Tranexamic acid for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema: A retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) prevent the breakdown of bradykinin and can lead to life threatening angioedema. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic that inhibits formation of precursors involved in bradykinin synthesis and, in case reports, has been described as a potential treatment for ACE-I angioedema. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) from January 2018 to August 2021 with angioedema while taking an ACE-I. Patients who received tranexamic acid (treatment group) were compared with patients who did not receive tranexamic acid (control group). Primary outcome was length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes evaluated included ICU admissions, intubations, and safety events. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients were included in this study (73 treatment; 189 control). Overall, the median ED LOS was longer in the treatment group than controls (20.9 h vs 4.8 h, p < 0.001). ICU admission rates were higher in the treatment group (45% vs 16%, p < 0.001). More patients were intubated in the treatment group (12% vs 3%, p = 0.018). No difference was seen between the treatment group and the controls for return within 7 days, complications related to thrombosis, and death. In patients presenting with severe angioedema symptoms who were admitted to the hospital, median LOS was not different between the two groups (58.7 h vs 55.7 h, p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received tranexamic acid had increased ED LOS, rates of ICU admission, and need for intubation. This finding may be related to the severity of presentation. Administration of tranexamic acid appears safe to use in ACE-I angioedema. Prospective randomized controlled studies should be considered to determine whether tranexamic acid is an effective treatment for ACE-I angioedema.

Retrospective Cohort Study of the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury with Vancomycin Area under the Curve-Based Dosing with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared to Meropenem or Cefepime.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complication associated with vancomycin. Previous studies demonstrated that the combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam increases the risk of AKI compared to vancomycin with meropenem or cefepime. These studies did not utilize area under the curve (AUC)-based dosing, which reduces vancomycin exposure and may decrease nephrotoxicity compared with trough-based dosing. This study evaluated the incidence of AKI in patients receiving AUC-dosed vancomycin with either concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) or meropenem or cefepime (VMC). This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital between October 2019 and September 2020 who received AUC-dosed vancomycin and concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, or cefepime for at least 48 h. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI during treatment or within 24 h of discontinuation. A total of 435 patients (VPT, n = 331; VMC, n = 104) who received a median duration of 4 days of treatment were included. The incidence of AKI was significantly higher with VPT than with VMC (13.6% versus 4.8% [P = 0.014]). Multivariable analysis showed VPT to be an independent risk factor for the development of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 3.00 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.15 to 7.76]). VPT was associated with more frequent AKI than VMC, even with the relatively short courses of antimicrobial therapy administered in this population. In comparison with the precedent in the literature for trough-based vancomycin dosing, our results suggest that the use of AUC-based vancomycin dosing in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, or cefepime may result in a lower overall incidence of AKI.

Withdrawn as duplicate: Evaluation of discharge prescribing after rescheduling of gabapentin as a controlled substance.

This article has been withdrawn due to a publisher error that caused the article to be duplicated. The definitive version of this article is published under DOI 10.1093/ajhp/zxab293.

A retrospective evaluation of heparin product reactions in patients with alpha-gal allergies.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-gal allergy, also known as red meat allergy or alpha-gal syndrome, can present after bites of certain tick species that contain galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) carbohydrate. Following this exposure, patients may develop an allergic reaction after mammalian meat consumption. Some heparin products are derived from porcine intestinal tissue, and it is therefore possible that administering these medications to a patient with an alpha-gal allergy may trigger a reaction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of reactions to porcine heparin products in patients with an alpha-gal allergy. METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted by review of electronic medical record data. Patients included were between the ages of 18 and 89 years, with a documented alpha-gal or red meat allergy and an admission to a hospital in the Sentara Healthcare system. The primary outcome was the incidence of allergic reactions upon exposure to heparin products in patients with a documented alpha-gal allergy. RESULTS: Patients with a documented alpha-gal allergy received a heparin product in 57 of 158 hospital visits (36.1%). Heparin products were tolerated in 56 of the 57 visits (98.3%). The incidence of an alpha-gal reaction to unfractionated heparin was 2.6% (1/39) while the incidence of an alpha-gal reaction to enoxaparin was 0% (0/22). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Heparin products were associated with a low incidence of alpha-gal reactions among patients with documented alpha-gal allergy. It is possible that enoxaparin poses less of a risk for reaction in these patients compared to unfractionated heparin.

Evaluation of discharge prescribing after rescheduling of gabapentin as a controlled substance.

PURPOSE: Gabapentin has increasingly been identified as a drug of abuse, especially when used concurrently with opioids. Rescheduling gabapentin as a schedule V controlled substance may strengthen monitoring and prescribing restrictions. The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of rescheduling gabapentin from a nonscheduled to a schedule V substance in Virginia on discharge prescribing patterns in a health system. METHODS: This was a retrospective, pre-post, multicenter chart review conducted at 4 sites. Data from 3 months before gabapentin rescheduling (prerescheduling group) and 3 months after gabapentin rescheduling (postrescheduling group) were evaluated. The primary outcome was the percentage of newly prescribed gabapentin prescriptions upon discharge, which was compared between the pre- and postrescheduling groups. RESULTS: A similar percentage of gabapentin prescriptions were newly prescribed in the prerescheduling group as compared to the postrescheduling group (55.0% vs 50.0%, P = 0.479). Gabapentin prescribing characteristics did not differ between the groups for new gabapentin prescriptions (n = 55 in the prerescheduling group, n = 50 in the postrescheduling group). Concomitant discharge prescribing of benzodiazepines (5.5% vs 2.0%, P = 0.619) and opioids (45.5% vs 60.0%, P = 0.136) did not differ significantly between the postrescheduling group and prerescheduling group for new gabapentin prescriptions. However, fewer opioid prescriptions exceeded 90 daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) in the postrescheduling group as compared to the prerescheduling group for new gabapentin prescriptions (36.0% vs 20.0%, P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Gabapentin prescribing practices did not differ before and after rescheduling of gabapentin as a controlled substance. There was a trend toward dosages with reduced daily MME for concomitant opioid prescriptions after rescheduling. However, additional investigation with larger studies over longer periods of time is needed to discover whether gabapentin rescheduling significantly changes prescribing practices.

Increasing Naloxone Prescribing in the Emergency Department Through Education and Electronic Medical Record Work-Aids.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) visits for opioid overdose continue to rise. Evidence-based harm reduction strategies for opioid use disorder (OUD), such as providing home naloxone, can save lives, but ED implementation remains challenging. METHODS: The researchers aimed to increase prescribing of naloxone to ED patients with OUD and opioid overdose by employing a model for improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team, and high-reliability interventions. Monthly naloxone prescribing rates among discharged ED patients with opioid overdose and OUD-related diagnoses were tracked over time. Interventions included focused ED staff education on OUD and naloxone, and creation of electronic medical record (EMR)-based work-aids, including a naloxone Best Practice Advisory (BPA) and order set. Autoregressive interrupted time series was used to model the impact of these interventions on naloxone prescribing rates. The impact of education on ED staff confidence and perceived barriers to prescribing naloxone was measured using a published survey instrument. RESULTS: After adjusting for education events and temporal trends, ED naloxone BPA and order set implementation was associated with a significant immediate 21.1% increase in naloxone prescribing rates, which was sustained for one year. This corresponded to increased average monthly prescribing rates from 1.5% before any intervention to 28.7% afterward. ED staff education had no measurable impact on prescribing rates but was associated with increased nursing perceived importance and increased provider confidence in prescribing naloxone. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in naloxone prescribing rates was achieved after implementation of high-reliability EMR work-aids and staff education. Similar interventions may be key to wider ED staff engagement in harm reduction for patients with OUD.

Evaluation of Calcium Homeostasis and Dietary Supplementation for Pediatric and Neonatal Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

OBJECTIVES: Although the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) significantly improves survival in patients with persistent respiratory or cardiovascular failure, it also induces physiologic stress and disrupts homeostatic mechanisms. Patients undergoing ECMO support at our institution have required widely variable quantities of calcium supplementation for maintenance of normal calcium levels. Our primary objective was to assess the frequency of calcium abnormalities in pediatric and neonatal ECMO patients. Secondary objectives included quantifying electrolyte supplementation provided during ECMO and determining the relationships between calcium abnormalities and ECMO duration, mortality, and intensive care and hospital length of stay. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective chart review of all patients less than 18 years of age who received ECMO support between July 1, 2013, and May 31, 2016. Clinical and laboratory data were reviewed for each patient for the duration of ECMO support, and the incidence of ionized calcium outside the reference range of 1.1 to 1.4 mmol/L beyond the first 24 hours of ECMO was recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included in the study: 51 patients (65%) experienced at least one reading outside the normal ionized calcium range, while 27 patients (35%) were normocalcemic during their ECMO course. There were no differences between groups in the quantities of calcium, phosphate, or vitamin D administered during ECMO. Abnormal calcium levels were associated with a longer duration of ECMO (median 9 days vs 6 days, p = 0.0054), prolonged ICU length of stay (median 33 vs 18 days, p = 0.0055), and prolonged hospital length of stay (median 52 vs 40 days, p = 0.0239). No significant differences were found in survival to decannulation or survival to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium abnormalities occur frequently in pediatric and neonatal patients during ECMO and are associated with worse patient outcomes. The underlying physiology of these changes is thought to be related to ECMO-induced disruption of normal calcium homeostasis.