Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hepatocell Carcinoma ; 8: 565-574, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34150679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) have revolutionized the therapy of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and have replaced previous PEG-interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) treatment. Patients with CHC and advanced liver disease are at increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effects of DAA-based CHC treatment on subsequent HCC incidence remain poorly understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-institution cohort study included 243 consecutive patients after PEG-IFN/RBV and 263 patients after DAA treatment. Multivariable cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare time to HCC between treatment types, censoring patients who died or had an orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) at the time of the competing event. Age, gender, BMI, viral load, cirrhosis, fibrosis stage, diabetes, virus genotype and previous PEG-IFN/RBV (before DAA) were used as covariates. In addition, we performed a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: Nineteen HCC cases were observed after DAA therapy compared to 18 cases after PEG-IFN/RBV treatment. Patients were followed for a median of 4.1 years (IQR: 3.5-4.7) for DAA and 9.3 years (IQR: 6.6-12.4) for the PEG-IFN/RBV group. In an unadjusted Cox model, a hazard ratio (HR) of 6.40 (CI: 2.20-18.61, p=0.006) for HCC following DAA vs PEG-IFN/RBV was estimated. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, age and liver cirrhosis were identified as further HCC risk factors but the HR estimates for DAA vs PEG-IFN/RBV still indicate a considerably increased hazard associated with DAA treatment (HR between 7.23 and 11.52, p≤0.001, depending on covariates). A HR of 6.62 (CI: 2.01-21.84, p=0.002) for DAA vs PEG-IFN/RBV was estimated in the propensity score-matched analysis. The secondary outcomes death and OLT did not differ between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In a cohort study from a tertiary care hospital rates of HCC after the start of DAA treatment were higher compared to PEG-IFN/RBV treatment. Our data reinforce the recommendation that surveillance should be continued after successful CHC treatment.

2.
Int J Cardiol ; 236: 375-380, 2017 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28283362

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using the MitraClip™ system has become a valuable alternative in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of the SYNTAX II score (SSII) in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing a Mitraclip procedure. METHODS: In seventy-five consecutive patients who underwent PMVR at the University Heart Center Zürich and the Cardiocentro Ticino, the SSSII was calculated at baseline. Clinical endpoints comprised of all-cause mortality, mitral valve surgery due to failure of PMVR or reoperation, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, heart transplantation and the composite of all four endpoints. RESULTS: Patients were followed for a median of 271days. And were divided in tertiles of SSII: SSII low ≤46.5 (n=25), SSII mid 46.6-54.4 (n=25) and SSII high ≥54.5 (n=25). Patients in the highest SSII tertile had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (33% vs. 40% vs. 53%) with a higher log-BNP (3.6 vs. 3.45 vs. 3.16) when compared to SSII mid and SSII low, respectively. However, the anatomical syntax score (SS) did not differ significantly within the tertiles (9.1±6.3 (SSII Low) vs 9.5±7.6 (SSII Mid) vs 10.2±6.7(SSII High), p=0.837). The primary endpoint occurred in 33% of patients (n=25). By multivariate analysis patients in the high SSII tertile (OR=6.12, 95% confidence interval, [CI] 1.45-25.86, p=0.014) and patients with a history of MI (OR=3.57, 95% confidence interval, [CI] 1.17-10.88, p=0.025) were at significantly higher risk of experiencing adverse events. Furthermore, in a combined outcome ROC curve analysis, the SSII showed good discrimination with an AUC of 0.73, p=0.001. A cutoff SSII >49 has been identified to have a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 53% with approximately 45% of the patients experiencing an event during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Using SSII in CAD patients undergoing PMVR is feasible and of prognostic significance hence widening its clinical utility in valvular heart disease.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Severity of Illness Index , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Instruments
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...