ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Admission to the pediatric ICU versus general pediatric floor for patients is a significant triage decision for emergency department physicians. Escalation of care within 24 hours of hospital admission is considered as a quality metric for pediatric E.R. There exists, however, a lack of data to show that such escalation leads to a poor outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare outcomes of patients who required escalation of care within 24 hours of hospital admission to the pediatric ICU (cases) from 01/01 2015 to 02/28 2019 with those who were directly admitted from emergency department to the PICU (controls). A total of 327 cases were compared to 931 controls. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis was done to compare the length of stay and mortality data. RESULTS: Patients who required escalation of care were significantly younger (median age 1.9 years compared to 4.6 years for controls) and had lower severity of illness score (PIM 3). Cases had a much higher proportion of respiratory diagnosis. ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay and the direct cost was significantly higher for cases compared to controls. This difference persisted for all age groups and respiratory diagnosis. The cost of care, however, was only different for 1-5 years and >5 years age groups. The difference in ICU length of stay (Δ11.1%) and hospital length of stay (Δ7.8%) persisted on multivariate regression analysis after controlling for age, sex, PIM3 score, and diagnostic variables. There was no difference in mortality on the univariate or multivariate analysis between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who required escalation of care within 24 hours of hospital admissions have more prolonged ICU and hospital stay and potentially increased cost of care. This measure should be considered while making patient disposition decisions in the emergency department.