ABSTRACT
The article scrutinises Rohini S. Rajagopal's work, what's a lemon squeezer doing in my vagina (2021), to illustrate the escalating medicalisation of infertile bodies. In a cultural context where reproductive concerns are construed as medical disorders demanding treatment and surveillance, medical professionals and pharmaceutical companies exploit these sociocultural dynamics to provide infertile couples with immediate solutions through Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Consequently, the study contributes a critical perspective to the field of medical humanities, initiating a nuanced discourse that interrogates the impact of terms such as 'living laboratories', 'baby machine', 'mother machine' and 'hope technology' on our comprehension of future motherhood. Drawing on feminist critiques of medicalisation, the article argues that biotechnology perpetuates the eighteenth-century biomedical metaphor of the body as a machine with replaceable parts. Notably, contemporary advancements in reproductive medicine allow for the replacement of perceived 'flawed' body parts, further objectifying them within this framework.
ABSTRACT
The article critically examines the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act 2021, its development process spanning 15 years, and its potential shortcomings in addressing the needs of India's 27 million infertile couples. By scrutinizing the recommendations presented in the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare's 129th report, the critique argues that the Act may not effectively cater to the diverse reproductive rights of the population. The article claims that most of its suggestions are in opposition to redefining families and accepting inclusive family structures other than heterosexual marriages. The study posits that the Act, with its inherent limitations, perpetuates the reinforcement of patriarchal family structures that medical science intends to disrupt. In order to foster inclusivity and comprehensibility, the article advocates for necessary amendments that align with the interest of the general populace.
ABSTRACT
In vitro fertilization (IVF) and surrogacy have enabled many to achieve their dreams of parenthood. With a turnover of $500 million, reproductive tourism in India has helped transform the country into a "global baby factory." However, as the surrogacy industry grew, so did concerns of women's exploitation, commodification of motherhood, and human rights violations. In an effort to prevent women from being exploited, the Indian government had taken successive administrative measures to regulate surrogacy. The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016 and Assisted Reproductive Technologies Bill 2008 were introduced in the Parliament to regulate various aspects of surrogacy arrangements. Yet, it was not until 25 January 2022, that the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 went into effect. The Act does, however, leave certain important points unaddressed. The article claims that the legislation's purposeful exclusion of the LGBTQ population and emphasis on "familial altruism" stinks of inequity and moral conservatism. It also delineates the mechanics of altruistic surrogacy by examining documents that illustrate how the connections between money and morality are framed via the framing of altruism. The article therefore demands that a comprehensive dialogue must be held considering the socio-economic realities of Indian society, or else India risks enacting yet another law that cannot be implemented or that society dislikes.
ABSTRACT
A 41-year-old gentleman underwent surgical repair of the fractured right parasymphisis and left condyle of his mandible. Post-operatively he developed hoarseness of voice and dyspnoea during speech, with deviation of the tongue on protrusion. After excluding intracranial and surgical causes, a clinical diagnosis of Tapia's syndrome was made.