS trial design: n=49 received both placebo (W0-24) and evobrutinib 25 mg (W25-48)); median follow-up time (pt-years): evobrutinib, 0.501; placebo, 0.463. Across indications, the proportion of patients with TEAEs and the EAIR were similar for evobrutinib and placebo (66.2% (247.6 events/100 pt-years) vs 62.4% (261.4 events/100 pt-years)). By indication, the EAIR (events/100 pt-years) of TEAEs for evobrutinib versus placebo were: MS: 119.7 vs 148.3; RA: 331.8 vs 306.8; SLE: 343.0 vs 302.1. Two fatal events occurred (in SLE). The serious infections EAIR was 2.7 and 2.1 events/100 pt-years for evobrutinib and placebo. For previously reported BTKi-class effects, the EAIR of transient elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase TEAEs (events/100 pt-years) with evobrutinib versus placebo was 4.8 vs 2.8/3.5 vs 0.7, respectively. IgG levels were similar in evobrutinib/placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first BTKi-integrated safety analysis that includes patients with MS. Overall, evobrutinib treatment (all doses) was generally well tolerated across indications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02975349, NCT03233230, NCT02975336.

Randomized Phase II JANUS Study of Atacicept in Patients With IgA Nephropathy and Persistent Proteinuria.

Introduction: Patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and persistent proteinuria are at risk of progression to kidney failure. Atacicept is a novel B-cell-targeted immunomodulator, shown to reduce immunoglobulin levels in patients with autoimmune diseases. Methods: JANUS (NCT02808429) was a phase II study that assessed the safety, pharmacodynamic effects, and efficacy of atacicept in patients with IgAN and proteinuria ≥1 g/d or 0.75 mg/mg on 24-hour UPCR despite maximal standard of care therapy. Results: A total of 16 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo (n = 5), atacicept 25 mg (n = 6), or atacicept 75 mg (n = 5) once weekly using subcutaneous injection. Twelve (75%) completed ≥48 weeks of treatment; 8 (50%) completed 72 weeks of treatment and the 24-week safety follow-up period. Fourteen patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Three patients (placebo n = 1; atacicept 25 mg n = 2) reported serious TEAEs, none of which were treatment related. Dose-dependent reductions in IgA, IgG, IgM, and galactose-deficient (Gd)-IgA1 with atacicept at week 24 were maintained to week 72. Early reduction in proteinuria was observed at week 24 with atacicept. Renal function progressively declined with placebo but remained stable under exposure to atacicept. Conclusion: Atacicept has an acceptable safety profile in patients with IgAN and is effective at reducing the levels of pathogenic factor Gd-IgA1, with potential improvements in proteinuria and renal function.

Disease course following High Disease Activity Status revealed patterns in SLE.

BACKGROUND: We sought to examine the disease course of High Disease Activity Status (HDAS) patients and their different disease patterns in a real-world longitudinal cohort. Disease resolution till Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) has been a general treatment goal, but there is limited information on this subset of patients who achieve this. METHODS: All consenting patients of the Monash Lupus Cohort who had at least 12 months of observation were included. HDAS was defined as SLEDAI-2K ≥ 10 ever, and HDAS episode as the period from the first HDAS clinic visit until attainment of LLDAS. We examined the associations of different HDAS patterns with the likelihood of damage accrual. RESULTS: Of 342 SLE patients, 151 experienced HDAS at least once, accounting for 298 HDAS episodes. The majority of HDAS patients (76.2%) experienced Recurrent HDAS (> 1 HDAS visit), and a smaller subset (47.7%) had Persistent HDAS (consecutive HDAS visits for longer than 2 months). Recurrent or Persistent HDAS patients were younger at diagnosis and more likely to experience renal or serositis manifestations; persistent HDAS patients were also more likely to experience neurological manifestations. Baseline SLEDAI greater than 10 was associated with longer HDAS episodes. Recurrent and Persistent HDAS were both associated with an increased likelihood of damage accrual. The total duration of HDAS episode greater than 2 years and experiencing multiple HDAS episodes (≥4) was also associated with an increased likelihood of damage accrual (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.08-2.97, p = 0.02, and OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.66-13.26, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: HDAS episodes have a highly variable course. Recurrent and Persistent HDAS, and longer duration of HDAS episodes, increased the risk of damage accrual. In addition to a major signifier of severity in SLE, its resolution to LLDAS can determine the subsequent outcome in SLE patients.

Spatiotemporal distribution and age of seizure onset in a pediatric epilepsy surgery cohort with cortical dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Focal Cortical Dysplasias (CD) are a common etiology of refractory pediatric epilepsy and are amenable to epilepsy surgery. We investigated the association of lesion volume and location to age of seizure onset among children with CD who underwent epilepsy surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study of epilepsy surgery patients with pathologically-confirmed CD. Regions of interest (ROI) determined preoperative lesion volumes on 1.5 T and 3 T T2 and SPGR MRIs, and location in 7 distributed neural networks. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were identified: 35 girls (56.5 %). Median age of seizure onset: 19.0 months (range 0.02 months - 16.0 years). Median age of surgery: 7.8 years (range 2.89 months - 24.45 years). CD were frontal (n = 21, 38 %); temporal (n = 15, 27 %); parietal (n = 10, 18 %); occipital (n = 3, 5%); multilobar (n = 6, 11 %). Frontal FCD had seizure onset < 1-year-old (P = 0.10); temporal lobe CD seizure onset was more likely > 5-years-old (P= 0.06). Median lesion volume for CD was 23.23 cm3 (range: 1.87-591.73 cm3). Larger CD lesions were associated with earlier epilepsy (P = 0.01, r = -0.16). We did not find that lesions proximal to early maturing cortical regions were associated with earlier seizure onset. We found an association with CD location in the default mode network (DMN) and age onset < 5years old (P = 0.03). Age of seizure onset was negatively correlated with percent of CD overlapping motor cortex (P = 0.001, r =-0.794) but not with CD overlap of the visual cortex (P = 0.35). There was no effect of CD type on age of epilepsy onset. SIGNIFICANCE: Larger CD lesions are associated with earlier onset epilepsy. CD most commonly occurs within the DMN and Limbic network, and DMN is associated with seizure onset before 5-years-old. Percent of CD overlapping motor cortex correlates with earlier seizure onset. These observations may reflect patterns of brain maturation or regional differences in clinical expression of seizures.

The ALPHA Project: Establishing consensus and prioritisation of global community recommendations to address major challenges in lupus diagnosis, care, treatment and research.

The Addressing Lupus Pillars for Health Advancement (ALPHA) Project is a global consensus effort to identify, prioritise and address top barriers in lupus impacting diagnosis, care, treatment and research. To conduct this process, the ALPHA Project convened a multistakeholder Global Advisory Committee (GAC) of lupus experts and collected input from global audiences, including patients. In phase I, the ALPHA Project used expert interviews and a global survey of lupus experts to identify and categorise barriers into three overarching pillars: drug development, clinical care and access to care. In phase II, reported here, the GAC developed recommended actionable solutions to address these previously identified barriers through an in-person stakeholder meeting, followed by a two-round scoring process. Recommendations were assessed for feasibility, impact and timeline for implementation (FIT), where potential FIT component values were between 1 and 3 and total scores were between 3 and 9. Higher scores represented higher achievability based on the composite of the three criteria. Simplifying and standardising outcomes measures, including steroid sparing as an outcome (drug development) and defining the lupus spectrum (clinical care) ranked as the highest two priority solutions during the GAC meeting and received high FIT scores (7.67 and 7.44, respectively). Leveraging social media (access to care) received the highest FIT score across all pillars (7.86). Cross-cutting themes of many solutions include leveraging digital technology and applying specific considerations for special populations, including paediatrics. Implementing the recommendations to address key barriers to drug development, clinical care and access to care is essential to improving the quality of life of adults and children with lupus. Multistakeholder collaboration and guidance across existing efforts globally is warranted.

Safety and clinical activity of atacicept in the long-term extension of the phase 2b ADDRESS II study in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Atacicept reduced SLE disease activity in the phase 2b ADDRESS II study, particularly in patients with high disease activity (HDA; SLEDAI-2K ≥10) at screening. We assessed long-term safety and efficacy of atacicept in the long-term extension (LTE) of ADDRESS II. METHODS: In the 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ADDRESS II study, patients received weekly atacicept (75 or 150 mg) or placebo. Atacicept was continued at the same dose in atacicept-treated patients in the LTE; placebo-treated patients switched to atacicept 150 mg. Long-term safety was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included SLE responder index (SRI)-4 and SRI-6 response rates and flares. RESULTS: In total, 253 patients entered the ADDRESS II LTE; 88 received atacicept 150 mg, 82 atacicept 75 mg and 83 placebo/atacicept 150 mg. Median active treatment duration in the LTE was 83.8 weeks. Frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar across groups (90.4-93.2%), and 12.5%, 14.6% and 21.7% of patients in the atacicept 150 mg, atacicept 75 mg and placebo/atacicept 150 mg groups reported serious TEAEs during the treatment period. The proportions of patients with TEAEs leading to discontinuation were 5.7%, 4.9% and 10.8%, respectively. SRI-4 and SRI-6 response rates were maintained with atacicept in the modified intent-to-treat and HDA populations and those on continuous 150 mg had a reduced risk of first severe flare and longer time to first severe flare vs those who initially received placebo. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with atacicept 150 mg in SLE patients had an acceptable safety profile, with durable efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02070978.

Algorithm for calculating high disease activity in SLE.

BACKGROUND: The ability to identify lupus patients in high disease activity status (HDAS) without knowledge of the SLEDAI could have application in selection of patients for treatment escalation or enrolment in trials. We sought to generate an algorithm that could calculate via model fitting the presence of HDAS using simple demographic and laboratory values. METHODS: We examined the association of high disease activity (HDA) with demographic and laboratory parameters using prospectively collected data. An HDA visit is recorded when SLEDAI-2K ≥10. We utilized the use of combinatorial search to find algorithms to build a mathematical model predictive of HDA. Performance of each algorithm was evaluated using multi-class area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the final model was compared with the naïve Bayes classifier, and analysed using the confusion matrix for accuracy and misclassification rate. RESULTS: Data on 286 patients, followed for a median of 5.1 years were studied for a total of 5680 visits. Sixteen laboratory parameters were found to be significantly associated with HDA. A total of 216 algorithms were evaluated and the final algorithm chosen was based on seven pathology measures and three demographic variables. It has an accuracy of 88.6% and misclassification rate of 11.4%. When compared with the naïve Bayes classifier [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.663], our algorithm has a better accuracy with AUC = 0.829. CONCLUSION: This study shows that building an accurate model to calculate HDA using routinely available clinical parameters is feasible. Future studies to independently validate the algorithm will be needed to confirm its predictive performance.

Optimizing data collection in dietary therapy clinics for epilepsy: A recommendation for standardized data collection forms.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to 1) examine medical records from one medium-sized dietary clinic as an example of data being collected clinically, 2) identify data limitations, and then 3) create standardized data collection forms with the long-term goals of improving clinical care and facilitating multicenter data analysis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at the Dietary Therapies for Epilepsy Clinic at Children's National Medical Center (CNMC) in Washington, D.C. Patients who initiated dietary therapy between 2015 and 2018 were assessed. Categorical variables were examined via Chi Square or Fisher's Exact tests and continuous variables were assessed via an independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, depending on normality. RESULTS: Forty-two patients underwent dietary therapy initiation during this time period, but only 26 had follow-up visit data. Of these patients, 54% reported non-seizure symptom improvement(s), and only 16 had quantitative seizure frequency information available, with 63% being clinical responders. No significant associations were observed between patient or diet characteristics and seizure or non-seizure improvement. Some variables, such as seizure duration, seizure severity, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and dietary compliance were not typically included in the records and therefore could not be evaluated statistically. Variations in seizure type(s), etiology, and clinical diagnoses/syndromes also made it unfeasible to evaluate differences in improvement based on these variables. Standardized data collection forms were created to address these limitations and are included as appendices. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest limitations with the clinical data currently being collected. Medium-sized clinics may not see enough patients to study specific epilepsy populations. Standardized patient forms could target these issues, thereby improving clinical care and expanding research opportunities. Future research can test these forms for clinical use and as a collection tool for larger scale research across clinics.

High disease activity status suggests more severe disease and damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Disease severity in SLE is an important concept related to disease activity, treatment burden and prognosis. We set out to evaluate if high disease activity status (HDAS), based on ever attainment of a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) disease activity score of ≥10, is an indicator for disease severity in SLE. METHODS: Using prospectively collected data, we assessed the association of HDAS with sociodemographic and disease characteristics and adverse clinical outcomes using logistic regression or generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: Of 286 patients with SLE, who were observed for a median (range) of 5.1 years (1-10.8 years), 43.7% experienced HDAS at least once during the observational period. Autoantibody positivity, particularly anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm positivity, were associated with increased likelihood of HDAS. Age ≥45 years at diagnosis was associated with reduced likelihood of HDAS (p=0.002). Patients with HDAS had higher Physician Global Assessment score (>1: OR 8.1, p<0.001) and were more likely to meet criteria for flare (mild/moderate flare: OR 4.4, p<0.001; severe flare: OR 17.2, p<0.001) at the time of experiencing HDAS. They were also more likely to have overall higher disease activity, as defined by time-adjusted mean SLEDAI-2K score in the highest quartile (OR 11.7, 95% CI 5.1 to 26.6; p>0.001), higher corticosteroid exposure (corticosteroid dose in highest quartile: OR 7.7, 95% CI 3.9 to 15.3; p<0.001) and damage accrual (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.9; p=0.003) when compared with non-HDAS patients. CONCLUSIONS: HDAS is associated with more severe disease, as measured by higher disease activity across time, corticosteroid exposure and damage accrual. The occurrence of HDAS may be a useful prognostic marker in the management of SLE.

Measure thrice, cut twice: On the benefit of reoperation for failed pediatric epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical outcomes are improved after repeat surgery for medically refractory epilepsy in children. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who received repeat resective surgery for ongoing seizures from 2000-2017. From a total of 251 consecutive individual epilepsy surgical patients for focal resection, 53 patients met study inclusion criteria and had adequate follow-up documented. RESULTS: Median age of seizure-onset was 2.0-years-old (IQR 0.3-5.5 years). The median age at first epilepsy surgery was 6.3-years-old (IQR 2.9-9.2 years) and at second epilepsy surgery was 8.4-years-old (IQR 4.7-12.6 years). Overall, 53 % (n = 28) of this series achieved Engel Class I (seizure freedom); with improved seizure control (Engel Class I-II) in 83 % (n = 44) of the cohort. 64 % (n = 34) had one reoperation; 26 % (n = 14) had two; and 9% (n = 5) had three. Pathology: 58 % (n = 31) had focal cortical dysplasia; 13 % (n = 10) tumor; 9% (n = 5) encephalitis; 6% (n = 3) gliosis; 4% (n = 2) mesial temporal sclerosis; and 2% (n = 1) hemimegalencephaly. Tumor pathology was associated with increased chance (p = 0.01) for seizure freedom (90 % of tumor patients had Engel Class I outcome). MTS had worse outcome with both patients having ongoing seizures (Engel II-IV). There were 6 patients who developed post-operative hemiparesis; one was unplanned but resolved. SIGNIFICANCE: Reoperation for pediatric epilepsy surgery can lead to seizure freedom in many cases and improved seizure control in most cases. Reoperation for brain tumor pathology is associated with a high rate of seizure freedom.

Attainment of treat-to-target endpoints in SLE patients with high disease activity in the atacicept phase 2b ADDRESS II study.

OBJECTIVE: Low disease activity (LDA) and remission are emerging treat-to-target (T2T) endpoints in SLE. However, the rates at which these endpoints are met in patients with high disease activity (HDA) are unknown. Atacicept, which targets B lymphocyte stimulator and a proliferation-inducing ligand, improved disease outcomes in SLE patients with HDA (SLEDAI-2K ≥10) at baseline in the phase 2b ADDRESS II study. This is a post hoc analysis of T2T endpoints in these patients. METHODS: Patients received weekly atacicept (75 or 150 mg s.c.) or placebo for 24 weeks (1:1:1 randomization). Attainment of three T2T endpoints, LDA (SLEDAI-2K ≤ 2), Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and remission (clinical SLEDAI-2K = 0, prednisone-equivalent ≤5mg/day and Physician's Global Assessment <0.5), was assessed and compared with SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 and SRI-6 response. RESULTS: Of 306 randomized patients, 158 (51.6%) had baseline HDA. At week 24, 37 (23.4%) HDA patients attained LDA, 25 (15.8%) LLDAS and 17 (10.8%) remission. Each of these endpoints was more stringent than SRI-4 (n = 87; 55.1%) and SRI-6 (n = 67; 42.4%). Compared with placebo (n = 52), at week 24, patients treated with atacicept 150 mg (n = 51) were more likely to attain LDA [odds ratio (OR) 3.82 (95% CI: 1.44, 10.15), P = 0.007], LLDAS [OR 5.03 (95% CI: 1.32, 19.06), P = 0.018] or remission [OR 3.98 (95% CI: 0.78, 20.15), P = 0.095]. CONCLUSION: At week 24, LDA, LLDAS and remission were more stringent than SRI-4 and SRI-6 response, were attainable in the HDA population and discriminated between treatment with atacicept 150 mg and placebo. These results suggest that T2T endpoints are robust outcome measures in SLE clinical trials and support further evaluation of atacicept in SLE. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01972568.

Antiepileptic Drugs in Pediatrics.

Epilepsy affects approximately 1% of the population. First-line treatment for epilepsy is the administration of anti-seizure medication, also referred to as antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), although this nomenclature is erroneous as these medications typically do not impact underlying epileptogenic processes; the goal of these medications is to control symptoms. Over 30% of patients are classified as having "medically refractory" epilepsy, i.e., lack of adequate seizure control despite trials of two or three AEDs (Kwan and Brodie, N Engl J Med 342:314-9, 2000). Epilepsy is associated with worse quality of life in children, adolescents, and their families (Cianchetti et al., Seizure 24:93-101, 2015). Patients with epilepsy have a two to three times greater risk of death than the general population, by various causes including sudden unexplained death in epilepsy patients (SUDEP) (Abdel-Mannan et al., Epilepsy Behav 90:99-106, 2019). It is these factors, among others, that have motivated the continued development of AEDs. This chapter will review the history and evolution of AED development, features of specific AEDs with a focus on the newest generation, and examples of AEDs in development.

Integrated safety profile of atacicept: an analysis of pooled data from the atacicept clinical trial programme.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the overall safety profile of atacicept, we conducted an integrated analysis of pooled safety data from all 17 clinical studies to date. METHODS: Three data sets were used to investigate safety endpoints: a double-blind placebo-controlled set (n = 1568), an SLE set (n = 761) and a full analysis set (n = 1845; including all 17 studies). RESULTS: Of 1568 patients in the double-blind placebo-controlled-set, 30.8% received placebo, and 8.2, 24.5 and 36.5% received atacicept 25, 75 and 150 mg, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates (adjusted by treatment-exposure) were generally higher with atacicept vs placebo, but no consistent association was found between atacicept dose and specific TEAEs or mortality. Serious infection and serious TEAE rates were similar for atacicept and placebo. The TEAE-related discontinuation rates were higher with atacicept vs placebo (16.1 vs 10.9/100 patient-years). In the full analysis set, 11 deaths occurred during treatment. Across indications, exposure-adjusted mortality rates/100 patient-years (95% CI) were 3.60 (0.90, 14.38), 0.34 (0.05, 2.43) and 1.18 (0.49, 2.82) with atacicept 25, 75 and 150 mg, respectively, and 0.44 (0.06, 3.12) with placebo. In SLE patients, exposure-adjusted mortality rates were 1.45 (0.54, 3.87) with atacicept 150 mg and 0.78 (0.29, 2.07) across all atacicept-treated patients. No deaths occurred with atacicept 75 mg or placebo. In the SLE and double-blind placebo-controlled sets, pharmacodynamic effects of atacicept were not associated with increased infection rates. CONCLUSION: The results of this integrated safety analysis support further development and evaluation of atacicept in selected patients for whom potential benefits might outweigh risks.