Mortality Factors in Crush Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Crush Syndrome is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following large-scale catastrophic earthquakes. Since there are no randomized controlled studies on Crush Syndrome, knowledge on this subject is limited to expert experience. The primary objective is to analyze the epidemiological and demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, and mortality factors of earthquake victims after the Pazarcik and Elbistan earthquakes on February 6, 2023. METHODS: This cross-sectional and observational retrospective study evaluated 610 earthquake victims who presented to our center between February 6 and April 30, 2023. Among these patients, 128 with Crush Syndrome were included in the study. Patient information was gathered from hospital records during their stay and from national registries upon referral. The primary outcome was to identify risk factors for mortality. Demographic and laboratory data were analyzed by acute kidney injury (AKI) stages; mortality-affecting factors were identified through regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 128 Crush Syndrome patients (100 adults, 28 children), 64 were female. The AKI rate was 32.8%. Among patients with AKI, the frequency of hemodialysis requirement was 69%, and the mortality rate was 14.2%. The overall mortality rate for patients with Crush Syndrome was 4.6%, compared to 3.9% (19/482) in earthquake victims without Crush Syndrome (p=0.705). Notably, low systolic blood pressure at admission was the only factor significantly affecting mortality in Crush Syndrome patients (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.088, p=0.021, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights low systolic blood pressure upon admission as a significant risk factor for increased mortality in Crush Syndrome patients. This finding may contribute to the literature by emphasizing the importance of monitoring blood pressure under rubble and administering more aggressive fluid therapy to patients with low systolic blood pressure.

[Antibody Screening and Risk Assessment of Healthcare Professionals in the COVID-19 Pandemic]. / COVID-19 Pandemisinde Saglik Çalisanlarinin Antikor Taramasi ve Risk Degerlendirmesi.

Globally 364102 healthcare professionals have been infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and 1253 of them died until 15 January 2021. Healthcare professionals serving at the forefront of combating the pandemic are in the high risk group. In our country, the data about coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) among healthcare professionals are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence in healthcare professionals, to evaluate the risks they encountered during work, and to examine their relationships with antibody positivity. A total of 572 healthcare professionals serving in various units of our hospital participated in our study and the presence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG was investigated by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (SARS-CoV-2 IgG test, Abbott Laboratories Diagnostics, USA) method in serum samples collected between May 18, 2020 and June 30, 2020. The demographic characteristics, medical history, work conditions, medical procedures performed and possible risk factors were questioned with a questionnaire form. The average age of the participants was 33.5 ± 9.2 (19-61) years, and 62.9% (360/572) of them were women. In our study, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence was 3.7% (21/572). The association of the antibody positivity with age, gender and occupational status was not statistically significant (p> 0.05). Comorbid diseases which were significantly higher in seropositive healthcare professionals were hypertension (19%) and diabetes mellitus (14.3%) (p<0.05). It was observed that antibody positivity was significantly higher in healthcare professionals working in high (52.4%) and medium risk (33.3%) areas, those who treat and/or examine patients with suspicious or positive COVID-19 (66.7%) and those who spend more than 30 minutes in COVID-19 patient rooms (76%) (p<0.05). The symptoms associated with seropositivity in healthcare workers with a history of symptoms (46%) were loss of smell (23.5%), loss of taste (20.0%) and respiratory distress (16.7%) (p<0.05). It was observed that the probability of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 increased 12 times if there was a colleague with COVID-19 in the hospital, four times if there was a patient in the house/lodging and six times if there was an infected person in the social environment (p<0.05). The rate of those who had the flu vaccine among the participants was 10.8% (62/572) and 9.7% of them were found to be anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive (p<0.05, 95% CI= 1.31-9.48). The seropositivity was significantly higher in non-smokers (4.8 %) compared to smokers (0.0%) (p<0.05). In our study, it was determined that the rate of seropositivity was 12 times higher in healthcare professionals who stated that they received hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis due to risky contact compared to those who did not receive prophylaxis (p<0.05, 95% CI= 4.11-40.64). The ratio of the personnel who answered "always" to the frequency of wearing gloves, masks, goggles/face shields and overalls was 85.7%, 96.9%, 62.1% and 65.4%, respectively. In conclusion, regular and large-scale seroepidemiological screening of healthcare professionals in the COVID-19 pandemic can contribute to the control of the pandemic by providing a better understanding of transmission dynamics and risk factors.

Generalist versus Abdominal Subspecialist Radiologist Interpretations of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Performed on Patients with Abdominal Pain and its Impact on the Therapeutic Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal pain is one of the most common patient complaints in the emergency department (ED) and abdominopelvic computed tomography (ACT) scan plays an important role in evaluation of these patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the differences between interpretations by generalist radiologists and abdominal subspecialist radiologists regarding the abdominopelvic computed tomography (ACT) of patients who were admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) and to investigate its effect on the patients' therapeutic approach. METHODS: The records of 16452 patients who were admitted to the emergency department with complaint of abdominal pain between January 2015 and April 2017 were reviewed, retrospectively. Out of these patients, 245 (1.5%) underwent ACT for differential diagnosis and among them, 137 (0.8%) patients had their ACT reports evaluated by generalist radiologists in 45 minutes and by abdominal subspecialist radiologist 8-12 hours later and were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups according to the effect of ACT reports on the performed treatment. Group 1: no effect on planned treatment, group 2: minor effect on planned treatment, which did not result in a change in the treatment process and group 3: major effect on planned treatment approach, which resulted in a change in the treatment process. These changes included at least one of the two criteria: changing the indication of surgery from emergency surgery to elective surgery and/or discharge of the patient from the ED, when actually hospitalization was required. RESULTS: Out of the 137 patients, 87 (63.5%) were male, 50 (36.5%) were female and the patients' mean age was 56 (27-93) years. There were 117 (85.4%) patients in group 1, 15 (10.9%) patients in group 2, and 5 (3.7%) patients in group 3. We determined minor inconsistency between the reports in group 2 and major inconsistency in group 3. Patients in group 3 suffered from delayed surgical intervention due to inconsistency of the CT reports resulting in prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity. In 17 patients (four patients in Group 1 and 13 patients in Group 2) treatment plan was changed due to CT results; and while surgical treatment was planned for them prior to CT scan, they were discharged with medical treatment after that and overtreatment was prevented. CONCLUSION: Contribution of abdominal radiologists to evaluation of ACT images in the ED would reduce the inconsistency in ACT reports and prevent the patients from receiving insufficient treatment or overtreatment.

What Can We Do to Improve Patient Satisfaction in the Emergency Department? A Prospective Study in a Turkish University Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, patients' satisfaction with emergency medical services provided to them has been one of the main criteria in the evaluation of the quality of these services. OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to determine the factors that affect the satisfaction of patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) and to provide new regulations. METHODS: This prospective and descriptive study included 341 patients who utilized the ED services of a university hospital between October 1, 2004, and June 30, 2005. The patients' demographic and visit characteristics, waiting times, and the total duration of stay in the ED were noted in the prepared questionnaire. In addition, all patients were asked to indicate their level of satisfaction with the care received in the ED based on a five-point Likert scale. The results were analyzed using ANOVA, chi-square, and logistic regression tests. RESULTS: Of the 341 patients, 219 (64.2%) were satisfied with the care they had received in the ED. Factors such as doctor and nurse behavior, medical information, the frequency of doctors and nurses visits, the ease of access to personnel, the cleanliness of the ED, and the availability of technical equipment had a statistically significant effect on the overall satisfaction of the patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The quality of patient care provided and the features of the ED determine the patients' satisfaction with the ED services.

Investigation on legal problems encountered by emergency medicine physicians in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Medicine is a profession that carries certain risks. One risky area of practice is the emergency department. Emergency physicians diagnose and treat a high volume of patients, and are also responsible for preparing reports for forensic cases. In this study, we aim to investigate emergency physicians' legal-administrative problems and reveal their level of understanding on forensic cases. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire form was prepared after the approval of an ethical committee. This form was sent to the residents, specialists and academicians of emergency medicine by e-mail. The physicians were asked to fill out the form online. All the gathered data was analyzed. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequency percentages with mean and standard deviation. Chi-square tests were used to compare the groups. Correlation between number of complaint cases and age, sex, career, institution, and duration of service in emergency department were investigated. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 294 physicians participated in the questionnaire. According to the questionnaire, 170 of the physicians were reported to the patient communication units due to medical malpractice. Mean number of compliant reports was 3.20±3.5. 29 of the physicians received administrative penalties. 42 of the physicians were judged in the court for medical malpractice. 1 physician was fined 5000 Turkish Liras as a result of these judgments. CONCLUSION: We found that the number of complaint reports is negatively correlated with duration of service in emergency medicine and age. There was a significant difference between number of complaint reports and career (p<0.05). The physicians' level of awareness on forensic cases was found to be insufficient. Lack of legislation knowledge may be an important cause of complaint reports concerning emergency physicians, who have a high load of patients. Thus, we think that increasing the frequency of post-graduate education sessions and periodical reviews might be beneficial.

Cardiac rupture.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rupture is an unusual cause of chest pain and sudden cardiovascular collapse. This diagnosis may be easily forgotten while managing a patient in extremis in the initial minutes of evaluation and resuscitation in the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: To report the benefit of immediate bedside cardiac ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cardiac rupture and its influence on emergent intervention in the ED. CASE REPORT: The initial electrocardiogram, performed within 5 min of arrival, of a 65-year old man who presented with 20 min duration of chest pain, showed a biphasic T wave in V1 and inverted T wave in V2, without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Fifteen minutes later, he lost consciousness and was pulseless without a shockable rhythm on the monitor. Chest compressions were started and the patient was intubated. Echocardiography was performed at the bedside by the emergency physician. Cardiac contractility was grossly decreased in both ventricles and a large amount of pericardial fluid was seen. Two attempts at ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis yielded only a few milliliters of blood. Interruptions in chest compressions were minimized during pericardiocentesis. Before transport of the patient to the operating room for definitive repair, asystole occurred. On the subsequent echocardiogram, heart contractions were absent and a hematoma was seen in the pericardial space. Resuscitation efforts were stopped. An autopsy was not performed per family request. CONCLUSIONS: Typical ultrasonographic findings of cardiac rupture were present in this patient, who presented in extremis with chest pain. Early bedside echocardiography can be helpful in directing the initial care of critically ill patients.

Interpretation of electrocardiogram images sent through the mobile phone multimedia messaging service.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of interpretations of electrocardiogram (ECG) images taken by a mobile phone and sent as multimedia message was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ECGs of 305 patients who were admitted to the emergency department with cardiac complaints were photographed with the camera of a Nokia (Espoo, Finland) N93 mobile phone. The images were sent via a multimedia messaging system to an identical mobile phone carried by a cardiologist and were interpreted on the screen of that mobile phone. Another cardiologist and an emergency physician interpreted ECG paper printouts separately. The findings of the core laboratory were used as the gold standard. The interpretation errors were scaled from 1 to 4 with respect to the significance of findings. RESULTS: The total ratio of Grade 4 errors, which consisted of significant errors, did not show any significant difference (p=0.76) between the interpretations by the emergency medicine specialist and the cardiologist who interpreted the ECGs on the mobile phone; the cardiologist who interpreted the ECG paper printouts made significantly fewer mistakes than the other two specialists (p=0.025 and p=0.023, respectively). The separate assessment of the findings showed that in the diagnostic process of ST-segment elevation, depression, and supraventricular tachycardia, the consistency of the interpretations (κ=0.81, κ=0.81, and κ=1.0, respectively) made on the mobile phone screen was slightly better than that of the emergency medicine specialist (κ=0.73, κ=0.77, and κ=0.80, respectively) and was similar to that of the cardiologist (κ=0.91, κ=0.91, and κ=1.0, respectively) who interpreted ECG paper printouts. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that sending the ECG images via a multimedia message service may be a practical and inexpensive telecardiology procedure.