ABSTRACT
Due to the growing population and rapid urbanization, fresh water is becoming increasingly scarce. Apart from drinking, clean water is essential in a variety of applications such as batteries, pharmaceuticals, vehicles, and many research and development labs. Due to the unfeasible deficiency of the groundwater reserves, we must understand the importance of judicious usage and proper supervision of the groundwater resources. For the removal of various harmful substances in the groundwater such as arsenic, fluorides, and chlorides, we take the help of groundwater distillation. With the increase in environmental pollutions caused due to the use of injudicious usage of natural resources, we should look for an alternative for groundwater distillation techniques using renewable energy such as solar power. Groundwater is widely acknowledged as a major supply of water for drinking, agriculture, and a variety of other uses. Researchers have also employed solar distillation to transform groundwater into drinkable water. Hence, the main aim of the review paper is that we use solar power for groundwater distillation as solar energy is both a pressing necessity and a vital supply for all living things. Solar energy utilization is essential due to increased global warming and pollution, and it is being replaced by the traditional use of fuels in the globe today. We majorly focus on the removal of harmful compounds such as arsenic and fluoride from the groundwater with the help of solar-powered distillation techniques. The role of renewable energy technology in the sustainability of future water systems with a growing demanding share of groundwater distillation is presented in this paper.
Subject(s)
Arsenic , Groundwater , Solar Energy , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Water Purification , Distillation , FluoridesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The occlusal scheme required for an edentulous patient is controversial. The purpose of this Best Evidence Consensus Statement was to evaluate the existing complete denture literature related to occlusal schemes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was limited to Meta-analyses, Systematic Reviews (SR), Randomized Controlled Studies (RCT) and Clinical Trials. Key Words were: Complete dentures, occlusion, harm; Complete dentures, occlusion alveolar bone loss; Complete dentures, occlusion, stability; Complete dentures, occlusion. Additional related articles were culled from the authors' library and reference lists in the articles found in the PubMed searches. RESULTS: Of the 165 articles that met the initial search criteria, 34 related to the focus questions and were evaluated and rated. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong support that the average denture patient, with good residual ridges and no neuromuscular problems, will function adequately with a properly fabricated complete denture regardless of the occlusal scheme. There is neither strong support for or against bilateral balanced occlusal schemes as it relates to patient satisfaction, preference or chewing ability. There is some support for increased alveolar bone loss with complete dentures that have a non-balanced occlusion. There is a need for bilateral balanced occlusal schemes for patients presenting with loss of stability and retention as a result of their presenting conditions (PDI III and IV).
Subject(s)
Dental Occlusion, Balanced , Denture Design , Consensus , Dental Occlusion , Denture, Complete , Humans , MasticationABSTRACT
Restoring esthetics and function for patients with maxillectomy defects presents a complex challenge for the clinician. Obturator prostheses are subject to rotational forces during function, allowing movement into the defect. Gaining prosthesis support from endosseous implants can limit the amount of rotation. Xerostomia and impaired tissue healing caused by radiation therapy further complicates the treatment for such patients. Several resilient and rigid obturator design concepts are available for restoration of such defects. This clinical report describes a design concept used to treat a patient with a maxillectomy defect caused by tumor resection secondary to a squamous cell carcinoma.
