Community-Based Healthcare for Migrants and Refugees: A Scoping Literature Review of Best Practices.

BACKGROUND: Strengthening community-based healthcare is a valuable strategy to reduce health inequalities and improve the integration of migrants and refugees into local communities in the European Union. However, little is known about how to effectively develop and run community-based healthcare models for migrants and refugees. Aiming at identifying the most-promising best practices, we performed a scoping review of the international academic literature into effective community-based healthcare models and interventions for migrants and refugees as part of the Mig-HealthCare project. METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was conducted in March 2018 following the PRISMA methodology. Data extraction from eligible publications included information on general study characteristics, a brief description of the intervention/model, and reported outcomes in terms of effectiveness and challenges. Subsequently, we critically assessed the available evidence per type of healthcare service according to specific criteria to establish a shortlist of the most promising best practices. RESULTS: In total, 118 academic publications were critically reviewed and categorized in the thematic areas of mental health (n = 53), general health services (n = 36), noncommunicable diseases (n = 13), primary healthcare (n = 9), and women's maternal and child health (n = 7). CONCLUSION: A set of 15 of the most-promising best practices and tools in community-based healthcare for migrants and refugees were identified that include several intervention approaches per thematic category. The elements of good communication, the linguistic barriers and the cultural differences, played crucial roles in the effective application of the interventions. The close collaboration of the various stakeholders, the local communities, the migrant/refugee communities, and the partnerships is a key element in the successful implementation of primary healthcare provision.

The "unexpected" growth of the private health sector in Greece.

The article analyses the situation which exists in the private health sector in Greece, it presents data on the growth of the private sector and discusses the reasons for this phenomenon in relation to privatisation trends in other European countries. The growth of private health care in Greece in the last 10 years is evident despite governmental attempts to minimise its role through the development of the National Health System in 1983 and the legislative restrictions on the private sector. Private health expenditure has increased, reaching 3.9% of the country's GNP (43% of the total expenditure in health) in 2000. The number of private hospitals and hospital beds has decreased (hospitals decreased from 468 in 1990 to 218 in 2000 and private beds decreased from 25,075 in 1980 to 15,806 in 2000) mainly because of the reduction in the number of small private hospitals. On the other hand, private doctors and private diagnostic centres have significantly increased. This situation is believed to be attributed mainly to the provision of inadequate and low quality public health services which have caused widespread dissatisfaction among the general public, and factors associated to improved standards of living, as well as the rapid growth of private insurance.

Reforming the reform: the Greek National Health System in transition.

The National Health System (ESY) in Greece, which was established in 1983, is in a state of continuous crisis. This situation is caused mainly by the system's problematic administration, low productivity and inadequate Primary Health Care. These have led the re-elected PASOK government to introduce by the end of 2000 a radical reform of the health system. The 200 reform measures announced by the new Minister of Health and Welfare include changes aiming at: the decentralization of the ESY, the creation of a unified financing system for the social insurance funds, a new management structure in public hospitals, the organization of a Primary Health System in urban areas, and the strengthening of Public Health and Health Promotion. These changes are presented and discussed in this paper.