Developmental epileptic encephalopathy in DLG4-related synaptopathy.

OBJECTIVE: The postsynaptic density protein of excitatory neurons PSD-95 is encoded by discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 4 (DLG4), de novo pathogenic variants of which lead to DLG4-related synaptopathy. The major clinical features are developmental delay, intellectual disability (ID), hypotonia, sleep disturbances, movement disorders, and epilepsy. Even though epilepsy is present in 50% of the individuals, it has not been investigated in detail. We describe here the phenotypic spectrum of epilepsy and associated comorbidities in patients with DLG4-related synaptopathy. METHODS: We included 35 individuals with a DLG4 variant and epilepsy as part of a multicenter study. The DLG4 variants were detected by the referring laboratories. The degree of ID, hypotonia, developmental delay, and motor disturbances were evaluated by the referring clinician. Data on awake and sleep electroencephalography (EEG) and/or video-polygraphy and brain magnetic resonance imaging were collected. Antiseizure medication response was retrospectively assessed by the referring clinician. RESULTS: A large variety of seizure types was reported, although focal seizures were the most common. Encephalopathy related to status epilepticus during slow-wave sleep (ESES)/developmental epileptic encephalopathy with spike-wave activation during sleep (DEE-SWAS) was diagnosed in >25% of the individuals. All but one individual presented with neurodevelopmental delay. Regression in verbal and/or motor domains was observed in all individuals who suffered from ESES/DEE-SWAS, as well as some who did not. We could not identify a clear genotype-phenotype relationship even between individuals with the same DLG4 variants. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study shows that a subgroup of individuals with DLG4-related synaptopathy have DEE, and approximately one fourth of them have ESES/DEE-SWAS. Our study confirms DEE as part of the DLG4-related phenotypic spectrum. Occurrence of ESES/DEE-SWAS in DLG4-related synaptopathy requires proper investigation with sleep EEG.

Corrigendum: Intrafamilial variability in SLC6A1-related neurodevelopmental disorders.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1219262.].

Intrafamilial variability in SLC6A1-related neurodevelopmental disorders.

Introduction: Phenotypic spectrum of SLC6A1-related neurodevelopmental disorders (SLC6A1-NDD) includes intellectual disability (ID), autistic spectrum disorders (ASD), epilepsy, developmental delay, beginning from early infancy or after seizure onset, and other neurological features such as hypotonia and movement disorders. Data on familial phenotypic heterogeneity have been rarely reported, thus in our study we aimed to investigate intrafamilial phenotypic variability in families with SLC6A1 variants. Methods: We collected clinical, laboratory and genetic data on 39 individuals, including 17 probands, belonging to 13 families harboring inherited variants of SLC6A1. Data were collected through an international network of Epilepsy and Genetic Centers. Results: Main clinical findings in the whole cohort of 39 subjects were: (a) epilepsy, mainly presenting with generalized seizures, reported in 71% of probands and 36% of siblings or first/second-degree relatives. Within a family, the same epilepsy type (generalized or focal) was observed; (b) ID reported in 100% and in 13% of probands and siblings or first/second-degree relatives, respectively; (c) learning disabilities detected in 28% of the SLC6A1 carriers, all of them were relatives of a proband; (d) around 51% of the whole cohort presented with psychiatric symptoms or behavioral disorders, including 82% of the probands. Out of the 19 patients with psychiatric symptoms, ASD were diagnosed in 40% of them; (e) neurological findings (primarily tremor and speech difficulties) were observed 38.5% of the whole cohort, including 10 probands. Our families harbored 12 different SLC6A1 variants, one was a frameshift, two stop-gain, while the remaining were missense. No genotype-phenotype associations were identified. Discussion: Our study showed that first-or second-degree relatives presented with a less severe phenotype, featuring mainly mild intellectual and/or learning disabilities, at variance with the probands who suffered from moderate to severe ID, generalized, sometimes intractable, epileptic seizures, behavioral and psychiatric disorders. These findings may suggest that a proportion of individuals with mild SLC6A1-NDD might be missed, in particular those with an older age where genetic testing is not performed. Further studies on intrafamilial phenotypic variability are needed to confirm our results and possibly to expand the phenotypic spectrum of these disorders and benefit genetic counseling.

Gain of function SCN1A disease-causing variants: Expanding the phenotypic spectrum and functional studies guiding the choice of effective antiseizure medication.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to refine the spectrum of SCN1A epileptic disorders other than Dravet syndrome (DS) and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) and optimize antiseizure management by correlating phenotype-genotype relationship and functional consequences of SCN1A variants in a cohort of patients. METHODS: Sixteen probands carrying SCN1A pathogenic variants were ascertained via a national collaborative network. We also performed a literature review including individuals with SCN1A variants causing non-DS and non-GEFS+ phenotypes and compared the features of the two cohorts. Whole cell patch clamp experiments were performed for three representative SCN1A pathogenic variants. RESULTS: Nine of the 16 probands (56%) had de novo pathogenic variants causing developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) with seizure onset at a median age of 2 months and severe intellectual disability. Seven of the 16 probands (54%), five with inherited and two with de novo variants, manifested focal epilepsies with mild or no intellectual disability. Sodium channel blockers never worsened seizures, and 50% of patients experienced long periods of seizure freedom. We found 13 SCN1A missense variants; eight of them were novel and never reported. Functional studies of three representative variants showed a gain of channel function. The literature review led to the identification of 44 individuals with SCN1A variants and non-DS, non-GEFS+ phenotypes. The comparison with our cohort highlighted that DEE phenotypes are a common feature. SIGNIFICANCE: The boundaries of SCN1A disorders are wide and still expanding. In our cohort, >50% of patients manifested focal epilepsies, which are thus a frequent feature of SCN1A pathogenic variants beyond DS and GEFS+. SCN1A testing should therefore be included in the diagnostic workup of pediatric, familial and nonfamilial, focal epilepsies. Alternatively, non-DS/non-GEFS+ phenotypes might be associated with gain of channel function, and sodium channel blockers could control seizures by counteracting excessive channel function. Functional analysis evaluating the consequences of pathogenic SCN1A variants is thus relevant to tailor the appropriate antiseizure medication.

Behavior in subcortical vascular dementia with sight pathologies: visual hallucinations as a consequence of precocious gait imbalance and institutionalization.

BACKGROUND: Subcortical vascular dementia (sVAD) is considered the most frequent dementia in old population, and it is due to a small vessel disease. It has a very specific nosography, where the dominant factors are dysexecutive functions, depression, and apathy. Very few studies described visual hallucinations in sVAD, apart from in the final stages of it. METHODS: This study recruited 577 patients with a diagnosis of sVAD associated with major ocular pathologies and 1118 patients with sVAD without any significant ocular pathology: Patients were followed up for 24 months. We studied the influence of ocular pathologies in precocious visual hallucinations, on behavior disorder (aggressiveness), and gait disorders (instability, fells). We registered the necessity of neuropsychiatric therapies, incidence of hospitalization, and institutionalization. RESULTS: What emerges from our study is that the ocular comorbidities might change the behavior profile of dementia, provoking behavioral alterations, and the need for therapies with adverse effects. As far as old age is a complicated status of life, many factors can modify its development. The possible contribution of multiple biological events cannot be neglected, particularly the underlying influence of chronic diseases as well as the geriatric conditions, per se, might compromise the cognitive functions and the pathological conditions. Ocular pathology as a superimposing event in sVAD might worse the outcome. A correct and rapid identification of critical patients might be relevant for the dynamic life events in these patients and their caregivers.