The Real Threat of Deepfake Pornography: A Review of Canadian Policy.

Deepfakes may refer to algorithmically synthesized material wherein the face of a person is superimposed onto another body. To date, most deepfakes found online are pornographic, with the people depicted in them rarely consenting to their creation and publicization. Deepfakes leave anyone with an online presence vulnerable to victimization. As a testament to policy often being reactionary to antisocial behavior, current Canadian legislation offers no clear recourse to those who are victimized by deepfake pornography. We aim to provide a critical review of the legal mechanisms and remedies in place, including criminal charges, defamation, copyright infringement laws, and injunctive relief that could be applied in deepfake pornography cases. To combat deepfake pornography, we suggest current laws to be expanded to include language specific to falsely created pornography without the explicit consent of all depicted persons. We also discuss the extent to which host websites are responsible for vetting the uploaded content on their platforms. Finally, we present a call for action on a societal and research level to deal with deepfakes and better support victims of deepfake pornography.

"We're Working in a Trauma Avoidant Culture": A Qualitative Study Exploring Assertive Community Treatment Providers' Perspectives on Working with Trauma and PTSD in People with Severe Mental Illness.

Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is the most widely used evidence-based community mental health intervention for people with severe mental illness (SMI). Despite research showing that the vast majority of those with SMI have traumatic histories, the ACT service model does not have consistent guidelines on how to address trauma in their client population. This study employed thematic-analysis through interviewing ACT providers to better understand their perspectives on working with trauma in clients. Five overarching themes with 21 sub-themes emerged: the role and scope of ACT teams and model regarding trauma, discussions of trauma with clients, current treatment of trauma, barriers to working with trauma, and recommendations for enabling trauma discussions and treatment. Some examples for recommendations were: a need for more training regarding trauma, increasing resources like including a psychologist and trauma specialized professionals on the team, more support from leadership, and a cultural change from medicalization. Implications of the barriers and suggestions are discussed.