Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 42
Filter
3.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 96: 107313, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35716621

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Aggressive Angiomyxoma (AA) is an uncommon, locally infiltrative mesenchymal tumor that primarily originates from perineal and pelvic sites of women, particularly in the 4th decade of life with having an emphasized tendency for local recurrence, whereas it has a low tendency to metastasize. Patients often present with nonspecific symptoms such as painless visible mass that might be misdiagnosed with every mass in genital and pelvic sites in reproductive-age women. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a 31-year-old female presenting with an enlargement on the right labia majora. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance were carried out, and the mass was surgically excised completely and without complication. The diagnosis of AA was made based on characteristic histopathological features. The postoperative follow-up for recurrence is currently being continued. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Due to its rarity and lack of specificity in clinical and radiological examinations, the pre-operative misdiagnosis rate of AA is rather high. Hence, most cases are diagnosed on histology after initial surgical excision. Surgical management is the gold standard treatment for primary tumors; however, in case of local recurrences, treatment choices range from surgical resection to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for tumors positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors. CONCLUSION: Wide surgical resection is the gold standard treatment of AA; however, exceptions might occur due to the depth of tumor infiltration to adjacent viscera. Therefore, adjunct medical therapies can play a crucial role in treatment. In addition, long-term follow-up is necessary due to the high rate of local recurrences.

4.
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins ; 14(1): 1-14, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31165401

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is to determine the effectiveness of probiotic supplementation on clinical symptoms, weight loss, glycemic control, lipid and hormonal profiles, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Eligible studies were systematically searched from Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases until January 2019. Cochran (Q) and I-square statistics were used to measure heterogeneity among included studies. Data were pooled by using random-effect model and expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Eleven articles were included in this meta-analysis. Probiotic supplementation significantly decreased weight (SMD - 0.30; 95% CI, - 0.53, - 0.07; P = 0.01), body mass index (BMI) (SMD - 0.29; 95% CI, - 0.54, - 0.03; P = 0.02), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (SMD - 0.26; 95% CI, - 0.45, - 0.07; P < 0.001), insulin (SMD - 0.52; 95% CI, - 0.81, - 0.24; P < 0.001), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (SMD - 0.53; 95% CI, - 0.79, - 0.26; P < 0.001), triglycerides (SMD - 0.69; 95% CI, - 0.99, - 0.39; P < 0.001), VLDL-cholesterol (SMD - 0.69; 95% CI, - 0.99, - 0.39; P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD - 1.26; 95% CI, - 2.14, - 0.37; P < 0.001), malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD - 0.90; 95% CI, - 1.16, - 0.63; P < 0.001), hirsutism (SMD - 0.58; 95% CI, - 1.01, - 0.16; P < 0.001), and total testosterone levels (SMD - 0.58; 95% CI, - 0.82, - 0.34; P < 0.001), and also increased the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) (SMD 0.41; 95% CI, 0.11, 0.70; P < 0.01), nitric oxide (NO) (SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.08, 0.59; P = 0.01), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SMD 0.64; 95% CI, 0.38, 0.90; P < 0.001), glutathione (GSH) (SMD 0.26; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.52; P = 0.04), and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels (SMD 0.46; 95% CI, 0.08, 0.85; P = 0.01). Probiotic supplementation may result in an improvement in weight, BMI, FPG, insulin, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, VLDL-cholesterol, CRP, MDA, hirsutism, total testosterone, QUICKI, NO, TAC, GSH, and SHBG but did not affect dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels, and total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol levels in patients with PCOS.


Subject(s)
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Probiotics , Biomarkers/metabolism , Dietary Supplements , Female , Glycemic Control , Humans , Inflammation/metabolism , Oxidative Stress , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/metabolism , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Triglycerides , Weight Loss
5.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 38(1): 45-49, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34664527

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the impact of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) supplementation on hormonal indices, mental health, and biomarkers of inflammatory responses and oxidative stress among female patients suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: The present double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial consisted of 55 PCOS women (aged 18-40 years old), who were randomized into groups receiving 100 mg/day of CoQ10 (28 cases) or placebo (27 cases) for 12 weeks. RESULTS: The supplementation of CoQ10 decreased significantly the scores of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (p = .03) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (p = .01) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level (p = .005) when comparing with the placebo group. Moreover, CoQ10 group exhibited a significant drop in total testosterone (p = .004), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) (p < .001), hirsutism (p = .002) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (p = .001) levels in the serum, and a significant rise in sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) (p < .001) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (p < .001) levels in the serum than the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: 12-week supplementation of CoQ10 to PCOS women showed beneficial impact on BDI, BAI, hs-CRP, total testosterone, DHEAS, hirsutism, SHBG, TAC and MDA levels.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Metabolome/drug effects , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Ubiquinone/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Antioxidants/analysis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate/blood , Depression/epidemiology , Dietary Supplements , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hirsutism/epidemiology , Humans , Inflammation/physiopathology , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/physiopathology , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/psychology , Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin/analysis , Testosterone/blood , Ubiquinone/administration & dosage , Young Adult
11.
Biol Trace Elem Res ; 195(1): 1-8, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31317471

ABSTRACT

This study was performed to evaluate the effects of selenium supplementation on gene expression related to insulin and lipid metabolism, and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The current randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in 36 patients with GDM. Participants were randomly divided into two groups to intake either 200 µg/day selenium supplements as selenium yeast or placebo (n = 18 each group) for 6 weeks. Selenium supplementation upregulated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (P = 0.03) and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) (P = 0.01) in lymphocytes of subjects with GDM compared with the placebo. Selenium supplementation did not affect gene expression of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Supplementation with selenium had a significant decrease in incidence of newborns' hyperbilirubinemia (5.6% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.03) and newborns' hospitalization (5.6% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.03) compared with the placebo. Overall, we found that selenium supplementation for 6 weeks among patients with GDM significantly increased PPAR-γ and GLUT-1 expression, but did not affect gene expression of LDLR and LP(a). It also reduced incidence of newborns' hyperbilirubinemia and newborns' hospitalization. Clinical trial registration number: http://www.irct.ir: IRCT20170513033941N35.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/drug therapy , Insulin/genetics , Lipid Metabolism/genetics , Pregnancy Outcome/genetics , Selenium/pharmacology , Diabetes, Gestational/genetics , Diabetes, Gestational/metabolism , Dietary Supplements , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gene Expression/drug effects , Hospitalization , Humans , Hyperbilirubinemia/drug therapy , Hyperbilirubinemia/genetics , Hyperbilirubinemia/metabolism , Infant, Newborn , Insulin/metabolism , Pregnancy , Selenium/administration & dosage
12.
J Midlife Health ; 10(2): 57-62, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31391753

ABSTRACT

The current evidence regarding the association between vitamin D status and pelvic floor disorder (PFD) are inconclusive. This meta-analysis was aimed to summarize existing data demonstrating the association between Vitamin D status and PFD using published observational studies. All national and international databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched up until January 30, 2018, and related published studies retrieved for meta-analysis. The effect sizes of Vitamin D status were presented as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using random-effect models and inverse variance method. The Cochran Q statistic and I 2 tests were used to evaluate the heterogeneity across included studies. Seven studies with 3219 women were included our meta-analysis. There was heterogeneity existing among included studies (I 2 = 96.4%, P < 0.001), so a random-effect model was used. The findings of this meta-analysis revealed that the mean serum Vitamin D levels in women with PFD were significantly lower than healthy women (SMD -0.60; 95% CI, -1.06, -0.13; P = 0.01). This meta-analysis demonstrates lower levels of serum Vitamin D in women with PFD rather than healthy women. Additional prospective studies regarding the association between Vitamin D status and PFD are required to confirm our findings.

13.
J Cell Physiol ; 234(8): 12301-12308, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30609029

ABSTRACT

Interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) is a chronic bladder inflammation that leads to chronic bladder pain and urinary urgency and frequency. The presentation of IC/PBS is heterogeneous, and it is classified as ulcerative IC/PBS and nonulcerative IC/PBS. The main cause of IC/PBS is thought to be a persistent inflammatory condition in the bladder, though the actual pathophysiology has not been identified yet. Although the underlying pathophysiology of IC/PBS is not completely understood, several theories for the etiology of this syndrome have been suggested, including deficiency of the glycosaminoglycan covering urothelium surface that results in leaky urothelium infection, immunological etiology, activated mast cells, neural changes, and inflammation. In addition, there are no gold standards for the detection of this disorder to date. So, determination of gene expression and its role in different signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of this heterogeneous disorder contribute to the more efficient cognition of the pathophysiology of this disease and to the design of effective treatments and molecular diagnostic methods for IC/PBS.


Subject(s)
Cystitis, Interstitial/physiopathology , Urinary Bladder/physiopathology , Cell Membrane Permeability/physiology , Central Nervous System/physiopathology , Cystitis, Interstitial/diagnosis , Cystitis, Interstitial/genetics , Female , Gene Expression/genetics , Glycosaminoglycans/deficiency , Humans , Male , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Pain/physiopathology , Urinary Incontinence, Urge/physiopathology
14.
Curr Pharm Des ; 24(27): 3184-3199, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30156145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were performed to determine the effects of curcumin intake on glycemic control and lipid profiles among patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and related disorders. METHODS: We searched the following databases up until January 2018: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The relevant data were extracted and evaluated for quality of the studies in accordance with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were pooled using the inverse variance method and expressed as standardized mean difference (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Twenty-six trials with 1890 participants were included in the current meta-analysis. The findings demonstrated the significant association between curcumin intake and reduced fasting glucose levels (SMD -0.78; 95% CI, -1.20, -0.37; P<0.001), homeostasis model of assessment-estimated insulin resistance (SMD -0.91; 95% CI, -1.52, -0.31; P=0.003) and HbA1c (SMD -0.92; 95% CI, -1.37, -0.47; P<0.001). In addition, curcumin supplementation was significantly associated with triglyceride (SMD -1.21; 95 % CI, -1.78, -0.65; P<0.001) and total cholesterol reduction (SMD -0.73; 95 % CI, -1.32, -0.13; P= 0.01). However, curcumin intake significantly increased insulin levels (SMD 0.92; 95% CI, 0.06, 1.78; P=0.036). We found no significant effect of curcumin supplementation on LDL- (SMD -0.52; 95% CI, -1.14, 0.11; P=0.10) and HDL-cholesterol levels (SMD 0.28; 95% CI, -0.22, 0.77; P=0.27). CONCLUSION: Overall, curcumin consumption was associated with a significant reduction in fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, triglycerides and total cholesterol levels among patients with MetS and related disorders, but did not affect LDL- and HDL-cholesterol levels.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/drug effects , Curcumin/pharmacology , Lipids/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
15.
Arch Iran Med ; 21(1): 1-7, 2018 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29664663

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, data on effects of probiotic administration on hormonal profiles, biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are scarce. This investigation was conducted to assess the effects of probiotic supplementation on hormonal profiles, biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in women with PCOS. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 60 women with PCOS, aged 18-40 years old. Subjects were randomly assigned into 2 groups to receive either probiotics or placebo (n = 30 each group) for 12 weeks. Metabolic profiles were quantified at baseline and after a 12-week intervention. RESULTS: After the 12-week intervention, compared with placebo, probiotic supplementation significantly increased serum sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) (+25.9 ± 32.5 vs. +0.5 ± 15.6 nmol/L, P < 0.001) and plasma total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (+8.8 ± 120.5 vs. -98.3 ± 246.4 mmol/L, P = 0.04), and significantly decreased serum total testosterone (-0.2 ± 0.7 vs. +0.2 ± 0.6 ng/mL, P = 0.03), modified Ferriman-Gallwey (mF-G) scores (-1.7 ± 1.5 vs. -0.2 ± 1.0, P < 0.001), serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (-1150.0 ± 1295.2 vs. +202.5 ± 1426.3 ng/mL, P < 0.001) and plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations (-0.2 ± 0.6 vs. +0.9 ± 1.3 µmol/L, P < 0.001). We did not observe any detrimental effect of probiotic supplementation on other metabolic profiles. CONCLUSION: Overall, probiotic supplementation of PCOS women for 12 weeks had beneficial effects on total testosterone, SHBG, mFG scores, hs-CRP, TAC and MDA levels but did not affect other metabolic profiles.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/therapy , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Antioxidants/metabolism , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Inflammation/blood , Inflammation/therapy , Iran , Malondialdehyde/blood , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/blood , Testosterone/blood , Young Adult
16.
Horm Metab Res ; 50(2): 93-105, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29342488

ABSTRACT

Although several studies have evaluated the effect of folate supplementation on diabetes biomarkers among patients with metabolic diseases, findings are inconsistent. This review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to summarize the evidence on the effects of folate supplementation on diabetes biomarkers among patients with metabolic diseases. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases up to 1 September 2017 were searched. Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias of included studies. Heterogeneity was measured with a Q-test and with I2 statistics. Data were pooled by using the fix or random-effect model based on the heterogeneity test results and expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 763 participants were included in the final analysis. The current meta-analysis showed folate supplementation among patients with metabolic diseases significantly decreased insulin (SMD -1.28; 95% CI, -1.99, -0.56) and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (SMD -1.28; 95% CI, -1.99, -0.56). However, folate supplementation did not affect fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (SMD -0.30; 95% CI, -0.63, 0.02) and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (SMD -0.29; 95% CI, -0.61, 0.03). The results of this meta-analysis study demonstrated that folate supplementation may result in significant decreases in insulin levels and HOMA-IR score, but does not affect FPG and HbA1c levels among patients with metabolic diseases.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Dietary Supplements , Folic Acid/therapeutic use , Metabolic Diseases/blood , Metabolic Diseases/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Hyperglycemia/blood , Hyperglycemia/drug therapy , Publication Bias , Risk Factors
17.
J Affect Disord ; 229: 41-47, 2018 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29306057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of omega-3 and vitamin E co-supplementation on parameters of mental health and gene expression related to insulin and inflammation in subjects with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Forty PCOS women were allocated into two groups and treated with 1000mg omega-3 fatty acids plus 400 IU vitamin E supplements (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20) per day for 12 weeks. Parameters of mental health were recorded at baseline and after the 12-week intervention. Gene expression related to insulin and inflammation were measured in blood samples of PCOS women. RESULTS: After the 12-week intervention, compared with the placebo, omega-3 and vitamin E co-supplementation led to significant improvements in beck depression inventory total score (- 2.2 ± 2.0 vs. - 0.2 ± 1.3, P = 0.001), general health questionnaire scores (- 5.5 ± 4.6 vs. - 1.0 ± 2.3, P < 0.001) and depression anxiety and stress scale scores (- 7.2 ± 5.2 vs. - 1.3 ± 1.3, P < 0.001). Compared with the placebo, omega-3 and vitamin E co-supplementation could up-regulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) expression (P = 0.04) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of PCOS women. In addition, compared with the placebo, omega-3 and vitamin E co-supplementation down-regulated interleukin-8 (IL-8) (P = 0.003) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) expression (P = 0.001) in PBMC of PCOS women. There were no significant difference between-group changes in glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1), IL-6 and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß) in PBMC of PCOS women. CONCLUSION: Omega-3 and vitamin E co-supplementation was effective in improving parameters of mental health, and gene expression of PPAR-γ, IL-8 and TNF-α of women with PCOS.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/therapeutic use , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/therapy , Vitamin E/therapeutic use , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gene Expression/physiology , Humans , Inflammation/blood , Insulin/blood , Interleukin-8/blood , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/metabolism , PPAR gamma/blood , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/blood , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood
18.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab ; 43(6): 565-570, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29316405

ABSTRACT

To the best our knowledge, data on the effects of magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation on glycemic control and markers of cardiometabolic risk in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are scarce. The purpose of this study was to establish the effects of magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation on glycemic control and markers of cardiometabolic risk of GDM patients. Sixty patients with GDM, aged 18-40 years, were randomized into 2 groups to intake either magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplements or placebo (n = 30 each group) for 6 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fasting blood samples were taken at baseline and week 6 to quantify related markers. After the 6-week intervention, compared with the placebo, magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation resulted in significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose (-0.37 ± 0.09 vs. +0.01 ± 0.09 mmol/L, P = 0.003), serum insulin levels (-21.0 ± 4.8 vs. +7.2 ± 4.8 pmol/L, P < 0.001), homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance (-1.0 ± 1.1 vs. +0.3 ± 1.3, P < 0.001), and a significant increase in quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (+0.02 ± 0.03 vs. -0.002 ± 0.03, P = 0.003). In addition, magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation significantly decreased serum triglycerides (-0.25 ± 0.10 vs. +0.34 ± 0.10 mmol/L, P = 0.001) and very-low-density-cholesterol concentrations (-0.11 ± 0.04 vs. +0.15 ± 0.04 mmol/L, P = 0.001) compared with the placebo. Overall, the results of this study demonstrated that magnesium-zinc-calcium-vitamin D co-supplementation for 6 weeks among patients with GDM had beneficial effects on glycemic control and few markers of cardiometabolic risk.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/drug effects , Calcium/therapeutic use , Diabetes, Gestational/drug therapy , Dietary Supplements , Magnesium/therapeutic use , Metabolic Syndrome/prevention & control , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Zinc/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Calcium/adverse effects , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/etiology , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Insulin/blood , Insulin Resistance , Iran , Lipids/blood , Magnesium/adverse effects , Metabolic Syndrome/blood , Metabolic Syndrome/diagnosis , Metabolic Syndrome/etiology , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin D/adverse effects , Young Adult , Zinc/adverse effects
19.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 31(9): 1128-1136, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28326881

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of probiotic supplementation on biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress and pregnancy outcomes among subjects with gestational diabetes (GDM). METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was done among 60 subjects with GDM who were not on oral hypoglycemic agents. Patients were randomly allocated to intake either probiotic capsule containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium bifidum (2 × 109 CFU/g each) (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for six weeks. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo, probiotic supplementation resulted in significant decreases in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (-5.3 ± 6.7 vs. +0.03 ± 9.0 mg/dL, p = .01), serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (-2.2 ± 2.7 vs. +0.5 ± 2.4 µg/mL, p < .001), plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations (-0.1 ± 0.8 vs. +0.5 ± 1.5 µmol/L, p = .03) and MDA/TAC ratio (-0.0003 ± 0.0008 vs. +0.0009 ± 0.002, p = .004), and a significant increase in total antioxidant capacity (TAC) levels (+65.4 ± 103.3 vs. -37.2 ± 143.7 mmol/L, p = .002). Probiotic supplementation did not affect pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, probiotic supplementation among women with GDM for six weeks had beneficial effects on FPG, serum hs-CRP, plasma TAC, MDA and oxidative stress index, but did not affect pregnancy outcomes.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Inflammation/blood , Oxidative Stress/physiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Dietary Supplements , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Malondialdehyde/blood , Placebos , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...