Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 97(4): 813-821, 2017 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28244418

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine, in a large series, the influence of the extent and dose of radiation to the fundus of the stomach and mediastinum on the development and severity of anastomotic complications in patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2005 and 2012, 364 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (41.4 Gy combined with chemotherapy) followed by esophagectomy were included. The future anastomotic region in the fundus was determined, and the mean dose, V20-V40, and upper planning target volume border in relation to mediastinal length, expressed as the mediastinal ratio, were calculated. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 22% and anastomotic stenosis in 41%. Logistic regression analysis revealed no influence of age, comorbidity, mean fundus dose, V20-V40, or the mediastinal ratio on the incidence of anastomotic leakage or anastomotic stenosis. In 28% of the patients severe complications (Clavien-Dindo score of ≥IIIB) occurred. The presence of multiple comorbidities (hazard ratio 2.4 [95% confidence interval 1.3-4.5], P=.006) and a mediastinal ratio of 0.5 to 1.0 (hazard ratio 1.9 [95% confidence interval 1.0-3.5], P=.036) were both independent predictors of severe complications. CONCLUSION: With a mean radiation dose of 24.2 Gy to the future anastomotic region of the gastric fundus, the radiation dose was not associated with the incidence of anastomotic leakage or anastomotic stenosis. The incidence of severe complications was associated with a high superior mediastinal planning target volume border.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical/mortality , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Stenosis/mortality , Esophagectomy/mortality , Radiation Injuries/mortality , Comorbidity , Esophagoplasty/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Neck/surgery , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 42(8): 1183-90, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27134188

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with resectable oesophageal cancer are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery within 3-8 weeks. In practice, surgery is often delayed for various reasons. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether delaying surgery beyond 8 weeks has an effect on postoperative morbidity, long-term survival, and pathologic response in patients treated for oesophageal ADC. METHODS: Patients who underwent nCRT followed by surgery, for cT1-3, N0-3, M0 ADC between 2001 and 2014 were retrospectively included from a prospectively obtained database. Patients with a time from the end of nCRT to surgery (TTS) ≤8 weeks were compared with patients with a TTS >8 weeks. RESULTS: Of 190 patients, 65 had a TTS ≤8 weeks, and 125 had a TTS >8 weeks. Patient characteristics were comparable for both groups, but patients with TTS >8 weeks exhibited higher ASA scores (p = 0.013) and more comorbidities (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed that TTS did not significantly influence postoperative morbidity, pathologic complete response rates, and five-year survival rates (42% in patients with TTS ≤8 weeks and 37% in patients with TTS >8 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying surgery beyond 8 weeks after nCRT did not significantly influence postoperative morbidity, pathologic response, and survival in patients with non-metastatic ADC. Therefore, it appears reasonable to postpone surgery beyond 8 weeks in patients who have not yet recovered from nCRT. However, if the patient is fit for surgery, postponing surgery does not have any additional advantages.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophagectomy/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL