A mixed-methods needs assessment for an antimicrobial stewardship curriculum in pediatrics.

Objective: Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) education initiatives for multidisciplinary teams are most successful when addressing psychosocial factors driving antimicrobial prescribing (AP) and when they address the needs of the team to allow for a tailored approach to their education. Design: We conducted a mixed-methods embedded study as a needs assessment, involving quantitative analysis of AS concerns observed by pharmacists through an audit while attending clinical team rounds, as well as qualitative semi-structured interviews based on the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) to identify psychosocial barriers and facilitators for antimicrobial prescribing for an inpatient general pediatric service. We analyzed the data using deductive and inductive methods by mapping the TDF to a model for social determinants of antimicrobial prescribing (SDAP) in pediatric inpatient health care teams. Setting: The Clinical Teaching Unit (CTU) and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), at a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Canada. Participants: Interviews (n = 23) with staff and resident physicians, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists. Results: Psychosocial facilitators and barriers for AS practice in the PICU and CTU which were identified included: collaboration, shared decision-making, locally accessible guidelines, and an overarching goal of doing right by the patient and feeling empowered as a prescriber. Some of the barriers identified included the norm of noninterference, professional comparisons, limited resources, feeling inadequately trained in AS, emotional prescribing, and a pejorative monitoring system. Conclusions: Our findings identified barriers and facilitators to AS decisions on pediatric inpatient teams as well as actionable needs in psychosocial-based AS education.

The Choice! The challenges of trying to improve medical students' satisfaction with their specialty choices.

The authors describe the residency match as a two-step process. The first step, the Choice, is where students use a combination of intuitive and analytic information processing to select the specialty that they believe will provide fulfilment and work-life balance over their entire career. The second step, the Match, uses a "deferred-acceptance" algorithm to optimize pairing of students and their specialty choices. Despite being the rate-limiting step, in the minds of students and other stakeholders, the outcomes of the Choice have typically been eclipsed by the outcomes of the Match. A recently published study found that during their second year of residency training, one in 14 physicians reported specialty choice regret, which associates with symptoms of burnout in residents. While the obvious solution is to design interventions that improve the specialty choices of students, this approach faces significant challenges, including the fact that: 1) satisfaction with specialty choice is a difficult-to-define construct; 2) specialty choice regret may be misattributed to a poor choice; and 3) choosing is a more complicated process than matching. The authors end by suggesting that if we hope to improve satisfaction with specialty choice then we should begin by defining this, deciding when to assess it, and then creating assessment tools for which there is validity evidence and that can identify the underlying causes of specialty choice regret.

Les auteurs décrivent le jumelage des résidents comme un processus en deux étapes. La première étape, le Choix, est celle où les étudiants utilisent une combinaison de traitement intuitif et analytique de l'information pour sélectionner la spécialité qui, selon eux, leur apportera l'épanouissement et l'équilibre entre leur vie professionnelle et leur vie privée tout au long de leur carrière. La deuxième étape, le Match, utilise un algorithme « d'acceptation différée ¼ pour optimiser le jumelage des étudiants et de leurs choix de spécialité. Bien qu'ils soient l'étape limitante du processus, selon les étudiants et d'autres parties prenantes, les résultats du Choix sont généralement éclipsés par ceux du jumelage. Une étude récemment publiée a révélé que, durant leur deuxième année de résidence, un médecin sur quatorze regrette d'avoir choisi une spécialité, ce qui est associé à des symptômes d'épuisement professionnel chez les résidents. Bien que la solution évidente soit de développer des interventions qui améliorent les choix de spécialité des étudiants, cette approche pose des défis importants, notamment le fait que : 1) la satisfaction à l'égard du choix de la spécialité est un concept difficile à définir ; 2) le regret du choix de la spécialité peut être attribué à tort à un mauvais choix ; et 3) le choix est un processus plus complexe que le jumelage. Les auteurs concluent en suggérant que si nous espérons améliorer la satisfaction à l'égard du choix de la spécialité, nous devrions commencer par définir ce concept, décider quand l'évaluer, puis créer des outils d'évaluation pour lesquels il existe des preuves de validité et qui peuvent identifier les causes sous-jacentes des regrets à l'égard du choix de la spécialité.

Exploring the construct of anticipatory stress in finding a job after residency training through cognitive interviewing: Implications for learner well-being and health workforce planning.

Background: Anticipatory stress (AS) is denoted by concern about future events for which there is little control. Most AS research has been physiological studies such as measuring salivary cortisol levels. Medical learners may experience AS regarding employment after residency, however AS a psychological construct across career stages has not previously been studied. The objective of this study is to explore the psychological construct of employment AS in medical students, residents, and former Program Directors (PDs). Methods: Participants were recruited from a large Canadian medical school via purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews with n=21 participants (six medical students, nine residents, and six PDs) were transcribed verbatim, and coded by two independent reviewers using thematic analysis. Results: Participants agreed that financial, family, and geographical factors exacerbate AS, and it is mitigated by flexibility, social support, and being proactive. External support, job market saturation, and differences between medical specialities also influence AS. Perspectives unique to participant groups included: medical students reflecting on a hidden curriculum and preoccupation with proximal issues over distal concerns of employment; residents experiencing competing residency program demands; former PDs finding that resident competency, yearly hiring fluctuations, and existing stress impact AS. Consequences of AS include physical and psychological manifestations, performance anxiety, and pursuing additional training. Conclusions: Perceptions of AS vary by medical career stage. Individual, program and systems-level changes can help manage and address the underlying cause of AS: an unreliable job market for physicians. Correcting the mismatch between residency positions and job openings may be a proactive, preventative approach.

Competence committees decision-making; an interplay of data, group orientation, and intangible impressions.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of competency-based medical education and utilization of competence committees (CC) represents a paradigm shift in residency education. This qualitative study aimed to explore the methods used by two operational CC and their members to make decisions about progression and competence of their residents. METHODS: An instrumental case study methodology was used to study the CC of two postgraduate training programs. Transcripts from observed CC meetings, member interviews, and guiding documents were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach to reveal themes explaining the decision-making process. RESULTS: Our study found that the CC followed a process that began within a social decision schema model and evolved to a discussion that invoked social influence theory, shared mental models, and social judgment scheme to clarify the points of contention. We identified that the CC decision-making was at risk of bias, primarily influenced by the group composition, the group orientation and individual members' mindset, as well as their personal experiences with the trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Increased awareness of the sources of bias in CC functioning and familiarity with the CC role in competency-based medical education would enable committees to provide valuable feedback to all trainees regardless of their trajectory.

Is there a role for a learner education handover as part of the Medical Council of Canada assessment and licensing process?

The transition from undergraduate medical education (UGME) to postgraduate medical education (PGME) is a time of vulnerability for medical schools, postgraduate residency programs, and most importantly, traineesThere is a disconnect between the UGME and PGME experience. Student information shared by UGME is primarily summative of knowledge and skills; PGME programs are unaware of specific learner accommodation requirements, tailored supervisory needs, or potential professionalism concerns identified during UGMEThis lack of integration between UGME and PGME increases potential risk to learners, postgrad programs and patientsBetter linkages and communication along the education continuum could optimize learning and reduce inefficiency and riskThe Medical Council of Canada (MCC) has asked if there is a role for a learner handover (LH) within their licensing processes; however the intended purpose of an LH must first be determinedA Canadian-based LH referred to as a Learner Education Handover (LEH) model including disclosure of student learning/disability accommodation needs, general health concerns, EDI/religious requirements, professionalism concerns, and recommendations for special focus in residency of specific areas of medical knowledge/skill is described.Findings from beta and pilot testing support the value and feasibility of the LEH model. Fundamental principles are outlined: LEH occurs post-residency matchLEH should be forward facing; focused on ongoing or recurring learner issues and needsLearners must be included in the processImplementation would require participation by all Canadian medical schools and all learnersImplementation challenges include: Ensuring learner safety following information disclosureEngaging UGME DeansProtection of information ensuring a 'need-to-know' status is maintainedIncorporating the LEH into the licensing activity could enable the MCC to support a system that proactively responds to learner needs, optimizes physician performance and promotes safe, high quality patient care.

La transition de la formation médicale prédoctorale (FMPrD) vers la formation médicale postdoctorale (FMPoD) est une période de vulnérabilité pour les facultés de médecine, les programmes de résidence et, surtout, les apprenants.Un gouffre sépare l'expérience de la FMPrD et celle de la FMPoD. L'information sur les étudiants partagée par les programmes de FMPrD consiste principalement en une évaluation sommative de leurs connaissances et habiletés; les programmes de FMPoD ne sont pas renseignés sur les besoins d'accommodement spécifiques et les besoins de supervision sur mesure des apprenants ou sur d'éventuelles préoccupations en lien avec la conduite professionnelle relevés pendant la formation de premier cycle.Ce manque d'intégration entre la FMPrC et la FMPoD augmente les risques pour les apprenants, les programmes de formation postdoctorale et les patients.Des liens plus solides et une meilleure communication tout au long du continuum éducatif pourraient optimiser l'apprentissage et réduire l'inefficacité et les risques.Le Conseil médical du Canada (CMC) a posé la question à savoir s'il y aurait une place pour le transfert d'information sur les apprenants dans le cadre de ses processus d'octroi de licences; toutefois, il faut d'abord déterminer l'objectif visé par le transfert d'information.Nous décrivons un modèle canadien de transfert d'information sur les apprenants, appelé modèle de transfert pour la formation des apprenants (TFA), qui comprend la divulgation des besoins de formation des apprenants et les mesures d'accommodement nécessaires selon leurs difficultés, des préoccupations générales en matière de santé, des exigences en matière d'équité/diversité/inclusion et de religion, des préoccupations en matière de professionnalisme et des recommandations concernant l'accent à mettre sur des domaines spécifiques des connaissances et d'habiletés pendant la résidence.Les résultats des tests bêta et des essais pilotes confirment la valeur et la faisabilité du modèle TFA.Le modèle est fondé sur les principes fondamentaux suivants : Le transfert d'information sur les apprenants a lieu après le jumelage de résidenceLe TFA doit être orienté vers l'avenir; il est axé sur les problèmes et les besoins permanents ou récurrents des apprenantsLes apprenants doivent participer au processusLa mise en œuvre du modèle exigerait la participation de toutes les facultés de médecine et de tous les apprenants au CanadaLa mise en œuvre comprend les défis suivants : Assurer la sécurité des apprenants après la divulgation de l'informationMobiliser les vice-deans des programmes de FMPrCAssurer la protection de l'information en respectant le principe du besoin de savoirL'intégration du transfert d'information sur les apprenants à l'activité d'octroi de licences pourrait permettre au CMC de soutenir un système qui répond de manière proactive aux besoins des apprenants, optimise le rendement des médecins et favorise la sécurité et la qualité des soins aux patients.

A behavior change model to address caregiver hesitancy around COVID-19 vaccination in pediatrics.

INTRODUCTION: Many families express hesitancy around immunizing their children against COVID-19. We sought to better understand the perspectives of vaccine hesitant caregivers, and develop targeted recommendations for health care workers and policymakers to engage in more effective vaccine discussions. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 23 caregivers recruited from a pediatric infectious diseases clinic, including a subset of patients referred to discuss vaccine hesitancy. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified themes that were mapped using behavior change models to identify perceived barriers and facilitators towards COVID-19 immunization. RESULTS: Barriers and facilitators were mapped to the WHO (World Health Organization) 3C's (confidence, complacency, convenience) model of vaccine hesitancy as well as the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation) behavior change model. Barriers included mistrust in authorities, misperception of the risk of COVID-19 in children, and perceived health contraindications and negative previous vaccine experiences. Facilitators included positive relationships with healthcare workers, the promise of a "return to normal", and societal pressures to immunize. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to increase vaccine uptake in the pediatric population must target specific barriers and facilitators to immunization expressed by caregivers. To address these concerns, we suggest: 1. Educating hesitant caregivers by highlighting the long-term pandemic effects on children and the threat of COVID-19 to children's health, 2. Building on the trust caregivers have in healthcare workers by involving frontline workers in public health policy, and 3. Harnessing the power of peer pressure by mobilization of societal pressures and establishing COVID-19 vaccination as the norm in children.

Crowdsourcing trainees in a living systematic review provided valuable experiential learning opportunities: a mixed-methods study.

OBJECTIVES: To understand trainee experiences of participating in a living systematic review (LSR) for rheumatoid arthritis and the potential benefits in terms of experiential evidence-based medicine (EBM) education. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a mixed-methods study with trainees who participated in the LSR and who were recruited broadly from training programs in two countries. Trainees received task-specific training and completed one or more tasks in the review: assessing article eligibility, data extraction, and quality assessment. Trainees completed a survey followed by a one-on-one interview. Data were triangulated to produce broad themes. RESULTS: Twenty one trainees, most of whom had a little prior experience with systematic reviews, reported a positive overall experience. Key benefits included learning opportunities, task segmentation (ability to focus on a single task, as opposed to an entire review), working in a supportive environment, international collaboration, and incentives such as authorship or acknowledgment. Trainees reported improvement in their competency as a Scholar, Collaborator, Leader, and Medical Expert. Challenges included communication and technical difficulties and appropriate matching of tasks to trainee skillsets. CONCLUSION: Participating in an LSR provided benefits to a wide range of trainees and may provide an opportunity for experiential EBM training, while helping LSR sustainability.

Residents' transformational changes through self-regulated, experiential learning for professionalism.

Purpose: Postgraduate trainees ('residents") are required to convey professional behaviours as they navigate complex clinical environments. However, little is known about experiential learning for professionalism. Thus, we asked residents about professionalism challenges within the clinical learning environment: 1) how challenges were identified, 2) what supported successfully addressing challenges and 3) the impact of addressing challenges to further inform resident education. Method: From 2015-2016, twenty-five residents across specialties and multiple university affiliated teaching hospitals participated in appreciative inquiry informed audio-taped semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were categorized deductively for the 2015 CanMEDS Professional Role element addressed (commitment to patients, society, the profession, and physician health). A pragmatic research paradigm focussed descriptive data analysis on actions and outcomes. Results: Residents actively identify opportunities for experiential learning of professionalism within the clinical workplace- addressing conflicting priorities with interprofessional clinicians to ensure excellent patient care, providing informal feedback regarding peers' and other healthcare clinicians' professionalism lapses and by gaining self-awareness and maintaining wellness. There were no descriptions of commitment to society. Values, relationships, and reflection supported professional behaviours. Many described transformative personal and professional growth as an outcome of addressing professionalism challenges. Conclusions: Residents self-regulated experiential learning for professionalism often results in transformational changes personally and professionally. Elucidation of how residents successfully navigate power dynamics and conflict to provide excellent patient care and feedback for professional regulatory behaviour will support professionalism education. An interprofessional research lens will be valuable to explore how best to incorporate commitment to society within clinical environments.

Objectif: Il est attendu des stagiaires postdoctoraux (résidents) d'adopter des comportements professionnels dans les environnements cliniques complexes dans lesquels ils évoluent. Cependant, on sait peu de choses sur l'apprentissage expérientiel des comportements professionnels. Nous avons donc interrogé les résidents sur les défis qu'ils rencontrent en lien avec le professionnalisme dans leur environnement d'apprentissage clinique : 1) quels sont les problèmes qu'ils considèrent comme étant liés au professionnalisme, 2) qu'est-ce qui les a aidés à relever ces défis avec succès et 3) quels sont les effets de leur réaction à ces problématiques et quelles leçons peut-on tirer de ces résultats pour mieux adapter la formation des résidents. Méthode: Entre 2015 et 2016, 25 résidents de diverses spécialités et hôpitaux universitaires ont participé à des entretiens semi-structurés qui ont été menés selon une méthode d'interrogation appréciative et qui ont été enregistrés sur bande audio. Les transcriptions ont été catégorisées de manière déductive par rapport au rôle du professionnel du référentiel CanMEDS 2015 (engagement envers les patients, la société, la profession et la santé des médecins). Fondée sur un paradigme de recherche pragmatique, l'analyse des données descriptives ciblait les actions et les résultats. Résultats: Les résidents décèlent activement les occasions d'apprentissage expérientiel du professionnalisme dans le milieu de travail clinique et ils réagissent par exemple en abordant les priorités divergentes avec les cliniciens d'équipes interprofessionnelles de façon à assurer l'excellence des soins aux patients, en fournissant des commentaires informels à leurs pairs et à d'autres cliniciens sur les comportements non professionnels de ces derniers, en prenant conscience d'eux-mêmes et en privilégiant le bien-être. Ils n'ont pas proposé de description de l'engagement envers la société. Les valeurs, les relations et la réflexion sont les facteurs qui ont soutenu l'adoption de comportements professionnels. Un grand nombre de répondants ont déclaré avoir vécu une croissance personnelle et professionnelle transformatrice grâce à l'action qu'ils ont prise pour résoudre un problème de professionnalisme. Conclusions: L'apprentissage expérientiel autorégulé du professionnalisme par les résidents entraîne souvent des changements transformationnels pour eux sur les plans personnel et professionnel. Une compréhension approfondie de la gestion réussie des rapports de pouvoir et des conflits par les résidents leur permettant d'assurer la qualité des soins aux patients et de donner une rétroaction à leurs collègues sur la conformité de leur comportement professionnel contribuerait grandement à l'enseignement du professionnalisme. L'adoption d'une approche de recherche interprofessionnelle serait utile pour explorer la meilleure façon d'intégrer l'engagement envers la société dans l'environnement clinique.

Considering a risk profile based on emergency department utilization in young people with eating disorders: Implications for early detection.

OBJECTIVE: While screening tools are available for the early identification of eating disorders, it may not be feasible to employ them in an emergency department (ED). Establishing a risk profile may improve the screening process. The purpose of this study was to investigate ED service utilization among patients with eating disorders and create a risk profile to help detect eating disorders at an earlier and more treatable stage. METHOD: We applied a concurrent mixed methods research design, however, only the quantitative findings will be presented. Our study involved a retrospective cohort analysis of administrative ED health data for patients (n = 243) aged 12-24 years in an eating disorders program. Two control groups: (1) all-cause (n = 716), (2) and mental health (n = 679) were included. RESULTS: 68.7% of eating disorder patients were discharged from the ED without follow-up being arranged. Comorbidities were recorded as the primary or secondary diagnosis, and patients presented with suicidality more frequently than controls (χ = 31.2, p < .001). Patients accessed ED services five times more often than controls. DISCUSSION: Despite eating disorder patients accessing the ED more frequently than controls, eating disorder diagnoses were not always assigned or documented. Our findings highlight the importance of enhanced eating disorder training for ED health care staff to better understand the risk profile, and the consideration of comorbidities and suicide risk when assessing patients to ensure early detection. CONCLUSION: As eating disorders are often undetected, more comprehensive training and access to screening tools may help improve detection, mitigate symptom progression, and enhance patient safety.

Ethnic disparities in care and outcomes of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study.

AIMS: Little is known about ethnic disparities in care and clinical outcomes of patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in national cohorts from universal healthcare systems derived from Europe. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 280 588 admissions with NSTEMI in the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP), 2010-2017, including White patients (n = 258 364) and Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) patients (n = 22 194). BAME patients were younger (66 years vs. 73 years, P < 0.001) and more frequently had hypertension (66% vs. 54%, P < 0.001), hypercholesterolaemia (49% vs. 34%, P < 0.001), and diabetes (48% vs. 24%, P < 0.001). BAME patients more frequently received invasive coronary angiography (80% vs. 68%, P < 0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (52% vs. 43%, P < 0.001), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (9% vs. 7%, P < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, BAME compared with White patients had similar in-hospital all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.91, confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.06; P = 0.23], major bleeding (OR 0.99, CI 0.75-1.25; P = 0.95), re-infarction (OR 1.15, CI 0.84-1.46; P = 0.34), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 0.94, CI 0.80-1.07; P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: BAME patients with NSTEMI had higher cardiometabolic risk profiles and were more likely to undergo invasive angiography and revascularization, with similar clinical outcomes as those of their White counterparts. Among the quality indicators assessed, there is no evidence of care disparities among BAME patients presenting with NSTEMI.

What works for whom in compassion training programs offered to practicing healthcare providers: a realist review.

BACKGROUND: Patients and families want their healthcare to be delivered by healthcare providers that are both competent and compassionate. While compassion training has begun to emerge in healthcare education, there may be factors that facilitate or inhibit the uptake and implementation of training into practice. This review identified the attributes that explain the successes and/or failures of compassion training programs offered to practicing healthcare providers. METHODS: Realist review methodology for knowledge synthesis was used to consider the contexts, mechanisms (resources and reasoning), and outcomes of compassion training for practicing healthcare providers to determine what works, for whom, and in what contexts. RESULTS: Two thousand nine hundred ninety-one articles underwent title and abstract screening, 53 articles underwent full text review, and data that contributed to the development of a program theory were extracted from 45 articles. Contexts included the clinical setting, healthcare provider characteristics, current state of the healthcare system, and personal factors relevant to individual healthcare providers. Mechanisms included workplace-based programs and participatory interventions that impacted teaching, learning, and the healthcare organization. Contexts were associated with certain mechanisms to effect change in learners' attitudes, knowledge, skills and behaviors and the clinical process. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion this realist review determined that compassion training may engender compassionate healthcare practice if it becomes a key component of the infrastructure and vision of healthcare organizations, engages institutional participation, improves leadership at all levels, adopts a multimodal approach, and uses valid measures to assess outcomes.

Interventions to improve the well-being of medical learners in Canada: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Medical education affects learner well-being. We explored the breadth and depth of interventions to improve the well-being of medical learners in Canada. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to July 11, 2020, using the Arksey-O'Malley, 5-stage, scoping review method. We included interventions to improve well-being across 5 wellness domains (i.e., social, mental, physical, intellectual, occupational) for medical learners in Canada, grouped as undergraduate or graduate nonmedical (i.e., health sciences) students, undergraduate medical students or postgraduate medical students (i.e., residents). We categorized interventions as targeting the individual (learner), program (i.e., in which learners are enrolled) or system (i.e., higher education or health care) levels. RESULTS: Of 1753 studies identified, we included 65 interventions that aimed to improve well-being in 10 202 medical learners, published from 1972 through 2020; 52 (80%) were uncontrolled trials. The median year for intervention implementation was 2010 (range 1971-2018) and the median length was 3 months (range 1 h-48 mo). Most (n = 34, 52%) interventions were implemented with undergraduate medical students. Two interventions included only undergraduate, nonmedical students; none included graduate nonmedical students. Most studies (n = 51, 78%) targeted intellectual well-being, followed by occupational (n = 32, 49%) and social (n = 17, 26%) well-being. Among 19 interventions implemented for individuals, 14 (74%) were for medical students; of the 27 program-level interventions, 17 (63%) were for resident physicians. Most (n = 58, 89%) interventions reported positive well-being outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Many Canadian medical schools address intellectual, occupational and social well-being by targeting interventions at medical learners. Important emphasis on the mental and physical well-being of medical learners in Canada warrants further exploration.

Exploring the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: an international cross-sectional study of medical learners.

BACKGROUND: The evidence surrounding the impact of COVID-19 on medical learners remains anecdotal and highly speculative despite the anticipated impact and potential consequences of the current pandemic on medical training. The purpose of this study was to explore the extent that COVID-19 initially impacted medical learners around the world and examine global trends and patterns across geographic regions and levels of training. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of medical learners was conducted between March 25-June 14, 2020, shortly after the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. RESULTS: 6492 learners completed the survey from 140 countries. Most medical schools removed learners from the clinical environment and adopted online learning, but students reported concerns about the quality of their learning, training progression, and milestone fulfillment. Residents reported they could be better utilized and expressed concerns about their career timeline. Trainees generally felt under-utilized and wanted to be engaged clinically in meaningful ways; however, some felt that contributing to healthcare during a pandemic was beyond the scope of a learner. Significant differences were detected between levels of training and geographic regions for satisfaction with organizational responses as well as the impact of COVID-19 learner wellness and state-trait anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The disruption to the status quo of medical education is perceived by learners across all levels and geographic regions to have negatively affected their training and well-being, particularly amongst postgraduate trainees. These results provide initial empirical insights into the areas that warrant future research as well as consideration for current and future policy planning.

CONTEXTE: On s'attendait à ce que la pandémie de la COVID-19 ait des conséquences sur la formation médicale, mais les constats relatifs à son impact sur les étudiants en médecine demeurent anecdotiques et plutôt spéculatifs. L'objectif de cette étude était d'explorer l'étendue des premiers effets de la COVID-19 sur les étudiants en médecine dans le monde et d'examiner les tendances et les schémas qui se dégagent, quels que soient la région géographique ou le niveau d'études. MÉTHODES: Une enquête transversale sur les étudiants en médecine a été menée entre le 25 mars et le 14 juin 2020, peu après que l'Organisation mondiale de la santé ait déclaré que la COVID-19 était une pandémie. RÉSULTATS: Le sondage a été réalisé auprès de 6492 étudiants de 140 pays. La plupart des facultés de médecine ont retiré les apprenants de l'environnement clinique et adopté l'apprentissage en ligne, mais les étudiants ont exprimé des préoccupations quant à sa qualité, à la progression de la formation et à l'atteinte de divers jalons. Les résidents jugent qu'ils pourraient être plus utiles et s'inquiètent de l'avancement de leur carrière. Les apprenants se sentent généralement sous-utilisés et souhaitent s'engager cliniquement de manière plus significative; cependant, certains estiment qu'il n'est pas à propos de demander aux étudiants de contribuer aux soins de santé pendant une pandémie. Des écarts importants ont été relevés entre les différents niveaux de formation et les différentes régions géographiques en ce qui concerne la satisfaction face aux réponses organisationnelles, l'impact de la COVID-19 sur leur bien-être et l'anxiété chronique et réactionnelle. CONCLUSIONS: La perturbation du statu quo dans l'éducation médicale est perçue par les étudiants de tous les niveaux et de toutes les régions géographiques, mais davantage encore par les résidents, comme ayant affecté négativement et leur formation et leur bien-être. Ces résultats fournissent des aperçus empiriques préliminaires sur les domaines qui méritent des recherches futures et qui devraient être pris en compte dans la formulation des politiques actuelles et à venir.

Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical learner wellness: a needs assessment for the development of learner wellness interventions.

BACKGROUND: On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) a global pandemic. We sought to understand impact of COVID-19 on learner wellness at a large tertiary care academic institution to inform the future development of learner wellness interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional, internet-based survey collected quantitative and qualitative data from learners April-June 2020. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were reported for quantitative data. Open-ended, qualitative responses were analyzed deductively using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty percent of enrolled learners in that faculty of medicine (540/2741) participated including undergraduate [Bachelor's] students (25.7%), graduate [science] students (27.5%), undergraduate medical students (22.8%), and postgraduate resident physicians (23.5%). We found that learner wellness across all stages of training was negatively impacted and the ways in which learners were impacted varied as a result of their program's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Learners in health sciences and medical education report worsening well-being because of the programs and the systems in which they function with the added burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future interventions would benefit from a holistic framework of learner wellness while engaging in systems thinking to understand how individuals, programs and respective systems intersect. The importance of acknowledging equity, diversity and inclusion, fostering psychological safety and engaging learners as active participants in their journey during a pandemic and beyond are key elements in developing wellness interventions.

CONTEXTE: Le 11 mars 2020, l'Organisation mondiale de la santé a déclaré que le nouveau coronavirus SRAS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) était pandémique. Nous avons tenté de cerner l'impact de la COVID-19 sur le bien-être des apprenants dans un grand centre universitaire de soins tertiaires afin d'étayer le développement futur d'interventions en faveur du bien-être des apprenants en contexte de pandémie. MÉTHODES: Une enquête transversale par sondage en ligne, menée entre les mois d'avril et juin 2020, a permis de recueillir des données quantitatives et qualitatives auprès des apprenants. Des statistiques descriptives et des analyses univariées ont été présentées comme données quantitatives. Les réponses ouvertes, qualitatives, ont été analysées de manière déductive par le biais d'une analyse thématique. RÉSULTATS: Vingt pour cent des étudiants de la faculté de médecine (540/2741) ont participé, dont 25,7 % étaient inscrits au premier cycle (baccalauréat), 27,5 % au deuxième cycle (sciences), 22,8 % au premier cycle en médecine et 23,5 % étaient résidents. Nous avons constaté que la pandémie a négativement affecté le bien-être des apprenants à tous les niveaux de formation et que les effets précis sur les étudiants pouvaient varier en fonction de la réponse de leur programme à la situation sanitaire. CONCLUSIONS: Les étudiants en médecine et en sciences de la santé signalent une détérioration de leur bien-être liée aux programmes et aux systèmes dans lesquels ils évoluent, auxquels s'ajoute le fardeau supplémentaire de la pandémie de la COVID-19. Il conviendrait de définir les interventions futures sur la base d'un cadre holistique du bien-être des apprenants tout en adoptant une réflexion systémique pour appréhender l'entrecroisement entre individus, programmes et systèmes. Reconnaître l'importance de l'équité, de la diversité et de l'inclusion, favoriser la sécurité psychologique et assurer la participation active des apprenants dans leur parcours pendant la pandémie et au-delà, constituent des éléments clés dans l'élaboration d'interventions au profit de leur bien-être.

Wellness in medical education: definition and five domains for wellness among medical learners during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Problem: The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) impacted medical learner well-being and serves as a unique opportunity to understand medical learner wellness. The authors designed a formal needs assessment to assess medical learners' perspectives regarding distress related to disrupted training environments. This Rapid Communication describes findings from a qualitative study which defined medical learner wellness and validated five wellness domains.Approach: We conducted follow-up telephone interviews to an online needs assessment survey to identify a learner definition for wellness and to validate five wellness domains, including social, mental, physical, intellectual, and occupational wellness. Using purposive and maximal variation sampling, 27 students were interviewed from July-August 2020. Thematic analysis was performed using a deductive thematic approach to qualitative analysis.Outcomes: Medical learners defined wellness as a general [holistic] sense of personal well-being - the opportunity to be and to do what they most need and value. Learners validated all five wellness domains for medical education. Learners acknowledged the need for an adoptable and adaptable holistic framework for wellness in medical education.Next steps: We recommend academic medical institutions consider learner wellness a key component of medical education to cultivate learners as a competent collective of self-reliant, scholarly experts. We encourage evaluation of wellness domains in diverse medical learner populations to identify feasible interventions potentially associated with improvements in medical learner wellness.

Teaching mindfulness-based stress management techniques to medical learners through simulation.

Acutely traumatic clinical events can exacerbate stress and burnout amongst healthcare providers. The Simulated Training for Resilience in Various Environments (STRIVE) course may provide a useful framework for medical educators to teach stress management skills to promote resilience amongst physician trainees. The course introduces the Big Four+ techniques (goal setting, visualization, self-talk, progressive muscular relaxation, attention control and tactical breathing) created by the Canadian Armed Forces using clinical scenarios. This framework can be easily adapted across other training contexts to equip future clinicians with a foundational skill set to optimize their response and recovery following critically stressful incidents.

Un événement clinique très traumatisant peut exacerber le stress et l'épuisement professionnel vécus par les soignants. Le cours « Simulated Training for Resilience in Various Environments ¼ ou STRIVE (formation par simulation pour développer la résilience dans divers environnements) offre un cadre utile aux enseignants en médecine pour initier les apprenants aux stratégies de gestion du stress afin de renforcer leur résilience. Le cours présente, à l'aide de scénarios cliniques, les principales techniques (les « Big Four+ ¼) créées par les Forces armées canadiennes, à savoir la fixation d'objectifs, la visualisation, le dialogue intérieur, la relaxation musculaire progressive, le contrôle de l'attention et la respiration tactique. Ce cadre peut être facilement adapté à d'autres contextes de formation afin de doter les futurs cliniciens d'un ensemble de compétences fondamentales pour optimiser leur capacité de réaction et de rétablissement face à un incident particulièrement stressant.

Efficacy of Advance Care Planning Videos for Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Cancer, Heart, and Kidney Failure Outpatient Settings.

BACKGROUND: Patient videos about advance care planning (ACP; hereafter "Videos"), were developed to support uptake of provincial policy and address the complexity of patients' decision-making process. We evaluate self-administered ACP Videos, compare the studies' choice of outcomes, show correlations between the patients' ACP actions, and discuss implications for health care policy. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of the Videos on patients' ACP/goals of care designation conversations with a health care provider. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using a 2-arm, 1:1 randomized controlled trial, we recruited outpatients with a diagnosis of kidney failure, heart failure, metastatic lung, gastrointestinal, or gynecological cancer from 22 sites. Analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. INTERVENTIONS: Videos describing the ACP process and illustrating the resuscitative, medical, and comfort levels of care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who reported having an ACP/goals of care designation (GCD) conversation with a health care provider by 3 mo. Outcomes were measured using the Behaviours in Advance Care Planning and Actions Survey, an online survey capturing ACP attitudes, processes, and actions. RESULTS: We analyzed 241 and 217 participants at baseline and 3 mo, respectively. The proportion of participants who had an ACP/GCD conversation with a health care provider by 3 mo was significantly different between study arms (46% intervention; 32% control; adjusted odds ratio, 1.83; P = 0.032). Adjusted for the quality of conversations, there was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Videos as stand-alone tools do not engage individuals in high-quality ACP. Pragmatic trials are necessary to evaluate their impact on downstream outcomes when integrated into intentional, comprehensive conversations with a health care provider. Considering the strong correlation between 2 activities (physicians discussing options, patients telling health care providers preferences), policy should focus on empowering patients to initiate these conversations.

Formalizing the Informal: Lessons Learned from a Competency-Based Mentorship Program for Residents in Psychiatry.

OBJECTIVE: CanMEDS competencies have been established and guide residency education in Canada, yet their inclusion in a formalized mentorship program for competency-based medical education (CBME) has yet to be explored. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted to investigate the perceptions of residents and faculty members in psychiatry who participated in a formalized CBME mentorship program. The authors conducted secondary analysis of intake survey data from program participants and collected semi-structured interview data. Chi-square analysis of survey data determined associations between participant demographics and perceptions of mentorship. Thematic analysis techniques were used to analyze interview data. Finally, survey and interview data were triangulated and transformed into broad themes. RESULTS: Survey data from 46 residents and 41 faculty members and semi-structured interview data from 8 residents and 6 faculty members were analyzed. Data analysis revealed support for the informal use of the CanMEDS roles framework in a mentoring context. Factors that influenced participant satisfaction with the program included mentor qualities, the mentor-mentee pairing strategy, informality of mentoring sessions, and the presence of administrators and other program coordinators to maintain and support the program. CONCLUSIONS: The perceptions of participants in this study suggest that formal mentorship programs can be beneficial for residents, in terms of enhancing clinical competencies, advancing overall well-being, ensuring preparedness to undertake professional careers, and the provision of essential psychosocial support. Future work is needed to assess the implementation of formal mentorship programs in other residency training programs.