Physician-Modified Endograft with the TREO Stent Graft System.

PURPOSE: Description of physician-modified endograft technique and its advantages using the TREO stent graft system. TECHNIQUE: After partial back-table deployment of the TREO endograft, fenestrations are created using a scalpel and reinforced with a double snare loop and running suture. The distance between the Z-shaped stents of the TREO main body of almost 20 mm allows for more flexible placement of multiple fenestrations and easier and faster re-sheathing. The technique is illustrated with physician modification of a TREO aortic cuff and bifurcated endograft in three patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms or type Ia endoleak after previous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. CONCLUSION: Physician modification of the TREO stent graft system can be safely performed, making it an excellent additional option to treat juxtarenal aneurysms. CLINICAL IMPACT: The TREO stent graft system offers various sizing options including different main body lengths and diameters, thus increasing applicability. Larger distance between the main body's stents facilitates placement of multiple physician-modified fenestrations. Re-sheathing is easier and faster due to the low number of main body stents which have to be re-sheathed. Therefore, the TREO stent graft system is an excellent platform for the physician-modified technique.

Endovascular repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with inner and outer off-the-shelf multibranched endografts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: During the last years a great progress has been noted in device technology and operator experience in treating complex aortic aneurysms. Fenestrated and branched custom-made devices require detailed preoperative planning and production time that can take ≤12 weeks. During this awaiting period, aortic-related mortality is increased. To overcome this limitation, off-the-shelf standardized multibranched devices were launched in the market for the treatment of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Our aim was to evaluate systematically all the published studies of off-the-shelf endografts for the treatment of pararenal and TAAAs. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to identify all the eligible studies that reported outcomes to the off-the-shelf with inner or outer multibranched devices and then conducted a qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis of the results. The main outcomes were technical success, mortality, target visceral vessel instability, major adverse events, and reintervention rates. We estimated pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 1605 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 13 (8 t-Branch, 3 E-nside, 1 We-Flow, and 1 TAMBE) were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 595 patients (70% male) were identified among the eligible studies. In terms of procedures, 64.4% were elective, 19.2% (13.4% outer multibranched group [OMG]; 6.1% inner multibranched group [IMG]) were emergent, and 16.4% (15.6% OMG; 0.8% IMG) were urgent. The pooled technical success was 92.1% (95% CI, 83.8%-96.4%) and 96.9% (95% CI, 92.5%-98.8%) for the outer and inner multibranched endografts, respectively. The pooled 30-day mortality was 10.4 % (95% CI, 6.6%-16.1%,) and 4.2% (95% CI, 2.0%-8.6%) for the OMG and IMG, respectively. The pooled 30-day and late target visceral vessel instability for the OMG was 3.5% (95% CI, 2.0%-6.1%) and 6.2% (95% CI, 4.7%-8.0%) and for the IMG 10.4% (95% CI, 4.5%-22.5%) and 1.6% (95% CI, 0.7%-3.3%) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis indicated good technical success and mortality rates for both devices despite the high rate of urgent procedures. Pararenal and TAAAs can be treated safely using the included devices. However, further studies are required to draw additional conclusions for the IMG owing to the small sample size.

Physician-modified versus chimney endografting for pararenal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the existing published evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of the endovascular aortic repair with chimney technique (ch-EVAR) and physician-modified stent-grafts (PMSGs) for the treatment of pararenal aortic aneurysm repair. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of all relevant studies reported until October 2023 according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines was performed. The pooled 30-day mortality, peri- and postoperative complication rates were estimated using fixed or random effect methods. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 679 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 16 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 1094 patients (ch-EVAR N.=861 and PMSG N.=233) (90% male) were identified. The pooled 30-day mortality rate was 3.4% for ch-EVAR and 2.6% for PMSG. The major adverse events (MAE) in the early period was 14.7% for ch-EVAR and 18.5% PMSG, respectively. Higher occlusion rate was observed of the chimney stents grafts (8.2%) than the bridging stents (1.4%) during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Ch-EVAR and physician-modified technology are safe with low 30-day mortality in elective settings for pararenal aortic aneurysms repair. No significant differences were seen between the two surgical methods regarding the early major adverse events rate. However, higher occlusion rate for the chimneys can be expected over time.

An asymptomatic double aortic arch with separate right vertebral artery and left subclavian artery originating from Kommerell Diverticulum combined with congenital asplenia and absence of celiac trunk.

This report describes the unique case of a completely patent Double Aortic Arch (DAA) combined with Kommerell Diverticulum (KD), absence of celiac trunk and congenital asplenia. The anatomical variants described were identified and assessed in a 51-year old female from a computed-tomography angiography (CTA) images with 3D-volume rendered reconstructions during her follow-up after hysterectomy. The reconstructed CTA images showed a DAA with the left common carotid artery stemming from the hypoplastic left aortic arch while the left subclavian artery originated from a KD in the descending thoracic aorta. A symmetric arrangement of the aortic arch branches was demonstrated, comprising a full vascular ring. Since the patient had been completely asymptomatic and with no symptoms of compression of the esophagus or trachea, no surgical management was advised. The abdomen CTA imaging revealed absence of the celiac trunk with direct origin of the common hepatic and the left gastric artery from the superior mesenteric artery as well as asplenia. We presented a case of asymptomatic DAA of completely patent arches with the right vertebral artery branching separately of and the left SCA originating from KD in the descending aorta. The term KD can be identified also in other arch anomalies than the one originally described. Since anatomical anomalies can be frequently combined, thorough imaging inspection with CTA of both thorax and abdomen is suggested.

Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We undertook a systematic review of the currently published literature on TEVAR for DTAAs and we combined the eligible studies into a meta-analysis with the intention of evaluating the efficacy and the long-term durability of this treatment option. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of the literature from January 2015 up to December 2022 was performed according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. For events during follow up we calculated the incidence rates (IRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) per 100 patient-years (p-ys) as the number of patients with outcome events occurring during the specific time period divided by the total number of p-ys. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 4127 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 12 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A Total of 1976 patients (62% male) were identified among the eligible studies. One-year survival was 90.1% (95% CI 86.3% to 93.0%), 3-year survival was estimated at 80.5% (95% CI 69.2% to 88.4%) and the 5-year survival was estimated at 73.2% (95%CI 64.3% to 80.5%) with significant heterogeneity among studies regarding these outcomes. Regarding freedom from reintervention analysis for 1 year and 5 years was 96.5% (95% CI 94.5% to 97.8%) and 85.4% (95% CI 56.7% to 96.3%) respectively. The pooled late complications IR per 100 p-ys was 55.0 (95% CI 39.1 to 70.9), whereas the pooled IR for late reinterventions per 100 p-ys was 21.2 (95% CI 26.0 to 87.5). Late type I endoleak was reported with a pooled IR of 26.7 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 19.8 to 33.6) and late type III endoleak with a pooled IR of 7.6 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 5.5 to 9.7). CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR presents a safe and feasible solution for the treatment of DTAA with sustained long-term effectivity. Current evidence supports a satisfactory 5-year survival with low rates of reinterventions.

Low-Profile Altura Endograft System for Endovascular Abdominal Aorta Aneurysm Repair. Preliminary Results in Elective and Emergent Situations.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the Altura endoprosthesis outcomes up to 12 months for patients affected by infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) either in elective or emergent situations. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study identifying all patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the Altura endoprosthesis from January 2021 to August 2022. Outcomes evaluated included mortality, technical and clinical success (freedom from procedure-related death, endoleak, migration, thrombosis, and reintervention), and the freedom from reintervention rate. RESULTS: A total of 34 (25 elective and 8 emergent) patients who underwent AAA with Altura endoprosthesis were retrospectively reviewed. The technical success of the Altura endograft either in elective or emergent situations was 100%. There was no inhospital mortality, but 1 (3%) patient who underwent AAA repair emergently, died unexpectedly 7 days after the discharge due to massive pulmonary embolism. The clinical success and the freedom from reintervention during the median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12-18), were 97%. One patient presented with disabling intermittent claudication at third month postoperatively, and the computed tomographic angiography (CTA) revealed thrombosis of one of the iliac endografts (3%). The patient underwent femorofemoral bypass with an uneventful postoperative course and immediate relief of the symptoms. One type II endoleak was spontaneously resolved on the sixth month. Sac shrinkage (>3 mm) was registered in 12 patients (35%), but the sac size was stable in the remaining 22 (65%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary outcomes of the Altura endograft seem to be promising, suggesting that the endograft could be safely used either in elective or emergent situations. Further studies with a major number of participants are needed to document its technical and clinical performance, especially in emergency situations that could be amenable to improvement.

Anterior Tibial to Dorsalis Pedis Bypass to Manage Acute Ischemia Attributed to Pilon Fracture.

Pilon fractures of the distal tibia are usually the result of a high-energy trauma and can affect seriously the arterial vasculature carrying an increased risk of amputation at the malleolar level or higher. Such cases represent a challenge for the orthopedic surgeons and a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory in order to salvage the threatened limb. We present an unusual case of a closed pilon fracture with injury of all tibial vessels leading to acute limb threatening ischemia. The patient was treated successfully with external fixation and a short tibial-pedal bypass with use of an autologous reversed saphenous vein graft. This example dictates how a distal leg fracture can be dramatic and that awareness of vascular examination coupled with high suspicion of vascular damage can be limb-saving. Multidisciplinary approach is warranted since the topology and complexity of the ankle lesions necessitate staged orthopedic reconstructions with tibio-distal bypass and appropriate skin coverage of the distal anastomosis.

The Altura endograft system for endovascular aneurysm repair: presentation of its unique design with clinical implications.

INTRODUCTION: The Altura aortic endograft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) consists of two separate components with a proximal double D-shaped design. The braided endoskeleton of the endograft is attached only at the proximal and distal ends of the inner surface of the fabric resulting in adjustable length of the Altura components. To ensure optimal orientation and sealing, the design of Altura permits collapse, readjustment, and deployment of the repositioned D-shaped endografts. AREAS COVERED: Since this new endograft design by Lombard presents unique characteristics, the aim of this article is to present its unique structure and deployment method and discuss its applicability, indications and associated concerns. EXPERT OPINION: The Altura endograft revolutionizes the mechanism of infrarenal sealing by containing no main body at all. This feature allows ideal treatment of AAA with considerable offset of the renal arteries and permits also relining in cases of failing endografts or in cases where the short length of existing structures precludes deployment of conventional bifurcated endografts.

Colour Duplex and/or Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Compared with Computed Tomography Angiography for Endoleak Detection after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study aims to assess the role of Color Duplex Ultrasound with or without contrast media for surveillance following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). A systematic search of the literature published until April 2022 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The pooled rates of endoleak detection through Contrast-Enhanced or Color Duplex Ultrasound (CEUS or CDUS) and Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effect analysis. Thirty-eight studies were considered eligible for inclusion. The total number of patients in the included studies was 5214 between 1997 and 2021. The overall pooled rate of endoleak detection using CDUS and CTA was 82.59% and 97.22%, while the rates for CEUS and CTA were 96.67% and 92.82%, respectively. The findings of the present study support the use of the CEUS for endoleak detection. However, it should be integrated into institutional protocols for EVAR surveillance to further evaluate its clinical utility in the post-EVAR period before it can be recommended as the sole imaging modality after EVAR.