Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Outcomes: A Comparison Between Patients Who Underwent the Procedure During the COVID-19 Pandemic and a Cohort Treated Prior to the Pandemic.

Background and objective During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many elective orthopedic surgeries, including anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), were temporarily postponed. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of ACLR in patients who underwent surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic with those in a cohort treated before the pandemic. Materials and methods This retrospective review compared patients who underwent primary ACLR during two periods: March to June 2020 (the pandemic group) and January to December 2018 (the pre-pandemic group). Matched cohorts (1:1) were created using propensity matching. Time from injury-to-first visit, injury-to-surgery, and first visit-to-surgery were calculated. Subjective and objective outcomes, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement, and complication rates were recorded for up to two years postoperatively. Statistical analysis included 𝛘2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical data, and t- or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for continuous data with significance set at P < 0.05. Results The pandemic and pre-pandemic groups consisted of 33 and 217 patients, respectively. Matched cohorts consisted of 33 patients each. The time from injury-to-surgery and the first visit-to-surgery was prolonged in the pandemic group. When unmatched, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at three months postoperatively and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-pain interference (PI) at six months postoperatively and at the final follow-up were higher in the pandemic group. When matched, PROMIS-PI at six months postoperatively was higher in the pandemic group, and VAS scores at one year postoperatively were higher in the pre-pandemic group. MCID achievement and complication rates did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusions ACLR procedures were significantly delayed in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. While patients treated before and during the pandemic experienced varying pain levels during recovery, their functional outcomes, MCID achievement, and complication rates did not differ significantly.

Utility of Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery Literature Review: A Comparative Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Literature reviews are essential to the scientific process and allow clinician researchers to advance general knowledge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the artificial intelligence (AI) programs ChatGPT and Perplexity.AI can perform an orthopedic surgery literature review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five different search topics of varying specificity within orthopedic surgery were chosen for each search arm to investigate. A consolidated list of unique articles for each search topic was recorded for the experimental AI search arms and compared with the results of the control arm of two independent reviewers. Articles in the experimental arms were examined by the two independent reviewers for relevancy and validity. RESULTS: ChatGPT was able to identify a total of 61 unique articles. Four articles were not relevant to the search topic and 51 articles were deemed to be fraudulent, resulting in 6 valid articles. Perplexity.AI was able to identify a total of 43 unique articles. Nineteen were not relevant to the search topic but all articles were able to be verified, resulting in 24 valid articles. The control arm was able to identify 132 articles. Success rates for ChatGPT and Perplexity. AI were 4.6% (6 of 132) and 18.2% (24 of 132), respectively. CONCLUSION: The current iteration of ChatGPT cannot perform a reliable literature review, and Perplexity.AI is only able to perform a limited review of the medical literature. Any utilization of these open AI programs should be done with caution and human quality assurance to promote responsible use and avoid the risk of using fabricated search results. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):e125-e130.].

Time-to-Surgery and Short-Term Outcomes of Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a rapid and significant transformation in patient management occurred across the healthcare system in order to mitigate the spread of the disease and address resource constraints. Numerous surgical cases were either postponed or canceled, permitting only the most critical and emergent cases to proceed. The impact of these modifications on patient outcomes remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare time-to-surgery and outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for trimalleolar ankle fractures during the pandemic to a pre-pandemic group. We hypothesized that the pandemic group would have a prolonged time-to-surgery and worse outcomes compared to the pre-pandemic cohort. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted within a single healthcare system, examining the treatment of trimalleolar ankle fractures during two distinct periods: April to July 2020 (COVID-19 group) and January to December 2018 (2018 group). Cases were identified using Current Procedural Terminology code 27822. Information on demographics, fracture characteristics, and outcomes was obtained through chart review. Outcomes analyzed included time-to-surgery, mean visual analog scale scores, ankle strength and range of motion, and complications. Results COVID-19 and 2018 groups consisted of 32 and 100 patients, respectively. No significant difference was observed in group demographics and comorbidities (p > 0.05). Fracture characteristics were similar between groups apart from tibiofibular syndesmosis injury, 62.5% (20/32) in COVID-19 vs 42.0% (42/100) in 2018 (p = 0.03). Time-to-surgery was not significantly different between the two groups (8.84 ± 6.78 days in COVID-19 vs 8.61 ± 6.02 days in 2018, p = 0.85). Mean visual analog scale scores, ankle strength, and ankle range of motion in plantarflexion were not significantly different between the two groups at three and six months postoperatively (p > 0.05). Dorsiflexion was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group at three months (p = 0.03), but not six months (p = 0.94) postoperatively. No significant difference in postoperative complication was seen between groups, 25.0% (8/32) COVID-19 group compared to 15.0% (15/100) 2018 group (p = 0.11). Conclusions Patients who underwent surgery during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic did not experience prolonged time-to-surgery and had similar outcomes compared to patients treated prior to the pandemic.